The transport education and training authority (teta) seeks a qualified service provider to evaluate all applications submitted for the 2026/2027 discretionary grant cycle. The scope includes assessing applications against teta guidelines, verifying documentation, and preparing compliance reports for the grant adjudication committee.
Key Requirements
- Submit electronic pricing proposal, sbd 4 (declaration of interest), SARS pin/csd supplier number, and proof of csd registration. - Minimum 3 years’ company experience in evaluating discretionary grant applications, with reference letters. - Project leader must have 6+ years’ strategic project experience, nqf level 8, and be a registered chartered accountant. - Project manager, audit & governance expert, and data analyst must each have 5+ years’ relevant experience and nqf level 7 qualifications. - Provide a detailed technical methodology, project plan, and proof of resources (personnel/tools). - Mandatory submission of b-bbee certificate (or affidavit for qse/eme), cipc registration, and certified ID copies of directors. - Bids scoring below 70/100 in quality evaluation are disqualified; final award uses 80/20 price-preference points.
Request for quotation for the appointment of the service provider to evaluate 2026/2027 discretionary grants
Briefing Session
Date & Time
Thursday, 25 June 2026 - 11:00
Venue
NA
Requirements & Eligibility
Eligibility Criteria
Please find attached goods specification and assist to furnish us with your quotation and the following supporting documents. 1. Completed and signed sbd4 2. Completed and signed sbd6.1 3. Valid BBBEE certificate / sworn affidavit signed by commissioner of oaths 4. SARS tax pin confirmation 5. General conditions of contract – it’s for noting, don’t submit this document. All quotations and supporting documents to be submitted to this email address, [email protected] Not later than thursday, 25 june 2026 @ 11h00, NO late quotations will be accepted. Nb: please ensure that your csd profile is updated with a valid b-bbee certificate or sworn affidavit. Kindly note that NO points
Professional Services & Consulting Industry Profile
Regulatory Bodies
SAICA
Tenders in this industry often require registration with these bodies.
Typical Documents
5 items
Company Registration (CIPC)
Tax Clearance Certificate
B-BBEE Certificate
CSD Registration
Company Profile
Recommended Certifications
Having these can improve your winning chances: CA(SA) - Chartered Accountant, PMI-PMP (Project Management Professional), Prince2 Practitioner, Six Sigma Certification
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards — PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement — so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
DocumentTOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdfReview complete
Description
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf
Important Dates
17 Jun
2026
PUBLICATION
Tender Published
Tender was published
25 Jun
2026
DEADLINE
Closing Date
Tender closing date
Procurement Rules & Compliance ContextThis tender may be governed by South African public procurement rules covering fairness, transparency, preferential procurement, anti-corruption, administrative justice and access to information.
7 rules
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
Core procurement rules
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
7
Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
high
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 – Section 217
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
high
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf
The Transport Education and Training Authority (TETA) is seeking a service provider to evaluate 2026/2027 Discretionary Grants applications. The provider must assess submissions against TETA guidelines, verify documentation, and ensure alignment with strategic priorities. The contract involves a three-stage evaluation process (Pre-Compliance, Quality Proposal, and Price/Specific Goals). The successful bidder will report to TETA’s Interim Project Management Office (IPMO).
Based on 25 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
Purpose: To appoint an independent service provider to evaluate all applications submitted under the readvertised DG Window of the 2026/2027 Discretionary Grant cycle.
Background: TETA is a Schedule 3A public entity responsible for skills development in the transport sector. An Interim Internal Project Management Office (IPMO) has been established to strengthen governance and coordinate grant implementation.
The service provider will evaluate proposals received after the Discretionary Grant notice closed on 31 March 2026 to help implement 2026/27 targets.
Important Dates
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
Closing date for grant applications was 31 March 2026.
TETA will arrange a briefing session with the successful service provider after appointment.
No other specific dates (like site visits or clarification deadlines) are provided in the document.
Contact Information
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
Department: Supply Chain Management Unit.
Submission: Electronic submission via email to the Supply Chain Department.
Specific contact names, emails, phones, or physical addresses are not provided in the extracted text.
Approval signatures include Head of Interim PMO (Adv Ishmael Malale) and SCM Manager (Mr. Zukisani Mangaliso) dated 21 May 2026.
No direct contact details (email, phone, address) for queries are provided.
Submission Guidelines
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
Submit the Pricing Proposal/Costing Schedule electronically via email to the Supply Chain Department.
Fully complete and sign the Declaration of Interest (SBD 4) electronically or in black ink.
Submit a SARS Pin with expiry date for tax verification, or provide your CSD Supplier Number.
Provide proof of Central Supplier Database registration (www.csd.gov.za).
Submit company reference letters not older than five years demonstrating experience in evaluating grants.
Complete all required schedules in the Request for Bid (RFB) as specified.
Provide a Letter of Authority for the signatory on company letterhead.
Submit signed and bank-stamped banking details.
Accept the General Conditions of Contract/Bid and answer all related questions.
Returnable Documents
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
CIPC Documents
The bidder must provide certified copies of Company /
Evaluation Criteria
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
Evaluation occurs in three stages:
1. Pre-Compliance (Administrative Compliance) Evaluation: Checks mandatory and administrative requirements. Failure to meet mandatory requirements leads to disqualification.
2. Quality Proposal Evaluation: Scored out of 100 points. Minimum threshold of 70 points required to proceed to Stage 3.
3. Price and Specific Goals Evaluation: Uses 80/20 preference point system (80 for price, 20 for specific goals including B-BBEE).
Mandatory requirements include: submission of pricing schedule, SBD 4, SARS Pin/CSD number, CSD registration, company experience (minimum 3 years), reference letters, and key personnel meeting qualification and experience thresholds.
Quality evaluation criteria (weighted):
Project Leader experience (30 points).
Project Manager experience (10 points).
Audit and Governance Expert experience (10 points).
Data Analyst experience (10 points).
Company experience (20 points).
Project Technical Approach and Methodology (20 points).
Price evaluation formula: Ps = 80
(1 - (Pt - Pmin) / Pmin).
Specific goals allocation (20 points total):
B-BBEE status level contributor (10 points).
Other specific goals (10 points): historically disadvantaged individuals (3), female (3), disability (2), youth (2).
Technical Specifications
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
Scope of work for evaluating 2026/2027 Discretionary Grant applications:
Obtain TETA data to compile a list of all applications for the 2026/2027 financial year.
Assess each application against TETA's approved DG Guidelines and prescribed requirements.
Verify completeness and validity of applicant documentation regarding Tax status, CSD, Accreditation, Workplaces, Workplace Approval, and budget alignment with the 26/27 funding framework.
Assess alignment of applications with the 26/27 Annual Performance Plan (APP), Strategic Plan, national priorities, and approved Sector Skills Plan.
Adapt evaluation schedules to confirm applicant details: entity name, registration status, type of training/project, business address, contact details, credits, learner numbers, blacklisting status, compliance status, and evaluation outcomes.
Prepare schedules of compliant and non-compliant applicants for the Grant Adjudication Committee.
Provide reports using structures and templates prescribed by the Interim Project Management Office.
The bidder must submit a proposal with a clear technical approach and methodology for evaluating grant applications.
The methodology will be scored (20 points) and must include three elements:
1. A detailed proposed project plan to achieve the objectives.
2. Demonstration of the ability to carry out the task.
3. Demonstration that the bidder has the appropriate resources (personnel and tools) to execute the plan.
Failure to include all three elements results in a score of 0.
Key personnel experience and qualification requirements:
Project Leader: Minimum 6 years as Project Leader on similar strategic projects, NQF level 8, qualified and registered Chartered Accountant.
Project Manager: Minimum 5 years as Project Manager on similar day-to-day projects, NQF level 7.
Audit and Governance Expert: Minimum 5 years in auditing and governance, NQF level 7.
Data Analyst: Minimum 5 years in qualitative and quantitative data analysis, NQF level 7.
Company: Minimum 3 years' experience in evaluating DG grant applications.
Provide a list of dedicated key personnel (other than Project Leader) with positions, CVs, and certified copies of qualifications not older than six months.
Complete all required experience schedules (Annexures A-E) listing previous projects, institutions, dates, and references.
Pricing Schedule
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
Provide a detailed cost proposal using the provided table format.
Quote professional fees per hour (excl. VAT) and per day (excl. and incl. VAT) for roles: Project Lead, Project Manager, Evaluators, Administrators, and others.
VAT rate for professional fees is 15%.
Quote disbursements for items like telephone calls (per minute), photocopying, printing, telefax, travelling charges (per kilometre), and any other specified costs, with applicable VAT rates.
The total price for evaluation is the total average price for all costed professional fee items.
Financial Requirements
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
Pricing must be broken down in the provided cost proposal table.
Professional fees must be quoted per hour (excl. VAT) and per day (excl. and incl. VAT) for roles including Project Lead, Project Manager, Evaluators, Administrators, and others.
VAT rate is 15% for professional fees.
Disbursements must be quoted for items like telephone calls (per minute), photocopying, printing, telefax, travelling charges (per kilometre), and any other specified costs, with applicable VAT rates.
The total price for evaluation purposes will be the total average price for all costed items on Professional Fees.
Note: TETA estimates 1881 proposals/applications were received.
Compliance Requirements
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
Mandatory requirements (failure leads to disqualification):
Submit fully completed and signed Declaration of Interest (SBD 4).
Submit SARS Pin with expiry date or CSD Supplier Number.
Provide proof of Central Supplier Database registration.
Company must have minimum 3 years' experience conducting DG grant evaluation, supported by reference letters and completed experience schedule.
Project Leader: Minimum 6 years' experience as Project Leader on similar strategic projects, NQF level 8 qualification, and must be a qualified and registered Chartered Accountant.
Project Manager: Minimum 5 years' experience as Project Manager on similar day-to-day projects and NQF level 7 qualification.
Audit and Governance Expert: Minimum 5 years' experience in auditing and governance and NQF level 7 qualification.
Data Analyst: Minimum 5 years' experience in qualitative and quantitative data analysis and NQF level 7 qualification.
Submit a proposal with a clear technical approach and methodology.
Provide a list of dedicated key personnel (other than Project Leader) with their positions, CVs, and certified copies of qualification certificates not older than six months.
Administrative requirements:
Submit a valid B-BBEE Certificate (or sworn affidavit for QSE/EME) and completed SBD 6.1 form. Joint ventures must submit a combined certificate and JV agreement.
Provide certified copies of CIPC company registration certificates and confirm registration is active (not deregistered).
Provide certified copies of Identity Documents of Directors/Owners or a list of directors.
Provide signed and bank-stamped banking details.
Accept General Conditions of Contract/Bid.
Provide a Letter of Authority for the signatory on company letterhead.
B-BBEE points are allocated as part of the 80/20 preference point system: Level 1 = 10 points, Level 2 = 9, Level 3 = 7, Level 4 = 6, Level 5 = 4, Level 6 = 3, Level 7 = 2, Level 8 = 1, Non-compliant = 0.
B-BBEE Requirements
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
Submit a valid B-BBEE Certificate (or sworn affidavit for QSE/EME) and completed SBD 6.1 form.
Failure to submit a valid certificate results in loss of preference points.
For joint ventures, submit a combined B-BBEE Certificate and a signed JV agreement.
B-BBEE points are allocated as part of the 80/20 preference point system: Level 1 = 10 points, Level 2 = 9, Level 3 = 7, Level 4 = 6, Level 5 = 4, Level 6 = 3, Level 7 = 2, Level 8 = 1, Non-compliant = 0.
Contractual Terms
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
The bidder must accept the General Conditions of Contract/Bid.
The contract period cannot be established at the moment due to other factors that may affect the processes.
Section
Source: TOR - Evaluation of DG Grants Application - IPMO-2.pdf (unknown)
Obtain TETA data to compile a list of all applications for discretionary grants for 2026/2027 financial year in collaboration with the Interim Project Management Office requirements,
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
TETA House, 344 Pretoria Ave, Ferndale, Randburg, 2194, South Africa
Document-Backed
Recently Synced
Source Snapshot Available
AI Enhanced
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
1
Last checked
17 Jun 2026
AI status
Enhanced
Data conflicts
None detected
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.