Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Documents available on tender detail page
Tender Type
Request for Quotation
Delivery Location
25 Queen Victoria Street - Gardens - Cape Town - 8000
Organization Type
GOVERNMENT
Published
11 Jun 2026
OCDS Reference
ocds-9t57fa-158840
Iziko museums of south africa seeks a qualified service provider to conduct a procurement analytics and value-for-money review, identify suspicious transactions and bid-rigging indicators, and perform approved forensic follow-up work. The engagement targets inefficiencies, wastage, and procurement manipulation in a public sector SCM environment.
AI Document Analysis Stages
Description
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdfCategories
Request for Quotation
25 Queen Victoria Street - Gardens - Cape Town - 8000
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf
Iziko Museums of South Africa seeks a qualified service provider to conduct a procurement analytics and value-for-money review, flag suspicious transactions (e.g., bid-rigging, manipulation), and perform forensic follow-up work if approved. The scope includes data analysis, control assessments, and reporting to executive structures. The tender closes on 23 June 2026, with submissions emailed to SCM contacts. Evaluation is based on functionality (70% minimum threshold) and price (80/20 preference system).
Date & Time
Tuesday, 23 June 2026 - 11:00
Venue
null
11 Jun
2026
Tender Published
Tender was published
23 Jun
2026
Closing Date
Tender closing date
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
For South African General contractors, the path to government procurement is paved with non-negotiable regulatory requirements. The most common barrier to entry is not a lack of capability, but a failure to master the foundational compliance frameworks that govern every bid. This complete regulatory guide to CSD and BBBEE compliance for General sector tender suppliers in South Africa demystifies the process. It provides a meticulous, step-by-step field manual for ensuring your company is fully compliant and audit-ready, enabling you to confidently access the R billions in opportunities across infrastructure maintenance, facilities management, and service delivery within the General sector.
Everything South African general contractors need to know about how to write a winning tender proposal without an in-house bid team in gauteng — covering CSD, BBBEE, step-by-step processes, common disqualification mistakes, and how Tenders-SA.org helps you find and win relevant contracts in Gauteng.
Everything South African general contractors need to know about complete guide to csd and bbbee compliance for general sector suppliers in south africa (2026) — covering CSD, BBBEE, step-by-step processes, common disqualification mistakes, and how Tenders-SA.org helps you find and win relevant contracts in Gauteng.
Everything South African general contractors need to know about complete guide to csd & bbbee compliance for general sector tenders in south africa — covering CSD, BBBEE, step-by-step processes, common disqualification mistakes, and how Tenders-SA.org helps you find and win relevant contracts in Gauteng.
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogMedian Estimate
R 220 000
Range
Based on 9 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Iziko Museums of South Africa requires a service provider to conduct a procurement analytics and value-for-money review. The primary scope includes: Analysing procurement/financial data to identify wastage, avoidable costs, abnormal trends, and weak value-for-money outcomes. Reviewing procurement planning, sourcing methods, emergency procurement, deviations, quotations, awards, contract usage, supplier performance, and payment patterns. Identifying transactions, suppliers, or patterns indicating split procurement, repeated awards, abnormal pricing, quotation manipulation, supplier rotation, cover quoting, conflicts of interest, bid-rigging, or procurement manipulation. Assessing delivery performance (under-delivery, late delivery, unreasonable costs, lack of evidence). Reviewing consequence management for non-delivery, poor performance, and non-compliance. Identifying opportunities for efficiency, cost containment, contract management, supplier performance, control strengthening, and value optimisation. Forensic follow-up work (if approved in writing by Iziko) may include document review, interviews, evidence gathering, digital forensic analysis, and forensic reports for management, disciplinary, or legal action. The service provider must demonstrate access to forensic capacity, including digital forensic analysis capability.
Important Dates
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)Closing date and time: 23 June 2026 at 11h00. Advert date: 11 June 2026. No site visit or briefing session required.
Contact Information
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)Technical enquiries: Siphamandla Oupa, email: [email protected]. Submission emails: [email protected] and [email protected]. Physical address: Iziko South African Museum, 25 Queen Victoria Street, Cape Town, 8001.
Submission Guidelines
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)Submit quotes/proposals and all accompanying documentation via email to: [email protected] and [email protected]. No physical submissions required. Ensure all mandatory documents (SBD 4, SBD 6.1, signed RFQ, CSD report, tax certificate, B-BBEE certificate, pricing structure, capability profile, CVs, project evidence, and conflict-of-interest declaration) are included. Alterations to the RFQ document beyond completing bidder details and pricing may disqualify the submission. False declarations will lead to disqualification.
Returnable Documents
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)7. Administrative Documents No. Document required 1 Central Supplier Database report with supplier number, company details and tax status verification pin. 2 Detailed pricing structure on company letterhead, inclusive of VAT, disbursements and escalations if applicable. 3 Valid B-BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit. 4 Signed RFQ document. 5 Valid tax certificate and/or tax pin. 6 Completed SBD 4 and SBD 6.1 forms. Company capability profile addressing procurement analytics, value-for-money reviews, forensic finance and digital forensic capacity. 8 CVs and qualifications/certifications of key personnel assigned to the project. 9 Evidence of at least three similar completed projects. 10 Independence and conflict-of-interest declaration.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)Mandatory
Preferential
Disqualifiers
Technical Specifications
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)Primary scope: Procurement analytics and value-for-money review. Tasks include: Analyse procurement/financial data to identify wastage, avoidable costs, abnormal trends, and weak value-for-money outcomes. Review procurement planning, sourcing methods, emergency procurement, deviations, quotations, awards, contract usage, supplier performance, and payment patterns. Identify indicators of split procurement, repeated awards, abnormal pricing, quotation manipulation, supplier rotation, cover quoting, conflicts of interest, bid-rigging, or procurement manipulation. Assess delivery performance (under-delivery, late delivery, unreasonable costs, lack of evidence). Review consequence management for non-delivery, poor performance, and non-compliance. Identify opportunities for efficiency, cost containment, contract management, supplier performance, control strengthening, and value optimisation. Follow-up scope: Approved forensic work (requires written Iziko approval) may include document review, interviews, evidence gathering, digital forensic analysis (computer/cellphone), and forensic reports for management action, consequence management, or legal referrals. Service provider must demonstrate access to forensic capacity, including digital forensic analysis capability. Deliverables: Procurement Analytics and Value-for-Money Report, Suspicious Transactions Register, Bid-Rigging and Related Indicators Assessment, Root-Cause and Control Weakness Analysis, Management Action and Improvement Roadmap, Forensic Follow-Up Reports (if approved), EXCO/Council Reporting. Project charter required, defining objectives, scope, methodology, timelines, deliverables, roles, reporting, data access, confidentiality, escalation, QA, and forensic approval process.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdfRequired expertise and capacity: Procurement analytics and spend analysis capability. Public sector SCM and PFMA environment experience. Value-for-money review experience. Forensic finance and investigation capability. Ability to identify bid-rigging and procurement manipulation indicators. Digital forensic capacity (computer/cellphone analysis, evidence preservation, chain-of-custody, forensic reporting). Experience reporting to executive management, audit/risk structures, boards, or councils. Key personnel must include: Engagement lead/partner (7+ years senior experience in forensic finance, procurement reviews, SCM, value-for-money), procurement/SCM specialist, forensic investigation specialist, data analytics specialist, digital forensic specialist, finance/assurance specialist. At least one senior team member must hold relevant qualifications (CA(SA), RA, CFE, CISA, CCE, EnCE, ACE, GCFE, GCFA, CISSP, CEH, etc.).
Pricing Schedule
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdfComplete the pricing schedule with fixed fees (incl. VAT) for: Part 1: Core procurement analytics and value-for-money review (data analysis, testing, bid-rigging indicators, suspicious transactions register, report, meetings, presentations). Part 2: Forensic follow-up on 5 suspicious transactions (provisional, for comparison). Part 3: Computer forensic analysis for 10 devices (provisional). Part 4: Cellphone forensic analysis for 10 devices (provisional). Part 5: Imaging, evidence preservation, chain-of-custody, and forensic reporting (provisional). Part 6: Disbursements (capped at % of Part 1 fee, pre-approved). Total evaluated bid price = sum of Parts 1-6. Notes: Only amounts in the pricing table will be evaluated. Forensic follow-up and device analysis require written Iziko approval. No additional costs will be paid unless disclosed and pre-approved. Attach breakdown of assumptions, resource categories, and rates. Payment terms: 80/20 preference system applies.
Financial Requirements
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)Pricing schedule must be completed with fixed fees (incl. VAT) for: Part 1: Full procurement analytics and value-for-money review (core assignment). Part 2: Forensic follow-up on 5 suspicious transactions (provisional, for comparison). Part 3: Computer forensic analysis for 10 devices (provisional). Part 4: Cellphone forensic analysis for 10 devices (provisional). Part 5: Imaging, evidence preservation, chain-of-custody, and forensic reporting (provisional). Part 6: Disbursements (capped at % of Part 1 fee, pre-approved). Total evaluated bid price = sum of Parts 1-6. Only amounts in the pricing table will be evaluated. Forensic follow-up and device analysis require written Iziko approval. No additional costs will be paid unless disclosed and pre-approved. Attach pricing assumptions, resource categories, and rates. Payment terms: 80/20 preference system applies.
Compliance Requirements
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)Mandatory compliance requirements: CSD registration with valid supplier number, tax status verification pin, and valid tax certificate. Completed and signed bid documents: RFQ, SBD 4 (Bidder’s Disclosure), SBD 6.1 (Preference Points Claim). Company capability profile addressing procurement analytics, value-for-money reviews, forensic finance, and digital forensic capacity. CVs and qualifications/certifications of key personnel. Evidence of at least 3 similar completed projects (appointment/completion letters, reference letters, or client confirmations). Independence and conflict-of-interest declaration (no conflict with Iziko, officials, Council, SCM personnel, or suppliers under review). Digital forensic capacity: Internal or subcontracted specialist with computer/cellphone analysis capability, supported by certifications (e.g., CCE, EnCE, ACE, GCFE, GCFA, CISA, CISSP, CEH, CFE) and evidence (CVs, tools, reports, protocols). B-BBEE: Valid certificate or sworn affidavit. Failure to meet any mandatory requirement may disqualify the bid. All declarations will be verified against CSD and other records.
B-BBEE Requirements
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)Annexure B: Preference Points Claim Form (SBD 6.1) This annexure must be completed and signed by the bidder. Bidders must use the latest applicable prescribed form where required by National Treasury or Iziko SCM. The completed form must accompany the quotation/proposal submission (Section 14 of this document). Required field Bidder response Name of company/firm Company registration number CSD supplier number B-BBEE status level / specific goals evidence Authorised representative Signature Date
Contractual Terms
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdfSuccessful bidder must sign a project charter before commencement, defining: Project objectives, scope, methodology, timelines, deliverables, roles/responsibilities, reporting protocols, data access requirements, confidentiality obligations, escalation protocols, quality assurance arrangements, and process for approving forensic follow-up work. Forensic follow-up work requires written Iziko approval after review of suspicious transactions register and analytics findings. Contract principles: Lowest/only quotation may not be accepted. Iziko reserves the right to reject any quotation or withdraw the RFQ before award. Proposal may form the basis of a negotiated formal contract. No contract exists until written agreement/project charter is signed. Alterations to RFQ (beyond bidder details/pricing) may disqualify the submission. False declarations or fraudulent claims may result in disqualification, cost recovery, contract cancellation, 10-year public sector restriction, or criminal prosecution.
Special Conditions
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)5. Project Charter The successful service provider will be required to sign a project charter before commencement of the assignment. The project charter must define the project objectives, scope, methodology, timelines, deliverables, roles and responsibilities, reporting protocols, data access requirements, confidentiality obligations, escalation protocols, quality assurance arrangements and the process for approving any forensic follow-up work arising from the procurement analytics review. Forensic follow-up work will not commence automatically. It must be approved in writing by Iziko after consideration of the suspicious transactions register and initial procurement analytics findings.
Requirements
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdf (RFQ)8. Mandatory Requirements Requirement Evidence required CSD and tax compliance CSD report and valid tax pin. Completed and signed bid documents Signed RFQ, SBD 4 and SBD 6.1. Appointment letters, completion letters, reference letters or signed client Three similar projects confirmations. CVs showing procurement analytics, SCM, value-for-money, forensic finance and Multidisciplinary capability digital forensic capacity. Profile of internal capacity or formally identified specialist partner/subcontractor, Digital forensic capacity including computer and cellphone analysis capability. Signed declaration of no conflict with Iziko, officials, Council members, SCM Independence personnel or suppliers likely to be reviewed. Failure to meet any mandatory requirement may render the submission non-responsive.
Section
Source: Iziko_RFQ_Procurement_Analytics_Value_for_Money_Review.pdfFunctionality evaluation (100 points, minimum 70 required to proceed): 1) Company experience (40 points): 40 for 3+ relevant assignments in the last 5 years (procurement analytics, SCM review, value-for-money, forensic finance, etc.), 30 for 2, 20 for 1, 0 for none or irrelevant. 2) Technical methodology (30 points): 30 for full digital forensic capability (certifications + evidence such as CVs, tools, reports, protocols), 15 for subcontracted capability with commitment letter, 10 for limited evidence, 0 for none. 3) Key personnel (30 points): 30 for multidisciplinary team (engagement lead, procurement/SCM specialist, forensic investigator, data analyst, digital forensic specialist, finance/assurance specialist) with senior experience (7+ years for lead) and relevant qualifications (CA(SA), CFE, CISA, etc.), 20 for partial coverage, 10 for weak areas, 0 for non-compliance. Documentary evidence is mandatory for all claims. Price evaluation: 80/20 preference system (80 points for price, 20 for B-BBEE). Only bidders passing mandatory compliance and functionality threshold proceed to price evaluation.
Recommended Certifications
Having these can improve your winning chances: SABS Product Certification, NRCS Certification
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 5 of 2000
Covers preferential procurement and preference-point systems used in public tenders.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 12 of 2004
Supports anti-corruption controls and supplier integrity in procurement processes.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 28 of 2024
Provides the national framework for public procurement across government.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 2 of 2000
Supports access to tender records, award decisions and public-sector procurement information.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 3 of 2000
Supports lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative tender decisions.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
To download these documents and access AI-powered analysis, visit the main tender page.
Organization
Iziko Museums of Cape TownContact Person
Siphamandla Oupa
Phone
021-481-3917
[email protected]
Website
www.iziko.org.za/museums/south-african-museum
Address
25 Queen Victoria St, Gardens, Cape Town, 8001, South Africa
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
1
Last checked
11 Jun 2026
AI status
Enhanced
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.
Key Personnel
Data conflicts
None detected
25 Queen Victoria St, Gardens, Cape Town, 8001, South Africa
Get deep intelligence on Supplies: General. Unlock full pricing strategies, bid frequency, and historical win rates.