This tender has been awarded to BONAKUDE CONSULTING for R 326 750 00.
BONAKUDE CONSULTING
Issuing Organization
uThukela Water (Pty) Ltd
Location
KwaZulu-Natal
Award Date
3 July 2026
Award Date
3 July 2026
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
72177
Awarded To
BONAKUDE CONSULTING
Awarding Entity
uThukela Water (Pty) Ltd
Award Value
R 326 750 00
Awarded: 3 July 2026
GOVERNMENT
Supply, delivery and installation of laboratory furniture
Supply, delivery and assembling of office furniture
Supply; installation and commisioning of 2 new hidrostal immersable pumps or equivalnt for the tayside low lift pump station
Supply, installation and commissioning of a new 400 kva electrical transformer
Supply, installation and commissioning of a new 500 kva electrical transformer - ngagane
Request for proposal for the appointment of a panel of service providers to provide technical accounting services at the national lotteries commission for a period of three years.
Expression of interest for a panel to provide internal audit services for a period of three (3) years
Invitation to service providers for the establishment of a pre-qualified list of service providers for the provision of accounting, assurance, coaching and training services for a fixed term period of three (3) years
Compilation and maintenance : grap & mscoa compliant fixed asset registers
Appointment of a panel of external firms to render performance audit services for a period of three (3) years
Get a full report on BONAKUDE CONSULTING including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
TENDER NOTICE - FIN2026-BID-013.pdf
111.8 KB
Tender source analysis
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Uthukela water (pty) ltd invites bids from saica-registered professional service providers to prepare grap-compliant annual financial statements for the 2025/2026 financial year using caseware. The tender is open to suppliers registered on the central supplier database and will be evaluated under the 80/20-point system.
AI Document Analysis Stages
Description
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyAn award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
New/replacement school - eastern cape
Department of justice: KZN various magistrate courts: supply and delivery of PPE uniform for DPWI cleaners and gardeners for 36 month
Kyc verification system for the period of 36 months
Rehabilitation of bayhead road extension and iran road - TRANSNET national
Upgrade of the north groyne – construction of ablution block - TRANSNET national
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Invitation for professional service providers to prepare GRAP-compliant Annual Financial Statements for the 2025/2026 financial year using CaseWare.
Important Dates
Source: TENDER NOTICE - FIN2026-BID-013.pdf (TENDER)Bid documents available for download from 05 June 2026. Closing date for bids: 19 June 2026 at 12:00.
Contact Information
Source: TENDER NOTICE - FIN2026-BID-013.pdf (TENDER)Technical enquiries: Mr Ntando Khumalo, phone: 034 328 5000, email: [email protected]. SCM-related enquiries: Ms Xolile Mgaga, phone: 034 328 5000, email: [email protected]. Submission address: uThukela Water (Pty) Ltd, 79 Harding Street, reception, Newcastle, 2940.
Submission Guidelines
Source: TENDER NOTICE - FIN2026-BID-013.pdf (TENDER)Submit a sealed bid endorsed with 'BID No: FIN2026-BID/013 – PREPARATION FOR AFS FY 2025/2026', including the bidder's name and address on the back of the envelope. Deposit the bid in the official tender box at uThukela Water (Pty) Ltd, 79 Harding Street, reception, Newcastle, by no later than 12:00 on 19 June 2026. Late submissions or those sent via facsimile or email will not be considered. Bids must comply with the conditions of the bid document, which must be downloaded from www.uthukelawater.co.za/currentenders starting 05 June 2026.
Returnable Documents
Source: TENDER NOTICE - FIN2026-BID-013.pdf (TENDER)Bid documents must be downloaded from www.uthukelawater.co.za/currentenders starting 05 June 2026. Submissions must be sealed, endorsed with bid number and details, and deposited in the tender box at the specified address by the deadline.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: TENDER NOTICE - FIN2026-BID-013.pdf (TENDER)Evaluation under the Preferential Procurement Regulations, 2022, using an 80/20-point system. Preference points are awarded based on specific goals claimed. Bidders must score at least 70% on functionality to advance to the next evaluation stage. The entity reserves the right to accept all, some, or none of the tenders and is not bound to accept the lowest bid.
Technical Specifications
Source: TENDER NOTICE - FIN2026-BID-013.pdf (TENDER)Prepare GRAP-compliant Annual Financial Statements for the 2025/2026 financial year using CaseWare. The service must be provided by a professional service provider.
Compliance Requirements
Source: TENDER NOTICE - FIN2026-BID-013.pdf (TENDER)Bidders must be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD). Register at www.csd.gov.za. Service providers must be registered with the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA).
Section
Source: TENDER NOTICE - FIN2026-BID-013.pdfEvaluation under Preferential Procurement Regulations, 2022, using an 80/20-point system. Preference points awarded based on specific goals claimed. Minimum 70% functionality score required to advance. Entity may accept all, some, or none of the tenders and is not bound to accept the lowest bid.
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: at least 70% on functionality to qualify for further evaluation
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for BONAKUDE CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: Minimum 70% functionality score required to advance
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for BONAKUDE CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: at least 70% on functionality to advance to the next evaluation stage
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records BONAKUDE CONSULTING as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for BONAKUDE CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for BONAKUDE CONSULTING.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Browse categories with current opportunities in this area.
Compare tender activity across provinces.
Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our Blog