This tender has been awarded to SISCOMM CATERING DESIGNS AND PROJECTS for RÂ 3Â 030.
Issuing Organization
Public Service & Administration
Location
Gauteng
Award Date
3 February 2025
SISCOMM CATERING DESIGNS AND PROJECTS
Award Date
3 February 2025
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
42452
Public Entity
Get a full report on (SISCOMM CATERING DESIGNS AND PROJECTS) including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
REGRET LETTER FOR Removal of Illegal Dwellers Services on Eskom Transmission Central Grid Servitudes and Lands on an as and when required basis for a period of two (2) years.
Procurement of Stationery for Idt National Office
Disposal of Old IT Assets
The Appointment of a Service Provider to Supply, Deliver and Assemble Office Furniture
Execute and complete Stage 1 - Initial Phase and Stage 2 - Execution Phase, of the NTCSA Industrialization Strategy by the end of FY28 for a period of two (2) years.
Appointment of a Service Provider to Review the Current Dpsa Senior Management Service Competency Assessment Battery.
Appointment of a Suitable Service Provider to Provide Travel Management Services to the Department of Public Service and Administration for a Period of 36 Months.
Appointment of a Panel of Service Providers to Provide Competency- Based Assessment Services for Senior Management Service (sms) Members in National and Provincial Departments for the Period of Four (4) Years.
Appointment of the Panel of Health Risk Managers for Purposes of the Implementation of the Policy and Procedure on Incapacity Leave and Ill-health Retirement (pilir) in the Public Service.
Scm 004/2024: Appointment of an Auditoraudit Company to Audit the Tender Process and Technical Evaluation of Bids for the Selection of Preffered Service Providers to Be Considered for Appointment to the Panel of Accredited Health Risk Managers for Purposes of the Application of the Policy and Procedure on Incapacity Leave and Ill-health Retirements (pilir)
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
Security contractors in Gauteng are entering 2026 under heightened scrutiny: every cloud or hosting service that stores, processes or transmits any state data must now prove full data-sovereignty, localisation and residency compliance before a security guarding or electronic security tender can even reach adjudication. National Treasury’s Instruction 2025-11 (effective 1 April 2026) makes SITA’s Cloud Framework Agreement 2.0 mandatory for national and provincial departments, while the Information Regulator’s 2025 enforcement guidance treats non-compliant hosting as an automatic POPIA breach. For security firms, the risk is immediate—if the CCTV archive, access-control database or guarding-management platform is not demonstrably hosted inside South Africa with verified local data custodians, your bid is rejected at box-tick.
Gauteng’s 2026 infrastructure pipeline exceeds R65 billion, yet 42% of General-category bids fail at compliance screening. With National Treasury’s April 2026 Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA) amendments now in force, every supplier engaged in provincial construction, maintenance, and facilities-management work must recalibrate their documentation matrix. Misinterpreting the revised 80/20 and 90/10 preference point thresholds, or submitting outdated BBBEE affidavits, triggers automatic disqualification—costing contractors both tender costs and opportunity value in the country’s most competitive procurement marketplace.
For every General contractor bidding in Gauteng in 2026, the difference between landing a contract and losing it often sits in a single digit on your B-BBEE scorecard. With National Treasury’s 2026 preferential procurement regulations now fully aligned to the revised B-BBEE Codes, a two-level swing can add—or deduct—up to 8 preference points under the 90/10 system and 16 points under 80/20. In a market where margins are razor-thin, that swing is decisive.
CIDB grading is no longer a “nice-to-have” in Gauteng—every tender from the Department of Infrastructure, City of Johannesburg, Ekurhuleni and Tshwane explicitly calls for the CIDB grade on page 1 of the SBD 1 form. In 2026 the provincial audit units run automated checks against the CIDB iEnabler database; if the grade on your submission does not match the CIDB record, the bid is culled before technical evaluation even opens. One keystroke error—an “8” instead of a “7”—and your envelope is shredded. That is why this guide exists.
đź’ˇ Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogNo other awards found for this supplier.