What the tender required and what the award supports
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Summary
Iziko museums of south africa seeks a qualified service provider to facilitate a two-day risk management workshop, conduct an independent risk maturity and tolerance assessment, and finalise combined assurance review services. The assignment includes updating risk governance documents and delivering practical, governance-ready outputs for management and oversight committees.
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards — PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement — so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
RFQRisk Assessment RFQ.pdfReview complete
Description
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf
Award analysis coverage
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
29 sourced criteria
financial capacity
12 sourced criteria
pricing
5 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
15 sourced criteria
evaluation
14 sourced criteria
experience
8 sourced criteria
personnel
4 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
7 sourced criteria
equity registrations
12 sourced criteria
What the buyer was looking for
1Inferred operational need
Scope includes inception, two-day workshop facilitation, risk document review/finalisation, independent risk maturity/tolerance assessment, combined assurance review, and governance reporting support.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
Iziko Museums of South Africa invites a qualified service provider to facilitate a two-day risk management workshop, conduct an independent risk tolerance and maturity assessment, review and finalise risk-related governance documents, produce a combined assurance framework, and provide presentation material for governance reporting. The output must be a complete, governance-ready risk management and combined assurance pack.
Important Dates
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf (RFQ)
Advert date: 19 June 2026.
Closing date and time for submission: 30 June 2026 at 11:00 am.
Address: Iziko South African Museum, 25 Queen Victoria Street, Cape Town, 8001.
Submission Guidelines
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf (RFQ)
Submit the completed RFQ, signed SBD 4 and SBD 6.1, company profile & methodology, CVs of key personnel, three reference letters, B‑BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit, and a declaration of independence.
Required administrative documents (CSD report with valid tax pin, tax certificate, etc.) must be attached; failure to provide any will render the bid non‑responsive.
Bids received after 30 June 2026 11:00 am will be disqualified.
Do not alter the tender document apart from filling in bidder details and price; any other changes will lead to automatic disqualification.
Suppliers listed on the Register of Tender Defaulters or the List of Restricted Suppliers are automatically disqualified.
Returnable Documents
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf (RFQ)
Submission Quotes / Proposals, and accompanying documentation, must be email Method of Delivery SCM [email protected]; [email protected]
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf (RFQ)
Functionality scoring (100 points total):
Company experience (25 points): Evidence of at least three relevant assignments in the last five years covering ERM workshop facilitation, risk register review, risk governance documentation, risk maturity assessment, risk appetite/tolerance work, combined assurance framework review, or governance reporting support.
Technical methodology and approach (35 points): Evaluated on work plan, workshop agenda, risk register templates, risk maturity assessment tool, combined assurance review tool, and quality assurance process.
Key personnel qualifications and experience (30 points): Engagement lead must have at least seven years’ senior ERM/internal audit/combined assurance experience and a relevant professional designation; team CVs must demonstrate practical experience.
Deliverable management and reporting quality (10 points): Clarity of deliverable tracker, project plan, quality assurance, and governance-readiness of outputs.
Price and preference points: The 80/20 preference point system applies. 80 points for price, 20 points for specific goals (B-BBEE status).
Bidders must provide documentary evidence for all claims; unsupported statements will not score points.
Technical Specifications
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf (RFQ)
Scope of Services:
Inception and preparation: Conduct inception meeting, review documents, prepare workshop agenda and templates.
Review and finalisation of risk documents: Update Risk Management Policy, Strategy, Methodology, Strategic and Operational Risk Registers, Risk Appetite and Tolerance Statement, Risk Heat Map, Reporting Templates, and related governance documents.
Independent risk tolerance and maturity assessment: Conduct assessment using a recognised risk maturity model, produce maturity rating, gap analysis, and improvement roadmap.
Combined assurance review: Develop combined assurance framework and matrix linking key strategic risks to assurance providers.
Reporting support: Prepare presentation material and technical support for EXCO, Audit and Risk Committee, and Council.
Deliverables must be clear, editable, internally consistent, and governance-ready.
Workshop Agenda: Day-by-day agenda with objectives, participant list, topics, risk identification and rating processes, treatment planning, and expected outputs.
Document Review Approach: Systematic review of existing risk policies, registers, and governance documents, with gap analysis and update methodology.
Maturity & Appetite Assessment: Use of a recognised risk maturity model, checklist, and scoring matrix to evaluate current state and define target maturity.
Combined Assurance Mapping: Development of a matrix linking risks to assurance providers (first, second, third line) and identifying coverage gaps.
Reporting: Production of governance-ready reports, presentation packs, and dashboards for EXCO, Audit and Risk Committee, and Council.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf
Minimum three relevant assignments in the last five years covering ERM workshop facilitation, risk register review, risk governance documentation, risk maturity assessment, risk appetite/tolerance work, combined assurance framework review, or governance reporting.
Each assignment must be documented with client name, period, scope, deliverables, and relevance.
Key personnel CVs must demonstrate:
Engagement lead with at least seven years’ senior ERM/internal audit/combined assurance experience and a relevant professional designation (e.g., CA(SA), CIA, CRMA, RIMS-CRMP, CGIP).
Specialists with proven experience in risk maturity assessment, risk appetite/tolerance, and combined assurance mapping.
Provide evidence of public-sector or regulated-entity experience.
Include three reference letters confirming successful delivery of similar projects.
Provide a clear checklist or scoring matrix for risk maturity and appetite/tolerance assessment, showing criteria, evidence required, and scoring methodology.
Combined assurance tool must be a matrix linking strategic risks to assurance providers, indicating coverage gaps and duplication.
Detail a quality assurance process including version control, internal review responsibilities, management sign-off points, and final acceptance criteria.
All tools and templates must be submitted with the bid; lack of these will reduce scores.
Pricing Schedule
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf
Provide a full cost breakdown on company letterhead, inclusive of VAT and any incidentals (travel, equipment).
Fixed fees required for:
Inception and preparation.
Two-day workshop facilitation.
Review and finalisation of risk documents.
Independent risk tolerance and maturity assessment.
Combined assurance framework and plan.
Close-out report and governance presentation.
Disbursements disclosed upfront, capped at 5% of total fixed fees, payable only with prior written approval.
Total cost excluding VAT, VAT at 15%, and total cost including VAT must be specified.
No variations allowed after award.
Financial Requirements
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf (RFQ)
Pricing must be presented on company letterhead with a full cost breakdown, resource categories, rates, and assumptions.
Fixed fees are required for:
Inception and preparation.
Two-day workshop facilitation.
Review and finalisation of risk documents.
Independent risk tolerance and maturity assessment.
Combined assurance framework and plan.
Close-out report and governance presentation.
Disbursements must be disclosed upfront, capped at 5% of total fixed fees, and payable only with prior written approval.
Total cost must be provided excluding VAT, VAT at 15%, and total cost including VAT.
The total evaluated bid price will be used for the 80% price-point calculation under the 80/20 preference system. No variations allowed after award.
Compliance Requirements
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf (RFQ)
Mandatory requirements:
CSD registration with valid supplier number and tax status verification PIN.
Valid tax certificate or tax PIN.
B-BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit confirming status level.
Completion of SBD 4 (Bidder’s Disclosure) and SBD 6.1 (Preference Points Claim Form).
Declaration of independence/conflict-of-interest.
Company profile and methodology addressing the scope.
CVs of key personnel.
Evidence of three similar completed assignments (references).
Bidders listed on the Register of Tender Defaulters or List of Restricted Suppliers will be disqualified.
Compliance with the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2022 (80/20 preference point system) is required.
B-BBEE Requirements
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf (RFQ)
Preference points are awarded for specific goals under the 80/20 system.
Points for B-BBEE status based on black ownership:
50% or more black ownership: 20 points.
Less than 50% black ownership: 10 points.
0% black ownership: 0 points.
Proof required: B-BBEE certificate, company registration certification, identification documentation, or CSD report.
Health & Safety
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf
The supplier must ensure all personnel deployed to Iziko premises comply with Iziko’s occupational health and safety policies and any site-specific safety requirements.
Contractual Terms
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf
The successful service provider must sign a project charter before commencement, defining objectives, scope, methodology, timelines, deliverables, roles, reporting protocols, confidentiality, and quality assurance.
Contract duration is the period required to complete all deliverables as per the scope.
Iziko may terminate for default (e.g., non-delivery, breach of confidentiality) with written notice and a cure period.
Penalties may include retention of paid fees and claims for liquidated damages in case of unjustified termination by the supplier.
All deliverables become Iziko's property upon acceptance; source files must be provided in editable format.
The supplier must comply with applicable legislation (PFMA, PPFA) and maintain required insurance.
Special Conditions
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf (RFQ)
Controlling interest is defined as holding majority equity or having the deciding vote or power to influence enterprise decisions.
Joint venture or consortium means an association of persons combining expertise, property, capital, efforts, skill, and knowledge for contract execution.
Requirements
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf (RFQ)
Bidders must complete SBD 4 (Bidder’s Disclosure) declaring any state employment, relationships with procuring institution officials, or interests in other related enterprises.
Provide particulars if any declarations are affirmative.
Section
Source: Risk Assessment RFQ.pdf
Additional evaluation considerations:
Demonstrated ability to produce governance-ready reports and presentation packs.
Evidence of best-value approach (expertise, experience, technical solution) not merely lowest price.
Compliance with Preferential Procurement Regulations 2022.
Ability to meet 60-day validity requirement for formal quotation.
Adherence to project charter and quality assurance processes.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
2Mandatory requirement
Fixed fees required for all service components (inception, workshop, document review, assessment, combined assurance, close-out report). Total cost must include VAT at 15%.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
3Inferred operational need
Suppliers on the Register of Tender Defaulters or List of Restricted Suppliers are automatically disqualified.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
4Mandatory requirement
Iziko Museums of South Africa invites a qualified service provider to facilitate a two-day risk management workshop, conduct an independent risk tolerance and maturity assessment, review and finalise risk-related governance documents, produce a combined assurance framework, and provide presentation material for governance reporting. The output must be a complete, governance-ready risk management and combined assurance pack.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
6Inferred operational need
Provide a clear checklist or scoring matrix for risk maturity and appetite/tolerance assessment, showing criteria, evidence required, and scoring methodology.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
11Inferred operational need
Maturity & Appetite Assessment: Use of a recognised risk maturity model, checklist, and scoring matrix to evaluate current state and define target maturity.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
19Mandatory requirement
Bidders must complete SBD 4 (Bidder’s Disclosure) declaring any state employment, relationships with procuring institution officials, or interests in other related enterprises.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
21Inferred operational need
Joint venture or consortium means an association of persons combining expertise, property, capital, efforts, skill, and knowledge for contract execution.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
26Inferred operational need
Independent risk tolerance and maturity assessment: Conduct assessment using a recognised risk maturity model, produce maturity rating, gap analysis, and improvement roadmap.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
31Inferred operational need
Inception and preparation.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
32Inferred operational need
Two-day workshop facilitation.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
33Inferred operational need
Review and finalisation of risk documents.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
34Inferred operational need
Independent risk tolerance and maturity assessment.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
35Inferred operational need
Combined assurance framework and plan.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
36Inferred operational need
Close-out report and governance presentation.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: Eligibility criteria · eligibility
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
48Mandatory requirement
BIDDER’S DISCLOSURE (SBD 4) 1. PURPOSE OF THE FORM (SBD 4) Any person (natural or juristic) may make an offer or offers in terms of this invitation to bid. In line with the principles of transparency, accountability, impartiality, and ethics as enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa and further expressed in various pieces of legislation, it is required for the bidder to make this declaration in respect of the details required hereunder. Where a person/s are listed in the Register for Tender Defaulters and / or the List of Restricted Suppliers, that person will automatically be disqualified from the bid process.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
51Mandatory requirement
Required administrative documents (CSD report with valid tax pin, tax certificate, etc.) must be attached; failure to provide any will render the bid non‑responsive.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
69Inferred operational need
Detail a quality assurance process including version control, internal review responsibilities, management sign-off points, and final acceptance criteria.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
71Scored criterion
Company experience (25 points): Evidence of at least three relevant assignments in the last five years covering ERM workshop facilitation, risk register review, risk governance documentation, risk maturity assessment, risk appetite/tolerance work, combined assurance framework review, or governance reporting support.
Threshold: at least three relevant assignments in the last five years covering E
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
73Scored criterion
Key personnel qualifications and experience (30 points): Engagement lead must have at least seven years’ senior ERM/internal audit/combined assurance experience and a relevant professional designation; team CVs must demonstrate practical experience.
Threshold: at least seven years’ senior ERM/internal audit/combined assurance ex
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
74Scored criterion
Deliverable management and reporting quality (10 points): Clarity of deliverable tracker, project plan, quality assurance, and governance-readiness of outputs.
Threshold: 10 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
76Inferred operational need
Minimum three relevant assignments in the last five years covering ERM workshop facilitation, risk register review, risk governance documentation, risk maturity assessment, risk appetite/tolerance work, combined assurance framework review, or governance reporting.
Threshold: Minimum three relevant assignments in the last five years covering E
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
79Inferred operational need
Engagement lead with at least seven years’ senior ERM/internal audit/combined assurance experience and a relevant professional designation (e.g., CA(SA), CIA, CRMA, RIMS-CRMP, CGIP).
Threshold: at least seven years’ senior ERM/internal audit/combined assurance ex
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
84Mandatory requirement
• The supplier must ensure all personnel deployed to Iziko premises comply with Iziko’s occupational health and safety policies and any site-specific safety requirements.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
86Inferred operational need
Submit the completed RFQ, signed SBD 4 and SBD 6.1, company profile & methodology, CVs of key personnel, three reference letters, B‑BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit, and a declaration of independence.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
88Mandatory requirement
The successful service provider must sign a project charter before commencement, defining objectives, scope, methodology, timelines, deliverables, roles, reporting protocols, confidentiality, and quality assurance.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
94Inferred operational need
3. DECLARATION I, the undersigned, (name) in submitting the accompanying bid, do hereby make the following statements that I certify to be true and complete in every respect: 3.1. I have read and I understand the contents of this disclosure; 3.2. I understand that the accompanying bid will be disqualified if this disclosure is found not to be true and complete in every respect; 3.3. The bidder has arrived at the accompanying bid independently from, and without consultation, communication, agreement, or arrangement with any competitor. However, communication between partners in a joint venture or consortium will not be construed as collusive bidding. 3.4. In addition, there have been no consultations, communications, agreements or arrangements with any competitor regarding the quality, quantity, specifications, prices, including methods, factors or formulas used to calculate prices, market allocation, the intention or decision to submit or not to submit the bid, bidding with the intention not to win the bid and conditions or delivery particulars of the products or services to which this bid invitation relates. 3.5. The terms of the accompanying bid have not been, and will not be, disclosed by the bidder, directly or indirectly, to any competitor, prior to the date and time of the official bid opening or of the awarding of the contract. 3.6. There have been no consultations, communications, agreements or arrangements made by the bidder with any official of the procuring institution in relation to this procurement process prior to and during the bidding process except to provide clarification on the bid submitted where so required by the institution; and the bidder was not involved in the drafting of the specifications or terms of reference for this bid. 3.7. I am aware that, in addition and without prejudice to any other remedy provided to combat any restrictive practices related to bids and contracts, bids that are suspicious will be reported to the Competition Commission for investigation and possible imposition of administrative penalties in terms of section 59 of the Competition Act No and or may be reported to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) for criminal investigation and or may be restricted from conducting business with the public sector for a period not exceeding ten (10) years in terms of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act No or any other applicable legislation. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED IN PARAGRAPHS 1, 2 and 3 ABOVE IS CORRECT. I ACCEPT THAT THE STATE MAY REJECT THE BID OR ACT AGAINST ME IN TERMS OF PARAGRAPH 6 OF PFMA SCM INSTRUCTION /22 ON PREVENTING AND COMBATING ABUSE IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SHOULD THIS DECLARATION PROVE TO BE FALSE.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
95Inferred operational need
Submit completed RFQ, signed SBD 4 and SBD 6.1, company profile, methodology, CVs of key personnel, three reference letters, B-BBEE certificate, and independence declaration by 30 June 2026 at 11:00 am via email to [email protected] (cc: [email protected]).
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
96Mandatory requirement
Mandatory compliance: CSD registration with valid tax PIN, valid tax certificate, and proof of B-BBEE status.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
97Inferred operational need
Evaluation criteria: 25% company experience, 35% technical methodology, 30% key personnel qualifications, 10% deliverable management. 80/20 preference point system applies (80% price, 20% B-BBEE).
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records HARMONY AND HELP CONSULTANCY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 95450 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
98Inferred operational need
Controlling interest is defined as holding majority equity or having the deciding vote or power to influence enterprise decisions.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.