This tender has been awarded to SMEC SOUTH AFRICA for RΒ 3Β 959Β 220 00.
AwardedTREA/029/26/MP
Award Information
Award Value
RΒ 3Β 959Β 220 00
Winning Supplier
SMEC SOUTH AFRICA
Type: QSE
Services: Professional
Appointment of service provider/s to assist and support the provincial treasury (pt) in the implementation of the infrastructure delivery management system (idms) for a period of (twelve) 12 months
Appointment of service provider/s to assist and support the provincial treasury (pt) in the implementation of the infrastructure delivery management system (idms) for a period of (twelve) 12 months
What the tender required and what the award supports
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Summary
The mpumalanga provincial treasury is seeking a service provider to assist in implementing an infrastructure delivery management system (idms) for a 12-month period. This tender is for professional services to support the provincial government's infrastructure project management. Bidders should be prepared to provide unspecified returnable documents as part of their submission.
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards β PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement β so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
Review in progress
The information shown on this card is preliminary. Our procurement team is currently finalising the submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical specifications, financial requirements, and compliance sections so you have a clean, bid-ready summary to work from. Document being finalised: TREA 029 (2).pdf. You donβt need to refresh β this page will pick up the updated review automatically.
DocumentTREA 029 (2).pdfCompliance review in progress
Award analysis coverage
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
Source analysis requires completion or review
financial capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
pricing
Source analysis requires completion or review
compliance returnables
2 sourced criteria
evaluation
Source analysis requires completion or review
experience
Source analysis requires completion or review
personnel
Source analysis requires completion or review
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
1 sourced criteria
equity registrations
Source analysis requires completion or review
What the buyer was looking for
1Inferred operational need
Returnable Documents: The document states that returnable documents are required but does not specify what they are.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SMEC SOUTH AFRICA.
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically β no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
Submission Guidelines
Source: TREA 029 (2).pdf (unknown)
Returnable Documents: The document states that returnable documents are required but does not specify what they are.
Compliance Requirements
Source: TREA 029 (2).pdf (unknown)
Insufficient searchable text - AI extraction recommended
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
2Inferred operational need
Insufficient searchable text - AI extraction recommended
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records SMEC SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3959220 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
3Inferred operational need
The tender is for professional services to implement an Infrastructure Delivery Management System (IDMS). The contract duration is 12 months. The client is the Mpumalanga Provincial Treasury. Returnable documents are required but are not specified in the provided text. The closing date for submissions is 3 August 2026. The bid type is an Open Tender. The tender document indicates that compliance requirements exist but details are not provided in the available text.
Threshold: 12 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements Β· requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SMEC SOUTH AFRICA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Appointment of a service provider for construction, repainting and waterproofing works at the National Lotteries Commission in Nelspruit MpumalangaRFQ/2025-010-010