This tender has been awarded to MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS for R 4 987 148 44.
Awarded
Award Information
Award Value
R 4 987 148 44
Winning Supplier
MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS
Type: EME
Professional Services
Services: Professional
Request for proposal for the appointment of a service provider to undertake various technical studies and township establishment processes for the creation of integrated and sustainable human settlement development in tshing area, within the jurisdiction of jb marks local municipality, north-west province
Request for proposal for the appointment of a service provider to undertake various technical studies and township establishment processes for the creation of integrated and sustainable human settlement development in tshing area, within the jurisdiction of jb marks local municipality, north-west province
What the tender required and what the award supports
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Summary
The housing development agency is seeking a service provider to conduct technical studies and manage township establishment processes for an integrated, sustainable human settlement in the tshing area of jb marks local municipality. The contract is open to professional service firms with relevant experience in planning, surveying, environmental, geotechnical, civil, traffic and social facilitation disciplines.
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards — PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement — so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
Review in progress
The information shown on this card is preliminary. Our procurement team is currently finalising the submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical specifications, financial requirements, and compliance sections so you have a clean, bid-ready summary to work from. Document being finalised: Tender document - HDANW2025028.pdf. You don’t need to refresh — this page will pick up the updated review automatically.
DocumentTender document - HDANW2025028.pdfCompliance review in progress
What the buyer was looking for
1Inferred operational need
Minimum 70% technical score required to progress to price evaluation.
Threshold: Minimum 70% technical score required to progress to price evaluation
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS.
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
Important Dates
Source: Tender document - HDANW2025028.pdf
Closing date: 30 January 2026
Closing time: 11:00 am
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Tender document - HDANW2025028.pdf
Evaluation will be conducted in four stages:
Admin compliance (Stage 1) – check completeness of all required documents, certificates and warranties. Incomplete or non‑compliant bids are disqualified.
Technical evaluation (Stage 2) – detailed analysis of capability against functional criteria. Minimum technical threshold is 70%; bidders scoring below are excluded from price evaluation.
Price and Specific Goals (Stage 3) – price evaluated on an 80/20 point system together with specific goal scores.
Bidder verification (Stage 4) – verification of information supplied in SBD 4.
Additional notes:
Bids may be invited to a Best and Final Offer if no bid meets the required points.
Final approval and notification follow the evaluation stages.
Technical Specifications
Source: Tender document - HDANW2025028.pdf
Scope of work is outlined in Annexure 1 (details not provided in extracted text).
Key functional criteria and points:
Work‑related experience (up to 45 points) – based on number of similar township establishment projects completed.
CVs of proposed team members (up to 45 points) – must include certified copies of qualifications and professional registrations not older than 3 months.
Approach, methodology, work plan and process (10 points).
Professional qualifications required (each with specific points):
Town Planner (SACPLAN) – up to 10 points.
Land Surveyor (SAGC) – up to 5 points.
Environmentalist (SA Council for Natural Science) – up to 5 points.
Geologist or Geotechnical Engineer (SACNASP/ECSA) – up to 5 points.
Civil Engineer (Pr Eng/Pr Tech Eng) – up to 5 points.
Traffic Engineer (ECSA) – up to 5 points.
Social Facilitator (Degree in Social Sciences) – up to 5 points.
Scoring follows the minimum 70 % threshold for technical evaluation.
Compliance Requirements
Source: Tender document - HDANW2025028.pdf
No specific requirements found
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
2Inferred operational need
Demonstrated experience on similar township establishment projects (up to 45 points).
Threshold: 45 points
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
3Inferred operational need
Qualified team members with current professional registrations (Town Planner, Land Surveyor, Environmentalist, Geologist/Geotechnical Engineer, Civil Engineer, Traffic Engineer, Social Facilitator).
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
4Inferred operational need
Submission of certified CVs and qualifications not older than three months.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
5Mandatory requirement
Completion of all required returnable documents; non‑compliance leads to disqualification.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
6Inferred operational need
Evaluation follows four stages: admin compliance, technical evaluation, price & specific goals, and bidder verification.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
7Inferred operational need
Potential invitation for Best and Final Offer if no bid meets required points.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
8Inferred operational need
Returnable Documents:
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
10Scored criterion
**Admin compliance (Stage 1)** – check completeness of all required documents, certificates and warranties. Incomplete or non‑compliant bids are disqualified.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS as appointed for this tender.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
11Scored criterion
**Technical evaluation (Stage 2)** – detailed analysis of capability against functional criteria. Minimum technical threshold is 70%; bidders scoring below are excluded from price evaluation.
Threshold: Minimum technical threshold is 70%
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for MAGODA DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
20Mandatory requirement
CVs of proposed team members (up to 45 points) – must include certified copies of qualifications and professional registrations not older than 3 months.
Threshold: 45 points
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.