This tender has been awarded to INTERNET FILING for R 447 026 888 00.
INTERNET FILING
Issuing Organization
Department of Home Affairs
Location
National
Award Date
16 October 2026
Award Date
16 October 2026
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
80706
Awarded To
INTERNET FILING
Awarding Entity
Department of Home Affairs
Award Value
R 447 026 888 00
Awarded: 16 October 2026
GOVERNMENT
Appointment of the valuer-general to assist with the valuation and acquisition of the land required for development of six ports of entry project public-private partnership
Appointment of a service provider(s) to assist with the drafting and finalisation of identified legislation pertaining to the department of home affairs
Appointment of an appropriately qualified service provider/s with suitable experience to render internal audit services and forensic investigation on behalf of the department on an “as-and-when required” basis, over a period of three (3) years, with an option to extend with a further two (2) years subject to satisfactory performance and availability of funds.
Specification to request quotation for the appointment of the service provider to provide cleaning services
Resource appointed to act as CD: SCM & assets and head of PPP unit, to assist with the implementing the 2025 interim and annual financial statements
Get a full report on INTERNET FILING including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf
763.0 KB
General_Conditions_of_Contract-_July_2011.pdf
78.8 KB
Tender source analysis
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
The department of home affairs seeks a service provider to supply, host, maintain and support a revenue administration system for civic affairs offices and mobile offices. The system must integrate with e-home and other platforms to collect, record and report revenue due to the department, in compliance with the PFMA, treasury regulations and departmental revenue policy, and must be delivered through the SITA RFB 1183 contract.
AI Document Analysis Stages
Description
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf0 of 2 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
31 sourced criteria
financial capacity
10 sourced criteria
pricing
6 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
25 sourced criteria
evaluation
12 sourced criteria
experience
Source analysis requires completion or review
personnel
2 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
4 sourced criteria
equity registrations
7 sourced criteria
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceAn award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Request for proposals for the appointment of a service provider to support climate change act implementation in 10 district municipalities within the western/southern corridor
Appointment of a professional service provider for the development of a feasibility study on the beneficiation of marula fruit (once-off).
Appointment of a professional service provider to develop a feasibility study for the sekhukhune district flea market facility (once-off).
Erratum:- procurement of professional civil and structural engineering services for the construction of new sidindi traditional council for the department of COGTA
Erratum:- procurement of professional civil and structural engineering services for the construction of new dumalisile traditional council for the department of COGTA
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
This tender seeks a service provider to supply, host, maintain, and support a Revenue Administration System for the Department of Home Affairs (RSA only). The system must enable the collection, recording, and reporting of revenue due from Civic Affairs (enabling documents such as travel documents, identity cards, SMART Cards, birth/marriage/death certificates) across 275 offices and 230 mobile units in nine provinces, as well as the e-Home platform. The system must integrate with the Basic Accounting System (BAS) for revenue reporting and comply with PFMA, Treasury Regulations, and departmental revenue policy. The contract period is 60 months.
Important Dates
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)Closing date: 18 September 2026 at 11:00.
Briefing session: Friday, 04 September 2026 from 10:00 to 11:00, virtual via Microsoft Teams (link provided). Non-compulsory.
Bid validity: 90 days from closing date.
Briefing Session
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)A non-compulsory virtual (Microsoft Teams) briefing session will be held on Friday, 04 September 2026 from 10:00 to 11:00. Link: https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/322459427685894?p=0hYY1N1H7o2CBmgg0L.
Contact Information
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)Bidding procedure enquiries:
Technical enquiries:
Submission: online via eTender portal at https://www.etenders.gov.za
Submission Guidelines
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)Bids must be submitted online via the National Treasury eTender portal (https://www.etenders.gov.za) by the closing date and time. Hardcopy, faxed, or emailed bids are not accepted. Bidders must ensure their bid status reads "Submitted" before the deadline. Required returnable forms include:
Disqualification risks:
Evaluation Criteria
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)Evaluation follows five stages:
Stage 1A: Non-compulsory virtual briefing session.
Stage 1B (Initial screening): bidder must be registered on CSD, tax compliant, not restricted, not a government employee, and have completed SBD 1 and SBD 4. Must also be accredited on SITA RFB 1183 for the required categories.
Stage 2 (Pre-qualification): comply with four requirements: (1) PASA accreditation as Systems Integrator or Third-Party Payment Provider, (2) Information Officer registered with Information Regulator, (3) proposed solution must have payment integration capabilities (EFT, Card not Present), (4) bidder must be listed on SITA RFB 1183/2022 for all specified ICT categories.
Stage 3 (Mandatory): system must incorporate POS processing capability customized for DHA and integrable with BQMS, ACP, Live capture/Service Manager, e-Home. Must also perform reconciliation of payments against DHA systems and bank processing systems.
Stage 4 (Functionality): scored out of 100 points, minimum threshold 70 points. Categories:
Stage 5 (Price and Specific Goals): 90/10 split (90 price, 10 specific goals) because estimated value exceeds R50 million. Price points calculated per PPPFA regulations. Specific goals: women ownership (4 pts for 100%, 3 for ≥51%, 1 for >0%), black ownership (3 pts for 100%, 2 for ≥51%, 1 for >0%). Evidence: CIPC registration, sworn affidavit or B-BBEE certificate.
Technical Specifications
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)Scope: supply, host, maintain, and support a Revenue Administration System for DHA Civic Affairs offices and mobile units across nine provinces (315 sites, 230 mobile units). The system must:
Hardware baseline (production and non-production) provided; bidders may propose alternatives per industry best practice.
Methodology
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdfBidders must provide a comprehensive structured approach covering: experience in designing/developing financial/transactional systems, proof of professional indemnity, a project plan with detailed time frames for smooth handover and operationalisation, a business continuity plan, a security/backup/storage plan, and a backup strategy.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdfBidders must demonstrate relevant experience in supplying, hosting, maintenance, and support of revenue administration solutions for collection, reconciliation, and reporting of cash, card, and EFT transactions into a core system of record (BAS) in a public sector environment. Points are awarded based on years of experience: less than 3 = 0, 3 = 15, 4 = 20, 5+ = 25. Reference letters must be signed, dated, on company letterhead, and indicate acceptable performance. Additionally, personnel assigned must have at least 5 years' experience in applicable programming technology (5 points).
Quality Management
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdfThe solution must be delivered per industry best practice. The Department provides a hardware baseline for production and non-production environments (including firewalls, load balancers, servers, storage, etc.). Bidders may propose alternatives that ensure optimum functioning. The system must be tested in quality assurance and user acceptance testing environments before go-live.
Pricing Schedule
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdfPricing must be submitted on SBD 3.3 (Professional Services). Bidders must provide a ceiling price based on total estimated time for all phases, inclusive of all applicable taxes. The fee structure includes: Development of the Solution, Installation, Maintenance and Support, Training, and Disbursements. Prices are fixed for the contract period and must be quoted in South African Rands. Bid validity: 90 days from closing date.
Financial Requirements
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)Pricing must be submitted on SBD 3.3 (Pricing Schedule – Professional Services). Bidders must indicate a ceiling price based on total estimated time for all phases, inclusive of all applicable taxes. Prices are fixed for the contract period and must be quoted in South African Rands. Bid validity: 90 days. Fee structure includes: Development of the Solution, Installation, Maintenance and Support, Training, and Disbursements. No bonds, guarantees, or payment terms are specified.
Compliance Requirements
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)Mandatory compliance items:
B-BBEE Requirements
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)Specific goals for preference points: Women ownership (100% = 4 points, ≥51% = 3 points, >0% = 1 point); Black ownership (100% = 3 points, ≥51% = 2 points, >0% = 1 point). Evidence: Company registration certificate, sworn affidavit or valid B-BBEE certificate (SANAS or CIPC).
Health & Safety
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdfNo specific health and safety requirements are stated in the tender document. The standard provisions of the General Conditions of Contract regarding unsatisfactory performance and termination apply.
Contractual Terms
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdfContract duration: 60 months from date of appointment. The service provider must not recruit DHA employees during bid preparation or contract execution. The Department owns all information, documents, and reports compiled. Copyright vests with DHA. Confidentiality obligations apply. The General Conditions of Contract (GCC) apply. The Department may terminate the contract with 7 days' written notice for non-compliance and claim damages. The contract may be terminated by either party; the provider will be paid for work completed up to a maximum of the total fee for the phase. Assignment or transfer of rights requires prior written consent.
Special Conditions
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)The service provider may not recruit DHA employees during bid preparation or contract execution. The successful bidder must supply a POS-based system customized for DHA revenue administration, integrable with BQMS, ACP, Live capture/Service Manager, and e-Home Affairs. The solution must have payment integration (EFT, Card not Present, etc.) and capability to reconcile payments against DHA systems and bank processing systems. The bidder must be listed on SITA RFB 1183/2022 for specific ICT categories (Project Management, Business Analysis, Business Solution Development, Organizational Change Management, Analysis Services, AI, IoT, DevOps and Integration provisioning). The bidder must be registered/accredited with PASA as a Systems Integrator or Third-Party Payment Provider, and its Information Officer must be registered with the Information Regulator.
Requirements
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdf (TENDER)Stage 1B Screening: bidder must be registered on CSD, in business, not restricted, tax compliant, not a government employee, completed SBD 1 and SBD 4 forms, and accredited on SITA RFB1183 for required categories. Stage 2 Pre-qualification: must have PASA accreditation (Systems Integrator/Third-Party Payment Provider); CIO/delegate registered with Information Regulator; proposed solution must have payment integration capabilities (EFT, Card not Present); must be listed on SITA RFB 1183/2022 for all required categories. Stage 3 Mandatory: system must incorporate POS processing capability customized for DHA and integrable with BQMS, ACP, Live capture/Service Manager, e-Home; must have capability to reconcile payments against transactions in DHA systems and bank processing systems.
Section
Source: INVITATION TO BID DHA16-2026.pdfStage 4 Functionality Evaluation (out of 100, threshold 70):
Stage 5 – Price and Specific Goals: 90/10 split (90 price, 10 specific goals) using PPPFA regulations. Specific goals: women ownership (4 pts for 100%, 3 for ≥51%, 1 for >0%), black ownership (3 pts for 100%, 2 for ≥51%, 1 for >0%).
Evaluation Criteria
Source: General_Conditions_of_Contract-_July_2011.pdf (TENDER)Bidders must have their tax matters in order and submit an original tax clearance certificate issued by the South African Revenue Service prior to contract award. The successful bidder must furnish a performance security within 30 days of contract award, in the amount and form specified in the Special Conditions of Contract. The supplier must not have engaged in corrupt, fraudulent, collusive or restrictive practices; the purchaser may terminate the contract and restrict the supplier from doing business with the public sector for up to 10 years for such practices. The supplier must not assign obligations without prior written consent. The contract is subject to the National Industrial Participation (NIP) Programme administered by the Department of Trade and Industry.
Technical Specifications
Source: General_Conditions_of_Contract-_July_2011.pdf (TENDER)provisions
in the SCC shall prevail.
Table of clauses
Compliance Requirements
Source: General_Conditions_of_Contract-_July_2011.pdf (TENDER)No specific requirements found
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Conflicting evidenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Relevant records disagree; review the cited sources and dates.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 90 days
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 90 days
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: at least 5 years' experience in applicable programming technology (5
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Conflicting evidenceThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
Relevant records disagree; review the cited sources and dates.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: minimum threshold 70 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 60 months
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: maximum of the total fee for the phase
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for INTERNET FILING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 4 points
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records INTERNET FILING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 447026888 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Browse categories with current opportunities in this area.
Compare tender activity across provinces.
Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our Blog