This tender has been awarded to Ningiza Horner Incorporated for N/A.
Ningiza Horner Incorporated
Issuing Organization
National Treasury (OCDS)
Location
National
Award Date
7 May 2021
Award Date
7 May 2021
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
276
Awarded To
Ningiza Horner Incorporated
Awarding Entity
Government Entity
Award Value
N/A
Awarded: 7 May 2021
Catering request of MFMA afs consistency workshop
Renewal of acl robotics professional starter pack 3 three years period
Dsm 01/26
E1184gxpou
Kzn131
A panel of external legal service providers to render legal services to gauteng provincial government departments and entities for a period of 36 months
The appointment of panel of attorneys to provide legal services to gauteng gambling board for a period of 36 months.
A panel of legal practitioners for provision of legal services for a period of 36 months
Appointment of panel of attorneys for the provision of legal services to the information regulator of south africa for a period of three years.
Appointment of panel of legal services for a duration of three years
Get a full report on Ningiza Horner Incorporated including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
Legal Panel RFP Final1REVISEDF_compressed.pdf
4314.6 KB
Tender source analysis
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Cathsseta invites bids from legal firms to serve on a panel of legal and compliance experts for a 3-year period, providing services in corporate/commercial law, labour law, litigation, and investigations. The tender aims to appoint 3-6 firms to support cathsseta’s legal needs on an as-needed, rotational basis.
AI Document Analysis Stages
Review in progress
The information shown on this card is preliminary. Our procurement team is currently finalising the submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical specifications, financial requirements, and compliance sections so you have a clean, bid-ready summary to work from. Document being finalised: Legal Panel RFP Final1REVISEDF_compressed.pdf. You don’t need to refresh — this page will pick up the updated review automatically.
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
7 sourced criteria
financial capacity
7 sourced criteria
pricing
2 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
28 sourced criteria
evaluation
20 sourced criteria
experience
3 sourced criteria
personnel
2 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
2 sourced criteria
equity registrations
2 sourced criteria
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Development of open space ward 5 upgrading of unique homes park
Upgrading of recreation of parks in vista park.
Description supply, delivery, installation and maintenance of a walkthrough metal detector system and x-ray luggage detector machine.
Hiring of construction plant as in when required for a period of 36 months
Upgrade and maintenance of municipal website for a period of 36 months
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Important Dates
Source: Legal Panel RFP Final1REVISEDF_compressed.pdfClosing date: 31 May 2021 at 11:00am.
Technical/SCM enquiries deadline: 21 May 2021.
Envisaged evaluation date: 02 June 2021.
Envisaged adjudication date: 09 June 2021.
Envisaged award date: 18 June 2021.
Project start date: 01 July 2021.
Bid validity period: 90 days from closing date.
Contact Information
Source: Legal Panel RFP Final1REVISEDF_compressed.pdfTechnical/SCM enquiries: [email protected].
Submission address: CATHSSETA Head Office, 270 and 294 George Road, Erand Gardens, Midrand, Johannesburg.
Attention: Supply Chain Office.
Submission Guidelines
Source: Legal Panel RFP Final1REVISEDF_compressed.pdfSubmit bids by 31 May 2021 at 11:00am to the bid box at CATHSSETA Head Office, 270 and 294 George Road, Erand Gardens, Midrand, Johannesburg. Late bids will not be accepted.
Required documents:
Clarifications:
Disqualification risks:
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Legal Panel RFP Final1REVISEDF_compressed.pdfEvaluation is based on functionality (minimum 70/100 points required) and the 80/20 preference point system (PPPFA, 2017).
Functionality criteria (100 points total):
35 points: 10+ years experience + demonstrated understanding.
15 points: 5-10 years experience + demonstrated understanding.
5 points: <5 years experience + demonstrated understanding.
15 points: Offices in Johannesburg (within 15km of South Gauteng High Court).
5 points: Offices in Gauteng but outside Johannesburg.
0 points: No offices in Johannesburg or Gauteng.
35 points: >10 years relevant experience (from admission as Legal Practitioner/Attorney).
15 points: 5-10 years experience.
5 points: <5 years experience.
20 points: 7+ reference letters for identified legal specialities (past 5 years).
10 points: 5-6 reference letters.
5 points: 3-4 reference letters.
Final award: Highest total points (functionality + price + preference points). Bids failing minimum functionality score or mandatory requirements are disqualified.
Technical Specifications
Source: Legal Panel RFP Final1REVISEDF_compressed.pdfObjective: Appoint 3-6 legal firms to serve on a panel of legal and compliance experts for 3 years (01 July 2021 – 30 June 2024).
Scope of services:
Requirements:
Proposal requirements:
Financial Requirements
Source: Legal Panel RFP Final1REVISEDF_compressed.pdfPricing:
Compliance Requirements
Source: Legal Panel RFP Final1REVISEDF_compressed.pdfMandatory documents (failure to submit disqualifies the bid):
Additional requirements:
Qualified inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 3 years
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 3 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 3 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: Minimum functionality score of 70/100 required
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: minimum 70/100 points required) and the 80/20 preference point syste
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 100 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 35 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 35 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 15 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 5 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 15 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 15 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 5 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 0 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 35 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 35 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 15 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 5 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 20 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 20 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 10 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 5 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: minimum functionality score or mandatory requirements are disqualifi
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Conflicting evidenceThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
Relevant records disagree; review the cited sources and dates.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 3 months
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for Ningiza Horner Incorporated.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records Ningiza Horner Incorporated as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 0 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Browse categories with current opportunities in this area.
Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our Blog