Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Documents available on tender detail page
Tender Type
Request for Quotation
Delivery Location
1Dr Lategan road - Groenkloof - Pretoria - 0002
Organization Type
GOVERNMENT
Published
10 Jun 2026
OCDS Reference
ocds-9t57fa-158704
AI Document Analysis Stages
Important Dates
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdf (RFQ)Categories
Request for Quotation
1Dr Lategan road - Groenkloof - Pretoria - 0002
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdf
The South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) invites consulting firms to submit quotations for developing a business case to transform SABS into a high-performing, self-sustaining, and globally competitive entity. The project involves reimagining SABS's future, defining target states, and creating a transformation roadmap. The engagement is expected to span 1 month, with a closing date of 15 June 2026.
Date & Time
Monday, 15 June 2026 - 11:00
Venue
null
10 Jun
2026
Tender Published
Tender was published
15 Jun
2026
Closing Date
Tender closing date
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogMedian Estimate
R 57 529
Range
Based on 13 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
{"briefingSession":"{\"date\":\"15 June 2026\",\"time\":\"11:00 am\",\"venue\":\"e vision statement, set of future scenarios, stakeholder propositions and design\",\"is_compulsory\":false}"}
Contact Information
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdf (RFQ){"name":"Dr Lategan","email":null,"phone":"012 428 6044","department":null,"address":"competitive entity. This transformation is expected to reposition SABS as a trusted partner to"}
Evaluation Criteria
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdf (RFQ)Mandatory Documents
Technical Evaluation
Experience
Description
Signed reference letters from at least 1 project in the last 10 years for a government institution, standards body, testing laboratory, or similar organization.
Scoring
1-3 Projects
10
4-5 Projects
20
6-7 Projects
30
8-9 Projects
40
>10 Projects
50
Team Expertise
Description
CVs and qualifications of key team members, with combined experience in strategy development/transformation.
Scoring
<5 Years
10
5-8 Years
20
8-12 Years
30
12-15 Years
40
>15 Years
50
Minimum Threshold
75% (combined score for experience and team expertise).
Preference Points
System
80/20 (Price: 80 points, Specific Goals: 20 points).
Specific Goals
Points awarded for BBBEE ownership levels (e.g., 100% black ownership = 10 points, 75-99% = 8 points, etc.).
Technical Specifications
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdf (RFQ)The SABS is a statutory body established in term of Standards Act, 1945 (Act No. ) and
continues to operate in terms of the Standards Act, 2008 (Act No. ) as the national
standardization institution in South Africa, mandated to:
2. Request for Quotation (RFQ)
This RFQ serves as an invitation to submit a quotation for the Appointment of a consulting firm to
develop a business case for the SABS, subject to the SABS Standard Terms and Conditions, a copy is
available on www.sabs.co.za, accessible through the link:
https://www.sabs.co.za/Procurement/proc_toc.asp
The Bidder is requested to provide a quotation, in writing, by the specified date. Should the Bidder
require any clarification, the clarification should be submitted by e-mail to the Procurement Specialist
identified in this document.
By submitting a quotation in response to this RFQ or participating in this RFQ process, the Bidder accepts
to be subject to and bound by all the terms and conditions contained in this RFQ document.
3. Confidentiality
This document may not be used for any purpose by the Bidder other than for developing their response
to it, and all reasonable efforts must be taken by the Bidder to ensure confidentiality of any information
provided. This document and any other information of a confidential nature provided to the Bidder
during the RFQ process are and will be covered by the non-disclosure agreement to be signed between
the SABS and the Bidder.
4. No Contract
Bidders shall note that this RFQ does not commit the SABS to any course of action resulting from the
receipt of quotations and the SABS may, at its discretion reject any submission which does not conform
to instructions and specifications which are contained herein or select a Bidder based upon its own
unique set of criteria. SABS also reserves the right not to select a bidder.
Nothing in this document shall be construed as a contract between the SABS and the Bidder, and no
communication, whether verbal or written, by the SABS personnel or agents during this process shall
create such a contract in respect of the requirements specified in this RFQ.
5. No Obligation to Proceed
The SABS reserves the right to discontinue the RFQ evaluation process at any time and will not be
responsible for any losses incurred by the Bidder because of discontinuation of the RFQ process
of 21
6. Validity of Proposals
The Bidder’s quotation shall remain valid for a period of one hundred and twenty (120) days from the
closing date. The SABS may at any time prior to the expiry of the bid validity period, extend the above
validity period by sixty (60) days by written notice to the Bidders. In that event, the SABS will not require
any consent from the Bidders, and bidders will not be required or permitted to amend any of their
quotations.
SABS retains the right, but is under no obligation, to request Bidders to extend the validity periods of
their quotations, prior to expiry thereof, if it has already invoked the extension referred to above and it
is in the SABS’ interest to further extend the bid validity period. Such a request shall be in writing. The
Bidder is not obliged to extend the validity period. Also, bidders will not be required or permitted to
amend any of their quotations.
7.1 Background and Context
The SABS is a State-Owned Entity (SOE) mandated to develop and maintain South African national
Standards (SANS) as well as to deliver conformity assessment services, including testing and certification.
Unlike many SOEs that operate within monopolistic environments, SABS functions in a highly competitive
market alongside private-sector and international counterparts. The organisation currently derives its
income from a combination of internally generated revenue and government grant funding, reflecting a
level of financial dependence on fiscal support.
The SABS has a strategic importance to the economy and despite its potential to serve as a key enabler
of quality, industrial development and trade, the organisation is currently operating below optimal
performance levels. The SABS is challenged by operational inefficiencies, constrained capabilities and an
organisational culture that limit its ability to compete effectively with leading global and private-sector
counterparts. In its current state, the organisation is not financially sustainable, with significant losses
projected in the absence of continued fiscal support.
Recognising this urgency, the SABS has embarked on the development of a comprehensive business case
to fundamentally transform the organisation into a high-performing, self-sustaining and globally
competitive entity. This transformation is expected to reposition SABS as a trusted partner to
government and industry, capable of addressing critical economic needs while delivering world-class
services across its core functions. Central to this effort is the need to clearly define the current
performance baseline of the SABS, benchmark it against leading regional and international organisations
and establish ambitious yet achievable targets aligned with best-in-class standards.
of 21
The business case must articulate the strategic, operational, and financial pathway required to achieve
this transformation, including the identification of critical capability gaps, enabling support functions
such as technology, laboratory infrastructure, and specialised skills, as well as the exploration of optimal
operating models. This includes assessing the role of strategic local and international partnerships to
enhance efficiency, innovation, and market relevance.
7.2. Objective
The objective of this consulting service is to facilitate and guide the development of a business case that
will transform SABS into a significant, high-performing entity that will outperform global best-in-class
organisations in standards development, testing, certification, training and business advisory. The
business case must quantify the level of investment required and demonstrate a credible pathway
toward long-term financial sustainability, profitability, and thought leadership within the standards
development and conformity assessment sector.
The consultant/s, deployed by the appointed service provider will be expected to lead and guide the
execution of the following work streams:
8.1. Reimaging the future of the SABS
Objective:
To develop a clear, compelling, and shared vision of future of the SABS as a world-class, high-
performing, and self-sustaining entity. This process will define the desired future state from a
stakeholder perspective and challenge current assumptions and constraints to enable a
transformational (not incremental) thinking.
Key activities
government, industry, regulators, civil society)
infrastructure for the economy
of 21
Deliverables
sustainability)
8.2. Target State Definition
Objective:
To develop a clear, compelling, and shared vision of future of the SABS as a world-class, high-
performing, and self-sustaining entity. This process will define the desired future state from a
stakeholder perspective and challenge current assumptions and constraints to enable a
transformational (not incremental) thinking.
Key activities
and impact
Deliverable
Target State Definition Report, including performance targets, strategic positioning and future operating
principles that are aligned to a world-class, high performing SOE
9. Timelines
The engagement is expected to span 1 month.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdfa) Previous experience in strategy development and transformation
completed across medium to large private and public sector entities. Each project must reflect the
following:
i. Client Name and Sector (Indicate whether public sector, SOE or private sector)
ii. Project Title and Description
iii. A clear summary of the assignment, including objectives and scope
iv. Project duration and completion date
v. Client Reference details, including name and designation of client representative
b) Expertise of project team
The bidder must provide team members (including the lead consultant) and for each team
member, the section must reflect the following:
i. Project Name and the role they will play in the project
ii. Years of experience in strategy development and transformation
iii. Relevant project experience and summary of key assignments the individual has worked on
of 21
outlining their relevant experience in strategy development and transformation
and/or similar work done within the last 10 years with at least 1 project
completed for a government institution, standards body, testing laboratory,
certification body or similar organization.
1: Limited or no experience (<3 project) - 10 points
2: Relevant experience (4 to 5 projects) – 20 points
3: Strong track record (6 to 7projects) – 30 points
4: Substantial experience (8 to 9 projects) – 40 Points
5: Extensive experience (>10 projects)– 50 points
Years of experience of the project team (Submit CV and Qualification
2 Certificates) 50
The service provider must demonstrate that the key specialist(s) appointed to the
project has the relevant experience to perform Organisational Transformation
work.
1: Less than 5 years combined experience in strategy development or
transformation – 10 points
2: >5 to 8 years combined experience in strategy development or transformation –
20 points
3. >8 to 12 years combined experience in strategy development or transformation
– 30 points
4. >12 to 15 years combined experience in strategy development or
transformation – 40 points
5. >15 years combined experience in strategy development or transformation- 50
points
100%
Quality Management
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdfamend any of their quotations.
7. Terms of reference
7.1 Background and Context
The SABS is a State-Owned Entity (SOE) mandated to develop and maintain South African national
Standards (SANS) as well as to deliver conformity assessment services, including testing and certification.
will transform SABS into a significant, high-performing entity that will outperform global best-in-class
organisations in standards development, testing, certification, training and business advisory. The
business case must quantify the level of investment required and demonstrate a credible pathway
toward long-term financial sustainability, profitability, and thought leadership within the standards
development and conformity assessment sector.
8. Scope of Work
Pricing Schedule
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdfOnly Bidders who meet the minimum threshold of 75% be evaluated further on 80/20 preference
points system of 2022. (Pricing and Specific Goal)
cover.
Compliance Requirements
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdf (RFQ)Minimum functionality/qualifying score: 75%
Central Supplier Database (CSD) registration report
Please note the following
▪ Treasury Central Supplier Database (CSD) registration report
▪ SBD 4 Bidder’s Disclosure
▪ SBD 6.1 Preference points claim form in terms of the Preferential Procurement
Points Allocation: 90 points
B-BBEE Details: E FOR THE SABS
Dear Bidder
The South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) hereby invites you to submit a quotation for the Appointment
of a consulting firm to develop a business case for the SABS
The details of the service to be provided are in the attached Request for Quote, RFQ 201994.
Please note the following:
▪ Treasury Central Supplier Database (CSD) registration report
▪ A valid BBBEE certificate/Sworn Affidavit (Specific Goal point
claim)
▪ SBD 4 Bidder’s Disclosure
▪ SBD 6.1 Preference points claim form in terms of the Preferential Procurement
Regulation 2022
▪ Appendix A – Non-Disclosure Agreement
SOUTH AFRICAN BUREAU OF STANDARDS – Established in terms of Section 2 of the Standards Act, 1945, as amended
Gauteng Head Office West Coast Region East Coast Region
1 Dr Lategan Road, Groenkloof Liesbeek Park Way, Rosebank 15 Garth Road,
Private Bag X191 PO Box 615, Rondebosch, Waterfall Park
Pretoria, 0001 Cape Town, 7701 PO Box 30087,
Tel +27 (0) 12 428 7911 Tel +27 (0) 21 681 6700 Mayville, 4058
Fax +27 (0) 12 344 1568 Fax +27 (0) 21 681 6701 Tel +27 (0) 31 203 2900
Fax +27 (0) 31 203 2907
1. Background
The SABS is a statutory body established in term of Standards Act, 1945 (Act No. ) and
continues to operate in terms of the Standards Act, 2008 (Act No. ) as the national
standardization institution in South Africa, mandated to:
2. Request for
Health & Safety
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdf▪ Treasury Central Supplier Database (CSD) registration report
▪ A valid BBBEE certificate/Sworn Affidavit (Specific Goal point
claim)
▪ SBD 4 Bidder’s Disclosure
▪ SBD 6.1 Preference points claim form in terms of the Preferential Procurement
Regulation 2022
▪ Appendix A – Non-Disclosure Agreement
SOUTH AFRICAN BUREAU OF STANDARDS – Established in terms of Section 2 of the Standards Act, 1945, as amended
1 Dr Lategan Road, Groenkloof Liesbeek Park Way, Rosebank 15 Garth Road,
Private Bag X191 PO Box 615, Rondebosch, Waterfall Park
Pretoria, 0001 Cape Town, 7701 PO Box 30087,
Tel +27 (0) 12 428 7911 Tel +27 (0) 21 681 6700 Mayville, 4058
Fax +27 (0) 12 344 1568 Fax +27 (0) 21 681 6701 Tel +27 (0) 31 203 2900
Fax +27 (0) 31 203 2907
1. Background
The SABS is a statutory body established in term of Standards Act, 1945 (Act No. ) and
continues to operate in terms of the Standards Act, 2008 (Act No. ) as the national
standardization institution in South Africa, mandated to:
2. Request for Quotation (RFQ)
Maximum size 14 MB, Proposals/ Bids must be
submitted on PDF Files (compressed zipped folder
if necessary), Proposals/Bids submitted via a link
and/or “we transfer” will not be accepted
It is the Bidder’s responsibility to ensure that the
quotation is received on time by SABS.
It is the Bidder’s responsibility to ensure that the
quotation is received on time by SABS.
Under no circumstances shall the SABS be responsible for any of the Bidder’s costs associated with the
preparation and/or submission of its quotation, including any costs incurred by the Bidder prior to the
signature, by both parties, of an agreement resulting from a successful bid.
19. Bidder’s contractual terms
The SABS will not be bound by any legal or contractual terms as may be included in the Bidder’s quotation,
in response to this RFQ.
of 21
Appendix A: Company experience/ List of Projects successfully completed (to the client’s satisfaction)
NB: To be filled in to support/substantiate the stated experience under the evaluation criteria and
bidders are encouraged to complete and return to SABS as part of the proposal.
Client/ Company Contact person Telephone number & Bidder’s specific Project Value Relevance to this assignment –
property, capital, efforts, skill and knowledge in an activity for the execution of a contract.
of 21
and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act No or any other applicable legislation.
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED IN PARAGRAPHS 1, 2 and 3 ABOVE IS CORRECT.
I accept that the state may reject the bid or act against me in terms of paragraph 6 of
PFMA SCM instruction /22 on preventing and combating abuse in the supply
4.3. Name of company/firm...............................................................................
4.4. Company registration number: .....................................................................
4.5. Type of company/ firm
□ Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium
□ One-person business/sole propriety
□ Close corporation
□ Public Company
□ Personal Liability Company
□ (Pty) Limited
□ Non-Profit Company
□ State Owned Company
[Tick applicable box ]
4.6. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm, certify that the
points claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender, qualifies the company/ firm
for the preference(s) shown and I acknowledge that:
i) The information furnished is true and correct.
ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the General Conditions as indicated in
paragraph 1 of this form.
iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a result of points claimed as shown in paragraphs
1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish documentary proof to the satisfaction
of the organ of state that the claims are correct.
iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any of the
conditions of contract have not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in addition to any other
remedy it may have –
(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process.
(b) recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a result of that
person’s conduct.
(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered as a result of
having to make less favourable arrangements due to such cancellation.
(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders and directors, or
only the shareholders and directors who acted on a fraudulent basis, be
of 21
restricted from obtaining business from any organ of state for a period not
exceeding 10 years, after the audi alteram partem (hear the other side) rule
has been applied; and
(e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.
..............................................
Signature(s) of tenderer(s)
Surname and name: ................................................................
Date: ...............................................................
Address: ...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
of 21
Appendix A – Non-Disclosure Agreement
Contractual Terms
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdfto it, and all reasonable efforts must be taken by the Bidder to ensure confidentiality of any information
provided. This document and any other information of a confidential nature provided to the Bidder
during the RFQ process are and will be covered by the non-disclosure agreement to be signed between
the SABS and the Bidder.
4. This agreement shall not apply to information which: -
of 21
(a) the Supplier can show had been lawfully received by it prior to disclosure under this agreement.
(b) is in the public domain or becomes so otherwise than through breach of this agreement.
(c) was disclosed to the Supplier by a third party who was under no obligation of confidence in respect
thereof.
Section
Source: APPOINTMENT OF A CONSULTING FIRM TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS CASE FOR THE SABS.pdfThe SABS reserves the right to discontinue the RFQ evaluation process at any time and will not be
of quality, industrial development and trade, the organisation is currently operating below optimal
14. Preference Points System
Only Bidders who meet the minimum threshold of 75% be evaluated further on 80/20 preference
points system of 2022. (Pricing and Specific Goal)
NB: To be filled in to support/substantiate the stated experience under the evaluation criteria and
a claim form for preference points for specific goals.
1.1 The following preference point systems are applicable to invitations to tender
the 80/20 system for requirements with a Rand value of up to R50 000 000 (all applicable
the 90/10 system for requirements with a Rand value above R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes
a) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 90/10 preference point system.
b) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 80/20 preference point system.
c) Either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system will be applicable in this tender. The lowest/
1.3 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts) shall be
(b) Specific Goals.
The maximum points for this tender are allocated as follows
Specific goals 20
Total points for Price and SPECIFIC GOALS 100
to claim points for specific goals with the tender, will be interpreted to mean that preference points
for specific goals are not claimed.
or at any time subsequently, to substantiate any claim in regard to preferences, in any manner
▪ SBD 6.1 Preference points claim form in terms of the Preferential Procurement
Pretoria, 0001 Cape Town, 7701 PO Box 30087,
Tel +27 (0) 12 428 7911 Tel +27 (0) 21 681 6700 Mayville, 4058
Fax +27 (0) 12 344 1568 Fax +27 (0) 21 681 6701 Tel +27 (0) 31 203 2900
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 5 of 2000
Covers preferential procurement and preference-point systems used in public tenders.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 12 of 2004
Supports anti-corruption controls and supplier integrity in procurement processes.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 28 of 2024
Provides the national framework for public procurement across government.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 2 of 2000
Supports access to tender records, award decisions and public-sector procurement information.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 3 of 2000
Supports lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative tender decisions.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
To download these documents and access AI-powered analysis, visit the main tender page.
Organization
SA Bureau of StandardsContact Person
LETHABO WHITNEY NEDONDWE
Phone
012-428-6157
[email protected]
Website
www.sabs.co.za/
Address
1 Dr Lategan Rd, Groenkloof, Pretoria, 0027, South Africa
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
1
Last checked
10 Jun 2026
AI status
Not enhanced
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.
Key Personnel
Get deep intelligence on Other service activities. Unlock full pricing strategies, bid frequency, and historical win rates.
Data conflicts
None detected
1 Dr Lategan Rd, Groenkloof, Pretoria, 0027, South Africa