This tender has been awarded to POLYMATH CONSULTING for RÂ 5Â 144Â 832.
Issuing Organization
Development Bank of Southern Africa
Location
Gauteng
Award Date
1 October 2024
POLYMATH CONSULTING
Award Date
1 October 2024
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
37996
GOVERNMENT
Get a full report on (POLYMATH CONSULTING) including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
For the Provision of Cyber Security Monitoring and Managed Detection and Response Services for the Sacaa for a Period of Three (3) Years
Re-advertisement: Quotation to Appoint a Service Provider to Conduct a Bulk Density Survey (dynamic Cone Penetrometer Testing) and Volumetric Survey at Power Stations
Terms of Reference to Appoint a Service Provider to Develop an Environmental Scan of Career Services in the Post School Education and Training.
Panel of Signage Corporate Clothing and Promotional Items
Provision of Internal Communication Platform for Three (3) Years
Appointment of a Service Provider for the Compilation of the Dbsa’s 2025/26 to 2027/28 Annual Reporting Suite
Appointment of a Professional Service Provider (psp) to Coordinate the Development and the Implementation of the Operation Vulindlela (ov) Titling Project on Behalf of National Treasury Cities Support Programme (nt-csp)
Appointment of a Professional Service Provider for the Planning, Design Development, Procurement Documentation and Works Supervision (stages 1-7) of Staff Accommodation Projects at Nylsvlei and Wolkberg Nature Reserves on Behalf of Limpopo Economic Development Environment and Tourism (ledet)
Supply and Delivery of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for a period of 36 months.
Appointment of a Credible Service Provider to Assist the Development Bank of Southern Africa with the Infrastructure Needs Assessment in South African Townships Under Market 2 Municipalities:1994 – 2024 Research Project
No other awards found for this supplier.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
Security contractors in Gauteng are entering 2026 under heightened scrutiny: every cloud or hosting service that stores, processes or transmits any state data must now prove full data-sovereignty, localisation and residency compliance before a security guarding or electronic security tender can even reach adjudication. National Treasury’s Instruction 2025-11 (effective 1 April 2026) makes SITA’s Cloud Framework Agreement 2.0 mandatory for national and provincial departments, while the Information Regulator’s 2025 enforcement guidance treats non-compliant hosting as an automatic POPIA breach. For security firms, the risk is immediate—if the CCTV archive, access-control database or guarding-management platform is not demonstrably hosted inside South Africa with verified local data custodians, your bid is rejected at box-tick.
Gauteng’s 2026 infrastructure pipeline exceeds R65 billion, yet 42% of General-category bids fail at compliance screening. With National Treasury’s April 2026 Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA) amendments now in force, every supplier engaged in provincial construction, maintenance, and facilities-management work must recalibrate their documentation matrix. Misinterpreting the revised 80/20 and 90/10 preference point thresholds, or submitting outdated BBBEE affidavits, triggers automatic disqualification—costing contractors both tender costs and opportunity value in the country’s most competitive procurement marketplace.
For every General contractor bidding in Gauteng in 2026, the difference between landing a contract and losing it often sits in a single digit on your B-BBEE scorecard. With National Treasury’s 2026 preferential procurement regulations now fully aligned to the revised B-BBEE Codes, a two-level swing can add—or deduct—up to 8 preference points under the 90/10 system and 16 points under 80/20. In a market where margins are razor-thin, that swing is decisive.
CIDB grading is no longer a “nice-to-have” in Gauteng—every tender from the Department of Infrastructure, City of Johannesburg, Ekurhuleni and Tshwane explicitly calls for the CIDB grade on page 1 of the SBD 1 form. In 2026 the provincial audit units run automated checks against the CIDB iEnabler database; if the grade on your submission does not match the CIDB record, the bid is culled before technical evaluation even opens. One keystroke error—an “8” instead of a “7”—and your envelope is shredded. That is why this guide exists.
đź’ˇ Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our Blog