This tender has been awarded to MERPAK for R 5 552 400 00.
MERPAK
Issuing Organization
Electoral Commission (IEC)
Location
Gauteng
Award Date
5 October 2026
Award Date
5 October 2026
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
78958
Awarded To
(MERPAK)
Awarding Entity
Electoral Commission (IEC)
Award Value
R 5 552 400 00
Awarded: 5 October 2026
GOVERNMENT
Handheld laser barcode scanner - electoral commission
Ubt cardboard version lge2026 - 48 candi - electoral commission
Election tablets - electoral commission
Iec mobile app development
Box file 5 pack flat a4 size
Get a full report on (MERPAK) including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf
402.4 KB
Tender source analysis
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
The electoral commission is procuring printed pink disputed ballot envelopes b5 and c5 for use in disputed ballots. Bidders must submit their bids online through the votaquotes system and meet the specified technical and compliance requirements.
AI Document Analysis Stages
Description
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
30 sourced criteria
financial capacity
1 sourced criteria
pricing
1 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
1 sourced criteria
evaluation
26 sourced criteria
experience
1 sourced criteria
personnel
Source analysis requires completion or review
equipment capacity
1 sourced criteria
delivery contract
3 sourced criteria
equity registrations
4 sourced criteria
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyAn award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Supply and deliver of knitting and hat making material for cwp.
Supply and delivery of cleaning material for cwp sites in the provinces.
Appointment of a suitable service provider to supply, deliver and offload cleaning materials and chemicals
External communications and reputation management service provider
Appointment of a panel of professional civil engineers to provide civil engineering services for the council for geoscience (cgs) for a period of three (3) years
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Printed pink (any shade) disputed ballot envelopes b5
(Marked) and c5 (unmarked) 80gsm
The Electoral Commission is desirous to procure the following:
1.1. Printed (any shade) pink disputed ballot envelopes: B5 (Marked) and C5
(Unmarked) to be used for the purposes of disputed ballots.
1.2. Note that samples submitted will not be returned to bidders at any point.
1.3. Bidders must be registered and approved on Electoral Commission’s Votaquotes
system (https://votaquotes.elections.org.za) to place a bid online.
1.4. A briefing session is scheduled for:
Date – 20 August 2026
Time – 11:00
Venue – 1303 Heuwel Avenue, Election House, Riverside Park, Centurion
LGE2026 – Bid Specifications for the Logistics Division.
2.1. General specifications for the required items are herewith provided. Bidders may
develop and submit designs within the parameters of these specifications, proposed
design, and illustration. Bidders are to ensure that their bid submissions do not
infringe on any third-party rights, inclusive of proprietary rights. In the event of any
infringement the bidder or service provider awarded a contract will be held liable.
2.2. Bidders ackn
Important Dates
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf (unknown){"briefingSession":{"date":"20 August 2026","time":"11:00","venue":"1303 Heuwel Avenue, Election House, Riverside Park, Centurion","is_compulsory":false}}
Contact Information
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf (unknown){"name":null,"email":null,"phone":"043 736 4004","department":"supply chain management","address":"The Logistics Division"}
Submission Guidelines
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf (unknown)Bidders must submit their bids online through the VotaQuotes system. Partial deliveries will not be accepted unless prior agreement and approval by the Electoral Commission. Bidders are required to submit a written proposal and samples for evaluation purposes.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf (unknown)Bidders must be registered on the National Treasury Central Supplier Database (CSD) and tax compliant. Bidders must meet the minimum requirements for B-BBEE level and CIDB grading (if applicable). The 80/20 preference point system (PPPFA scoring) will apply in the adjudication process.
Technical Specifications
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf (unknown)The Electoral Commission requires printed pink (any shade) disputed ballot envelopes: B5 (Marked) and C5 (Unmarked) to be used for the purposes of disputed ballots. The envelopes must be 80gsm, windowless, and have a "peel and seal" closure. The dimensions of the envelopes are: B5 (Marked) = 176mm x 250mm and C5 (Unmarked) = 162mm x 229mm.
Methodology
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf (unknown)It will be necessary for the successful service provider to develop production strategies to ensure successful performance of the work.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf (unknown)Bidders on this auction should be established operators in the relevant industry and/or have direct control over the product design and production process.
Quality Management
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdfThe Electoral Commission reserves the right to conduct inspections at the service provider's premises for quality and adherence to specifications before deliveries are made.
Financial Requirements
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf (unknown)Prices must include delivery of the specified quantities to the specified sites as per section 18. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of a valid tax invoice and copies of signed delivery notes from the service provider.
Health & Safety
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdfThe service provider must undertake and warrant that all goods shall, at the time of delivery, be according to specifications, in good condition, order and ready for use.
Environmental
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf (unknown)The printed blue special voting envelopes are intended to be recycled after use where possible.
Contractual Terms
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdfThe contract for the supply and delivery of the printed pink disputed ballot envelopes is a 'once off' requirement. However, should the Electoral Commission require additional envelopes, such additional quantities will be ordered from the service provider.
Requirements
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf (unknown)The bidder is not an employee of the state. Having certified the SBD4, it is accepted that the bidder’s conduct does not constitute a transgression of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act.
Section
Source: Bid Specifications Disputed Ballot Envelopes B5 and C5 - 0010573903.pdf11.3. Bidders are required to submit a written proposal and samples for evaluation
11.5. For bid evaluation purposes, all bidders who have submitted a bid for this
Stage 2: Evaluation Based on Functionality
specifications/functionality in accordance with the following evaluation criteria
Key requirements for evaluation.
Bid evaluation criteria
Stage 3: Bid Adjudication Process
Stage 3 – Adjudication of Bids
Only bids that comply with the requirements and conditions of the bid and that meet the minimum criteria in the bid evaluation
Therefore, the 80/20 preference point system (PPPFA scoring) in terms of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act,
2005 (PPPFA) and the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2022 shall apply in the adjudication process of this auction where
all acceptable bids received are equal to or below R50 million including VAT. Preference points will be allocated as follows
B-BBEE Status Level of Contributor Number of Points
Bid Evaluation Committee
provider’s premises for quality and adherence to specifications before deliveries are
quality are in accordance with the specification.
Stage 1: Assessment of Bidder’s Disclosure
As part of the evaluation of the procurement process, the information provided by a person on the SBD4
In so doing, it must be noted that if the bid evaluation establishes that
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MERPAK.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MERPAK.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MERPAK.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MERPAK.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MERPAK.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MERPAK.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: minimum criteria in the bid evaluation
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MERPAK.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: minimum requirements for B-BBEE level and CIDB grading (if applicabl
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: minimum requirements for B-BBEE level and CIDB grading (if applicabl
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: minimum requirements for B-BBEE level and CIDB grading (if applicabl
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MERPAK as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 5552400 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Compare tender activity across provinces.
Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our Blog