What the tender required and what the award supports
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Summary
The limpopo tourism agency (lta) seeks a service provider to deliver organisational redesign and development services over 36 months on a request basis. The project aims to review and optimise lta’s structure, benchmark best practices, develop job descriptions, grade positions, and implement change management to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards — PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement — so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
RFQLTAQ003-26_27 PROVISION OF ORGANIZATIONAL REDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.pdfReview complete
Important Dates
Source: LTAQ003-26_27 PROVISION OF ORGANIZATIONAL REDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.pdf (RFQ)
Award analysis coverage
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
23 sourced criteria
financial capacity
15 sourced criteria
pricing
8 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
14 sourced criteria
evaluation
20 sourced criteria
experience
3 sourced criteria
personnel
4 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
1 sourced criteria
delivery contract
5 sourced criteria
equity registrations
12 sourced criteria
What the buyer was looking for
1Mandatory requirement
Prices must be firm, VAT-inclusive, and valid for 80 days from closing date; submit a detailed quotation alongside SBD 3.1.
Threshold: 80 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
Closing date and time: 06 July 2026 at 12:00.
No other dates (e.g., briefings, site visits, clarification deadlines) are specified.
Contact Information
Source: LTAQ003-26_27 PROVISION OF ORGANIZATIONAL REDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.pdf (RFQ)
Specification contact: Mr. Chris Ramoshaba – Email: [email protected], Tel: (015) 293 3600.
Postal address: Limpopo Tourism Agency, P.O. Box 2814, Polokwane, 0700.
Submission Guidelines
Source: LTAQ003-26_27 PROVISION OF ORGANIZATIONAL REDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.pdf (RFQ)
Submit a written quotation on your company letterhead.
Physical submission only: Place your bid in the LTA quotation box at ERF 92/688, Portion 2, N1 Main Road, Southern Gateway Ext 4, Polokwane.
Deadline: 06 July 2026 at 12:00. Emailed submissions will not be accepted.
Price offer must be valid for 80 days from the closing date.
Mandatory forms: Complete and submit SBD 3.1 (Pricing Schedule), SBD 4 (Bidder’s Disclosure), and SBD 6.1 (Preference Claim Form). Missing or incomplete forms will disqualify your bid.
Bid document rules: Use black ink only; initial all corrections; do not use correction fluid or submit copies. Alterations or copies invalidate the bid.
No payment is required for this bid. Beware of scams.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: LTAQ003-26_27 PROVISION OF ORGANIZATIONAL REDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.pdf (RFQ)
Evaluation follows a three-phase process under the Preferential Procurement Regulations (2022):
Phase 1: Administrative Compliance – Mandatory documents (SBD 3.1, SBD 4, SBD 6.1) must be fully completed and signed. Failure to submit or disclose all CSD-registered companies linked to directors results in disqualification.
Phase 2: Functionality – Minimum qualifying score is 60%. Criteria include:
Company experience (8+ years scores highest; proof via reference letters from at least three contactable referees).
Military veteran ownership (10 points if applicable; proof of registration on National Military Veterans Database required).
Phase 3: Price and Preference Points – 80/20 system applied. Lowest acceptable bid scores 80 points for price; higher bids score proportionally less. 20 points allocated for specific goals (Black people, youth, women, persons with disability, military veterans) based on ownership percentage. Proof required (e.g., CSD report, medical certificate for disability).
Bidders failing Phase 1 or Phase 2 are disqualified from further evaluation.
Final selection is based on the highest total points (price + preference).
Technical Specifications
Source: LTAQ003-26_27 PROVISION OF ORGANIZATIONAL REDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.pdf (RFQ)
Scope: Provide organisational redesign and development services for Limpopo Tourism Agency (LTA) over 36 months on a request basis.
Deliverables:
Review existing divisional structures, benchmark against best practices, and make recommendations.
Assess organisational components (division of labour, span of control, chain of command, authority, responsibility, delegation, accountability) against LTA’s mandate and goals.
Identify efficiency and effectiveness improvements.
Review staffing levels, positions, skills, and competencies per division.
Develop job descriptions, competency profiles, and grade jobs using a recognised system (Paterson Grading system accreditation or partnership letter required).
Consult all relevant stakeholders.
Compile recommendation reports for management.
Develop and present an implementation plan for recommended changes.
Capacity requirements:
Submit company profile (size, staff complement, infrastructure, location).
Provide proof of similar services (reference letters from at least three contactable referees).
Submit abridged CVs of key personnel demonstrating prior experience and qualifications.
Methodology
Source: LTAQ003-26_27 PROVISION OF ORGANIZATIONAL REDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.pdf
Assess organisational structure components (division of labour, span of control, chain of command, authority, responsibility, delegation, accountability) against LTA’s mandate and goals.
Identify options to improve efficiency and effectiveness of the organisational structure.
Benchmark divisional structures against industry best practices and recommend integration where applicable.
Review staffing levels, positions, skills, and competencies per division to ensure alignment with workloads.
Develop job descriptions, competency profiles, and grade jobs using a recognised system (e.g., Paterson Grading).
Consult all relevant stakeholders throughout the process.
Develop an implementation plan for recommended changes.
Present findings and compile detailed recommendation reports for management.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: LTAQ003-26_27 PROVISION OF ORGANIZATIONAL REDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.pdf
Company experience: Provide proof of similar services (signed reference letters on valid letterheads from at least three contactable referees). LTA reserves the right to verify references.
Key personnel: Submit abridged CVs of key personnel demonstrating prior experience (5+ years scores highest) and relevant qualifications.
Functionality scoring for experience:
Company years in organisational redesign: 8+ years (10 points), 6-7 years (8 points), 4-5 years (6 points), 3-4 years (4 points), 0-2 years (0 points).
Reference letters: More than three (10 points), three (5 points), less than three (0 points).
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LEKOKO CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
5Inferred operational need
Assess organisational structure components (division of labour, span of control, chain of command, authority, responsibility, delegation, accountability) against LTA’s mandate and goals.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
13Inferred operational need
Submit SBD 4 (Bidder’s Disclosure) and disclose all CSD-registered companies linked to directors/shareholders; failure to disclose leads to disqualification.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LEKOKO CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
17Inferred operational need
Assess organisational components (division of labour, span of control, chain of command, authority, responsibility, delegation, accountability) against LTA’s mandate and goals.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
19Inferred operational need
Develop job descriptions, competency profiles, and grade jobs using a recognised system (Paterson Grading system accreditation or partnership letter required).
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LEKOKO CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
25Inferred operational need
Review of organisational structure per programme/division (including stakeholder consultation, status quo analysis, recommendations).
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LEKOKO CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
26Inferred operational need
Annual licence for OrgPlus or similar system.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
27Inferred operational need
Professional/consulting services per hour.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LEKOKO CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
28Inferred operational need
Developing job descriptions per position.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LEKOKO CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
29Inferred operational need
Grading per job.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
45Mandatory requirement
Mandatory forms: Complete and submit SBD 3.1 (Pricing Schedule), SBD 4 (Bidder’s Disclosure), and SBD 6.1 (Preference Claim Form). Missing or incomplete forms will disqualify your bid.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
51Inferred operational need
No abuse of the Supply Chain Management System or prior contract failure with written notice.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
57Inferred operational need
Bid document rules: Use black ink only; initial all corrections; do not use correction fluid or submit copies. Alterations or copies invalidate the bid.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
61Inferred operational need
Evaluation follows a three-phase process (Administrative Compliance, Functionality, Price/Preference Points) under the 80/20 Preferential Procurement Regulations (2022).
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LEKOKO CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
62Inferred operational need
Functionality scoring for experience:
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
63Inferred operational need
Company years in organisational redesign: 8+ years (10 points), 6-7 years (8 points), 4-5 years (6 points), 3-4 years (4 points), 0-2 years (0 points).
Threshold: 10 points
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LEKOKO CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
68Mandatory requirementConflicting classification
Phase 1: Administrative Compliance – Mandatory documents (SBD 3.1, SBD 4, SBD 6.1) must be fully completed and signed. Failure to submit or disclose all CSD-registered companies linked to directors results in disqualification.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
75Scored criterion
Phase 3: Price and Preference Points – 80/20 system applied. Lowest acceptable bid scores 80 points for price; higher bids score proportionally less. 20 points allocated for specific goals (Black people, youth, women, persons with disability, military veterans) based on ownership percentage. Proof required (e.g., CSD report, medical certificate for disability).
Threshold: 80 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
81Inferred operational need
Company experience: Provide proof of similar services (signed reference letters on valid letterheads from at least three contactable referees). LTA reserves the right to verify references.
Threshold: at least three contactable referees)
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
84Inferred operational need
Proof of CSD registration, company profile, reference letters from at least three contactable referees, and abridged CVs of key personnel are required.
Threshold: at least three contactable referees
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LEKOKO CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
85Inferred operational need
Review staffing levels, positions, skills, and competencies per division to ensure alignment with workloads.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records LEKOKO CONSULTING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 305182 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
APPOINTMENT OF A SERVICE PROVIDER TO ASSIST THE DEPARTMENT OF LAND REFORM AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONVEYANCING SERVICES FOR PORTION OF PORTION 4 (R/E) OF THE FARM WEENEN NUMBER 40 REGISTRATION DIVISION KS, MEASURING 18 , 2970 HECTARES SITUATED IN MOGALAKWENA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY WITHIN WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITYPSSCLP-5/2/1/1 2025-2026 83