Pt−P min
Ps = 80 (1 − )
P min
Where
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration
Pt = Price of tender under consideration
Pmin = Price of lowest acceptable tender
3.2. Formulae for disposal or leasing of state assets and income
Generating procurement
17 | P a g e
Request for proposal (RFP) for the appointment of not more than
3 service providers for the provision of general building
Maintenance and repairs on an as and when basis for a period of
36 months in the western cape region
WCR/01/04/2026
3.2.1. Points awarded for price
A maximum of 80 points is allocated for price on the following basis:
80/20 or
Pt−P max
Ps = 80 (1 + )
P max
Where
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration
Pt = Price of tender under consideration
Pmax= Price of highest acceptable tender
- Points awarded for specific goals
4.1. In terms of Regulation 4(2); 5(2); 6(2) and 7(2) of the Preferential Procurement Regulations,
preference points must be awarded for specific goals stated in the tender. For the purposes
of this tender the tenderer will be allocated points based on the goals stated in table 1 below
as may be supported by proof/ documentation stated in the conditions of this tender:
4.2. In cases where organs of state intend to use Regulation 3(2) of the Regulations, which states
that, if it is unclear whether the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system applies, an organ of
state must, in the tender documents, stipulate in the case of—
(a) an invitation for tender for income-generating contracts, that either the 80/20
preference point system will apply and that the highest acceptable tender will be used
to determine the applicable preference point system; or
(b) any other invitation for tender, that either the 80/20 preference point system will apply
and that the lowest acceptable tender will be used to determine the applicable
preference point system,
then the organ of state must indicate the points allocated for specific goals for both the 80/20
preference point system.
18 | P a g e
Request for proposal (RFP) for the appointment of not more than
3 service providers for the provision of general building
Maintenance and repairs on an as and when basis for a period of
36 months in the western cape region
WCR/01/04/2026
Specific goals for the tender and points claimed are indicated per the table below.
((Note to organs of state: Where the 80/20 preference point system is applicable, corresponding points
must also be indicated as such.
Note to tenderers: The tenderer must indicate how they claim points for each preference point system.)
Number of points Number of points
claimed (80/20 Acceptable allocated
system)
The specific goals allocated points Evidence (80/20 system)
in terms of this tender (To be completed
(To be completed by the tenderer)
by the organ of
state)
Black Women Owned Certified copy of ID 4
Documents of the
Owners
Black Youth owned. Certified copy of ID 4
Documents of the
Owners
QSE 51% Black Owned Audited Annual 4
Financials/B-BBEE
Certificate/Affidavit
51 % Black Owned CIPC 4
Documents/B-
Bbee
Certificate/Affidavit
Entities with a B-BBEE Contributor Audited Annual 4
status of a least level 2
Financials/B-BBEE
Certificate/Affidavit
Total 20
Declaration with regard to company/firm
4.3. Name of company/firm...............................................................................
4.4. Company registration number: .....................................................................
4.5. Type of company/ firm
19 | P a g e
Request for proposal (RFP) for the appointment of not more than
3 service providers for the provision of general building
Maintenance and repairs on an as and when basis for a period of
36 months in the western cape region
WCR/01/04/2026
Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium
One-person business/sole propriety
Close corporation
Public Company
Personal Liability Company
(Pty) Limited
Non-Profit Company
State Owned Company
[Tick applicable box]
4.6. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm, certify
that the points claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender, qualifies the
company/ firm for the preference(s) shown and I acknowledge that:
i) The information furnished is true and correct;
ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the General Conditions as
indicated in paragraph 1 of this form;
iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a result of points claimed as shown in
paragraphs 1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish documentary proof
to the satisfaction of the organ of state that the claims are correct;
iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any of the
conditions of contract have not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in addition to any
other remedy it may have –
(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process;
(b) recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a result
of that person’s conduct;
(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered as a
result of having to make less favourable arrangements due to such
cancellation;
(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders and
directors, or only the shareholders and directors who acted on a
fraudulent basis, be restricted from obtaining business from any organ
of state for a period not exceeding 10 years, after the audi alteram
partem (hear the other side) rule has been applied; and
(e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.
..............................................
Signature(s) of tenderer(s)
Surname and name: ................................................................
Date: ...............................................................
Address: ...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
20 | P a g e