What the tender required and what the award supports
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Summary
The eastern cape – east london industrial development zone (elidz) is seeking to appoint a qualified legal service provider to deliver on‑demand commercial law services, including advice, contract work, litigation and dispute resolution, for a three‑year period starting 1 may 2026. The tender is open to firms that meet the technical, b‑bbee and insurance requirements and can submit separate technical and financial proposals by 6 april 2026.
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards — PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement — so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
Review in progress
The information shown on this card is preliminary. Our procurement team is currently finalising the submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical specifications, financial requirements, and compliance sections so you have a clean, bid-ready summary to work from. Document being finalised: V1-RFP template_Envelope A Commercial Law 03032026.pdf. You don’t need to refresh — this page will pick up the updated review automatically.
DocumentV1-RFP template_Envelope A Commercial Law 03032026.pdfCompliance review in progress
Award analysis coverage
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
8 sourced criteria
financial capacity
11 sourced criteria
pricing
1 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
10 sourced criteria
evaluation
9 sourced criteria
experience
1 sourced criteria
personnel
2 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
1 sourced criteria
equity registrations
2 sourced criteria
What the buyer was looking for
1Inferred operational need
Scope of Services:
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SMITH TABATA.
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
Important Dates
Source: V1-RFP template_Envelope A Commercial Law 03032026.pdf
Document download opens: 9 March 2026 12:00 (noon) at www.elidz.co.za.
Question‑and‑answer period closes: 27 March 2026 16:00; answers issued by 31 March 2026 14:00.
Closing date for submission: 6 April 2026 12:00 (online portal).
Intended contract start date: 1 May 2026 (after signing of Service Level Agreement).
Service commencement date noted in tender: 9 March 2026 (start date for the project).
Contact Information
Source: V1-RFP template_Envelope A Commercial Law 03032026.pdf
Physical address for any hard‑copy delivery (if required): ELIDZ Head Office, Lower Chester Road, Sunnyridge, East London, PO Box 5458, GREENFIELDS, EAST LONDON 5208.
Submission Guidelines
Source: V1-RFP template_Envelope A Commercial Law 03032026.pdf
Submit two separate envelopes: Envelope A – Technical Proposal (all supporting documents) and Envelope B – Financial Proposal (price schedule).
All documents must be uploaded online via https://tenderportal.elidz.co.za before 12:00 on 6 April 2026.
Late, emailed, faxed or telephonic submissions will be rejected.
Envelope A must NOT contain any price information; inclusion of price in Envelope A results in disqualification.
Envelope B must include a signed “Form of Offer”; an unsigned financial proposal results in disqualification.
All tenders must be signed by an authorised signatory and a copy of the board resolution (for companies) must be attached.
Required returnable documents (Envelope A): original cancelled cheque or bank‑stamped letter, company profile, valid B‑BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit (per turnover), proof of office location, three reference letters (Annexure 2), completed track record (Annexure 3), project team organogram and CVs, CSD registration certificate, JV participation documents (if applicable), Fidelity Fund certificates of all directors, letter of good standing from the Legal Practice Council, proof of professional indemnity insurance (minimum R5 million cover), and original cancelled cheque for trust account.
Required compulsory documents: completed and signed ELIDZ Procurement Handbook (including tax clearance), CSD registration certificate.
Failure to provide any of the above may lead to disqualification.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: V1-RFP template_Envelope A Commercial Law 03032026.pdf
Functional Evaluation Matrix (total 100 points):
Years firm has existed (30 points): >5 years = 30, 2‑5 years = 20, <2 years = 5.
References (30 points): up to 10 points per reference letter (minimum 3 letters, highest three scores used).
Track record – Commercial Law (40 points): 10+ relevant projects = 40, 6‑9 = 30, 3‑5 = 20.
Minimum score to progress to next phase: 70 points.
Price evaluation: 80 % of total points based on price competitiveness (price points calculated using the formula provided, capped at 80). Specific goals (BBBEE, localisation, SMME, youth, women, disability, Eastern Cape) contribute up to 20 points.
Preference points are awarded according to the specific goal table (e.g., 7 points for ≥51 % Black ownership, 8 points for Eastern Cape‑based supplier, etc.).
Failure to submit a valid B‑BBEE certificate/affidavit may result in zero preference points.
The highest total score (price + specific goals) determines the award, subject to compliance with all conditions.
Technical Specifications
Source: V1-RFP template_Envelope A Commercial Law 03032026.pdf
Scope of Services:
Provide commercial law advice and representation on‑demand, including insolvency, liquidation, business rescue, contract drafting/negotiation, litigation, dispute resolution and general advisory services.
Services to be delivered at ELIDZ offices (Lower Chester Road, Sunnyridge, East London) or any other location directed by ELIDZ.
Monthly management report due by the 25th of each month; ad‑hoc reports as required.
Firm must be an established attorney practice with qualified lawyers experienced in commercial law.
Provide organogram and CVs of all team members; key persons to be identified.
Substitution of key resources only with ELIDZ approval.
Exclusions:
Any commercial law services not listed in the scope, and services already contracted elsewhere.
Compliance with on‑demand performance is a material breach if not met.
Financial Requirements
Source: V1-RFP template_Envelope A Commercial Law 03032026.pdf
Price schedule to be submitted in Envelope B (financial proposal) – price must be firm for 120 days after closing date and expressed in South African Rand, VAT inclusive.
Payment milestones: monthly over the three‑year contract as per Service Level Agreement.
Payment terms: invoices payable within 30 days of receipt; invoices must be original, VAT‑compliant and include all required details.
Late invoice or non‑compliant invoice will be returned for correction; payment may be delayed.
No price information may appear in Envelope A; inclusion leads to disqualification.
No bonds or guarantees are explicitly required in the extracted text.
Compliance Requirements
Source: V1-RFP template_Envelope A Commercial Law 03032026.pdf
Central Supplier Database (CSD) registration and MAAA number must be provided.
Valid B‑BBEE certificate (accredited) for Generic suppliers; sworn affidavit for EME/QSE as per turnover thresholds. Minimum level 4 for firms with turnover < R10 million; higher levels for Black‑owned entities.
CIPC registration certificate and certified copies of ID(s) and share certificate required.
Fidelity Fund certificates for all directors.
Letter of good standing from the Legal Practice Council.
Proof of professional indemnity insurance (minimum R5 million cover).
Proof of office location (lease, municipal statement, etc.).
JV participation documentation if applicable.
SHE (Safety, Health & Environment) compliance documentation may be required (risk assessments, PPE list, workmen’s compensation letters, etc.).
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
2Inferred operational need
Provide commercial law advice and representation on‑demand, including insolvency, liquidation, business rescue, contract drafting/negotiation, litigation, dispute resolution and general advisory services.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SMITH TABATA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
9Inferred operational need
Submit two sealed envelopes online – Envelope A (technical documents, no price) and Envelope B (financial proposal with signed Form of Offer) by 12:00 hrs 6 April 2026.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SMITH TABATA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 20000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
10Mandatory requirement
Provide all mandatory documentation: CSD registration, SARS tax clearance, valid B‑BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit, professional indemnity insurance (min R5 million), Fidelity Fund certificates, Legal Practice Council good‑standing letter, office‑location proof, company profile, organogram and CVs, reference letters (3) and track‑record form.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SMITH TABATA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
11Mandatory requirement
• Submit two separate envelopes: Envelope A – Technical Proposal (all supporting documents) and Envelope B – Financial Proposal (price schedule). • All documents must be uploaded online via https://tenderportal.elidz.co.za before 12:00 on 6 April 2026. • Late, emailed, faxed or telephonic submissions will be rejected. • Envelope A must NOT contain any price information; inclusion of price in Envelope A results in disqualification. • Envelope B must include a signed “Form of Offer”; an unsigned financial proposal results in disqualification. • All tenders must be signed by an authorised signatory and a copy of the board resolution (for companies) must be attached. • Required returnable documents (Envelope A): original cancelled cheque or bank‑stamped letter, company profile, valid B‑BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit (per turnover), proof of office location, three reference letters (Annexure 2), completed track record (Annexure 3), project team organogram and CVs, CSD registration certificate, JV participation documents (if applicable), Fidelity Fund certificates of all directors, letter of good standing from the Legal Practice Council, proof of professional indemnity insurance (minimum R5 million cover), and original cancelled cheque for trust account. • Required compulsory documents: completed and signed ELIDZ Procurement Handbook (including tax clearance), CSD registration certificate. • Failure to provide any of the above may lead to disqualification.
Threshold: minimum R5 million cover)
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SMITH TABATA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
12Mandatory requirement
Price schedule to be submitted in Envelope B (financial proposal) – price must be firm for 120 days after closing date and expressed in South African Rand, VAT inclusive.
Threshold: 120 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records SMITH TABATA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 20000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
18Inferred operational need
Valid B‑BBEE certificate (accredited) for Generic suppliers; sworn affidavit for EME/QSE as per turnover thresholds. Minimum level 4 for firms with turnover < R10 million; higher levels for Black‑owned entities.
Threshold: Minimum level 4 for firms with turnover < R10 million
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records SMITH TABATA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 20000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
31Mandatory requirement
Firm must have >5 years existence (or meet minimum points), demonstrate at least 3‑5 relevant commercial law projects, and submit three reference letters to achieve the functional evaluation score (minimum 70 points).
Threshold: minimum points)
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SMITH TABATA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
32Scored criterion
Functional Evaluation Matrix (total 100 points):
Threshold: 100 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records SMITH TABATA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 20000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
37Scored criterion
Preference points are awarded according to the specific goal table (e.g., 7 points for ≥51 % Black ownership, 8 points for Eastern Cape‑based supplier, etc.).
Threshold: 7 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SMITH TABATA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
43Inferred operational need
Service delivery is on‑demand at ELIDZ offices or other locations directed by ELIDZ, with monthly management reports due by the 25th of each month and compliance with SHE requirements where applicable.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SMITH TABATA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
44Inferred operational need
Preference points (up to 20) are awarded for BBBEE ownership, Eastern Cape localisation, SMME, youth, women or disability ownership as per the specific goals table.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SMITH TABATA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 20000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
45Scored criterion
Price evaluation: 80 % of total points based on price competitiveness (price points calculated using the formula provided, capped at 80). Specific goals (BBBEE, localisation, SMME, youth, women, disability, Eastern Cape) contribute up to 20 points.
Threshold: 20 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.