Toggle Global Chat
Awarded Tender: Grap 104 ecl implementation tender – greater kokstad municipality
Contract Awarded This tender has been awarded to ALTIMAX for R 626 520 00.
All Tenders Awarded Award Details Financial Service Activities, Except Insurance and Pension Funding
Appointment of the service provider for the full implementation of the revised grap 104(expected credit loss (ecl) impairment model Issuing Organization
Greater Kokstad Local Municipality
Awarding Entity
Greater Kokstad Local Municipality
Award Value
R 626 520 00
Awarded: 24 August 2026
View Award Details · Ref: GKM 01-26/27 Greater Kokstad Local Municipality GOVERNMENT
Greater Kokstad Local Municipality, South Africa Organization Directors T.September Contact Person MS K DZINGWE Contact Person MS K DZINGWE Contact Person Mr Q Diedrick Contact Person MISS A. Mahlaka Contact Person And 1 others...
View Supplier Intelligence Get a full report on ALTIMAX including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
Appointment of the service provider for the full implementation of the revised grap 104(expected credit loss (ecl) impairment model
Tender source analysis
What the tender required and what the award supports Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
The greater kokstad municipality seeks to appoint a qualified service provider to fully implement the revised grap 104 standard, focusing on the design, development, and operationalisation of an expected credit loss (ecl) impairment model. The project includes gap analysis, model development, integration with munsoft, policy updates, training, and audit support over a 12-month period. This tender is open to experienced financial services providers with expertise in grap and ecl modelling.
Document TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf Review complete 0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
16 sourced criteria
financial capacity
11 sourced criteria
pricing
6 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
19 sourced criteria
evaluation
11 sourced criteria
experience
3 sourced criteria
personnel
1 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
4 sourced criteria
equity registrations
2 sourced criteria
1 Inferred operational need
Submit a sealed bid marked with the bid number and closing date to the tender box at 75 Hope Street, Kokstad by 12:00 on 21 July 2026. Late bids will not be accepted. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Continue exploring related tenders Follow the links below to explore this tender context.
SA Tenders Awards Full Implementation of Revised GRAP 104 (ECL Impairment Model) – Greater Kokstad Municipality Tender context Return to this tender’s issuing organisation, province, or category.
Related opportunities Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Related active categories Browse categories with current opportunities in this area.
View all Active provinces Compare tender activity across provinces.
View all Active buying organisations Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Intelligence and resources Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Explore this section SA Tenders Awards Full Implementation of Revised GRAP 104 (ECL Impairment Model) – Greater Kokstad Municipality Tender context Return to this tender’s issuing organisation, province, or category.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf
Appointment of a service provider for the full implementation of the revised GRAP 104 (Expected Credit Loss impairment model) for a period of one year. The provider will deliver an automated solution ensuring compliance with the standard, covering design, development, implementation, and operationalisation of the ECL model.
Important Dates
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf (TENDER)
Closing Date and Time: 21 July 2026 at 12:00.
Compulsory Briefing: None.
Contact Information
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf (TENDER)
For Technical Enquiries: Contact Ms. Smangele Mbhele. Tel: 039 797 6652. Email: [email protected]
For Supply Chain Management (Bidding Procedure) Enquiries: Contact Ms. Andiswa Mahlaka. Tel: 039 797 6700. Email: [email protected]
Submission Address: Tender Box, Reception Area, 75 Hope Street, Kokstad, 4700.
Submission Guidelines
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf (TENDER)
Submit your bid in a sealed envelope clearly marked with the bid number and closing date.
Deliver the bid to the tender box at Reception Area, 75 Hope Street, Kokstad, 4700 by 12:00 on 21 July 2026. Late bids will not be considered.
Use only the official bid forms provided; do not retype or redraft them.
Ensure the total bid price is clearly written on MBD1. Omission of price on MBD1 leads to disqualification.
Attach a Central Supplier Database (CSD) report not older than 3 months, or ensure your CSD number on MBD1 is correct for verification.
Provide proof that your company and each director do not owe municipal rates/taxes for more than 90 days. Acceptable proof includes a valid municipal statement, lease agreement, or affidavit.
For joint ventures, submit a signed JV agreement identifying the lead partner. Each partner must be CSD registered and tax compliant.
Complete, sign, and submit all required MBD forms (MBD1, MBD4, MBD6.1, MBD8, MBD9). Incomplete or unsigned forms render the bid non-responsive.
Bids submitted by post, fax, email, or telegraph will not be considered.
Bidders are responsible for ensuring their documents are placed in the correct tender box.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf (TENDER)
Two-stage evaluation: Stage 1 – Functionality (minimum threshold of 40 points to proceed); Stage 2 – 80/20 preferential point system.
Functionality criteria (total 70 points):
Company Experience: 40 points – Evidence of at least 2 appointments/reference letters for ECL model implementation per revised GRAP 104 (full 40 points) or 1 appointment (20 points).
Key Personnel: 30 points – Project manager experience in overseeing financial instrument impairment projects under GRAP.
Stage 2 (80/20): 80 points for price, 20 points for specific goals:
Goal 1 – Ownership (max 10): 5 points if business owned ≥50% by black person; 5 points if owned ≥50% by black women.
Goal 2 – RDP (max 10): 10 points if business located within KZN province; 5 points if outside KZN.
Bidders must submit required documentation to claim preference points (e.g., detailed CSD report, Section J documents).
Only bidders achieving at least 40 points on functionality will be evaluated further.
Technical Specifications
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf (TENDER)
Scope: Full implementation of revised GRAP 104 (Expected Credit Loss impairment model) for a period of 12 months.
Key deliverables:
Assessment and gap analysis of current accounting policies and processes.
Development of an automated ECL model compliant with revised GRAP 104, incorporating probability-weighted outcomes, forward-looking data, segmentation, historical loss data, time value of money, and lifetime expected credit losses.
Data analysis and model calibration using historical debtor data and risk drivers.
Model implementation and integration with existing MUNSOFT financial systems.
Accounting policy development and technical compliance guidance.
Financial statement disclosure support and templates.
Model validation and audit support, including independent review.
Training and knowledge transfer to finance staff.
Technical support for 12 months.
Performance monitoring: Monthly reviews against KPIs; penalties for poor performance (written warnings, 2.5% or 5% invoice reduction, contract termination).
Key competencies: Company must have experience in GRAP application and ECL model implementation; project manager must have experience in GRAP financial instrument projects.
Methodology
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf
The service provider must follow a detailed methodology covering assessment, ECL model development, data analysis, implementation, accounting policy compliance, disclosure support, validation, training, and technical support.
The model must be automated, integrate with MUNSOFT, and include probability-weighted outcomes, forward-looking data, and historical trends.
A work plan and budget consistent with the scope must be presented.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf
Company must have relevant experience in applying GRAP and implementing new GRAP Standards.
Company must demonstrate experience in at least one project involving the application and implementation of Expected Credit Loss (ECL) models per GRAP 104/IFRS 9 principles.
Project manager must have experience overseeing full implementation of financial instrument impairment projects under GRAP.
For evaluation, provide signed reference letters/appointment letters as proof of experience.
Quality Management
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf
Performance is assessed against KPIs using a 5-point rating scale: Excellent (5), Good (4), Acceptable (3), Poor (2), Very Poor (1).
Performance scoring: 95-100% (Excellent), 80-94% (Good), 70-79% (Acceptable), 60-69% (Poor), below 60% (Very Poor).
Poor or Very Poor performance may trigger invoice deductions or warnings.
Pricing Schedule
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf
Prices must be firm, inclusive of all taxes, and valid for at least 90 days.
The total bid price must be clearly stated on MBD1.
Bidders must provide a detailed work plan and budget, including monthly quotes, consistent with the scope of work.
Financial Requirements
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf (TENDER)
Prices quoted must be firm, inclusive of all taxes, and valid for at least 90 days from the tender closing date.
The total bid price must be carried over to MBD1. Omission leads to disqualification.
Bidders must provide proof of good standing regarding municipal rates and taxes for the company and each director.
For joint ventures, all partners must be CSD registered and tax compliant.
Bidders must present a detailed work plan and budget, including monthly quotes, consistent with the scope of work.
Performance penalties may apply: written warnings, 2.5% or 5% invoice reductions for poor performance, or contract termination for repeated non-performance.
Compliance Requirements
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf (TENDER)
Central Supplier Database (CSD): Submit a CSD report not older than 3 months or ensure correct CSD number on MBD1. Registration is mandatory.
Tax Compliance: Submit your SARS Tax Compliance Status PIN or a printed TCS certificate. Foreign suppliers must complete a pre-award questionnaire.
B-BBEE: Submit a B-BBEE Verification Certificate or Sworn Affidavit (for EMEs & QSEs) to qualify for preference points.
Declaration of Interest (MBD4): Fully disclose any relationships with municipal/state officials. Failure constitutes a false declaration.
Preference Points Claim (MBD6.1): Complete to claim points for specific goals.
Past SCM Practices (MBD8): Declare any previous government contract restrictions or failures.
Independent Bid Determination (MBD9): Certify the bid was prepared without collusion.
Municipal Rates Clearance: Provide proof that the company and each director do not owe municipal rates/taxes for more than 90 days.
Professional Registrations: Company Director must provide SAICA membership proof. Data Analyst must provide ASSA/ASABA membership proof.
Persons in the service of the state are not eligible to bid.
Contractual Terms
Source: TOR'S REVISED GRAP 104 IMPLEMENTATION revised TOR's.pdf
The successful bidder must sign a written contract (MBD7).
Contract duration is 12 months.
Performance is reviewed monthly against KPIs.
Failure to meet standards may result in written warnings, invoice reductions (2.5% or 5%), or contract termination for repeated non-performance.
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
2 Mandatory requirement
Complete all mandatory MBD forms (MBD1, MBD4, MBD6.1, MBD8, MBD9) and ensure the total bid price is on MBD1; omission leads to disqualification. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
3 Mandatory requirement
Prices must be firm, inclusive of all taxes, and valid for at least 90 days; provide a detailed work plan and budget with monthly quotes. Threshold: at least 90 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
4 Inferred operational need
Performance is assessed against KPIs using a 5-point rating scale: Excellent (5), Good (4), Acceptable (3), Poor (2), Very Poor (1). Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
5 Inferred operational need
Performance scoring: 95-100% (Excellent), 80-94% (Good), 70-79% (Acceptable), 60-69% (Poor), below 60% (Very Poor). Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
6 Inferred operational need
Poor or Very Poor performance may trigger invoice deductions or warnings. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
7 Mandatory requirement
The model must be automated, integrate with MUNSOFT, and include probability-weighted outcomes, forward-looking data, and historical trends. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
8 Mandatory requirement
A work plan and budget consistent with the scope must be presented. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
9 Inferred operational need
Scope: Full implementation of revised GRAP 104 (Expected Credit Loss impairment model) for a period of 12 months. Threshold: 12 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
10 Inferred operational need
Key deliverables: Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
11 Inferred operational need
Assessment and gap analysis of current accounting policies and processes. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
12 Inferred operational need
Development of an automated ECL model compliant with revised GRAP 104, incorporating probability-weighted outcomes, forward-looking data, segmentation, historical loss data, time value of money, and lifetime expected credit losses. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
13 Inferred operational need
Data analysis and model calibration using historical debtor data and risk drivers. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
14 Inferred operational need
Model validation and audit support, including independent review. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
15 Inferred operational need
Technical support for 12 months. Threshold: 12 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
16 Inferred operational need
Performance monitoring: Monthly reviews against KPIs; penalties for poor performance (written warnings, 2.5% or 5% invoice reduction, contract termination). Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
17 Mandatory requirement
Project manager must have experience overseeing full implementation of financial instrument impairment projects under GRAP. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
18 Scored criterion
Key Personnel: 30 points – Project manager experience in overseeing financial instrument impairment projects under GRAP. Threshold: 30 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
19 Inferred operational need
Model implementation and integration with existing MUNSOFT financial systems. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
20 Inferred operational need
Financial statement disclosure support and templates. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
21 Mandatory requirement
Key competencies: Company must have experience in GRAP application and ECL model implementation; project manager must have experience in GRAP financial instrument projects. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
22 Mandatory requirement
Prices quoted must be firm, inclusive of all taxes, and valid for at least 90 days from the tender closing date. Threshold: at least 90 days from the tender closing date
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
23 Mandatory requirement
The total bid price must be carried over to MBD1. Omission leads to disqualification. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
24 Mandatory requirement
Bidders must provide proof of good standing regarding municipal rates and taxes for the company and each director. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
25 Mandatory requirement
For joint ventures, all partners must be CSD registered and tax compliant. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
26 Mandatory requirement
Bidders must present a detailed work plan and budget, including monthly quotes, consistent with the scope of work. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
27 Inferred operational need
Performance penalties may apply: written warnings, 2.5% or 5% invoice reductions for poor performance, or contract termination for repeated non-performance. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
28 Inferred operational need
Submit proof that the company and each director do not owe municipal rates/taxes for more than 90 days. Threshold: 90 days
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
29 Mandatory requirement
Prices must be firm, inclusive of all taxes, and valid for at least 90 days. Threshold: at least 90 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
30 Mandatory requirement
The total bid price must be clearly stated on MBD1. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
31 Mandatory requirement
Bidders must provide a detailed work plan and budget, including monthly quotes, consistent with the scope of work. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
32 Inferred operational need
Provide proof that your company and each director do not owe municipal rates/taxes for more than 90 days. Acceptable proof includes a valid municipal statement, lease agreement, or affidavit. Threshold: 90 days
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
33 Inferred operational need
Municipal Rates Clearance: Provide proof that the company and each director do not owe municipal rates/taxes for more than 90 days. Threshold: 90 days
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
34 Inferred operational need
Appointment of a service provider for the full implementation of the revised GRAP 104 (Expected Credit Loss impairment model) for a period of one year. The provider will deliver an automated solution ensuring compliance with the standard, covering design, development, implementation, and operationalisation of the ECL model. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
35 Mandatory requirement
The service provider must follow a detailed methodology covering assessment, ECL model development, data analysis, implementation, accounting policy compliance, disclosure support, validation, training, and technical support. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
36 Inferred operational need
Submit your bid in a sealed envelope clearly marked with the bid number and closing date. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
37 Inferred operational need
Deliver the bid to the tender box at Reception Area, 75 Hope Street, Kokstad, 4700 by 12:00 on 21 July 2026. Late bids will not be considered. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
38 Inferred operational need
Use only the official bid forms provided; do not retype or redraft them. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
39 Inferred operational need
Ensure the total bid price is clearly written on MBD1. Omission of price on MBD1 leads to disqualification. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
40 Inferred operational need
Attach a Central Supplier Database (CSD) report not older than 3 months, or ensure your CSD number on MBD1 is correct for verification. Threshold: 3 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
41 Mandatory requirement
For joint ventures, submit a signed JV agreement identifying the lead partner. Each partner must be CSD registered and tax compliant. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
42 Inferred operational need
Complete, sign, and submit all required MBD forms (MBD1, MBD4, MBD6.1, MBD8, MBD9). Incomplete or unsigned forms render the bid non-responsive. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
43 Inferred operational need
Bids submitted by post, fax, email, or telegraph will not be considered. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
44 Inferred operational need
Bidders are responsible for ensuring their documents are placed in the correct tender box. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
45 Inferred operational need
Accounting policy development and technical compliance guidance. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
46 Mandatory requirement
Central Supplier Database (CSD): Submit a CSD report not older than 3 months or ensure correct CSD number on MBD1. Registration is mandatory. Threshold: 3 months
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
47 Mandatory requirement
Tax Compliance: Submit your SARS Tax Compliance Status PIN or a printed TCS certificate. Foreign suppliers must complete a pre-award questionnaire. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
48 Inferred operational need
Declaration of Interest (MBD4): Fully disclose any relationships with municipal/state officials. Failure constitutes a false declaration. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
49 Inferred operational need
Past SCM Practices (MBD8): Declare any previous government contract restrictions or failures. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
50 Inferred operational need
Independent Bid Determination (MBD9): Certify the bid was prepared without collusion. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
51 Mandatory requirement
Professional Registrations: Company Director must provide SAICA membership proof. Data Analyst must provide ASSA/ASABA membership proof. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
52 Inferred operational need
Persons in the service of the state are not eligible to bid. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
53 Inferred operational need
Achieve a minimum functionality score of 40 points to proceed to the 80/20 preferential point evaluation. Threshold: minimum functionality score of 40 points to proceed to the 80/20 pre
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
54 Inferred operational need
For evaluation, provide signed reference letters/appointment letters as proof of experience. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
55 Scored criterion
Two-stage evaluation: Stage 1 – Functionality (minimum threshold of 40 points to proceed); Stage 2 – 80/20 preferential point system. Threshold: minimum threshold of 40 points to proceed)
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
56 Scored criterion
Functionality criteria (total 70 points): Threshold: 70 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
57 Scored criterion
Company Experience: 40 points – Evidence of at least 2 appointments/reference letters for ECL model implementation per revised GRAP 104 (full 40 points) or 1 appointment (20 points). Threshold: at least 2 appointments/reference letters for ECL model implementatio
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
58 Scored criterion
Stage 2 (80/20): 80 points for price, 20 points for specific goals: Threshold: 80 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
59 Scored criterion
Goal 1 – Ownership (max 10): 5 points if business owned ≥50% by black person; 5 points if owned ≥50% by black women. Threshold: 5 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
60 Scored criterion
Goal 2 – RDP (max 10): 10 points if business located within KZN province; 5 points if outside KZN. Threshold: 10 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
61 Scored criterion
Bidders must submit required documentation to claim preference points (e.g., detailed CSD report, Section J documents). Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
62 Scored criterion
Only bidders achieving at least 40 points on functionality will be evaluated further. Threshold: at least 40 points on functionality will be evaluated further
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
63 Inferred operational need
Preference Points Claim (MBD6.1): Complete to claim points for specific goals. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
64 Mandatory requirement
Demonstrate company experience in at least one ECL model implementation per revised GRAP 104, with reference letters; key personnel must have relevant GRAP experience. Threshold: at least one ECL model implementation per revised GRAP 104
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
65 Mandatory requirement
Company must have relevant experience in applying GRAP and implementing new GRAP Standards. Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
66 Mandatory requirement
Company must demonstrate experience in at least one project involving the application and implementation of Expected Credit Loss (ECL) models per GRAP 104/IFRS 9 principles. Threshold: at least one project involving the application and implementation of
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
67 Inferred operational need
Training and knowledge transfer to finance staff. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
68 Delivery obligation
The successful bidder must sign a written contract (MBD7). Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
69 Inferred operational need
Contract duration is 12 months. Threshold: 12 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
70 Inferred operational need
Performance is reviewed monthly against KPIs. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
71 Inferred operational need
Failure to meet standards may result in written warnings, invoice reductions (2.5% or 5%), or contract termination for repeated non-performance. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ALTIMAX.
Qualified inference
Supported inference The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
72 Inferred operational need
Provide a CSD report not older than 3 months, proof of tax compliance (SARS PIN or TCS certificate), and B-BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit. Threshold: 3 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
73 Inferred operational need
B-BBEE: Submit a B-BBEE Verification Certificate or Sworn Affidavit (for EMEs & QSEs) to qualify for preference points. Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ALTIMAX as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 626520 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
APPOINTMENT OF SERVICE PROVIDER(S) FOR THE SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION OF QUEUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SASSA LOCAL OFFICES AT KZN SASSA:08-25-ICT-KZN
Kwazulu Natal - Public Works (Head Office)
347
Supplier readiness
Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding
Related opportunities Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Related active categories Browse categories with current opportunities in this area.
View all Active provinces Compare tender activity across provinces.
View all Active buying organisations Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
View all Intelligence and resources Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.