Awarded Tender: Dept of communications digital gauteng open tender service
Contract Awarded
This tender has been awarded to ZAPPARRATA GERING for R 4 669 000 00.
Awarded
Award Information
Award Value
R 4 669 000 00
Winning Supplier
ZAPPARRATA GERING
Type: EME
Professional Services
Services: Professional
DCDT/07/2025/26 appointment of a service provider to review sita’s business model and strategic relevance within the digital public services infrastructure context
Issuing Organization
DEPARTMENTOF COMMUNICATIONS AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
DCDT/07/2025/26 appointment of a service provider to review sita’s business model and strategic relevance within the digital public services infrastructure context
Validity Period90 Days
Briefing Session
Yes (Compulsory)1166 Park Street, iParioli Office Park, Bluecrane Boardroom
Original Tender Documents
DCDT-07-2025-26 Review Sita’s business model and strategic relevance within the digital public services infrastructure context.pdf
What the tender required and what the award supports
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Summary
The department of communications and digital technologies (DCDT) is seeking a qualified service provider to conduct a comprehensive review of the state information technology agency’s (SITA) business model and its strategic relevance within the digital public services infrastructure. The contract is open to professional service firms with expertise in digital government transformation and is based in gauteng.
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards — PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement — so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
Review in progress
The information shown on this card is preliminary. Our procurement team is currently finalising the submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical specifications, financial requirements, and compliance sections so you have a clean, bid-ready summary to work from. Document being finalised: DCDT-07-2025-26 Review Sita’s business model and strategic relevance within the digital public services infrastructure context.pdf. You don’t need to refresh — this page will pick up the updated review automatically.
DocumentDCDT-07-2025-26 Review Sita’s business model and strategic relevance within the digital public services infrastructure context.pdf
Award analysis coverage
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
2 sourced criteria
financial capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
pricing
Source analysis requires completion or review
compliance returnables
4 sourced criteria
evaluation
Source analysis requires completion or review
experience
1 sourced criteria
personnel
1 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
Source analysis requires completion or review
equity registrations
Source analysis requires completion or review
What the buyer was looking for
1Inferred operational need
Provide a methodology for assessing SITA’s role and relevance within the national digital infrastructure.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ZAPPARRATA GERING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4669000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
Compliance review in progress
Submission Guidelines
Source: DCDT-07-2025-26 Review Sita’s business model and strategic relevance within the digital public services infrastructure context.pdf
Submit all required returnable documents as specified in the tender (exact list not extracted).
Ensure documents are complete and signed where required.
Late or incomplete submissions may be disqualified.
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
2Inferred operational need
Ensure confidentiality and security of all DCDT and SITA information accessed during the engagement.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ZAPPARRATA GERING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4669000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
3Mandatory requirement
Submit all required returnable documents as specified in the tender, ensuring they are complete and signed.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ZAPPARRATA GERING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4669000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
4Inferred operational need
Meet the submission deadline of 30 January 2026, 09:00 GMT.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records ZAPPARRATA GERING as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4669000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
5Inferred operational need
Comply with DCDT’s procurement and compliance standards for open‑tender professional services.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for ZAPPARRATA GERING.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
6Mandatory requirement
• Submit all required returnable documents as specified in the tender (exact list not extracted). • Ensure documents are complete and signed where required. • Late or incomplete submissions may be disqualified.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.