Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Documents available on tender detail page
Tender Type
Request for Quotation
Delivery Location
555 School Street - Petrsuville - Petrusville - 8770
Organization Type
GOVERNMENT
Published
20 Jul 2026
OCDS Reference
ocds-9t57fa-162938
This erratum amends the evaluation criteria for the request for quotation (ren RFQ 002/26/27) issued by renosterberg local municipality for the review of SCM and uifw-related policies and facilitation of workshops. IT clarifies the allocation of the 20 preference points, splitting them between local economic development (locality) and black ownership. Bidders must note that this erratum supersedes any inconsistent allocation in the original bid document.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Return to this tender’s issuing organisation, province, or category.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Date & Time
Monday, 27 July 2026 - 12:00
Venue
null
None
Categories
Request for Quotation
555 School Street - Petrsuville - Petrusville - 8770
Tenders in this industry often require registration with these bodies.
Recommended Certifications
Having these can improve your winning chances: IITPSA Membership, ISO 27001 (Information Security Management), ISO 20000 (IT Service Management), CISSP
AI Document Analysis Stages
Description
Source: ERRATUM - SCM AND UIFW (REN RQF 002 2627) Signed.pdf20 Jul
2026
Tender Published
Tender was published
27 Jul
2026
Closing Date
Tender closing date
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
ERRATUM - SCM AND UIFW (REN RQF 002 2627) Signed.pdf
This erratum corrects the evaluation criteria for a tender (REN RFQ 002/26/27) issued by Renosterberg Local Municipality. The original criteria for 'Specific Goals' have been replaced with a new structure that splits 20 preference points equally between Local Economic Development (based on supplier locality) and Black Ownership. The amendment is mandatory and overrides any inconsistent information in the original bid document.
To download these documents and access AI-powered analysis, visit the main tender page.
Matched by category & region
Free guidance to prepare before you bid
Not sure if your business is ready for this tender? Check CSD, CIDB, and B-BBEE requirements, run a readiness assessment, and move from opportunity to submission.
Open Supplier Readiness HubWe refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Erratum 002 26/27 for the "REVIEW OF SCM AND UIFW-RELATED POLICIES AND FACILITATION OF WORKSHOPS" bid.
Important Dates
Source: ERRATUM - SCM AND UIFW (REN RQF 002 2627) Signed.pdf (RFQ)Closing Date: 20 JUL 2026
Evaluation Criteria
Source: ERRATUM - SCM AND UIFW (REN RQF 002 2627) Signed.pdf (RFQ)The evaluation of Specific Goals (20 points) shall be conducted in accordance with Pages 7 and 8 of the bid documents and shall be allocated as follows:
Specific Goal 1: Local Economic Development (Maximum 10 Points)
Specific Goal 2: Black Ownership (Maximum 10 Points)
The Municipality confirms that the 20 preference points are split as follows:
This amendment shall also apply to the MBD 6.1: Preference Points Claim Form (Table 1). Bidders are advised that preference points for Specific Goals will be evaluated and allocated in accordance with this Erratum, notwithstanding any inconsistent allocation reflected elsewhere in the bid document.
The evaluation of bids shall be conducted in accordance with this Erratum, which forms an integral part of the original bid document. All other terms and conditions of the bid remain unchanged.
Technical Specifications
Source: ERRATUM - SCM AND UIFW (REN RQF 002 2627) Signed.pdf (RFQ)Review of SCM and UIFW-related policies and facilitation of workshops.
Erratum 002 26/27 for the "REVIEW OF SCM AND UIFW-RELATED POLICIES AND FACILITATION OF WORKSHOPS" bid.
Section
Source: ERRATUM - SCM AND UIFW (REN RQF 002 2627) Signed.pdfThe evaluation of Specific Goals (20 points) shall be conducted in accordance with Pages 7 and 8 of the bid documents and shall be allocated as follows:
Specific Goal 1: Local Economic Development (Maximum 10 Points)
Specific Goal 2: Black Ownership (Maximum 10 Points)
The Municipality confirms that the 20 preference points are split as follows:
This amendment shall also apply to the MBD 6.1: Preference Points Claim Form (Table 1). Bidders are advised that preference points for Specific Goals will be evaluated and allocated in accordance with this Erratum, notwithstanding any inconsistent allocation reflected elsewhere in the bid document.
The evaluation of bids shall be conducted in accordance with this Erratum, which forms an integral part of the original bid document. All other terms and conditions of the bid remain unchanged.
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 5 of 2000
Covers preferential procurement and preference-point systems used in public tenders.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 12 of 2004
Supports anti-corruption controls and supplier integrity in procurement processes.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 28 of 2024
Provides the national framework for public procurement across government.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 2 of 2000
Supports access to tender records, award decisions and public-sector procurement information.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 3 of 2000
Supports lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative tender decisions.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
These rules are linked to the work category, industry, or regulated service area.
Act 88 of 1998
Relevant to public-sector ICT procurement and government technology acquisition routes.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve telecommunications, networks, fibre, connectivity, or electronic communications.
Act 36 of 2005
Relevant to telecoms, network infrastructure, electronic communications services and connectivity tenders.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve telecommunications, networks, fibre, connectivity, or electronic communications.
Act 25 of 2002
Relevant to electronic transactions, digital procurement channels, e-signatures and online service delivery.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve telecommunications, networks, fibre, connectivity, or electronic communications.
Address
Renosterberg Local Municipality, South Africa
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
1
Last checked
02 Aug 2026
AI status
Enhanced
Data conflicts
None detected
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.
Median Estimate
R 1 893 948
Range
Based on 10 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogGet deep intelligence on Telecommunications. Unlock full pricing strategies, bid frequency, and historical win rates.