Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Issuing Organization
Automotive Industry Development Centre (AIDC)Location
Gauteng
Closing Date
03 Jul 2026
Documents available on tender detail page
Tender Type
Request for Quotation
Delivery Location
30 Helium road, Rosslyn ext. 2 Pretoria 0020 and its remote sites - Rosslyn - Pretoria - 0020
Organization Type
GOVERNMENT
Published
19 Jun 2026
OCDS Reference
ocds-9t57fa-159612
The automotive industry development centre (aidc) invites service providers to submit quotations for a limited pre-feasibility study to assess the establishment of the gauteng automotive research institute (gari). The study aims to develop a viable, industry-supported concept for a high-impact research institute aligned with gauteng’s automotive sector needs, to be completed within three months.
Date & Time
Friday, 03 July 2026 - 11:00
Venue
30 Helium road, Rosslyn ext. 2 Pretoria 0020
Responses to sent to [email protected] And please do not copy me or any of aidc employees. Failure to adhere to this instruction, the submission will be disqualified.
Categories
Request for Quotation
30 Helium road, Rosslyn ext. 2 Pretoria 0020 and its remote sites - Rosslyn - Pretoria - 0020
19 Jun
2026
Tender Published
Tender was published
03 Jul
2026
Closing Date
Tender closing date
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf
The Automotive Industry Development Centre (AIDC) in Gauteng is requesting quotations from potential service providers to conduct a limited pre-feasibility study for the establishment of the Gauteng Automotive Research Institute (GARI). The study aims to develop a viable concept for GARI, validated by stakeholder engagement, and must be completed within 3 months. The project aligns with the Tshwane Automotive City Masterplan and AIDC’s Automotive Centre of Excellence (ACoE) initiative.
Median Estimate
R 462 369
Range
Based on 25 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
As a procurement specialist for Tenders SA, I am excited to share insights on the critical aspects of software development government contracts, specifically focusing on Service Level Agreements (SLAs), Source Code Escrow, and Intellectual Property (IP) clauses. In the current regulatory environment of 2026, security contractors in Gauteng must navigate a complex landscape of compliance requirements to successfully secure and execute government contracts. Understanding these elements is crucial for ensuring that contracts are not only awarded but also executed efficiently, meeting the needs of both the government and the service providers.
In the high-stakes arena of South African procurement, winning isn't just about what you bid, but where you bid. Discover how provincial tender data is leveling the playing field for SMMEs and driving localized economic transformation.
The Western Cape construction sector is booming in 2026, with over 180 active tenders and 109 registered organizations competing for work. But here’s the hard truth: without the correct CIDB grading, your bid won’t even make it past the first compliance check. The Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) grading system is non-negotiable—it determines the value of contracts you can legally pursue. If your grade doesn’t match the tender’s financial threshold, you’re disqualified before your technical proposal is even reviewed. This guide cuts through the noise, giving you a clear, actionable roadmap to upgrade your CIDB grade and stay competitive in a crowded market.
From luxury lodge concessions to conservation supplies, SANParks offers a world of opportunity. Learn how to navigate the unique procurement landscape of South Africa's national parks in 2026.
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogTenders in this industry often require registration with these bodies.
Recommended Certifications
Having these can improve your winning chances: CA(SA) - Chartered Accountant, PMI-PMP (Project Management Professional), Prince2 Practitioner, Six Sigma Certification
AI Document Analysis Stages
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Contact Information
Source: Annexure A_Integrity Pact for Businesses.pdf (TENDER){"name":null,"email":"[email protected]","phone":"086 726 1681","department":null,"address":"ivate X121"}
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Annexure A_Integrity Pact for Businesses.pdf (TENDER)Bidders must not have been convicted by a court for fraud/corruption in procurement processes, theft, or extortion. They must not be listed on the National Treasury's database of Restricted Suppliers or the Register of Tender Defaulters. The bidder must be willing to enter into the Integrity Pact and comply with its commitments.
Technical Specifications
Source: Annexure A_Integrity Pact for Businesses.pdf (TENDER)This agreement is part of the tender document, which shall be signed and submitted
along with the tender document. The Chief Executive Officer of the bidding company or
his/her authorised representative shall sign the integrity pact. If the winning bidder has
not signed this integrity pact during the submission of the bid, the tender/proposal shall
be disqualified.
2. Objectives
Now, therefore, the Gauteng Provincial Government and the Bidder agree to enter into
this pre-contract agreement, hereinafter referred to as an integrity pact, to avoid all forms
of corruption by following a system that is fair, transparent, and free from any
influence/unprejudiced dealings before, during and after the currency of the contract to
be entered, with a view to:
2.1 Enable the Gauteng Provincial Government to obtain the desired contract at a
reasonable and competitive price in conformity to the defined specifications of the works,
goods and services; and
2.2 Enable bidders to abstain from bribing or any corrupt practice to secure the contract by
assuring them that their competitors will refrain from bribing and other corrupt practices
and the Gauteng Provincial Government will commit to preventing corruption, in any form
by their officials by following transparent procedures.
3. Governance
3.1 The integrity pact seeks to ensure that both parties comply with all applicable provincial,
national, continental, and international laws and regulations regarding fair competition
and anti-corruption.
4. Environment
4.1 The integrity pact requires that both parties comply with all applicable environmental,
health, and safety regulations.
5. Protection of information
5.1 The integrity pact seeks to ensure that both parties undertake to protect the
confidentiality of information. Each party, when given access to confidential information
as part of the business relationship should not share this information with anyone unless
authorised.
6. Reputation
6.1 The Gauteng Provincial Government wants to work with bidders who are proud of their
reputation for fair dealing and quality delivery.
6.2 The Gauteng Provincial Government wants to ensure that working with government is
reputation enhancing for the supplier.
6.3 The Gauteng Provincial Government expects bidders/suppliers to be protective of
government’s reputation, and ensure that neither they, nor any of their partners or
subcontractors, bring government to disrepute by engaging in any act or omission which
is reasonably likely to diminish the trust that the public places in government.
2 | P a g e G P G I n t e g r i t y P a c t f o r B u s i n e s s e s
6.4 The Gauteng Provincial Government further requires its bidders/suppliers to always
adhere to ethical conduct even outside their contractual obligation with the Gauteng
Provincial Government.
7. Values of the gauteng provincial government
7.1 The value system of the Gauteng City Region is shown below:
Gauteng city region values system
Core values ethical values
Patriotism Integrity
Purposefulness Accountability
Team focused Dignity
Integrity Transparency
Accountability Respect
Passionate Honesty
Activism
7.2 The Gauteng Provincial Government commits to ensure that the values system is
embedded into the day-to-day operations of its institutions.
8. Commitments of the gauteng provincial government
The Gauteng Provincial Government commits itself to the following:
8.1 The GPG commits that its officials will at all times conduct themselves in accordance
with Treasury Regulations 16A.81, copy of which is attached marked Annexure A, and
that:
8.1.1 The GPG is committed to doing business with integrity and proper regard for ethical
business practices.
8.1.2 The GPG hereby undertakes that no official of the GPG, connected directly or indirectly
with the contract will demand, take a promise for or accept, directly or through
intermediaries, any bribe, consideration, gift, reward, favour, or any material or
immaterial benefit or any other advantage from the bidder, either for themselves or for
any person, organisation or third party related to the contract in exchange for an
advantage in the bidding process, bid evaluation, contracting or implementation
process related to the contract.
8.1.3 The GPG further confirms that its officials have not favoured any prospective bidder in
any form that could afford an undue advantage to that bidder during the tendering
stage and will further treat all bidders alike.
8.1.4 The GPG will during the tender process treat all Bidder(s) with equity.
8.1.5 All officials of the GPG shall report any attempted or completed violation of clauses to
the following details:
1 Government Notice No. R. published under Government Gazette No. March 2005, as
amended
3 | P a g e G P G I n t e g r i t y P a c t f o r B u s i n e s s e s
Gauteng Ethics Hotline National Anti-Corruption Hotline
Toll-free number 080 1111 633 0800 701 701
SMS call-back 49017 N/A
E-mail [email protected] [email protected]
Fax 086 726 1681 0800 204 965
Website www.thehotline.co.za www.publicservicecorruptionhotline.org.za
Post Chief Directorate: Integrity Public Service Commission
Management Private X121
Private Bag X61 Pretoria
Marshalltown 0001
2001
Walk-in Office of the Premier Gauteng Provincial Office
55 Marshall Street Public Service Commission
Marshalltown Schreiner Chambers 6th Floor
Johannesburg 94 Pritchard Street
2001 Johannesburg
8.1.6 Following the report on the violation of the above clauses by the official(s), through
any source, the GPG shall investigate allegations of such violations against the official
or other role players and when justified:
a) Take steps against such official and other role players (necessary disciplinary
proceedings, and/or any other action as deemed fit, bar such officials from further
dealings related to the contract process). In such a case, while an enquiry is being
conducted by the Gauteng Provincial Government the proceedings under the
contract would not be stalled.
b) Inform the relevant Treasury of steps taken in 8.1.5(a) against such officials; and
c) Report any conduct by such official and other role players that may constitute an
offence to the South African Police Service.
9. Commitments of the bidders
The bidder commits himself/herself to take all measures necessary to prevent corrupt
practices, unfair means and illegal activities during any stage of his/her bid or during any
pre-contract or post contract stage to secure the contract or in furtherance to secure it
and commits himself/herself to the following:
9.1 The bidder is committed to doing business with integrity and proper regard for ethical
business practices.
4 | P a g e G P G I n t e g r i t y P a c t f o r B u s i n e s s e s
9.2 The bidder will not offer, directly or through intermediaries, any bribe, gift, consideration,
reward, favour, any material or immaterial benefit or other advantage, commission, fees,
brokerage or inducements to any official of the Gauteng Provincial Government,
connected directly or indirectly with the bidding process, or to any person, organisation
or third party related to the contract in exchange for any advantage in the bidding,
evaluation, contracting and implementation of the contract.
9.3 The bidder further undertakes that he/she has not given, offered or promised to give,
directly or indirectly any bribe, gift, consideration, reward, favour, any material or
immaterial benefit or other advantage, commission, fees, brokerage or inducements to
an official of the Gauteng Provincial Government or otherwise in procuring the contract
or forbearing to do or having done any act in relation to the obtaining or execution of the
contract or any other contract with the Gauteng Provincial Government for showing or
forbearing to show favour or disfavor to any person in relation to the contract or any
other contract with the Gauteng Provincial Government.
9.4 The bidder will not collude with other parties interested in the contract to preclude the
competitive bid price, impair the transparency, fairness and progress of the bidding
process, bid evaluation, contracting and implementation of the contract.
9.5 The Bidder(s)/Contractor(s) will not enter with other Bidders into any undisclosed
agreement or understanding, whether formal or informal. This applies in particular to
prices, specifications, certifications, subsidiary contracts, submission or non-submission
of bids or any other actions to restrict competitiveness or to introduce cartelization in the
bidding process.
9.6 The Bidder(s)/Contractor(s) will, when presenting his / her bid, disclose any and all
payments he /she has made, is committed to or intends to make to agents, brokers or
any other intermediaries in connection with the award of the contract.
9.7 In case of sub–contracting, the Principal Contractor shall take the responsibility of
adoption of Integrity Pact by the Sub-Contractor.
9.8 The bidder shall report any attempted or completed violation of clauses 9.1 to 9.7
including any alleged unethical conduct to the Gauteng Ethics Hotline (details are
provided at clause 8.1.4).
9.9 The bidder (or anyone acting on its behalf) warrants that:
9.9.1 It has not been convicted by a court of law for fraud and/or corruption with respect to
the procurement/tendering processes; and/or
9.9.2 It has not been convicted by a court of law for theft or extortion; and/or
9.9.3 It is not listed on the National Treasury’s database of Restricted Suppliers or Register
of Tender Defaulters.
10. Sanctions for violation
10.1 The breach of any aforesaid provisions or providing false information by employers,
including manipulation of information by evaluators, shall face administrative charges
and penal actions as per the existing relevant rules and laws.
10.2 The breach of the Pact or providing false information by the Bidder, or any one
employed by him, or acting on his behalf (whether without the knowledge of the
5 | P a g e G P G I n t e g r i t y P a c t f o r B u s i n e s s e s
Bidder), or acting on his/her behalf, shall be dealt with as per the provisions of the
Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act ().
10.3 The Gauteng Provincial Government shall also take all or any one of the following
actions, wherever required:
compensation to the bidder. However, the proceedings with the other bidder(s)
would continue.
compensation to the bidder.
demand and recover from the Contractor liquidated damages of the Contract
value.
database for tender defaulters.
11. Conflict of interest
11.1 A conflict of interest involves a conflict between the public duty and private interest (for
favor or vengeance) of a public official, in which the public official has private interest
which could improperly influence the performance of their official duties and
responsibilities. Conflicts of interest would arise in a situation when any concerned
members of both parties are related either directly or indirectly, or has any association
or had any confrontation. Thus, conflict of interest of any tender committee must be
declared in a prescribed form.
11.2 The bidder shall not lend or borrow any money from or enter any monetary dealings
or transactions, directly or indirectly, with any member of the tender committee or
officials of the Gauteng Provincial Government, and if he/she does so, the Gauteng
Provincial Government shall be entitled forthwith to rescind the contract and all other
contracts with the bidder.
12. Legal actions
12.1 The actions stipulated in this Integrity Pact are without prejudice to any other legal
action that may follow in accordance with the provisions of the extant law in force
relating to any civil or criminal proceedings.
13. Validity
13.1 The validity of this Integrity Pact shall cover the tender process and extend until the
completion of the contract to the satisfaction of both the Gauteng Provincial
Government and the bidder (service provider).
13.2 Should one or several provisions of the Pact turn out to be invalid; the remainder of
this Pact remains valid. In this case, the parties will strive to come to an agreement to
their original intentions.
6 | P a g e G P G I n t e g r i t y P a c t f o r B u s i n e s s e s
Gpg integrity pact for businesses
Bidder/supplier/service provider
Signature of the CEO
Full name of the CEO
Tender number
Date
7 | P a g e G P G I n t e g r i t y P a c t f o r B u s i n e s s e s
Compliance Requirements
Source: Annexure A_Integrity Pact for Businesses.pdf (TENDER)No specific requirements found
Contractual Terms
Source: Annexure A_Integrity Pact for Businesses.pdf (TENDER)contracts with the bidder.
Special Conditions
Source: Annexure A_Integrity Pact for Businesses.pdf (TENDER)7.1 The value system of the Gauteng City Region is shown below:
7.2 The Gauteng Provincial Government commits to ensure that the values system is embedded into the day-to-day operations of its institutions.
Section
Source: Annexure A_Integrity Pact for Businesses.pdfadvantage in the bidding process, bid evaluation, contracting or implementation
stage and will further treat all bidders alike.
Toll-free number 080 1111 633 0800 701 701
reputation for fair dealing and quality delivery.
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 5 of 2000
Covers preferential procurement and preference-point systems used in public tenders.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 12 of 2004
Supports anti-corruption controls and supplier integrity in procurement processes.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 28 of 2024
Provides the national framework for public procurement across government.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 2 of 2000
Supports access to tender records, award decisions and public-sector procurement information.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 3 of 2000
Supports lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative tender decisions.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
These rules are linked to the type of public body issuing this tender.
Act 71 of 2008
Relevant to governance and reporting obligations for state-owned companies and public entities.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve professional consulting, advisory, research, feasibility, or management services.
These rules are linked to the work category, industry, or regulated service area.
Act 38 of 2001
Relevant to financial services, audit, accounting, KYC and anti-money-laundering obligations.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve professional consulting, advisory, research, feasibility, or management services.
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
Standard Bidding Document (SDB) 4_ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf
The Automotive Industry Development Centre (AIDC) is requesting quotations from service providers to conduct a limited pre-feasibility study for establishing a Gauteng Automotive Research Institute (GARI). The tender involves completing a disclosure form (SBD4) to ensure compliance with transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption regulations.
Annexure A_Integrity Pact for Businesses.pdf
This document is an Integrity Pact that must be signed and submitted as part of a tender bid for a limited pre-feasibility study to establish the Gauteng Automotive Research Institute (GARI). The pact is a mandatory anti-corruption agreement between the bidder and the Gauteng Provincial Government, outlining mutual commitments to ethical conduct, transparency, and fair competition throughout the tender process and contract execution.
SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 -For PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf
The Automotive Industry Development Centre (AIDC) in Gauteng is requesting quotations from potential service providers to conduct a limited pre-feasibility study for establishing the Gauteng Automotive Research Institute (GARI). The tender uses the 80/20 preference point system, with 80 points allocated for price and 20 for specific goals, including B-BBEE status.
To download these documents and access AI-powered analysis, visit the main tender page.
Organization
Automotive Industry Development Centre (AIDC)Contact Person
Ali Malefo
Phone
012-564-5043
[email protected]
Website
www.aidc.co.za/
Address
30 Helium Rd, Rosslyn, Pretoria North, 0200, South Africa
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
4
Last checked
19 Jun 2026
AI status
Enhanced
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.
Key Personnel
Contact Information
Source: Standard Bidding Document (SDB) 4_ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (TENDER)Department: SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Standard Bidding Document (SDB) 4_ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (TENDER)Not listed on Register for Tender Defaulters or List of Restricted Suppliers; must submit complete and truthful SBD4 disclosure; must not have conflicts of interest with state employment or relationships with AIDC; bid must be independent without collusive arrangements; must comply with Competition Act and Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act.
Compliance Requirements
Source: Standard Bidding Document (SDB) 4_ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (TENDER)Bidders must complete the Bidder’s Disclosure Form (SBD4) with the following requirements:
Description
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdfThe AIDC, as the development agency of the Gauteng Growth and Development Agency, seeks a service provider to conduct a limited pre‑feasibility study for the establishment of a Gauteng Automotive Research Institute (GARI). The study will define the concept, operating model, governance, funding and implementation roadmap, and must be completed within three months.
Important Dates
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)Briefing Session
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)Briefing is compulsory.
Date & time: 26 June 2026, 10:00.
Venue: 30 Helium Road, Rosslyn, Pretoria.
Attendance is required for all potential bidders.
Contact Information
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)Primary contact: Ali Malefo (Supplier Chain Management).
Phone: 012 564 5043.
Email: [email protected].
All submissions must be sent to the above e‑mail address; do not copy any other AIDC personnel.
Submission Guidelines
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)Returnable Documents
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)COMPANY NAME: ...................................................................................................................................... CONTACT PERSON: ...................................................................................................................................... TELEPHONE NUMBER: ................................................................................................................................. CELLULAR NUMBER: .................................................................................................................................... FAX NUMBER: .............................................................................................................................................. In submitting any information or documentation requested in this RFQ, the Respondent is hereby consenting to the processing of their personal information for the purpose of this RFQ and further confirming that they are aware of their rights in terms of Section 5 of POPIA Respondents are required to provide consent below: YES NO Please indicate if your company is Registered on National Treasury – Central Supplier Database (provide your CSD Number) CSD number "ACTIVE STATUS": - means your BBBEE Certificate or Sworn affidavit is still valid (thus your documents have not yet expired) NB: Please Note: - AIDC won’t be able to do business with suppliers not registered on CSD as per National Treasury SCM Instruction No./17.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)Mandatory
Preferential
Technical Specifications
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)Scope: Conduct a limited high‑level pre‑feasibility study for the establishment of the Gauteng Automotive Research Institute (GARI).
Deliverables:
1. Market assessment – benchmarking of local and international academic‑industrial models; stakeholder register and engagement plan.
2. Technical assessment – develop 1‑2 feasible concept options aligned with industry and academia needs.
3. Concept evaluation – assessment framework, scoring, and short‑listing of the preferred concept(s).
4. High‑level operating model – description of how AIDC, the Automotive Supplier Park and academic partners will interact.
5. Academic framework – qualification levels (NQF 8‑10), partnership arrangements, possible international collaboration.
6. Governance model – roles and responsibilities of all partners.
7. Funding model – identification of development, capital and operational funding sources (no quantification required).
8. Stakeholder re‑alignment – present concepts to key stakeholders, capture expressions of interest, and refine the concept as needed.
9. Implementation roadmap – timeline, milestones and risk register (fatal‑flaw and go/no‑go risks).
10. Final report and presentation.
All work must be completed within three months of the inception meeting.
Methodology
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)1. Market assessment – benchmarking of local and international academic‑industrial models; stakeholder register and engagement plan.
2. Technical assessment – develop 1‑2 concept options that meet market findings.
3. Concept evaluation – apply an assessment framework, score concepts, and shortlist the preferred option(s).
4. Operating & academic framework – define high‑level operating model, partnership structure and qualification pathways.
5. Governance & funding – outline governance roles and identify potential funding sources.
6. Stakeholder re‑alignment – present concepts, capture expressions of interest, and refine as required.
7. Implementation roadmap – detailed timeline, milestones, risk register and final deliverables.
All stages must be documented and submitted according to the PSC schedule.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdfMinimum three (3) completed projects in any of the following areas: feasibility studies, pre‑feasibility studies, business case development, research‑institute establishment or innovation‑hub development (within the last 5 years). Provide client letters on official letterhead, including contact details and a description of the work performed.
Organogram must show the following key roles: Economist, Project Lead, Research Specialist, Automotive Expert/Consultant. The Project Lead must have at least two (2) relevant projects; the Research Specialist must hold at least an Honours degree (NQF 8) – higher qualifications earn additional points.
Quality Management
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdfThe pre‑feasibility study must deliver a clear, viable concept within a 3‑month timeframe, based on genuine industry demand and validated by stakeholder expressions of interest. Recommendations should be supported by high‑level benchmarking, stakeholder analysis and a risk assessment. All findings must be documented in the final report and presented to the Project Steering Committee.
Pricing Schedule
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdfPricing Schedule (to be completed on the supplied form):
1. Project Inception – 1 unit.
2. Market Assessment & Concept Development – 1 unit.
3. High‑Level Operating, Governance & Funding Model – 1 unit.
4. Stakeholder Re‑Alignment – 1 unit.
5. Implementation Roadmap – 1 unit.
6. Final Report & Presentation – 1 unit.
All unit prices must be quoted in R, inclusive of VAT, and the total price must be indicated. Delivery period in months must be stated.
Financial Requirements
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)Compliance Requirements
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)B-BBEE Requirements
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)Provide a valid BBBEE affidavit (DTI/CIPC) or SANAS‑accredited verification certificate. Use the approved DTI or CIPC affidavit template. Complete SBD 6.1 (preference points claim) and SBD 6.2 (local content declaration). Active status of the BBBEE certificate/affidavit is required; otherwise the bidder is ineligible.
Health & Safety
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdfFor any construction‑related services, the successful contractor must provide a CIDB‑graded Safety File before commencing work. The Safety File must be kept up‑to‑date and submitted to AIDC on request. All work must comply with applicable OHS legislation and AIDC site safety procedures.
Contractual Terms
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)Requirements
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (RFQ)Closing date: 03 July 2026, 14:00.
RFQ validity: 90 business days.
Project duration: 3 months from the inception meeting.
All mandatory documents (SBD 4, SBD 6.1, SBD 6.2, declaration of interest, pricing schedule) must be attached and ticked “YES”.
Section
Source: RFQ for PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdfAdditional evaluation criteria (beyond the standard):
Evaluation Criteria
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 -For PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (TENDER)General
Exclusions
Pricing Schedule
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 -For PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (TENDER)Rand value definition:
Financial Requirements
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 -For PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (TENDER)Price must include all applicable taxes and exclude unconditional discounts. The total estimated contract value (rand value) includes all applicable taxes.
Compliance Requirements
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 -For PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (TENDER)B-BBEE compliance is required to claim preference points. Acceptable proof includes:
B-BBEE status levels and corresponding points:
Company registration details must be provided, including:
A signed declaration certifying the accuracy of claims and acknowledging the consequences of fraudulent claims is mandatory.
B-BBEE Requirements
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 -For PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdf (TENDER)B-BBEE points are awarded based on the bidder’s status level. Acceptable proof includes:
Points:
Contractual Terms
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 -For PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdfContractual terms include the following obligations and consequences:
Consequences of fraudulent claims or non-compliance:
Section
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 -For PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY.pdfPrice scoring formula for income-generating contracts or disposal/leasing of state assets:
Ps = 80
Where:
Data conflicts
None detected
30 Helium Rd, Rosslyn, Pretoria North, 0200, South Africa
Get deep intelligence on Scientific research and development. Unlock full pricing strategies, bid frequency, and historical win rates.