This tender has been awarded to TECHNOSTAR ENGINEERING for Undisclosed Amount.
Issuing Organization
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)
Location
National
Award Date
27 August 2024
TECHNOSTAR ENGINEERING
Award Date
27 August 2024
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
33673
TECHNOSTAR ENGINEERING (PTY) LTD
GOVERNMENT
Get a full report on (TECHNOSTAR ENGINEERING) including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
Advertised RFQ 03/03/2026: Request for Quotation for the Supply, Delivery and Installation of High-density Filing Cabinets and Fire-resistant Combination Cabinets (cidb Grading 1gb or Higher)
Electronic System for Municipal Health and Quality Services for a 3 Year Period
Appointment of A Service Provider for Supply and Delivery of Grey 60mm Interlocking Paving Blocks at Maquassi Hills Local Municipality
Provision of Alarm Monitoring and Armed Response Services for Overberg District Municipality’s Head Office, Annex Building and Bredasdorp Depot for the Period ending 30 June 2029
Scmu3-p26/27-0045-ch- Supply and Delivery of Dairy Products for Sterkstroom, Molteno, Cradock, Martjie Venter and Wilhelm Stahl Hospital for a Period of 12 Months From 01st April 2026 to 31st March 2027
RFQ for the Certification Audit of Integrated Management System (IMS) combining ISO 9001: 2015 QMS and ISO 45001:2018 OHSMS at a company supported by CSIR.
Request for Quotation (RFQ) for the provision of 2 years hardware warranty extension to the CSIR
Request for Quotation (RFQ) for the provision of KnowBE4 Security awareness subscription to the CSIR
Request for Proposals (RFP) The Provision or supply of services for the development and Documentation of Business Workflow Architecture to the CSIR.
Request for Proposals (RFP) The provision of services for the implementation of Business Process Optimisation using Lean Manufacturing Principles in manufacturing companies.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
Security contractors in Gauteng are entering 2026 under heightened scrutiny: every cloud or hosting service that stores, processes or transmits any state data must now prove full data-sovereignty, localisation and residency compliance before a security guarding or electronic security tender can even reach adjudication. National Treasury’s Instruction 2025-11 (effective 1 April 2026) makes SITA’s Cloud Framework Agreement 2.0 mandatory for national and provincial departments, while the Information Regulator’s 2025 enforcement guidance treats non-compliant hosting as an automatic POPIA breach. For security firms, the risk is immediate—if the CCTV archive, access-control database or guarding-management platform is not demonstrably hosted inside South Africa with verified local data custodians, your bid is rejected at box-tick.
Gauteng’s 2026 infrastructure pipeline exceeds R65 billion, yet 42% of General-category bids fail at compliance screening. With National Treasury’s April 2026 Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA) amendments now in force, every supplier engaged in provincial construction, maintenance, and facilities-management work must recalibrate their documentation matrix. Misinterpreting the revised 80/20 and 90/10 preference point thresholds, or submitting outdated BBBEE affidavits, triggers automatic disqualification—costing contractors both tender costs and opportunity value in the country’s most competitive procurement marketplace.
For every General contractor bidding in Gauteng in 2026, the difference between landing a contract and losing it often sits in a single digit on your B-BBEE scorecard. With National Treasury’s 2026 preferential procurement regulations now fully aligned to the revised B-BBEE Codes, a two-level swing can add—or deduct—up to 8 preference points under the 90/10 system and 16 points under 80/20. In a market where margins are razor-thin, that swing is decisive.
CIDB grading is no longer a “nice-to-have” in Gauteng—every tender from the Department of Infrastructure, City of Johannesburg, Ekurhuleni and Tshwane explicitly calls for the CIDB grade on page 1 of the SBD 1 form. In 2026 the provincial audit units run automated checks against the CIDB iEnabler database; if the grade on your submission does not match the CIDB record, the bid is culled before technical evaluation even opens. One keystroke error—an “8” instead of a “7”—and your envelope is shredded. That is why this guide exists.
đź’ˇ Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our Blog