This tender has been awarded to SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT for R 4 871 906 00.
SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT
Issuing Organization
Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)
Location
Western Cape
Award Date
15 October 2026
Award Date
15 October 2026
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
80507
Awarded To
SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT
Awarding Entity
Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)
Award Value
R 4 871 906 00
Awarded: 15 October 2026
GOVERNMENT
Request for quote (RFQ) for appointment of service provider for the supply, replacement and removal of turbo (d - 34843) at east london in the eastern cape.
Request for quote (RFQ) appointment of service provider for the removal and replacement of main generator (d - 34108) at east london in the eastern cape.
Appointment of one (01) service provider for supply and delivery of cleaning chemicals and material in eastern cape region for a period of (24) twenty-four months on an as and when required basis
The appointment of contractors - PRASA
Purchasing agreement - PRASA
Request for bids for the appointment of a contractor for the repairs and upgrades of the existing nurseries and associated glasshouse infrastructure for the south african national biodiversity institute (sanbi) at the kirstenbosch national botanical garden, cape town: phase 2
Request for bids for the appointment of a service provider to inspect, repair and maintain various thatch roofs at the kirstenbosch national botanical garden and karoo desert national botanical garden for a period of five years
Supply and delivery of electrical protection testing equipment for TRANSNET rail network depots for a period of one year.
Building alterations at SARS the bridge
Panel of registration of contractors for the implementation of infrastructure projects for the free state department of education to assist with the construction, renovation and refurbishment works f various infrastructure projects on as and when required basis for the period of three (3) years
Get a full report on SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
Annexure A- 11kV Aeril Bundled Cable BoQ - Unpriced.pdf
244.8 KB
RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf
496.4 KB
Tender source analysis
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
PRASA requires a contractor to repair an 11kv aerial bundled cable between foreshore substation and cape town station within 3 months. Currently, only one of two feeds is operational, leaving the station vulnerable during power blackouts as standby generators have insufficient capacity. This tender is for experienced electrical contractors with CIDB grading level 4 ep or higher who can complete the repair work in the western cape region.
AI Document Analysis Stages
Description
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf0 of 2 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
17 sourced criteria
financial capacity
11 sourced criteria
pricing
6 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
31 sourced criteria
evaluation
10 sourced criteria
experience
1 sourced criteria
personnel
Source analysis requires completion or review
equipment capacity
2 sourced criteria
delivery contract
6 sourced criteria
equity registrations
9 sourced criteria
Threshold: 3 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Provision of independent incident investigation services for petrosa , mossel bay
Upgrade of the HVAC and extraction system at athlone stadium the tender.
Construction of a new environmental education centre, administrative buildings and ablution facilities at the edith stephens nature reserve, near philippi.
Supply, delivery and support of computing and networking equipment for the meerkat band 5b project
Supply of licenses and support of google workspace enterprise standard and google vault services for sarao for a period 12 months, with an option to renew for a period of 6 months
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Important Dates
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf (RFQ)Contact Information
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf (RFQ)Submission Guidelines
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf (RFQ)Returnable Documents
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf (RFQ)Bid response documents may be deposited in the bid box situated at (street address): PRASA tender drop off office 3 old marine drive cape town
Evaluation Criteria
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf (RFQ)Evaluation is in three stages:
Stage 1: Compliance (Mandatory)
Stage 2: Technical/Functionality (Minimum threshold 65%)
Stage 3: Price and Specific Goals (80/20 preference point system)
Technical Specifications
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf (RFQ)Scope: Repair of an 11kV aerial bundled cable between Foreshore substation and Cape Town station.
Background:
Objective:
Contract Work:
Methodology
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdfExperience & Qualifications
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdfPricing Schedule
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdfFinancial Requirements
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf (RFQ)Compliance Requirements
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf (RFQ)Mandatory Registrations and Documents:
Disqualification Conditions:
Contractual Terms
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdfSpecial Conditions
Source: RFQ Document -11kv Aerial Bundle Cable.pdf (RFQ)Description
Source: Annexure A- 11kV Aeril Bundled Cable BoQ - Unpriced.pdfRepair of 11kV aerial bundled cable from Foreshore to Cape Town in the Western Cape Region. Work includes: supply and installation of new cable, testing and retention of healthy portions of existing bundle, removal and decommissioning of damaged cable, transportation of damaged cable to Salt River depot, installation of suspension insulators, and installation of underground cable sections. Contract duration: 3 months.
Submission Guidelines
Source: Annexure A- 11kV Aeril Bundled Cable BoQ - Unpriced.pdf (unknown)The provided document is only the Bill of Quantities (Annexure A) and does not include submission guidelines. To comply, bidders must: obtain the full RFQ document from PRASA SCM, which should specify the submission address, deadline, required returnable documents, and format. Directly contact PRASA SCM to request the complete tender package.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Annexure A- 11kV Aeril Bundled Cable BoQ - Unpriced.pdf (unknown)Evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated in the provided document. However, bidders should likely meet the following: registration as an electrical contractor, proven experience in 11kV cable installation and repair, compliance with South African electrical regulations, valid tax clearance certificate, and adherence to Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) standards. Ability to transport damaged cable to Salt River depot may also be required.
Technical Specifications
Source: Annexure A- 11kV Aeril Bundled Cable BoQ - Unpriced.pdf (unknown)Scope of work includes: supply and installation of 1500m of 150mm² 11kV MV ABC Aluminium 3-core cable; testing of existing bundle, retaining healthy portions, and removing/decommissioning/transporting damaged cable to Salt River depot (lump sum); supply and installation of 20 suspension insulators; installation of 2000m of ABC cable on existing structures; supply and installation of 200m of Cu 150mm XLPE underground cable; installation of 10 joints on bundled cable and 3 joints on underground cable; provision of security and OHS consumables for 2 months; and a provisional sum of R50,000 for unforeseen items. Location: Foreshore to Cape Town, Western Cape. Contract duration: 3 months.
Pricing Schedule
Source: Annexure A- 11kV Aeril Bundled Cable BoQ - Unpriced.pdf (unknown)Bidders must complete the unpriced BOQ by inserting rates and calculating amounts for the following line items: 1) 150mm² 11kV MV ABC Aluminium 3-core cable (1500m), 2) Test bundle, retain healthy portions, remove/decommission/transport damaged cable to Salt River depot (lump sum), 3) Supply and install suspension insulators (20 each), 4) Install ABC cable on existing structures (2000m), 5) Supply and install Cu 150mm XLPE underground cable (200m), 6) Install joints on bundled cable (10 each), 7) Install joints on underground cable (3 each), 8) Security and OHS consumables (2 months), 9) Provisional sum (R50,000). Total = Subtotal + 15% VAT.
Financial Requirements
Source: Annexure A- 11kV Aeril Bundled Cable BoQ - Unpriced.pdf (unknown)Bidders must complete the unpriced BOQ by inserting rates and calculating amounts for all line items. Key financial details: VAT is 15%; a provisional sum of R50,000 is included for contingency/unforeseen work. Payment terms are not specified in this document — refer to the full RFQ for details. BOQ line items include: 150mm² 11kV MV ABC Aluminium 3-core cable (1500m), testing/removal/transport of damaged cable (lump sum), suspension insulators (20 each), ABC cable installation (2000m), Cu 150mm XLPE underground cable (200m), joints for bundled and underground cables, security and OHS consumables (2 months), and the provisional sum. Total = Subtotal + 15% VAT.
Compliance Requirements
Source: Annexure A- 11kV Aeril Bundled Cable BoQ - Unpriced.pdf (unknown)No specific compliance requirements are stated in the provided document. Bidders should refer to the full RFQ, which typically includes: Central Supplier Database (CSD) registration, valid tax clearance certificate, B-BBEE certification, CIDB grading (if applicable), and relevant electrical/construction certifications or professional registrations.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 3 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 2 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Conflicting evidenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Relevant records disagree; review the cited sources and dates.
Threshold: 10 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 2 years
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 2 months
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 2 months
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 5 years
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Conflicting evidenceThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
Relevant records disagree; review the cited sources and dates.
Threshold: Minimum threshold 65%)
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 50 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: minimum 3 years' experience
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 80 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: minimum 3 years' experience
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: minimum technical/functionality score of 65% based on service provid
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Conflicting evidenceThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
Relevant records disagree; review the cited sources and dates.
Threshold: 20 points
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 4871906 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for SHUMANI DEVELOPMENT.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Browse categories with current opportunities in this area.
Compare tender activity across provinces.
Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our Blog