How will bids be evaluated?

{ "general": [ "The service provider must have expertise in Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) and mining safety research.", "The organization must demonstrate the capability to conduct high-quality research and deliver actionable outcomes.", "The proposing organization must have the necessary facilities and resources to complete the project." ], "technical": [ "Experience in validating diagnostic tools for safety equipment in mining or similar high-risk environments.", "Familiarity with Sealed Self-Contained Self-Rescuers (SCSRs) and their operational requirements in mining.", "Ability to design and execute a research methodology that meets the technical/functional criteria outlined in the Terms of Reference." ], "legal": [ "Compliance with South African labor, health, and safety laws.", "Valid business registration and tax compliance (including VAT registration if applicable)." ] }

Mine Health and Safety Council Gauteng Tender

Appointment of a service provider to undertake research project coe 240901 “validation of non-destructive testing (ndt) as a reliable diagnostic tool for sealed self - contained self-rescuers (scsrs) in mining environment”

The project scope is to validate Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) as a reliable diagnostic tool for Sealed Self-Contained Self-Rescuers (SCSRs) in mining environments. The research must improve health and safety in the South African mining industry and include a plan for implementation or dissemination of outcomes.

Submit a completed proposal template with executive summary, project plan, and budget. Include cvs, qualifications, and a signed declaration. Address research methodology, deliverables (e.g., Reports, implementation plan), and risk mitigation. Provide a detailed financial breakdown (HR, operating, capital, sub-contractor costs) with VAT proof if applicable. Ensure alignment with the mine health and safety act and focus on mining safety outcomes.

Submit the following returnable documents as part of your proposal: completed proposal template, executive summary, detailed project plan, budget summary, CVs of project team members, copies of qualifications, and a signed declaration by the proposing organisation.

The project involves validating Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) as a reliable diagnostic tool for Sealed Self-Contained Self-Rescuers (SCSRs) in mining environments. Key deliverables include: research outcomes, implementation plan, and dissemination strategy. The proposal must address: research questions/hypotheses, aim and objectives, significance of the study, literature review, research methodology, outputs, transfer of outcomes, and risk mitigation.

Provide a detailed financial summary including: total project cost (excluding and including VAT), breakdown of costs per milestone, human resources costs, operating or running costs, sub-contractor costs, and capital costs. Proof of VAT registration must be provided if VAT is charged; if not VAT registered, no VAT must be charged.

No specific compliance requirements stated beyond VAT registration proof if applicable.

compromising enclosure seals. diagnostic tool for SCSRS in mining environment.

{"closingDate":"19 June 2026","closingTime":"11h00","briefingSession":"{\"date\":null,\"time\":\"12:00 am\",\"venue\":null,\"is_compulsory\":false}"}

https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/317492025365184?p=ApzX7JQDcz87AzBw6S

{"name":null,"email":"[email protected]","phone":null,"department":"s where applicable) to validate the effectiveness of the proposed NDT and other","address":"al and other"}

Returnable Documents: Submission of fully completed Invitation to Bid (SBD 1) Comply Do Not comply, Fully completed SBD 6.1 (Preference Claim Form), Comply Do Not comply, Bidder must complete the detailed pricing Schedule (SBD Comply Do Not comply, INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS (E.G., ISO 16810, ASTM E213). (CV,

Less than 10 years’ experience or no CV attached = 0 points, 4 CRITERIA 4: QUALIFICATIONS OF THE TEAM MEMBER WITH 15, QUALIFICATIONS OF THE TEAM MEMBER WITH EXPERIENCE IN

B7 Maple Place, 145 Western Service Road, Woodmead, Sandton,2080 correct delivery address. If the bid is late, it will NOT be accepted for consideration by MHSC. The tender box is generally open weekdays at the below delivery address.

1.1 Introduction to the mine health and safety council

The Mine Health and Safety Council (MHSC) is a national public entity (Schedule 3A) established in

terms of the Mine Health and Safety Act (MHSA), No. , as amended. The MHSC is

mandated to advise the Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources on Mine Health and Safety

(MHS) issues in the mining industry, relating to the development and implementation of the MHSC

annual MHS research programme, reviewing and development of MHS legislation and dissemination

(knowledge and technology transfer) of MHSC research outcomes to improve MHS conditions in the

South African Mining Industry (SAMI).

Self-contained self-rescuers (SCSRs) are critical life-saving equipment designed for use by

underground mineworkers when escaping to safety in toxic or oxygen-deficient atmospheres. They

are critical for ensuring mineworkers’ survival during emergencies involving toxic gases or oxygen-

deficient environments (Smith et al., 2018; WHO, 2022). These devices provide breathable air during

emergencies such as fires, explosions, or other hazardous events common in mining environments

(Smith et al., 2018). The lifesaving potential of SCSRs is measured, monitored, and assessed

annually through compliance with Regulation 16.4 of the Mine Health and Safety Act. As per

Regulation 16.4 of the MHSA, functional testing is conducted on at least 1% of in-use SCSRs,

typically through destructive methods (DMRE, 2021). This leads to equipment wastage and does not

allow for periodic assessment of devices assigned to individual workers (Jones & Mthembu, 2020).

The technique relies on high-frequency sound waves and is valued for its portability, repeatability,

and minimal operator training needs (Santos et al., 2023).

Recent studies highlight the growing feasibility of implementing advanced (non-destructive testing)

NDT methods in underground mining, particularly in evaluating equipment integrity without

compromising enclosure seals.

Recent advancements in ultrasonic NDT have highlighted its potential for reliable application to

sealed safety-critical devices. Pascall et al. (2002) demonstrated the effectiveness of ultrasonic C-

scan imaging in detecting micro-leaks and assessing seal strength in sealed packaging systems,

providing a conceptual basis for evaluating sealed SCSR enclosures. Lee et al. (2024) applied time-

of-flight and acoustic impedance-based ultrasonic imaging to classify and detect internal conditions

in unknown sealed objects, showing promise for non-intrusive diagnostics in SCSRs. Furthermore,

Hassani and Dackermann (2023) emphasized ultrasonic sensor accuracy and real-time monitoring

capabilities in their systematic review of NDT and structural health technologies. Abdollahi-

Mamoudan et al. (2025) contributed insights into ultrasonic signal behavior across composite

interfaces, a relevant factor for multi-material SCSR housings.

Aramburu et al. (2025) examined ultrasonic diagnostics in polymer-composite pressure vessels,

which are analogous in structure and operational requirement to SCSR in mining environments.

These findings strengthen the case for validating ultrasonic NDT as a qualitative and quantitative

method for sealed SCSR integrity evaluation. Given the South African mining sector’s high-risk

profile, integrating such predictive diagnostics aligns with the global shift toward proactive safety

systems (ILO, 2022).

Furthermore, Regulation 16.3 mandates that no defective SCSR may be issued to employees

(DMRE, 2021). The primary aim of these regulations is to ensure that every SCSR issued daily is in

good working order and capable of attaining its intended life-saving potential.

This proposed study aims to determine whether NDT can provide a dependable, non-invasive method

of assessing the condition of sealed SCSRs. Ultrasonic NDT has already been successfully applied

in various industries to detect internal defects and verify the integrity of sealed equipment without

causing damage (Brown & Zhao, 2019). If validated for use on SCSRs, this technique could reduce

reliance on destructive sampling, improve the monitoring of life-saving equipment, and strengthen

occupational health and safety outcomes in the mining sector (MHSC, 2022).

2. Part a: the contract

2.1 Context of this procurement

The MHSC intends to appoint a service provider to investigate the use of NDT as a reliable

diagnostic tool for SCSRS in mining environment.

2.2 Contract period

The duration of this project is expected to be 18 Months.

Note: The 15 months will be allocated towards the project work.

The 3 months will be allocated to MHSC administrative duties, such as project initiation,

contracts, and project closeout.

2.3 Detailed specifications/scope of work

The service provider will be required to undertake the following as part of the scope of work:

2.3.1 Conduct an in-depth literature review including cross-industry applications of NDT particularly

in safety-critical sectors.

2.3.2 Benchmark against international ultrasonic testing standards such as ISO 16810:2024 and

ASTM E213-20 and international best practices.

2.3.3 Evaluate the technical feasibility of applying NDT on sealed SCSRs without compromising

their integrity and identify the most appropriate parameters (e.g., frequency, probe type)

suitable for SCSR testing.

2.3.4 Develop a detailed NDT and other procedure tailored for sealed SCSRs, including equipment

specifications, test conditions, and qualitative/quantitative indicators of SCSR integrity.

2.3.5 Design and implement a test programme using sample SCSRs (including both functional and

defective units where applicable) to validate the effectiveness of the proposed NDT and other

methods.

2.3.6 Analyse test data to determine the accuracy, repeatability, and reliability of the NDT as a

qualitative indicator of SCSR integrity.

2.3.7 Host a hybrid workshop in Gauteng and involve Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEMs),

regulators, and safety professionals to review and discuss findings.

2.3.8 Develop a draft guidance document on the test methodology based on NDT that can be

adopted as a reliable diagnostic tool for SCSRS in mining environment.

2.4 Expected reseach outcomes

The expected outcomes of the research are as follows:

2.4.1 A report on the conducted literature review as outlined in 2.3.1.

2.4.2 A report on benchmark on NDT testing standards as outlined in 2.3.2.

2.4.3 A report on the technical feasibility of applying NDT as outlined in 2.3.3.

2.4.4 A report the developed NDT procedure tailored for sealed SCSRs as outlined in 2.3.4.

2.4.5 A report on the implemented test programme using sample SCSRs as outlined in 2.3.5.

2.4.6 A report on the analysed test data as outline in 2.3.6.

2.4.7 A report on the conducted workshop as outlined in 2.3.7.

2.4.8 Final guidance document as outlined in 2.3.8.

2.4.9 Draft report.

2.4.10 Final report.

3. Part b: the pricing

Pricing instructions

1. Applicable currency: All prices shall be quoted in South African Rand (R).

2. Completion of pricing schedule: Bidders shall complete the pricing schedule in full,

inserting all the information required therein.

3. Price Quotation Basis: total prices quoted must be inclusive of all applicable taxes

including VAT, less all unconditional discounts, plus all costs to deliver the services and/or

goods. Where imported goods/services are to be used, and pricing is subject to exchange

rate fluctuations, the exchange currency against the Rand must be stipulated, as well as the

exchange rate at the time of bidding. The portion of the bid price subject to exchange rate

fluctuations must be stated.

4. Submission of pricing: bidders must submit their pricing proposals with the technical

proposal. The pricing folder must be clearly labelled as such.

BID PRICE SCHEDULE (SBD 3.1 Firm Unit Prices)

The following Schedule of Prices must be completed by the Tenderer. The total price must include

everything necessary to complete the terms of the Specifications or scope of work.

Activities as per expected project outcome estimated price

Project initiation R

A report on the conducted literature review R

A report on benchmark on NDT testing standards R

A report on the technical feasibility of applying NDT R

A report the developed NDT procedure tailored for sealed SCSRs R

A report on the implemented test programme using sample SCSRs R

A report on the analysed test data R

A report on the workshop conducted R

Final guidance document R

Draft report. R

Final report. R

Total exc VAT r

VAT (15%) r

Total inc VAT r

TOTAL BID PRICE (VAT Inclusive): R..........................................................

Prices quoted are fully inclusive of all costs including applicable taxes and disbursements

and other overheads. (Please note that all prices quoted should be inclusive of Value Added

Tax (VAT) and Price fluctuations the duration of the contract. Where applicable the price

should include Supply, Delivery, Maintenance, and any other costs relating to this bid.

Price changes whether because of CPI, PPI, industry extensions or expansions will be allowed

in terms of the signed contract by both parties.)

4. Part c: bid selection process

4.1 Bid preparation and submission

4.1.1 Number of bid documents: 1 X Original and 2 X copies of the same original (Hard

copies) – Three.

4.1.2 Number of bid documents: 1 X (Electronic Copy) of the original document in PDF

(USB) – One.

4.1.3 Number of Bid documents: 1 X pricing proposal (Hard copy) – One.

NB: Both technical proposal and pricing proposal must be submitted separately (two

envelope system).

4.2 Bid closing

4.2.1 There shall be no public opening by the MHSC of the bids received.

4.2.2 There shall be no discussions with any enterprise until evaluation and

adjudication of the proposal has been complete.

4.2.3 Any subsequent discussions shall be at the discretion of MHSC. Unless specifically

provided for in the proposal document, bids submitted by means of telegram,

telex, facsimile or similar means shall not be considered by MHSC.

4.2.4 All bids shall close on the specified date and time as stipulated in the bid document.

4.2.5 Bids received after closing time and date will be classified as LATE and will not be

considered.

4.2.6 Bids submitted in any other manner other than the specified address (tender

box) shall not be accepted.

4.3 Administrative compliance (returnable documents)

Administrative compliance/responsiveness will be tested based on returnable documents

submitted and signatures on the Bid documents.

At this stage the verification is to review bid responses for purposes of assessing

compliance and governance with RFB requirements, whereby a bidder will be

disqualified if they do not fully comply, it must be determined what documents are

required to be returned by Bidders.

Bids will be verified for compliance with the procedural requirements of the bid, which entails

the completion and/or submission of the returnable documents and schedules specified in

the Returnable Documents and Schedules Checklist below. No award will be done without

complete provision of returnable documents and any schedules.

Returnable documents are categorized as follows:

Submission of fully completed Invitation to Bid (SBD 1) Comply Do Not comply

Substantiation: The bidder must submit the fully completed and signed SBD1 (Invitation to Bid)

Fully completed and signed Bidders’ Disclosure form (SBD Comply Do Not comply

Substantiation: The bidder must submit the fully completed and signed Bidders Disclosure

(Sbd 4)

Fully completed SBD 6.1 (Preference Claim Form), Comply Do Not comply

Substantiation: The bidder must submit the fully completed preference claim form, points must be

correctly claimed and the points for the specific goals must be supported by a valid B-BBEE

certificate or a certified sworn affidavit. Bidders should ensure the points are correctly claimed for the

specific goals and information is captured correctly and information is true. False information may

result in the bid being disqualified.

Bidder must complete the detailed pricing Schedule (SBD Comply Do Not comply

Substantiation: The bidder must submit and attach to the bid response fully completed pricing

Schedule (SBD 3)

The recommended bidder, where applicable, will be requested to sign and complete

the SBD 7 contract form upon award.

Submission of fully completed Contract Form (where Comply Do Not comply

applicable)

Substantiation: The bidder must submit and attach the fully completed and signed and initialled

SBD 7 (Contract form)

4.4 Mandatory compliance – central supplier database

Bidders are required to be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) of National

Treasury prior to submitting their bid (open tenders). Failure to being registered on the CSD

and failure to submit the requested proof of registration on CSD information will lead to

disqualification. (Please provide proof of registration on the Central Supplier Database). Only

suppliers who are registered with the Central Supplier Database (CSD) will be considered for

this bid. Bidders who are not registered on CSD, will be disqualified.

4.5 Mandatory compliance – tax status verification

Bidders are required to submit their tax compliance status with their bid in the form of a Tax

Verification PIN from SARS or CSD supplier number which must be captured in the SBD 1.

MHSC only conducts business with bidders whose tax matters are in order. Failure to comply in

terms of tax obligations will render your bid non-responsive and disqualified. It is the responsibility

of the bidder to ensure they are tax compliant at time of submitting their response.

4.6 Protection of personal information act, (popia)

MHSC adheres to the Protection of Personal Information Act, (POPIA) requirements

regarding personal information which came into effect 1 July 2021. As MHSC, we are committed

to protecting your privacy and ensuring that personal information collected is used properly,

lawfully, and transparently.

4.7 Occupational health and safety

The service provider acknowledges that he is fully aware of the provisions of the Mine Health and

Safety Act .MHSC promotes a culture of occupational health and safety in the mining

industry. The service provider acknowledges that he is fully aware of the provisions of the OHS

Act and that he is an employer in his own right with duties and responsibilities as

prescribed in the Act.

5. Part d: bid evaluation process

The evaluation process will be conducted in various stages. To move to the next stage of evaluation,

the previous stage of evaluation must have been fully complied with.

5.1 Required experience

The service provider must have at least 5 years of experience in conducting applied research and the

project team must have members with expertise in the following areas:

5.1.1 Minimum of 10 years’ experience in NDT technology with direct experience in testing sealed

SCSRs or safety-critical devices under international standards (e.g., ISO 16810, ASTM E213).

5.1.2 Minimum of 10 years’ experience in occupational hygiene with knowledge of SCSRs in the SAMI.

Note: Bidders are to ensure that the team members used in the proposal must be the same team to

execute the project. In instances whereby the team members resign, it is the bidder’s responsibility to

ensure they replace those resources with resources of the same expertise and experience.

Reference

Abdollahi-Mamoudan, F., et al. (2025). Non-destructive testing and evaluation of hybrid/composite systems

with ultrasonic methods. Sensors, 25(12), Article 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25123635

Aramburu, A. B., et al. (2025). Systematic review of NDT methods applied to polymer-composite pressure

vessels. Composite Structures. (In press).

Brown, T. & Zhao, L., 2019. Applications of ultrasonic NDT in sealed equipment. Journal of Non-Destructive

Testing, 36(4), pp.211-225.

Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE), 2021. Mine Health and Safety Act Regulations: Selfcontained self-rescuers (SCSR) compliance requirements. Pretoria: Department of Mineral Resources and

Energy.

International Organization for Standardization. (2024). ISO 16810: Non-destructive testing – Ultrasonic

testing – General principles.Jones, P. & Mthembu, S., 2020. Evaluation of SCSR testing protocols in the

South African mining industry. Mining Safety Journal, 44(2), pp.55-67.

Lee, H., et al. (2024). Non-destructive ultrasonic testing for identifying concealed contents inside unknown

sealed objects. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73141-0

Mine Health and Safety Council. (2022). Occupational health and safety research priorities 2022/2023.

Johannesburg, South Africa.Pascall, M. A., Richtsmeier, J., Riemer, J., & Farahbakhsh, B. (2002). Nondestructive packaging seal strength analysis and leak detection using ultrasonic imaging. Packaging

Technology and Science, 15(6), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.599

Smith, J., Patel, R. & Dlamini, T., 2018. Respiratory protective equipment in underground mining: A review.

Safety in Mines, 52(1), pp.13-28.

World Health Organization. (2022). Occupational safety in underground environments. Geneva: WHO.

Lee, H., et al. (2024). Non-destructive ultrasonic testing for identifying concealed contents inside unknown

sealed objects. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73141-0

Pascall, M. A., Richtsmeier, J., Riemer, J., & Farahbakhsh, B. (2002). Non-destructive packaging seal

strength analysis and leak detection using ultrasonic imaging. Packaging Technology and Science, 15(6),

275–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.599

5.2 Evaluation process

The evaluation process will comprise of the following phases:

Phase 1: Functionality Evaluation.

Phase 2: Pricing and Specific goals Evaluation.

5.2.2 Technical / functionality evaluation phase 1

Evaluate the bid responses in line with the evaluation criteria detailed under paragraph

“Technical / Functionality evaluation. Bidders must achieve [70%] in this phase for their bid to

progress to the next phase of evaluation.

The tender will be evaluated in accordance with PPPFA in line with the following functional criteria

using the 80/20 preferential procurement principle.

NO criteria weighting

1 criteria 1: company experience 5

Experience of the service provider / collaborator in

Applied research or consulting (company profile

Stating number of years in applied research or

Consulting must be attached):

Greater than 5 years’ experience in applied research / consulting = 5

points

5 years’ experience in applied research / consulting = 3 points
Less than 5 years’ experience or no company profile attached or

number of years not included = 0 points

2 criteria 2: reference letters 5

Signed and verifiable reference letters on valid

Letter heads with contactable details from

Organisations where previous related research work

Was conducted by the service provider (attach

Verifiable reference letters):

5 or more reference letters that meet all criteria as stipulated above =

5 points

NO criteria weighting

4 reference letters that meet all criteria as stipulated above = 4 points
3 reference letters that meet all criteria as stipulated above = 3 points
Less than 3 reference letters that meet all criteria as stipulated above

= 0 points

No reference letter = 0 points

Note: Letters that do not meet all the criteria as stipulated above will

not be considered, and will qualify for 0 points

3 criteria 3: team member experience in ndt technology 15

Experience of at least one team member with an minimum

Of 10 years in ndt technology with direct experience in

Testing sealed scsrs or safety critical devices under

International standards (e.G., Iso 16810, astm e213). (Cv

Stating number of years experience must be attached):

More than 10 years’ experience = 5 points
10 years’ experience = 3 points
Less than 10 years’ experience or no CV attached = 0 points

4 criteria 4: qualifications of the team member with 15

Experience in ndt technology

Qualifications of the team member with experience in

Ndt technology (ndt technology, mechanical

Engineering, materials science, metallurgy, physics,

Electrical engineering, engineering technology or

Related) (attach copies of the qualifications):

Master’s Degree or above= 5 points
Honours degree =3 points

NO criteria weighting

Less than Honours degree or no qualification = 0 points

5 criteria 5: team member experience in occupational 10

Hygiene in the mining sector

Experience of at least one team member with a minimum

Of 10 years experience in occupational hygiene in

The mining sector (cv stating number of years of

Experience must be attached):

More than 10 years’ experience in occupational hygiene in the mining

sector = 5 points

10 years’ experience in occupational hygiene in the mining sector = 3

points

Less than 10 years’ experience in occupational hygiene in the mining

sector = 0 points

No CV attached = 0 points

6 criteria 6: qualifications of the team member with 10

Experience in occupational hygiene in the mining sector

Qualification of the team member with experience in

Occupational hygiene in the mining sector (attach

Copies of the qualifications):

Master’s Degree or above= 5 points
Honours degree =3 points
Less than Honours degree or no qualification = 0 points

8 criteria 8: quality of the project proposal 40

(Methodology, project scope and project schedule)

The project proposal must address the following four

Occupational hygiene in the mining sector (attach

Copies of the qualifications):

Master’s Degree or above= 5 points
Honours degree =3 points
Less than Honours degree or no qualification = 0 points

8 criteria 8: quality of the project proposal 40

(Methodology, project scope and project schedule)

1. Clearly defined methodology (design/approach to be taken,

participants, datasets, study sites, instruments, procedures, etc).

2. The proposed methodology must be feasible (number of

participants or accessibility of participants, accessibility of study

sites, access to datasets, data collection access, sample sizes,

etc.).

project outcomes, clear timelines, and costing.

(Attach project proposal as per the provided

Proposal template)

The proposal sufficiently addresses all the four requirements = 5 points
The proposal does not address all the four requirements = 0 points

Note: Proposals that reproduce the scope of work text verbatim, without

interpreting or translating it into a clear methodological approach, will not

be considered to have provided a valid methodology and will be scored =

0 points.

Total 100

5.2.3 Price and preference (specific goals) evaluation phase 2

Bid price proposals are compared on an equal and fair basis, considering all aspects of

the bid pricing requirements. Qualifying bids are ranked on price and specific goals

points claimed in the following manner:

(i) Price - with the lowest priced bid receiving the highest price score as set out in the

Preferential Procurement Regulations 2022.

(ii) Preference - preference points are allocated in accordance with the Preferential

Procurement Policy Framework Act (Act ) and its Regulations 2022 as claimed in the

specific goals claim form (SBD 6.1) are added to the price ranking scores. The points for

specific goals must be supported by a valid B-BBEE certificate or certified sworn affidavit.

A maximum of 80 points will be allocated for price on the following basis:

80/20

Pt−Pmin⬚

Ps=80(1− ) Type equation here.

Pmin⬚

Where;

Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration

Pt = Price of tender under consideration

Pmin = Price of lowest acceptable tender

A maximum of 20 points will be allocated for specific goals on the following basis:

The tenderer must indicate how they claim points for each preference point

system in line with the specific goals of the RFQ as outlined in SBD

6.1.

6. Part e: bid conditions

6.1 Conditions and instruction to the bidder

a) Response preparation costs: MHSC is NOT liable for any costs incurred by a bidder in the

process of responding to this Bid Invitation, including on-site presentations.

b) Counter Conditions: MHSC. draws bidders’ attention that amendments to any of the Bid

RFB document, please refer queries, in writing, to the contact person(s) listed above in SBD 1 or

below. Under no circumstances may any other employee within MHSC be approached for any

information.

1 criteria 1: company experience 5

Applied research or consulting (company profile

Consulting must be attached):

Greater than 5 years’ experience in applied research / consulting = 5

points

5 years’ experience in applied research / consulting = 3 points
Less than 5 years’ experience or no company profile attached or

number of years not included = 0 points

2 criteria 2: reference letters 5

4 reference letters that meet all criteria as stipulated above = 4 points
3 reference letters that meet all criteria as stipulated above = 3 points
Less than 3 reference letters that meet all criteria as stipulated above

= 0 points

No reference letter = 0 points

Note: Letters that do not meet all the criteria as stipulated above will

not be considered, and will qualify for 0 points

3 criteria 3: team member experience in ndt technology 15

Of 10 years in ndt technology with direct experience in

International standards (e.G., Iso 16810, astm e213). (Cv

Stating number of years experience must be attached):

More than 10 years’ experience = 5 points
10 years’ experience = 3 points
Less than 10 years’ experience or no CV attached = 0 points

4 criteria 4: qualifications of the team member with 15

Related) (attach copies of the qualifications):

Master’s Degree or above= 5 points
Honours degree =3 points

Less than Honours degree or no qualification = 0 points

5 criteria 5: team member experience in occupational 10

Of 10 years experience in occupational hygiene in

The mining sector (cv stating number of years of

Experience must be attached):

More than 10 years’ experience in occupational hygiene in the mining

sector = 5 points

10 years’ experience in occupational hygiene in the mining sector = 3

points

Less than 10 years’ experience in occupational hygiene in the mining

sector = 0 points

No CV attached = 0 points

6 criteria 6: qualifications of the team member with 10

___

APPOINTMENT OF A SERVICE PROVIDER TO UNDERTAKE RESEARCH PROJECT CoE 240901

“Validation of non-destructive testing (ndt) as a reliable diagnostic tool for

Sealed self - contained self-rescuers (scsrs) in mining environment”

Bid Number MHSC013/2026-2027

05 June 2026Advertisement Date

06 July 2026Closing Date

11h00 amClosing Time

Non-Compulsory Date: 19 June 2026

Briefing Session Time: 12:00 am