Appointment of a service provider to provide public relations and reputation management services for SABC for a period of twelve (12) months.

{"closingDate":"01 JULY 2026","closingTime":"12H00PM","briefingSession":"{\"date\":\"17 JULY 2026\",\"time\":\"12H00PM\",\"venue\":\"E & TIME 17 JULY 2026 AT 12H00PM\",\"is_compulsory\":false}"}

{"name":"_________________________________________________________","email":"[email protected]","phone":null,"department":"ies and platforms for PR campaigns in","address":"e submissions will invalidate the quote submitted."}

Returnable Documents: 5.1 Submit proof Central Supplier Database (CSD) registration 5.2 Proof of Valid TV License Statement for the Company; all active Directors and Shareholder must have valid TV Licenses. (Verification will also be done by the SABC internally). 5.3 Valid Tax Clearance Certificate or SARS “Pin” to validate supplier’s tax matters 5.4 Original or Certified copy of Valid BBBEE Certificate or Sworn affidavit (from SANAS accredited Verification Agency) 5.5 Certified copy of Company Registration Document that reflect Company Name, Registration number, date of registration and active Directors or Members. 5.6 Certified copy of Shareholders’ certificates. 5.7 Certified copy of ID documents of the Directors or Members. NB: NO CONTRACT WILL BE AWARDED TO ANY BIDDERS WHOSE TAX MATTERS ARE NOT IN ORDER. NO CONTRACT WILL BE AWARDED TO ANY BIDDERS WHOSE TV LICENCE STATEMENT ACCOUNT IS NOT VALID. NO CONTRACT WILL BE AWARDED TO ANY BIDDER WHO IS NOT REGISTRED ON THE CSD RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 4 Strictly Confidential, COMPANY OVERVIEW South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) is a Public Entity founded in August 1936 and listed in terms of Schedule 2 of the Public Finance Management Act, Act No. , as a public broadcaster in South Africa, and provides 19 radio stations as well as five television broadcasts to the general public.

evaluation.

10. Phase 2: functionality / technical evaluation criteria

forward for evaluation of Price & Specific Goals.

Criteria Area Evaluation Criteria Min. Points Max.

• Above 8 years of experience - 10 points
• 6-8 years of experience – 5 points
• Less than 6 years of experience = 0 points
• 3 or more reference letters - 10 points
• Less than 3 reference letters- 0 points
• Identification of risk problem (5 points)
• Key reputational tactics employed (5 points)

executed. (5 points)

hour basis as and when required - 20 Points

Total points 105 115

Summary: The points obtained for the presentation evaluation must be at least 105 points out of a maximum of 115

points. Bidders who do not achieve the threshold will not be taken to the next phase of evaluations which is Price

and Specific Goals.

12. Price and specific goals

a. The 80/20 preference point system will apply to evaluate responses

b. The award of the tender / RFQ to will be based on functionality evaluation.

c. The Price and BEE (Specific goals) will be applicable to award the highest scoring bidder

13. Price and (specific goals) application during contract implementation

The 80/20 preference point system

A maximum of 80 points is allocated for price on the following basis

Ps = Points scored for comparative price of bid under

One of the key priorities the SABC aims to put considerable effort is the restoration of its public image and trust

among its audiences, industry counterparts, advertises and the plethora of stakeholders with whom the

broadcaster enjoys affinity. One of the ways in which the broadcaster can reclaim its reputation and display its

dominance and credibility as an industry leader is to solicit the services of experts in the field of Corporate

Image, Reputation Management and Public Relations.

4. Requirements and scope of services

The project scope will include the following:

4.1 PR and Reputation management

• Public Relations strategy that supports the SABC’s Corporate Plan.

4.2 Launch events.

• Print media – advertorials, competitions, customer endorsements.
• Broadcast media - talk shows, endorsements, segments sponsorships, celebrity endorsements, television

and radio show scripting for owned and earned media.

• Digital media – websites, dedicated blogs and social media pages or sites, web banners.
• Below the Line (“BTL”) marketing support- traditional and new media.
• Conceptualise, present and execute consumer PR campaigns which articulate specific consumer

engagement approaches in terms of: Messaging; tactics; timing (schedule or calendar of activities);

platforms, audience and measurement in support of specific programmes and campaigns based on agreed

narrative; support marketing, brand and product activities (across brand and product platforms including

products, sponsorship, social marketing, integrated marketing).

4.3 Media engagement approaches to consider in this context include:

• Research surveys
• Celebrity endorsements/ Influencers
• Competitions etc.
• Online PR (for example dedicated blogs, online editorial etc.)

4.4 Corporate PR activities:

• Develop strategic PR plans to enhance the SABC's corporate reputation and address any identified

reputational risks.

• Provide recommendations for proactive reputation management strategies and tactics.

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 5

Strictly Confidential

4.5 Consumer PR activities in support of specific integrated marketing campaigns. Specific activities to consider

in this context include:

• Media liaison (media releases, media engagement, media invitations) in support of reputation management,

sponsorship and other brand activities (e.g. art exhibitions and marketing campaigns activations).

• Social and online media PR activities in support of reputation management, sponsorship and other brand

activities (e.g. marketing campaigns activations)

4.6 Consumer PR campaigns activity schedule / calendar:

• Develop a consumer PR campaign calendar articulating opportunities and platforms for PR campaigns in

support of specific programmes and campaigns supported in the agreed narrative and the supporting brand

activities.

4.7 Platforms

• Facebook
• Twitter
• LinkedIn
• Instagram
• YouTube
• TikTok

4.8 Reporting

• Bespoke report on a monthly, quarterly and ad hoc basis.

4.9 Meetings

• Weekly – status team meetings are compulsory.
• Ad hoc meetings as and when required to support the brands.
• Monitoring / Alerting
• Monitoring social landscape and ensuring that they escalate issues to the business regularly when they pick

up something that could potentially damage our reputation.

• Monitor current and upcoming competitors and alert the team.
• Dashboard – weekly PR and reputation management report highlighting opportunities and reputational risks,

and the recommendations to address them.

5. Case studies

A. Case Study One: Credentials

The agency is required to demonstrate:

➢ An impressive track record, strong business acumen and solid strategic thinking

➢ Experience in servicing complex business accounts, understanding of the public sector is crucial.

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 6

Strictly Confidential

In response the agency is required to present:

➢ An introduction to the entity that is pitching for the account.

➢ A summary of their credentials with specific emphasis on:

• Sector expertise nationally and globally.
• A show-reel of their best and most recent consumer PR work
• Current clients and an indication of their complexity
• An indication of where SABC will rank on their client list and what percentage this will contribute to their

revenue.

➢ The company’s point of difference (USP) and the value they believe they will bring to the SABC.

➢ The company must demonstrate how they remain agile in an ever-changing environment and speed to

responsiveness in such environments.

➢ How company will approach the public versus Business clients

➢ How company will navigate multiple business requirements into a holistic PR approach.

B. Case Study Two: Corporate Client Relaunch

The agency is required to demonstrate:

➢ How they helped a large corporate client relaunch itself in the market with a new identity and brand promise to re-

engage the market to be top of mind and change customer perceptions.

In response the agency is required to present:

➢ What touch points did you use and why?

➢ How did this campaign perform from a sales and customer engagement perspective?

➢ Why you believe this execution was memorable to consumers’ minds?

➢ How did you achieve the business and marketing objectives?

➢ What was the market response?

6. RFQ validity period

This bid will remain valid 90 (ninety) days from the date of bid closing.

7. Costing

The quotation must reflect a detailed cost breakdown, and any indirect costs associated with the delivery of the required

service. Bidders are advised to use Annexure F - Pricing Schedule

8. Duration of the contract

Twelve (12) Months

9. Location

SABC Auckland Park

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 7

Strictly Confidential

10. Phase 2: functionality / technical evaluation criteria

➢ The tender submission will be technically evaluated out of 130

➢ A minimum threshold of 105 out of a maximum of 130 has been set.

➢ Bidders achieving less than the set threshold will be declared non-responsive and therefore will not continue

forward for evaluation of Price & Specific Goals.

Criteria Area Evaluation Criteria Min. Points Max.

Points

Organizational capacity Demonstrate a strong strategic capability with a minimum of six (6)

(capability and experience) years’ experience and success in developing solutions for the

broadcast sector / similar environment or public sector and

corporate brands.

• Above 8 years of experience - 10 points
• 6-8 years of experience – 5 points
• Less than 6 years of experience = 0 points

The Service provider must provide evidence of previous work done

15 20

through reference letters in the public and/or private sector from at

least Three (3) current/previous clients. Reference letters should be

on a client’s letterhead, indicating bidders’ name, contact details of clients

(name, telephone and/or email), duration of the service offered (start and

end dates), description of services related to the RFQ.

• 3 or more reference letters - 10 points
• Less than 3 reference letters- 0 points

Approach and The service provider must demonstrate tried and tested approach

Methodology and methodology, employing proprietary processes and tools for

the development of reputation strategies and the measurement of

corporate reputation. (Provide Two (2) case studies based on

broadcasting/similar and public sector portfolios).

Case study should entail the following on Reputation Management:

25 points

• Identification of risk problem (5 points)
• Processes and tools to mitigate reputation risk/problem (5

points)

• Key reputational tactics employed (5 points)
• Measurement of the effectiveness of the reputation strategy

executed. (5 points)

• Measurement of the effectiveness of the reputation strategy

executed. (5 points)

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 8

Strictly Confidential

Case study should entail the following on Public Relations: 25 50 50

points

• Identification of risk problem (5 points)
• Processes and tools to mitigate Public Relations

risk/problem (5 points)

• Key Public Relations tactics employed (5 points)
• Measurement of the effectiveness of the Public Relations

strategy executed. (5 points)

• Measurement of the effectiveness of the Public Relations

strategy executed. (5 points)

Capabilities and experience Demonstrate technical and professional experience, and

of the proposed qualifications of the proposed specialist in public

specialist/company relations/reputation management with six (6) years’ experience or

more.

20 20

• (Attach CVs and Qualifications of specialist or team)

Minimum requirement – Diploma/Degree in

Communications, Media or equivalent field. (20 points)

Bidder to provide a team organogram with titles that will be working on

the SABC account.

• 1-3 team members- 10 points 0 10
• No organogram – 0 points

Project Plan Bidder to provide fully detailed project plan including milestones

based on the RFQ.

• 1-2 weeks- 30 points
• 2-3 weeks – 20 points 20 30
• 3-4 weeks – 0 points

Total points 105 130

Summary: Minimum threshold: To be eligible to proceed to the next stage of the evaluations (presentation evaluations) the

bidder must achieve a minimum threshold score of 105%.

11. Third phase: presentation evaluation

Criteria Area Evaluation Criteria Min. Points Max.

Points

Case Study One Demonstrate an impressive track record, strong business acumen

and solid strategic thinking.

Experience in servicing complex business accounts and understanding

of the public sector is crucial. Present a case study of relevant work done

and how you will implement learnings/best practice in servicing an SABC

platform.

15 20

• Good case presented – 20 points

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 9

Strictly Confidential

• Fair case presented- 15 points
• Poor case presented- 0 points

Credentials 1. A summary of bidder’s credentials with specific emphasis on:

• Sector expertise nationally and globally.
• A show-reel of their best and most recent consumer PR work
• Current clients and an indication of their complexity

2. The company’s point of difference (USP) and the value they believe

they will bring to the SABC.

The company must demonstrate how they remain agile in an ever-

changing environment and speed to responsiveness in such

environments.

3. How company will navigate multiple business requirements into a

holistic PR approach.

15 20

• Good credentials presented – 20 points
• Fair credentials presented - 15 points
• Poor credentials presented - 0 points

Case Study Two: Corporate The bidder is required to demonstrate:

Client Relaunch

• How they helped a large corporate client reshape its

reputation with stakeholder’s and the general public. Position

itself in the market with a new identity and brand promise to 30 30

reengage the market in order to be top of mind and change

customer perceptions - 30 points

Reporting In response the bidder is required to present:

• 1. What touch points did you use and why? 5 points
• How did this campaign perform from a sales and customer

engagement perspective? 5 points

• Why do you believe this execution was memorable to 25 25

consumers’ minds? 5 points

• How did you achieve the business and marketing objectives?

5 points

• What was the market response? 5 points

Capacity

• Due to the nature of the organisation with its various

platforms, the specialist is required to be available on a 24- 20 30

hour basis as and when required - 20 Points

Total points 105 115

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 10

Strictly Confidential

Summary: The points obtained for the presentation evaluation must be at least 105 points out of a maximum of 115

points. Bidders who do not achieve the threshold will not be taken to the next phase of evaluations which is Price

and Specific Goals.

12. Price and specific goals

a. The 80/20 preference point system will apply to evaluate responses

b. The award of the tender / RFQ to will be based on functionality evaluation.

c. The Price and BEE (Specific goals) will be applicable to award the highest scoring bidder

13. Price and (specific goals) application during contract implementation

a. PRICE

The 80/20 preference point system

A maximum of 80 points is allocated for price on the following basis:

Pt-Pmin

Ps= 80 ( 1- Pmin )

Where:

Ps = Points scored for comparative price of bid under

Consideration

Pt = Comparative price of bid under consideration

Pmin = Comparative price of lowest acceptable bid

b. BEE (SPECIFIC GOALS)

Specific goals 80/20

EME/SME 51% owned by Black people 10

51% owned by Black people; 5

51% owned by Black people who are women 3

Black Youth 2

• NB: All tenders will be issued to the market with all specific goals, and these will be scored in

accordance with the evidence as submitted by the bidder. The bidder who does not meet the specific

goals will not be disqualified but score zero.

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 11

Strictly Confidential

c. ADJUDICATION USING A POINT SYSTEM

➢ The bidder obtaining the highest number of total points will be awarded the contract.

➢ Preference points shall be calculated after process has been brought to a comparative basis taking into account

all factors of non-firm prices.

➢ Should two or more bids be equal in all respects, the award shall be decided by the drawing of lots.

d. OBJECTIVE CRITERIA

➢ The SABC reserves the right not to award this tender to any bidder based on the proven poor record of

accomplishment of the bidder in previous projects within the SABC.

➢ The SABC will not award contract/s to the bidders who are blacklisted or have committed other acts of fraud and

misrepresentation of facts e.g., tax compliance, company financials, etc. will be eliminated from the bid process.

➢ The SABC reserves the right not to award this tender to any bidder who fails the financial stability assessment.

➢ No SABC former employees shall be awarded contracts with the SABC within (Twelve) 12 months after termination

of employment with the SABC.

➢ Should employees resign or retire from the employment of the SABC and become directors of other businesses

tendering with the SABC, such tender shall not be considered until the cooling off period of (Twelve) 12 months has

expired.

➢ Should the employee be dismissed from the SABC employment, such employee shall be prohibited from conducting

business with SABC for a period of 5 (Five) years from the date of dismissal.

➢ Should the employee be found guilty in a court of law due to criminal conduct/act, such employee will not be

considered to do/conduct business with SABC, until the criminal record has been legally expunged.

➢ The SABC shall not procure any goods, services, works or Content from any Board member or Board member

owned business, to ensure that suppliers competing for the SABC’s business have confidence in the integrity of

SABC’s selection process.

➢ Should the SABC’s Board members no longer serve on the SABC Board but become directors of other companies,

the SABC shall not conduct business with those companies until the cooling off period of 12 (Twelve) months has

expired.

➢ Should the Board member be found guilty in a court of law due to criminal conduct/act, such Board member will not

be considered to do/conduct business with SABC, until the criminal record has been legally expunged.

14. Communication

➢ Respondents are warned that a response will be disqualified should any attempt be made by a tenderer either

directly or indirectly to canvass any officer(s) or employees of SABC in respect of a tender, between the closing date

and the date of the award of the business.

All enquiries relating to this RFQ should be emailed three days before the closing date.

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 12

Strictly Confidential

15. Conditions to be observed when tendering

The Corporation does not bind itself to accept the lowest or any tender, nor shall it be responsible for or pay any expenses or losses

which may be incurred by the Tenderer in the preparation and delivery of his tender. The Corporation reserves the right to accept a

separate tender or separate tenders for any one or more of the sections of a specification. The corporation also reserves the

right to withdraw the tender at any stage.

• No tender shall be deemed to have been accepted unless or until a formal contract / letter of award is signed by both

parties.

• The Corporation reserves the right to:

➢ Make a selection solely on the information received in the submissions

➢ Enter into negotiations with any one or more of preferred bidder(s) based on the criteria specified in the

evaluation of this tender.

➢ Contact any bidder during the evaluation process, in order to clarify any information, without informing any other

bidders. During the evaluation process, no change in the content of the RFQ shall be sought, offered or

permitted.

➢ Cancel this RFQ or any part thereof at any time.

• Should a bidder(s) be selected for further negotiations, they will be chosen on the basis of the greatest benefit to the

Corporation and not necessarily on the basis of the lowest costs, aligned to the Price & Specific Goals.

16. Cost of bidding

The Tenderer shall bear all costs and expenses associated with preparation and submission of its tender or RFQ, and

the Corporation shall under any circumstances be responsible or liable for any such costs, regardless of, without limitation,

the outcome of the bidding, evaluation, and selection process.

17. Payment terms

SABC will effect payment sixty (60) days after the service provider has rendered the service and submitted an invoice /

statement.

End of RFQ document

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 13

Strictly Confidential

Annexed to this document for completion and return with the document:

Annexure A - Declaration of Interest

Annexure B - SBD 6.1 Form

Annexure C - Consortiums, Joint Ventures and Sub-Contracting Regulations

Annexure D - Previous completed projects/Current Projects

Annexure E - SBD 4 Form

Annexure F - Pricing Schedule

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 14

Strictly Confidential

Annexure a

Declaration of interest

1. Any legal or natural person, excluding any permanent employee of SABC, may make an offer or offers in terms of this tender

invitation. In view of possible allegations of favoritism, should the resulting tender, or part thereof be awarded to-

(a) any person employed by the SABC in the capacity of Tenderer, consultant or service provider; or

(b) any person who acts on behalf of SABC; or

(c) any person having kinship, including a blood relationship, with a person employed by, or who acts on behalf of SABC; or

(d) any legal person which is in any way connected to any person contemplated in paragraph (a), (b) or (c),

it is required that:

The Tenderer or his/her authorised representative shall declare his/her position vis-à-vis SABC and/or take an oath declaring

his/her interest, where it is known that any such relationship exists between the Tenderer and a person employed by SABC

in any capacity.

Does such a relationship exist? [YES/NO]

If YES, state particulars of all such relationships (if necessary, please add additional pages containing the required

information):

[1] [2]

Name :..........................................................................

Position :.............................................................................

Office where employed :.............................................................................

Telephone number :..........................................................................

Relationship :..........................................................................

2. Failure on the part of a Tenderer to fill in and/or sign this certificate may be interpreted to mean that an association as stipulated

in paragraph 1, supra, exists.

3. In the event of a contract being awarded to a Tenderer with an association as stipulated in paragraph 1, supra, and it

subsequently becomes known that false information was provided in response to the above question, SABC may, in addition to

any other remedy it may have:

• recover from the Tenderer all costs, losses or damages incurred or sustained by SABC as a result of the award of the

contract; and/or

• cancel the contract and claim any damages, which SABC may suffer by having to make less favourable arrangements

after such cancellation.

_________________________ _________________ _________________

Signature of declarant tender number date

__________________________ _________________________________________

Position of declarant name of company or tenderer

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 15

Strictly Confidential

Annexure b

Sbd 6.1

Preference points claim form in terms of the preferential procurement regulations 2022

This preference form must form part of all tenders invited. It contains general information and serves as a claim form for preference

points for specific goals.

Nb: before completing this form, tenderers must study the general conditions, definitions

And directives applicable in respect of the tender and preferential procurement

Regulations, 2022

1. General conditions

1.1 The following preference point systems are applicable to invitations to tender:

• the 80/20 system for requirements with a Rand value of up to R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes included); and
• the 90/10 system for requirements with a Rand value above R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes included).

1.2 To be completed by the organ of state

a) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 80/20 preference point system.

1.2.1 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts) shall be awarded for:

(a) Price; and

(b) Specific Goals.

1.3 To be completed by the organ of state:

The maximum points for this tender are allocated as follows:

Specific goals 80/20

EME/SME 51% owned by Black people 10

51% owned by Black people; 5

51% owned by Black people who are women 3

Black Youth 2

1.4 Failure on the part of a tenderer to submit proof or documentation required in terms of this tender to claim points for

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 16

Strictly Confidential

specific goals with the tender, will be interpreted to mean that preference points for specific goals are not claimed.

1.5 The organ of state reserves the right to require of a tenderer, either before a tender is adjudicated or at any time

subsequently, to substantiate any claim in regard to preferences, in any manner required by the organ of state.

2. Definitions

(a) “tender” means a written offer in the form determined by an organ of state in response to an invitation to provide goods

or services through price quotations, competitive tendering process or any other method envisaged in legislation.

(b) “price” means an amount of money tendered for goods or services, and includes all applicable taxes less all

unconditional discounts;

(c) “rand value” means the total estimated value of a contract in Rand, calculated at the time of bid invitation, and includes

all applicable taxes;

(d) “tender for income-generating contracts” means a written offer in the form determined by an organ of state in response

to an invitation for the origination of income-generating contracts through any method envisaged in legislation that will

result in a legal agreement between the organ of state and a third party that produces revenue for the organ of state, and

includes, but is not limited to, leasing and disposal of assets and concession contracts, excluding direct sales and disposal

of assets through public auctions; and

(e) “the Act” means the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 (Act No. ).

3. Formulae for procurement of goods and services

3.1. Points awarded for price

3.1.1 The 80/20 or 90/10 preference point systems

A maximum of 80 or 90 points is allocated for price on the following basis:

80/20 or 90/10

Pt−Pmin

Ps= 80(1− ) or Ps= 90(1− Pt−Pmin )

Pmin Pmin

Where

Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration

Pt = Price of tender under consideration

Pmin = Price of lowest acceptable tender

3.2. Formulae for disposal or leasing of state assets and income generating procurement

3.2.1. Points awarded for price

A maximum of 80 or 90 points is allocated for price on the following basis:

80/20 or 90/10

Pt−Pmax

Ps= 80(1+ ) or Ps= 90(1+ Pt−Pmax )

Pmax Pmax

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 17

Strictly Confidential

Where

Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration

Pt = Price of tender under consideration

Pmax = Price of highest acceptable tender

4. Points awarded for specific goals

4.1. In terms of Regulation 4(2); 5(2); 6(2) and 7(2) of the Preferential Procurement Regulations, preference points must be

awarded for specific goals stated in the tender. For the purposes of this tender the tenderer will be allocated points based

on the goals stated in table 1 below as may be supported by proof/ documentation stated in the conditions of this tender:

4.2. In cases where organs of state intend to use Regulation 3(2) of the Regulations, which states that, if it is unclear whether

the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system applies, an organ of state must, in the tender documents, stipulate in the case

of—

(a) an invitation for tender for income-generating contracts, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system

will apply and that the highest acceptable tender will be used to determine the applicable preference point

system: or

(b) any other invitation for tender, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system will apply and that the

lowest acceptable tender will be used to determine the applicable preference point system,

then the organ of state must indicate the points allocated for specific goals for both the 90/10 and 80/20 preference point

system.

Table 1: Specific goals for the tender and points claimed are indicated per the table below.

Note to tenderers: The tenderer must indicate how they claim points for each preference point system.

Number of points Number of points

claimed. allocated

(80/20 system) (80/20 system)

The specific goals allocated points in terms of this tender

(To be completed (To be completed

by the tenderer) by the organ of

state)

SMMEs (inclusive or QSEs and EMEs) 51% owned by Black people 10

51% owned by Black people; 5

51% owned by Black people who are women 3

Black Youth 2

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 18

Strictly Confidential

NB: All tenders will be issued to the market with all specific goals, and these will be scored in accordance with the evidence as

submitted by the bidder. The bidder who does not meet the specific goals will not be disqualified but score zero

Source Documents to be submitted with the tender or RFQ

Specific Goals Acceptable Evidence

B-BBEE Valid BEE Certificate / Sworn Affidavit (in case of JV, a consolidated scorecard will be

accepted)

Black Women Owned Certified ID Documents of the Owners/shareholder

Black Youth owned Certified ID Documents of the Owners

EME or QSE 51% Black Owned Annual Financial/ Management Accounts/ B-BBEE Certificate / Affidavit/ Certified ID

Documents of the Owners/shareholder

51% Black Owned CIPC Documents / B-BBEE Certificate/Affidavit/ Certified ID Documents of the

Owners/shareholder

South African Enterprises CIPC Documents

Declaration with regard to company/firm

4.3. Name of company/firm...............................................................................

4.4. Company registration number: .....................................................................

4.5. Type of company/ firm

 Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium

 One-person business/sole propriety

 Close corporation

 Public Company

 Personal Liability Company

 (Pty) Limited

 Non-Profit Company

 State Owned Company

[Tick applicable box]

4.6. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm, certify that the points claimed, based

on the specific goals as advised in the tender, qualifies the company/ firm for the preference(s) shown and I

acknowledge that:

i) The information furnished is true and correct;

ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the General Conditions as indicated in paragraph 1 of this

form;

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 19

Strictly Confidential

iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a result of points claimed as shown in paragraphs 1.4 and 4.2, the

contractor may be required to furnish documentary proof to the satisfaction of the organ of state that the claims

are correct;

iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any of the conditions of contract have

not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in addition to any other remedy it may have –

(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process;

(b) recover costs, losses, or damages it has incurred or suffered as a result of that person’s conduct;

(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered as a result of having to make

less favourable arrangements due to such cancellation.

(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders, and directors, or only the

shareholders and directors who acted on a fraudulent basis, be restricted from obtaining

business from any organ of state for a period not exceeding 10 years, after the audi alteram

partem (hear the other side) rule has been applied; and

(e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.

..............................................

Signature(s) of tenderer(s)

Surname and name: ................................................................

Date: ...............................................................

Address: ...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 20

Strictly Confidential

Annexure c

Consortiums, joint ventures and sub-contracting regulations

1. Consortiums and joint ventures

1.1 A trust, consortium or joint venture will qualify for points for their B-BBEE status level as a legal entity, provided that the

entity submits their B-BBEE status level certificate.

1.2 A trust, consortium or joint venture will qualify for points for their B-BBEE status level as an unincorporated entity,

provided that the entity submits their consolidated B-BBEE scorecard as if they were a group structure and that such a

consolidated B-BBEE scorecard is prepared for every separate tender.

2 sub-contracting

2.1 A person awarded a contract may only enter into a subcontracting arrangement with the approval of the organ of state.

2.2 A person awarded a contract in relation to a designated sector, may not subcontract in such a manner that the local

production and content of the overall value of the contract is reduced to below the stipulated minimum threshold.

2.3 A person awarded a contract may not subcontract more than 30% of the value of the contract to any other enterprise that

does not have an equal or higher B-BBEE status level of contributor than the person concerned, unless the contract is

subcontracted to an EME that has the capability and ability to execute the subcontract.

3 declaration of sub-contracting

3.1 Will any portion of the contract be sub-contracted? YES / NO

3.2 If yes, indicate:

3.2.1 The percentage of the contract will be sub-contracted ...................................%

3.2.2 The name of the sub-contractor ..........................................................................

3.2.3 The B-BBEE status level of the sub-contractor......................................................

3.2.4 whether the sub-contractor is an EME YES / NO

___________________________ _________________ _________________

Signature of declarant tender number date

__________________________ _________________________________________

Position of declarant name of company or tenderer

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 21

Strictly Confidential

Annexure “d”

Previous completed Host-to-Host projects (preferably provide a detailed company profile, detailed the below mentioned information)

Project Descriptions Client Contact Contact person Email address Period of projects Value of projects Project Commence Completed date

no date

Current Host-to-Host projects (preferably provide a detailed company profile, detailed the below mentioned information)

Project Descriptions Client Contact Contact person Email address Period of projects Value of projects Project Commence Completion date

no date

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 22

Strictly Confidential

Annexure “d”

Bidder’s disclosure

1. Purpose of the form

Any person (natural or juristic) may make an offer or offers in terms of this invitation to bid. In line with the principles of

transparency, accountability, impartiality, and ethics as enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa and

further expressed in various pieces of legislation, it is required for the bidder to make this declaration in respect of the details

required hereunder.

Where a person/s are listed in the Register for Tender Defaulters and / or the List of Restricted Suppliers, that person will

automatically be disqualified from the bid process.

2. Bidder’s declaration

2.1 Is the bidder, or any of its directors / trustees / shareholders / members / partners or any person having a controlling interest1

in the enterprise,

employed by the state? YES/NO

2.1.1 If so, furnish particulars of the names, individual identity numbers, and, if applicable, state employee numbers of sole

proprietor/ directors / trustees / shareholders / members/ partners or any person having a controlling interest in the enterprise,

in table below.

Full Name Identity Number Name of State institution

2.2 Do you, or any person connected with the bidder, have a relationship with any person who is employed by the procuring

institution? YES/NO

1 the power, by one person or a group of persons holding the majority of the equity of an enterprise, alternatively, the

person/s having the deciding vote or power to influence or to direct the course and decisions of the enterprise.

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 23

Strictly Confidential

2.2.1 If so, furnish particulars:

................................................................................................

................................................................................................

2.3 Does the bidder or any of its directors / trustees / shareholders / members / partners or any person having a controlling

interest in the enterprise have any interest in any other related enterprise whether or not they are bidding for this contract?

Yes/no

2.3.1 If so, furnish particulars:

........................................................................................

........................................................................................

➢ An impressive track record, strong business acumen and solid strategic thinking

➢ Experience in servicing complex business accounts, understanding of the public sector is crucial.

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 6

Organizational capacity Demonstrate a strong strategic capability with a minimum of six (6)

(capability and experience) years’ experience and success in developing solutions for the

broadcast sector / similar environment or public sector and

corporate brands.

• Above 8 years of experience - 10 points
• 6-8 years of experience – 5 points
• Less than 6 years of experience = 0 points

of the proposed qualifications of the proposed specialist in public

specialist/company relations/reputation management with six (6) years’ experience or

more.

20 20

• (Attach CVs and Qualifications of specialist or team)

Minimum requirement – Diploma/Degree in

Communications, Media or equivalent field. (20 points)

Annexure “d”

Previous completed Host-to-Host projects (preferably provide a detailed company profile, detailed the below mentioned information)

no date

Current Host-to-Host projects (preferably provide a detailed company profile, detailed the below mentioned information)

the SABC account.

Note: Qualification must be SAQA verified.

service. Bidders are advised to use Annexure F - Pricing Schedule

Annerure f: pricing schedule

Minimum functionality/qualifying score: 105

Valid Tax Clearance Certificate or SARS “Pin” to validate supplier’s tax matters

tax compliance, company financials, etc

Central Supplier Database (CSD) registration

service. Bidders are advised to use Annexure F - Pricing Schedule

First phase – prequalification crite

Points Allocation: 80 points

B-BBEE Details: ed

by the tenderer) by the organ of

state)

SMMEs (inclusive or QSEs and EMEs) 51% owned by Black people 10

51% owned by Black people; 5

51% owned by Black people who are women 3

Black Youth 2

RFQ/COM/2026/10252092/32 18

Strictly Confidential

NB: All tenders will be issued to the market with all specific goals, and these will be scored in accordance with the evidence as

submitted by the bidder. The bidder who does not meet the specific goals will not be disqualified but score zero

Source Documents to be submitted with the tender or RFQ

Specific Goals Acceptable Evidence

B-BBEE Valid BEE Certificate / Sworn Affidavit (in case of JV, a consolidated scorecard will be

accepted)

Black Women Owned Certified ID Documents of the Owners/shareholder

Black Youth owned Certified ID Documents of the Owners

EME or QSE 51% Black Owned Annual Financial/ Management Accounts/ B-BBEE Certificate / Affidavit/ Certified ID

Documents of the Owners/shareholder

51% Black Owned CIPC Documents / B-BBEE Certificate/Affidavit/ Certified ID Documents of the

Owners/shareholder

South African Enterprises CIPC Documents

Declaration with regard to company/firm

4.3. Name of company/firm...............................................................................

4.4. Company registration number: .....................................................................

4.5. Type of company/ firm

 Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium

 One-person business/sole propriety

 Close corporation

 Public Company

 Personal Liability Company

 (Pty) Limited

 Non-Profit Company

 State Owned Company

[Tick applicable box]

4.6. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm, certify that the points claimed, based

on

I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED IN PARAGRAPHS 1, 2 and 3 ABOVE IS CORRECT.

I accept that the state may reject the bid or act against me in terms of paragraph 6 of PFMA

SCM instruction /22 on preventing and combating abuse in the supply chain