This tender has been awarded to ILT GROUP for R 6 725 537 50.
Awarded
Award Information
Award Value
R 6 725 537 50
Winning Supplier
ILT GROUP
Type: EME
Telecommunications
Services: Functional (including Cleaning and Security Services)
Request for bid for appointment of a service provider for procurement of cleaning and gardening services for various courts in mpumalanga, free state and kwa-zulu natal provinces.
Request for bid for appointment of a service provider for procurement of cleaning and gardening services for various courts in mpumalanga, free state and kwa-zulu natal provinces.
Validity Period120 Days
Briefing Session
Yes (Compulsory)Link on the Departmental website
Original Tender Documents
RFB 07 2025 APPOINTMENT OF A SERVICE PROVIDER FOR PROCUREMENT OF CLEANING AND GARDENING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COURTS IN MPUMALANGA, FREE STATE AND KWA-ZULU NATAL PROVINCES.pdf
What the tender required and what the award supports
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Summary
The justice and constitutional development department is seeking a service provider to deliver cleaning and gardening services to various courts located in mpumalanga, free state and kwazulu‑natal provinces. The contract will be awarded through an open tender process and is open to qualified suppliers with relevant experience in court facility maintenance.
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards — PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement — so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
Review in progress
The information shown on this card is preliminary. Our procurement team is currently finalising the submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical specifications, financial requirements, and compliance sections so you have a clean, bid-ready summary to work from. Document being finalised: RFB 07 2025 APPOINTMENT OF A SERVICE PROVIDER FOR PROCUREMENT OF CLEANING AND GARDENING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COURTS IN MPUMALANGA, FREE STATE AND KWA-ZULU NATAL PROVINCES.pdf. You don’t need to refresh — this page will pick up the updated review automatically.
DocumentRFB 07 2025 APPOINTMENT OF A SERVICE PROVIDER FOR PROCUREMENT OF CLEANING AND GARDENING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COURTS IN MPUMALANGA, FREE STATE AND KWA-ZULU NATAL PROVINCES.pdf
Award analysis coverage
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
3 sourced criteria
financial capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
pricing
Source analysis requires completion or review
compliance returnables
3 sourced criteria
evaluation
Source analysis requires completion or review
experience
1 sourced criteria
personnel
1 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
Source analysis requires completion or review
equity registrations
Source analysis requires completion or review
What the buyer was looking for
1Inferred operational need
Provide comprehensive cleaning and gardening services to multiple court sites across Mpumalanga, Free State and KwaZulu‑Natal.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ILT GROUP.
Qualified inference
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
Compliance review in progress
Submission Guidelines
Source: RFB 07 2025 APPOINTMENT OF A SERVICE PROVIDER FOR PROCUREMENT OF CLEANING AND GARDENING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COURTS IN MPUMALANGA, FREE STATE AND KWA-ZULU NATAL PROVINCES.pdf
Returnable Documents: (list to be provided in the tender pack).
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
2Inferred operational need
Adhere to the stipulated timelines and service level agreements.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ILT GROUP.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
3Inferred operational need
Be a registered South African entity with the necessary licences and certifications.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ILT GROUP as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 6725537.5 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
4Mandatory requirement
Submit all required returnable documents as outlined in the tender pack.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ILT GROUP as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 6725537.5 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
5Inferred operational need
Meet the Justice Department’s compliance and quality standards for court environments.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ILT GROUP.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
6Inferred operational need
• Returnable Documents: (list to be provided in the tender pack).
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.