Awarded Tender: Mhsc tender: hearing conservation research in sami (MHSC023/2026-27) - national
Contract Awarded
This tender has been awarded to ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA for R 3 400 550 00.
AwardedMHSC023/2026/27
Award Information
Award Value
R 3 400 550 00
Winning Supplier
ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA
Type: GEN
Mining Support Service Activities
Appointment of a service provider to undertake research project coe 240702 “evaluate the effectiveness of current hearing conservation programs in the sami”
Appointment of a service provider to undertake research project coe 240702 “evaluate the effectiveness of current hearing conservation programs in the sami”
What the tender required and what the award supports
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Summary
The mine health and safety council (mhsc) invites bids from qualified service providers to conduct a research project evaluating the effectiveness of current hearing conservation programs (hcps) in the south african mining industry (sami). The appointed provider will conduct literature reviews, analyze noise risk profiles, develop a guidance document and framework, and deliver reports over an 18-month period. This tender is for experienced research teams with expertise in occupational hygiene, audiology, and occupational medicine.
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards — PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement — so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
DocumentMHSC_023_2026_2027.pdfReview complete
Description
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf
Award analysis coverage
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
37 sourced criteria
financial capacity
7 sourced criteria
pricing
5 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
23 sourced criteria
evaluation
20 sourced criteria
experience
6 sourced criteria
personnel
5 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
3 sourced criteria
equity registrations
9 sourced criteria
What the buyer was looking for
1Inferred operational need
Submit bids via email to [email protected] by 19 August 2026, 11:00 AM. Late bids are not accepted.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
Expected outcomes include: project initiation report, literature review report, noise risk profile report, guidance document report, final HCP framework, stakeholder workshop report, draft final report, and final report.
Project duration: 18 months (15 months for project work, 3 months for MHSC administrative duties).
Important Dates
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
Closing date and time: 19 August 2026 at 11:00 AM.
Non-compulsory briefing session: 31 July 2026 at 12:00, via Microsoft Teams. Meeting link: https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/365978273845606?p=eGRGExqUa6PVWUtT64.
Deadline for queries: 10 August 2026. Submit written queries to [email protected].
Bid validity period: Your bid must remain valid for 120 days from the closing date.
Briefing Session
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
Non-compulsory briefing session: 31 July 2026 at 12:00.
No phone numbers or physical addresses are provided in the document.
Do not approach any other MHSC employees for information.
Submission Guidelines
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
Submit your bid via email to [email protected]. The maximum email attachment size is 150MB.
Bids must be submitted by the closing date: 19 August 2026 at 11:00 AM. Late submissions will not be considered.
You must use the official bid forms (SBD documents) provided. Do not retype them; photocopies are acceptable.
Complete and submit the following mandatory returnable documents: SBD1 (Invitation to Bid), SBD4 (Bidder's Disclosure), SBD6.1 (Preference Claim Form), and SBD3 (Pricing Schedule).
You must be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) before submitting. Non-registered bidders will be disqualified.
Provide your Tax Compliance Status PIN from SARS or your CSD number in SBD1. Failure to be tax compliant will disqualify your bid.
Bids must be signed in black ink. Ensure all pages are present and no pages are duplicated.
Do not set any counter conditions or amend bid conditions, as this will invalidate your bid.
Returnable Documents
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
Bidders must sign the tender register when submitting their bid at the tender box.
SBD4 (Bidder's Disclosure) must be completed and signed. It requires disclosure of any relationship with state employees, interests in other enterprises, and confirmation of no collusive bidding.
Bidders must certify that information is true and complete; false declarations may lead to disqualification and penalties.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
Stage 1: Mandatory Evaluation – Must comply with all mandatory requirements:
Occupational hygienist/technologist registered with SAIOH (attach valid certificate).
Occupational Medical Practitioner registered with HPCSA (attach valid certificate).
Audiologist registered with HPCSA (attach valid certificate).
Stage 2: Technical/Functionality Evaluation – Must achieve at least 70% to proceed. Criteria and weights:
Company Experience (5 points): >5 years in applied research/consulting = 5; 5 years = 3; <5 years = 0. Attach company profile.
Reference Letters (5 points): 5+ verifiable letters = 5; 4 = 4; 3 = 3; <3 = 0. Must be signed, on letterhead, with contactable details.
Team Member Experience in Occupational Hygiene (10 points): >10 years = 5; 10 years = 3; <10 = 0. Attach CV.
Qualifications of Occupational Hygienist (10 points): Master's or above = 5; Honours = 3; below = 0. Attach copies.
Experience of Audiologist in SAMI (10 points): >10 years = 5; 10 = 3; <10 = 0. Attach CV.
Qualifications of Audiologist (10 points): Master's or above = 5; Honours = 3; below = 0. Attach copies.
Experience of Occupational Medical Practitioner (10 points): >10 years = 5; 10 = 3; <10 = 0. Attach CV.
Qualification of OMP (5 points): Doctorate = 5; Master's in related field = 4; MBCHB + DOH = 3; below = 0. Attach certificates.
Quality of Project Proposal (35 points): Must address all four requirements (methodology, feasibility, scope coverage, schedule) = 5; otherwise 0. Proposals copying scope verbatim score 0.
Stage 3: Price and Specific Goals Evaluation – 80/20 preference point system. Price scores based on lowest acceptable tender; specific goals points per SBD6.1, supported by valid B-BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit.
Technical Specifications
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
Scope: Evaluate the effectiveness of current Hearing Conservation Programs (HCPs) in the South African Mining Industry (SAMI).
Key Deliverables:
Conduct a local and international literature review on HCP effectiveness, covering factors like occupational noise exposure, ototoxicity, and non-occupational noise.
Using DMPR data (past 10 years), determine the noise risk profile of SAMI employees and study current HCPs to identify best practices and gaps.
Develop a guidance document with improved HCP aspects for the SAMI.
Conduct a stakeholder hybrid workshop in Gauteng.
Expected Outcomes:
Project initiation report.
Literature review report.
Noise risk profile report.
Guidance document report.
Final HCP framework.
Stakeholder workshop report.
Draft final report.
Final report.
Study Sites: Minimum of 2 gold mines, 2 coal mines (1 underground, 1 surface), 2 platinum mines, 2 diamond mines, and 1 other commodity mine.
Team Requirements:
The service provider must have at least 5 years of experience in applied research.
Project team must include members with:
Minimum 10 years' experience in occupational hygiene with expertise in ONIHL, workplace risk factors, and HCPs in SAMI.
Minimum 10 years' experience in audiology with expertise in audiometric assessments and HCP effectiveness in SAMI.
Minimum 10 years' experience as an occupational medical practitioner in SAMI.
Methodology
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf
Conduct a local and international literature review on HCP effectiveness, considering factors contributing to ONIHL, prevalence trends, and gaps in legislative frameworks.
Using DMPR data and other resources (past 10 years), determine the noise risk profile of employees in SAMI and study current HCPs.
Study sites: minimum of 2 gold mines, 2 coal mines (1 underground, 1 surface), 2 platinum mines, 2 diamond mines, and 1 other commodity mine.
Develop a guidance document with improved HCP aspects.
Conduct a stakeholder hybrid workshop in Gauteng.
Quality Management
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf
The project involves evaluating hearing conservation programs, which include engineering controls, worker training, noise zone demarcation, audiometric testing, and use of hearing protection devices.
Engineering controls are preferred for noise reduction, but hearing protection devices are often used as a supplementary measure.
Pricing Schedule
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf
The total price must include everything necessary to complete the terms of the specifications or scope of work.
Pricing schedule (SBD 3.3) includes items: project initiation, literature review report, noise risk profile report, guidance document report, final HCP framework, stakeholder workshop report, draft final report, and final report.
Prices must be inclusive of VAT and all other costs. Price changes may be allowed in terms of the signed contract.
Financial Requirements
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
All prices must be quoted in South African Rand (ZAR), inclusive of VAT and all other costs.
Complete the pricing schedule (SBD 3.3) fully, listing costs for each deliverable: project initiation, literature review report, noise risk profile report, guidance document report, final HCP framework, stakeholder workshop report, draft final report, and final report.
If using imported goods/services subject to exchange rate fluctuations, state the currency and exchange rate at bid time, and specify the portion of price subject to fluctuation.
Submit the pricing proposal with the technical proposal, clearly labelled.
The bid price must remain valid for 120 days from the closing date.
Payment terms: Within 30 days of invoice receipt after completion of deliverables, per PFMA and Treasury Regulations.
No services may be rendered before an official MHSC purchase order is issued.
Compliance Requirements
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
Mandatory Registrations and Certificates:
Occupational hygienist/technologist must be registered with the South African Institute for Occupational Hygiene (SAIOH). Attach valid certificate.
Occupational Medical Practitioner must be registered with the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA). Attach valid certificate.
Audiologist must be registered with the HPCSA. Attach valid certificate.
Tax and Supplier Database:
You must be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD). Non-registration leads to disqualification.
Provide your Tax Compliance Status PIN from SARS or your CSD number in SBD1. Tax non-compliance disqualifies the bid.
B-bbee:
Submit a fully completed SBD6.1 (Preference Claim Form). Points claimed for specific goals must be supported by a valid B-BBEE certificate or a certified sworn affidavit.
False information may result in disqualification.
Other Compliance:
Submit fully completed and signed SBD1, SBD4, and SBD3.
The successful bidder will be required to sign SBD7 (Contract Form) upon award.
Bidders must disclose any relationships with state employees or conflicts of interest in SBD4.
B-BBEE Requirements
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
The 80/20 preference point system applies (for requirements up to R50 million).
Maximum points: 80 for price, 20 for specific goals.
Bidders must complete SBD6.1 to claim specific goals points, supported by a valid B-BBEE certificate or certified sworn affidavit.
Failure to submit proof will be interpreted as not claiming preference points.
The organ of state may require substantiation of any claim at any time.
Health & Safety
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf
The service provider must acknowledge awareness of the Mine Health and Safety Act and OHS Act, and their duties as an employer.
The project addresses occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL), a major occupational health concern in South African mining.
Team must include an occupational medical practitioner with minimum 10 years' experience in SAMI, with qualifications scored (doctorate highest, MBCHB with DOH, etc.).
Environmental
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf
The research references key literature on occupational and environmental noise exposure, hearing loss prevention, and occupational diseases.
Sources include Chamber of Mines, CSIR, Department of Employment and Labour, DMPR, WHO, and academic studies.
Contractual Terms
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf
The award may be subject to price negotiations with the preferred bidder if bid prices are not market related.
Payment will be made within 30 days from receipt of invoice after completion of deliverables, per PFMA and Treasury Regulations.
MHSC reserves the right to conduct due diligence (interviews, samples, presentations, site visits, reference checks) with shortlisted bidders.
Special Conditions
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
MHSC adheres to the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) requirements regarding personal information, effective 1 July 2021. Personal information collected is used properly, lawfully, and transparently.
Requirements
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf (TENDER)
Bidders must be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) prior to submitting their bid. Only registered suppliers will be considered.
Bidders must submit their tax compliance status with their bid in the form of a Tax Verification PIN from SARS or CSD supplier number, captured in SBD1.
Failure to comply with tax obligations will render the bid non-responsive and disqualified.
Section
Source: MHSC_023_2026_2027.pdf
The evaluation process is conducted in stages. To move to the next stage, the previous stage must be fully complied with.
Stage 1: Mandatory Evaluation – Verify mandatory requirements are met. Failure leads to disqualification.
Stage 2: Technical/Functionality Evaluation – Bidders must achieve at least 70% to progress. Criteria include company experience, reference letters, team experience, qualifications, and quality of project proposal.
Stage 3: Price and Specific Goals Evaluation – 80/20 preference point system.
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
2Inferred operational need
Submit all required SBD forms (SBD1, SBD3, SBD4, SBD6.1) fully completed and signed. Use official forms only.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
3Inferred operational need
Provide a detailed project proposal addressing methodology, feasibility, scope, and schedule. Proposals copying the scope verbatim will score zero.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
4Mandatory requirement
Bid must remain valid for 120 days from closing date. Prices must be in ZAR inclusive of VAT.
Threshold: 120 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
5Inferred operational need
Expected outcomes include: project initiation report, literature review report, noise risk profile report, guidance document report, final HCP framework, stakeholder workshop report, draft final report, and final report.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
7Inferred operational need
The project involves evaluating hearing conservation programs, which include engineering controls, worker training, noise zone demarcation, audiometric testing, and use of hearing protection devices.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
11Inferred operational need
Conduct a local and international literature review on HCP effectiveness, considering factors contributing to ONIHL, prevalence trends, and gaps in legislative frameworks.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
13Inferred operational need
Study sites: minimum of 2 gold mines, 2 coal mines (1 underground, 1 surface), 2 platinum mines, 2 diamond mines, and 1 other commodity mine.
Threshold: minimum of 2 gold mines
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
15Inferred operational need
Conduct a stakeholder hybrid workshop in Gauteng.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
23Inferred operational need
• MHSC adheres to the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) requirements regarding personal information, effective 1 July 2021. Personal information collected is used properly, lawfully, and transparently.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
26Inferred operational need
Conduct a local and international literature review on HCP effectiveness, covering factors like occupational noise exposure, ototoxicity, and non-occupational noise.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
39Inferred operational need
Complete the pricing schedule (SBD 3.3) fully, listing costs for each deliverable: project initiation, literature review report, noise risk profile report, guidance document report, final HCP framework, stakeholder workshop report, draft final report, and final report.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
40Inferred operational need
If using imported goods/services subject to exchange rate fluctuations, state the currency and exchange rate at bid time, and specify the portion of price subject to fluctuation.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
47Inferred operational need
Pricing schedule (SBD 3.3) includes items: project initiation, literature review report, noise risk profile report, guidance document report, final HCP framework, stakeholder workshop report, draft final report, and final report.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
49Mandatory requirement
Complete and submit the following mandatory returnable documents: SBD1 (Invitation to Bid), SBD4 (Bidder's Disclosure), SBD6.1 (Preference Claim Form), and SBD3 (Pricing Schedule).
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
50Mandatory requirement
Must be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) and provide a valid Tax Compliance PIN or CSD number.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
51Mandatory requirement
Bidders must submit their tax compliance status with their bid in the form of a Tax Verification PIN from SARS or CSD supplier number, captured in SBD1.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
53Mandatory requirement
SBD4 (Bidder's Disclosure) must be completed and signed. It requires disclosure of any relationship with state employees, interests in other enterprises, and confirmation of no collusive bidding.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
73Inferred operational need
Achieve at least 70% in the functionality evaluation (Stage 2) to proceed. Key criteria include company experience, reference letters, team expertise, and project proposal quality.
Threshold: at least 70% in the functionality evaluation (Stage 2) to proceed
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
74Scored criterion
The evaluation process is conducted in stages. To move to the next stage, the previous stage must be fully complied with.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Conflicting evidence
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
Relevant records disagree; review the cited sources and dates.
76Scored criterion
Stage 2: Technical/Functionality Evaluation – Bidders must achieve at least 70% to progress. Criteria include company experience, reference letters, team experience, qualifications, and quality of project proposal.
Threshold: at least 70% to progress
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
78Scored criterion
Team must include an occupational medical practitioner with minimum 10 years' experience in SAMI, with qualifications scored (doctorate highest, MBCHB with DOH, etc.).
Threshold: minimum 10 years' experience in SAMI
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
99Mandatory requirement
Mandatory team registrations: SAIOH for occupational hygienist, HPCSA for audiologist and occupational medical practitioner. Attach valid certificates.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
100Inferred operational need
Venue: Microsoft Teams meeting.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
112Scored criterion
Stage 3: Price and Specific Goals Evaluation – 80/20 preference point system. Price scores based on lowest acceptable tender; specific goals points per SBD6.1, supported by valid B-BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records ENTERPRISES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 3400550 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
114Mandatory requirement
Submit a fully completed SBD6.1 (Preference Claim Form). Points claimed for specific goals must be supported by a valid B-BBEE certificate or a certified sworn affidavit.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.