(Phase 0) (phase 1) (phase 2) bidders must submit all bidders are required to achieve a bidders will be evaluated out documents as outlined in minimum of 70 points out of points and phase 2 will paragraph 1 table 1 below. Points on functionality and only apply to bidders who only bids that comply with practical demonstration have met and/or exceeded the all these criteria will evaluation phase to proceed to threshold of 80 points. Proceed to phase 1. Phase 2 (price and specific goals). 9.1. Phase 0: pre-qualification criteria 9.1.1. Without any limitation in respect of the department’s other critical requirements relevant to this bid, prospective bidders must submit all the documents listed in the table below: table 1: documents to be submitted for pre-qualification must be submitted for bidder [each legal persona of consortium/jv] and each subcontractor: document that must be submitted for bidder, non-submission/non-compliance shall result in [each legal persona of yes/no disqualification consortium/jv] and each subcontractor permission in terms of popi act to utilise information contained in complete and sign the attached pro-forma document documents for procurement purpose invitation to bid – complete and sign the attached pro-forma document sbd 1 tax status i.Written Confirmation that SARS may on an ongoing basis during the period of the contract disclose the bidders tax compliance status. Ii.In The event where the bidder submits a hard copy of the tax clearance certificate, the csd verification outcome will take precedence. Pin number may be provided for tax verification status declaration of interest note! Care must be taken to list all “other related – companies” (sbd 4, par. 2.3). Failure to comply sbd 4 may lead to disqualification. Should the bidder have more enterprises to declare, such information can be provided on a separate sheet. Preferential points claim complete and sign the attached pro-forma document. Form sbd 6.1 Supporting documents requested on this form must be submitted as evidence. Registration on the i.The Bidder must be registered as a service central supplier provider on the central supplier database database (csd report) (csd). If not registered proceed with completing the company registration prior to submission of the proposal. Visit https://secure.csd.gov.za/ To obtain a vendor number. Ii.Submit Proof of registration. Pricing schedule (bidder submit full details of the pricing proposal with the bid only) documents. 9.1.2. Each document must be completed and signed by the duly authorised representative on behalf of the prospective bidding company. 9.1.3. During this phase bid responses will be evaluated with emphasis placed on documentary compliance with the listed administrative and mandatory bid requirements. 9.1.4. Bidders’ proposal shall be disqualified because of non- submission. 9.1.5. Bidders’ proposal may be disqualified as a result of non-completion of the listed documents. 9.2. Phase 1: technical evaluation criteria = 100 points: 9.2.1. All bidding companies are required to fully adhere to the technical evaluation criteria scorecard and compliance checklist. 9.2.2. Only bidders that have fully met the pre-qualification criteria in phase (0) zero will accordingly be evaluated in phase 1 for determination of functionality. 9.2.3. Bidding companies will be evaluated on an overall score of 100 points. 9.2.4. Bidders are required to score a minimum of 70 points to proceed to phase 2: valuation of pricing and specific goals. 9.2.5. Phase 1: technical evaluation criteria: the bidders’ information will be scored according to the points determination system. 9.3. Phase 2: price and specific goals evaluation (80 + 20) = 100 points: 9.3.1. Only prospective bidders that have attained the 70-points on phase 01 will go further for phase 02 evaluation. 9.3.2. Threshold in phase 1 will subsequently progress for evaluation in phase 2 in relation to pricing options and specific goals qualification criteria. 9.3.3. The following formula must be used to calculate the points out of 80 9.3.4. For price in respect of a quotation with a rand-value equal to or below 50 million rands, inclusive of all applicable taxes: 9.3.4.1. Stage 1 - price evaluation (80 points): criteria points price evaluation ps =80 9.3.5. Stage 2 – specific goals (20 points): 9.3.6. A maximum of 20 points may be allocated to a bidder for specific goals specified in the quotation. 9.3.7. The points scored for specific goals must be added to the points scored for price and the total must be rounded off to the nearest two decimal places. 9.3.8. The table below provides the specific goals, its criteria of measurement and the proof to be offered by bidder to qualify for 20 points: 9.3.9. A bidder must submit proof or evidence for claiming points for specific goals as indicated above. A bidder must also complete preference form (sbd 6.1) In detail to claim points for specific goals. 9.3.10. A bidder failing to submit proof or evidence on points claimed may not be disqualified but: 9.3.11. May only score points out of 80 for price; and 9.3.12. Scores 0 points out of 20 for specific goals. 9.3.13. The points scored by a bidder for specific goals must be added to the points scored for price for total points. 9.3.14. The points scored must be rounded off to the nearest two decimal place. Application of specific goals in the white paper on rdp; & the code of good practice in b-bbee: DHET preferential procurement 80/20 claim 90/10 claim evidence bidder indicate if referen bidder must must tick NO specific goal criteria specific goal points tick (x) next specific goal points evidence is ce (x) next to proof/ evidence contribution claimed to points contribution claimed points provided, & claimed claimed specify 100% black owned 65,00 7,20 65,00 3,60 copy of cipc y n person 75%-99% black owned 50,00 5,54 50,00 2,77 (companies and specify historically rdp 60%-74% black owned 40,00 4,43 40,00 2,22 intellectual property 1 disadvantaged 1.4.4; 51%-59% black owned 30,00 3,32 30,00 1,66 commission) on the basis of 3.1.4 0-50% black owned 10,00 1,11 10,00 0,55 shareholder race registration, copies of none 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 id’s as well as csd 100% women owned 40,00 4,43 40,00 2,22 copy of cipc y n persons rdp 75%-99% women owned 30,00 3,32 30,00 1,66 (companies and specify historically 1.4.4; 60%-74% women owned 20,00 2,22 20,00 1,11 intellectual property 2 disadvantaged 3.1.4; 51%-59% women owned 10,00 1,11 10,00 0,55 commission) on the basis of 3.2.7; 7.7 0-50% women owned 5,00 0,55 5,00 0,28 shareholder gender none 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 registration, copies of ID’ ll csd persons 100% owned by persons with disabilities 0,50 0,06 0,50 0,03 certified medical y n historically 75%-99% owned by persons with disabilities 0,30 0,03 0,30 0,02 certificate or specify 3 disadvantaged rdp 7.7 60%-74% owned by persons with disabilities 0,20 0,02 0,20 0,01 substantive proof. On the basis of 0-59% owned by persons with disabilities 0,10 0,01 0,10 0,01 disability none 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 100% youth owned 25,00 2,77 25,00 1,39 copy of cipc y n 75%-99% youth owned 15,00 1,66 15,00 0,83 (companies and specify development of rdp 60%-74% youth owned 10,00 1,11 10,00 0,55 intellectual property youth 1.4.6; 7.7 51%-59% youth owned 5,00 0,55 5,00 0,28 commission) 0-50% youth owned 2,50 0,28 2,50 0,14 shareholder none 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 registration, copies of ID’ ll csd eme 50,00 5,54 50,00 2,77 BBBEE certificate or y n qse 20,00 2,22 20,00 1,11 sworn affidavit for specify rdp gen 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 eme or qse; copy of development of cipc (companies and 5 3.10; Smmes intellectual property 3.1.4 None 0,00 0,00 0,00 commission) shareholder 0,00 registration. Total 180,50 20,00 180,50 10 specific goal if additional specific goals are selected, then total points must be adjusted to equal 20 points legend selection the sub-category for points may vary as approved as long as the total point do not exceed 20 criteria for smme, the number of employees & turn-over as approved by dept: small business development applies proof/ evidence other or additional criteria may be approved bidders are requested to submit the supporting documents as proof /evidence of the points claimed on sbd6.1 As per the above table. Bidders must claim points they qualify for otherwise they will forfeit them even if the supporting proof documents are attached. 9.4. Functionality evaluation table in terms of technical detail, the following will be taken into consideration when evaluating the quotations: criteria weight knowledge of pset and relevant qualifications 10 the service provider/lead researcher needs to have qualifications in psychology, education, development studies, or related fields. A phd or equivalent a master’s degree or equivalent experience in conducting research in the pset 40 the suitable service provider will be awarded points based on experience in conducting research in the pset as indicated below: more than 10 years’ experience 30 between 5 – 10 years’ experience 20 between 1– 5 years’ experience experience in conducting research in career development services 20 the suitable service provider will be awarded points based on experiences/number of relevant career development projects conducted. More than 6 career development services projects between 3 – 5 career development services projects 15 between 1– 2 career development services projects 10 methodology and implementation plan 20 the service provider will provide a detailed project plan, methodology and 10 milestones. Additional points will be allocated for: detailed identification risks and risk mitigation plan clear and comprehensive methodology contactable references from previous clients 10 the following points will be awarded for contactable references 3 or more contactable references 10 1 to 2 contactable references 5 total 100 note: bidders must obtain a minimum of 70 points to be evaluated further on pricing and specific goals. Costing / pricing 1. The price must include all training, facilitation, travel, venue costs, materials, poe support, and summative assessments. 2. All costs must be vat-inclusive (if applicable) and fixed for the duration of the contract.