This tender has been awarded to WOOD SOUTH AFRICA for R 12 273 210 00.
WOOD SOUTH AFRICA
Issuing Organization
PetroSA
Location
Western Cape
Award Date
1 October 2026
Award Date
1 October 2026
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
82416
Awarded To
WOOD SOUTH AFRICA
Awarding Entity
PetroSA
Award Value
R 12 273 210 00
Awarded: 1 October 2026
GOVERNMENT
Provision of drone inspection services of lpg spheres for petrosa, mossel bay
Provision for a fa platfrom monitoring settlement survey for petrosa
Feasibility study - petrosa
Provision of civil services to petrosa gtl refinery
Proposal for alarm monitoring at the centre of excellence and repeater towers in mossel bay
Get a full report on WOOD SOUTH AFRICA including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
HOW TO SUBMIT A TENDER OR QUOTATION.pdf
2103.5 KB
CTT26927_Scope of Work.pdf
188.7 KB
Tender source analysis
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Petrosa is procuring a comprehensive feasibility engineering study for a proposed 300-360 mw combined cycle gas turbine (ccgt) power plant at the gtl refinery in mossel bay, utilising indigenous offshore gas and existing infrastructure. The appointed consultant must confirm technical and commercial viability and produce a bankable aace class 3 cost estimate. Bidders must be registered on the csd with a maaa number to access the full tender documentation.
AI Document Analysis Stages
Submission Guidelines
Source: HOW TO SUBMIT A TENDER OR QUOTATION.pdf (RFQ)0 of 2 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
8 sourced criteria
financial capacity
3 sourced criteria
pricing
Source analysis requires completion or review
compliance returnables
4 sourced criteria
evaluation
4 sourced criteria
experience
Source analysis requires completion or review
personnel
1 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
1 sourced criteria
delivery contract
Source analysis requires completion or review
equity registrations
Source analysis requires completion or review
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for WOOD SOUTH AFRICA.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceAn award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Appointment of a professional civil & structural engineering consulting for the construction of municipal stores
Consolidated CRM support and maintenance for twelve (12) months
Appointment of a panel of service providers for events management for a period of three (3) years
Provision of office premises to lease for overstrand sub-district in hermanus for the period ending 30 june 2029
Appointment of a service provider for the supply and delivery of radar tools at george airport (fagg)
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Bidders must submit electronically through the PetroSA e-tender portal. The process involves logging in, accepting terms and conditions, completing two questionnaires (an evaluation criteria questionnaire and a tender questionnaire), entering a response price and lead time, attaching required documents, and submitting the tender. Changing a price after submission cancels the original tender unless the tender is resubmitted.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: HOW TO SUBMIT A TENDER OR QUOTATION.pdf (RFQ)The evaluation process uses a system-based evaluation criteria questionnaire and a separate tender questionnaire that bidders must complete. No specific scoring weights or thresholds are stated in the available document.
Technical Specifications
Source: HOW TO SUBMIT A TENDER OR QUOTATION.pdf (RFQ)The tender is for a feasibility engineering study for a gas power plant project (Project Alpha). No detailed technical specifications are provided in the available document.
Compliance Requirements
Source: HOW TO SUBMIT A TENDER OR QUOTATION.pdf (RFQ)No specific compliance requirements are stated in the available document.
Section
Source: HOW TO SUBMIT A TENDER OR QUOTATION.pdf (RFQ)The evaluation process includes a system-based evaluation criteria questionnaire and a separate tender questionnaire that bidders must complete. No further details are available.
Description
Source: CTT26927_Scope of Work.pdf (TENDER)The appointed consultant will perform a feasibility-level engineering study to confirm technical and commercial viability and develop a bankable AACE Class 3 cost estimate. The scope includes: development of the Basis of Design (BoD); feasibility engineering for the power island and associated balance-of-plant facilities; assessment of existing utility infrastructure and required upgrades; electrical system design, grid integration and power evacuation studies; identification of project risks, execution strategies and implementation schedules; and support for future Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) and EPC procurement phases.
Important Dates
Source: CTT26927_Scope of Work.pdf (TENDER)Scope clarification meeting: Virtual TEAMS, 11h00 CAT on 20 August 2026. Attendance is optional but must be confirmed by 15h00 on 19 August 2026 by emailing names to the PetroSA representative.
Briefing Session
Source: CTT26927_Scope of Work.pdf (TENDER)A Virtual TEAMS scope clarification meeting is scheduled for 11h00 CAT on 20 August 2026. Tenderers wishing to attend must inform the PetroSA representative by 15h00 on 19 August 2026, submitting names via email.
Contact Information
Source: CTT26927_Scope of Work.pdf (TENDER)Enquiries: Hennie Fortuin, Tender Office, +27 (0)21 929-3211, [email protected]
Submission Guidelines
Source: CTT26927_Scope of Work.pdf (TENDER)All tenders and quotations are submitted via PetroSA's eProcurement system. Access to the full tender documentation requires a CSD registration number (MAAA prefix). Bidders with a MAAA CSD number can log in using the provided credentials; those without must register via the link in the document. Contact the call centre on 012 663 8815 or [email protected] for login issues.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: CTT26927_Scope of Work.pdf (TENDER)No evaluation criteria are stated in the extracted document. Bidders must be registered on the CSD and have a MAAA CSD registration number to access the full tender documentation.
Technical Specifications
Source: CTT26927_Scope of Work.pdf (TENDER)Scope: Feasibility engineering study for a proposed 300-360 MW Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) power plant at the GTL Refinery in Mossel Bay, utilising indigenous offshore gas and existing infrastructure. The study must confirm technical and commercial viability and produce a bankable AACE Class 3 cost estimate.
Work includes: Basis of Design (BoD); feasibility engineering for power island and balance-of-plant; assessment of existing utility infrastructure and upgrades; electrical system design, grid integration and power evacuation studies; risk identification, execution strategies and implementation schedules; support for future FEED and EPC procurement phases.
Key deliverables: BoD Report; Feasibility Engineering Study and Technical Feasibility Report; process, utility, electrical and grid integration studies; preliminary layouts, system philosophies and equipment specifications; RAM assessment; HAZID Workshop Report and Project Risk Register; AACE Class 3 capital and operating cost estimates; project execution and procurement schedules; final executive presentation and supporting documentation.
Compliance Requirements
Source: CTT26927_Scope of Work.pdf (TENDER)Bidders must be registered on the CSD and have a MAAA CSD registration number to access the full tender documentation. Bidders without a MAAA CSD number must register via the provided link.
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for WOOD SOUTH AFRICA.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for WOOD SOUTH AFRICA.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for WOOD SOUTH AFRICA.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for WOOD SOUTH AFRICA.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for WOOD SOUTH AFRICA.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for WOOD SOUTH AFRICA.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records WOOD SOUTH AFRICA as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 12273210 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Browse categories with current opportunities in this area.
Compare tender activity across provinces.
Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our Blog