This tender has been awarded to LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY for R 50 000 00.
LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY
Issuing Organization
Technology Innovation Agency
Location
Gauteng
Award Date
12 June 2026
Award Date
12 June 2026
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
70460
Awarded To
LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY
Awarding Entity
Technology Innovation Agency
Award Value
R 50 000 00
Awarded: 12 June 2026
GOVERNMENT
Kaeser compressor service (c service/major/overhaul) - please email to [email protected]
Govern AI subscription - technology innovation
Method of training: online course name: html and ccs accredited training please ensure you offer us accredited course
Sourcing a certification body for iso 9001:2015 recertification audits, annual surveillance audits, and training services over a three-year cycle
Hyland sharebase licences x 100
No other awards found for this supplier.
Get a full report on LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
SBD4 new.doc
86.5 KB
SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 CORRECT_request for quotes.docx
48.1 KB
POS9800.docx
98.6 KB
Tender source analysis
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
The technology innovation agency is seeking a service provider to deliver an in-person amavi and les SA ip valuation course for one delegate. This tender is open to all eligible suppliers and requires strict compliance with ethical, transparency, and anti-corruption standards.
AI Document Analysis Stages
Review in progress
The information shown on this card is preliminary. Our procurement team is currently finalising the submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical specifications, financial requirements, and compliance sections so you have a clean, bid-ready summary to work from. Document being finalised: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 CORRECT_request for quotes.docx. You don’t need to refresh — this page will pick up the updated review automatically.
0 of 3 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
5 sourced criteria
financial capacity
3 sourced criteria
pricing
1 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
7 sourced criteria
evaluation
3 sourced criteria
experience
Source analysis requires completion or review
personnel
Source analysis requires completion or review
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
1 sourced criteria
equity registrations
7 sourced criteria
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Provision of installation and infrastructure upgrade for anti-climb perimeter security fence at ESKOM megawatt park (mwp) for a period of forty-seven (47) months. (Eleven (11) months construction and thirty-six (36) months maintenance and support).
Request for information (RFI) hosted and managed private infrastructure-as-a-service
Procurement of 889 security insignia.
Request for quote o payments of stipents bma im2272026
The appointment of a professional service provider to conduct an economic and social cost-benefit analysis of climate change impacts and adaptation measures in key sectors of south africa, in line with the climate change act, 2024 (act n0. 22 of 2024) for a period of three (3) years.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Important Dates
Source: POS9800.docxClosing date for submissions: 08 June 2026 at 09:00 AM.
Contact Information
Source: POS9800.docxContact Person: Mapule Msiza. Email: [email protected]. Delivery address: In-person training with online exams.
Submission Guidelines
Source: POS9800.docxSubmit a completed and signed Request for Quotation (RFQ) form. Include the following returnable documents: SBD 4, SBD 6.1, and proof of specific goals where applicable. Quotations received after 08 June 2026 at 09:00 AM will be disqualified. Price quotations must remain valid for 30 days after the closing date.
Returnable Documents
Source: POS9800.docxQuotations must be accompanied by: SBD 4, SBD 6.1 forms, proof of specific goals where applicable, and the completed and signed Request for Quotation (RFQ) form.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: POS9800.docxEvaluation uses the 80/20 preferential point system. Functional criteria: Supplier must be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD). Quotations must be valid for 30 days post-closing. Preferential points (20 max) are awarded for: 50% ownership by Historically Disadvantaged Individuals (HDI) (proof: share register/CSD report), 51% ownership by Black Women (proof: share register/CSD report), at least one owner with a disability (proof: physician’s letter with practice number), at least one owner is a youth (proof: certified ID copy).
Technical Specifications
Source: POS9800.docxScope: Provide the AMAVI and LES SA IP Valuation Certification Course for 1 delegate (in-person). The candidate has completed Block 1, so only Blocks 2-3 are required. Training Phase (3-4 months): Preparation via online modules (Excel, IP, Corporate Finance & Accounting). Blocks 2-3: 3 days per block, mix of on-site and virtual courses (60 hours total, including lectures, exercises, case studies, and over 1500 slides). Deliverables: Written IP valuation report focusing on a real case, with double grading (individual candidate assessment + final synthesis by jury). Exam Phase (3-4 months): Online exam with 2-hour modules, 30 questions per module from a bank of over 180 questions and exercises. Outcome: Internationally recognised professional standard in IP valuation, covering diagnosis of valuation mandates, structuring engagements, assessing IP's contribution to business strategy, selecting valuation methodologies, and implementing core deterministic IP valuation approaches.
Financial Requirements
Source: POS9800.docxPayment terms: Invoice paid after goods and services delivery and within 30 days as per the National Treasury Act. Quotations must include pricing for the full course (Blocks 2-3, training, and exam phases).
Compliance Requirements
Source: POS9800.docxSuppliers must be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD). Proof of specific goals (where applicable) must be submitted with the quotation. Required proofs: Share Register or CSD Report for HDI and Black Women ownership, physician's letter confirming disability, and certified ID copy for youth ownership.
Special Conditions
Source: POS9800.docxQuotations received after the closing date and time will not be considered. Price quotations must remain valid for 30 days after the closing date.
Section
Source: POS9800.docxContact Person Mapule Msiza Email Address [email protected]
Submission Guidelines
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 CORRECT_request for quotes.docxSubmit the SBD 6.1 Preference Points Claim Form as part of your quotation. Include all required proof or documentation for specific goals to claim preference points. The organ of state may request substantiation of claims at any time, including after adjudication.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 CORRECT_request for quotes.docxEvaluation uses either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system, determined by the lowest acceptable tender. Points are awarded for: Price (80 or 90 points) and Specific Goals (20 or 10 points). Specific goals include: 50% HDI ownership (5 points), 51% black women ownership (5 points), disability ownership (5 points), or youth ownership (5 points). Tenderers must certify claims and accept penalties for fraud or non-compliance, including disqualification, cost recovery, contract cancellation, or blacklisting for up to 10 years.
Technical Specifications
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 CORRECT_request for quotes.docxThe tender is for an in-person AMAVI and LES SA IP Valuation Course for 1 delegate. No additional technical specifications, deliverables, or service levels are provided.
Compliance Requirements
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022 CORRECT_request for quotes.docxCompliance with the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2022 is mandatory. Tenderers must: Complete the SBD 6.1 form. Provide proof for any specific goals claimed (e.g., B-BBEE ownership, disability, youth). Certify the accuracy of all claims. Accept potential penalties for fraudulent claims, including disqualification, cost recovery, contract cancellation, or blacklisting for up to 10 years.
Description
Source: SBD4 new.docDefinitions: - Controlling interest: Majority equity holder or person/s with deciding vote/power to direct enterprise decisions. - Joint venture/consortium: Association of persons combining expertise, property, capital, efforts, skill, and knowledge for contract execution.
Submission Guidelines
Source: SBD4 new.docSubmit the following returnable documents: - Completed and signed Bidder’s Disclosure Form (SBD4). - Declaration of Interest, certifying: no state employment for bidder/directors/trustees/shareholders; no relationships with Technology Innovation Agency employees; no conflicts of interest; no collusion with competitors; no prior involvement in drafting specifications; no disclosure of bid terms before official opening. - Bid must be prepared independently, without competitor consultation.
Returnable Documents
Source: SBD4 new.docRequired returnables: - SBD4 Bidder’s Disclosure Form, with declarations on: state employment (bidder/directors/trustees/shareholders/partners); relationships with procuring institution employees; interests in related enterprises. - If applicable, provide full names, identity numbers, and state employee numbers for affected individuals.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: SBD4 new.docDisqualification criteria: - Automatic disqualification if bidder, directors, trustees, shareholders, or partners are listed in the Register for Tender Defaulters or List of Restricted Suppliers. - Failure to disclose state employment or relationships with procuring institution employees results in disqualification. - Evidence of collusion, competitor consultation, or involvement in specification drafting disqualifies the bid. - Non-compliance with South African competition and anti-corruption laws (e.g., Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act No. 12 of 2004) leads to disqualification. - False or incomplete SBD4 declarations may result in bid rejection or action under PFMA SCM Instruction 03 of 2021/22.
Technical Specifications
Source: SBD4 new.docScope: In-person AMAVI AND LES SA IP Valuation Course for 1 delegate. - Eligibility: Open to any natural or juristic person. - Bid must align with principles of transparency, accountability, impartiality, and ethics as per the Constitution of South Africa. - Definitions: Controlling interest = majority equity or deciding vote/power to direct enterprise decisions. Joint venture/consortium = association combining expertise, property, capital, efforts, skill, and knowledge for contract execution.
Compliance Requirements
Source: SBD4 new.docMandatory compliance: - Bidder, directors, trustees, shareholders, members, or partners must not be listed in the Register for Tender Defaulters or List of Restricted Suppliers. - Full and accurate completion of the Bidder’s Declaration (SBD4) is required; false or incomplete disclosures risk disqualification. - No collusion, prior competitor consultation, or involvement in specification drafting is permitted. - Compliance with PFMA SCM Instruction 03 of 2021/22 on preventing and combating abuse in SCM is mandatory. - Suspicious bids may be reported to the Competition Commission or National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) for investigation, with potential penalties under applicable legislation.
Requirements
Source: SBD4 new.docBidder certifications: - Confirmation of independent bid preparation (no competitor consultation). - No collusion on quality, quantity, specifications, prices, or delivery terms. - No disclosure of bid terms to competitors before official opening. - No prior consultations with procuring institution officials (except for clarification). - No involvement in drafting specifications. - Acceptance that false declarations may lead to bid rejection or action under PFMA SCM Instruction 03 of 2021/22.
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 4 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 4 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: at least one owner with a disability (proof: physician’s letter with
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: at least one owner with a disability (proof: physician’s letter with
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 90 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 10 years
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LICENCING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 50000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Compare tender activity across provinces.
Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
Win SETA-accredited training tenders, skills development contracts, and educational service opportunities. Learn about SAQA registration and accreditation.
Access North West education infrastructure development tenders for 2026. A practical guide to school construction, sanitation, and maintenance procurement for CIDB-registered contractors in the province.
Access Limpopo education department school building maintenance tenders. Guide to school repairs, renovations, and infrastructure contracts.
Guide to Western Cape education department tenders for suppliers. Learn about school supplies, infrastructure, catering, and educational services procurement.
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our Blog