Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Documents available on tender detail page
Tender Type
Request for Quotation
Delivery Location
100 Soutpan street - Onderstepoort - Pretoria - 0110
Organization Type
GOVERNMENT
Published
04 Aug 2026
OCDS Reference
ocds-9t57fa-164510
The agricultural research council is seeking quotations for on-site calibration of a ph meter. This tender is for suppliers capable of providing calibration services at the council's location in gauteng. Bidders must complete and submit the sbd 4 bidder's disclosure form as part of their quotation.
Date & Time
Thursday, 13 August 2026 - 11:00
Venue
null
Categories
Request for Quotation
100 Soutpan street - Onderstepoort - Pretoria - 0110
04 Aug
2026
Tender Published
Tender was published
13 Aug
2026
Closing Date
Tender closing date
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdf
The Agricultural Research Council (ARC) is requesting quotations for the on-site calibration of a pH meter at the Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute in Pretoria, Gauteng. The calibration must be performed at pH levels 4, 7, 9, and 10, and the service provider must hold a valid SANAS accreditation certificate. The tender is subject to the 80/20 preferential procurement system, with 80 points for price and 20 points for specific goals (e.g., ownership by HDIs, women, youth, persons with disabilities, BEE status, and SMME promotion). Bidders must be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) and submit all required SBD forms (including SBD4 and SBD 6.1) by the closing date.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Median Estimate
R 581 900
Range
Based on 25 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
A practical guide to researching which companies win South African government tenders, exploring award history, supplier profiles, and competitive positioning using the Tenders-SA Company Intelligence tool.
In the high-stakes arena of South African procurement, winning isn't just about what you bid, but where you bid. Discover how provincial tender data is leveling the playing field for SMMEs and driving localized economic transformation.
As a procurement specialist for Tenders SA, I am excited to share insights on the critical aspects of software development government contracts, specifically focusing on Service Level Agreements (SLAs), Source Code Escrow, and Intellectual Property (IP) clauses. In the current regulatory environment of 2026, security contractors in Gauteng must navigate a complex landscape of compliance requirements to successfully secure and execute government contracts. Understanding these elements is crucial for ensuring that contracts are not only awarded but also executed efficiently, meeting the needs of both the government and the service providers.
Access North West education infrastructure development tenders for 2026. A practical guide to school construction, sanitation, and maintenance procurement for CIDB-registered contractors in the province.
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogTenders in this industry often require registration with these bodies.
Recommended Certifications
Having these can improve your winning chances: CA(SA) - Chartered Accountant, PMI-PMP (Project Management Professional), Prince2 Practitioner, Six Sigma Certification
AI Document Analysis Stages
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Description
Source: RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdf (RFQ)RFQ number: ovi01req003774
CLOSING DATE: Date: 13 August 2026
Time: 11:00
100 old Soutpan Road Onderstepoort
ENQUIRY Name: Karabo Mofokeng
Email: [email protected]
Please complete the attached revised SBD4
below or attached terms of reference (TOR).
pH meter on site calibration
1.00 Ea
Important Dates
Source: RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdf (RFQ){"closingDate":"13 August 2026","closingTime":"11:00","briefingSession":"{"date":null,"time":null,"venue":null,"is_compulsory":false}"}
Contact Information
Source: RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdf (RFQ){"name":null,"email":"[email protected]","phone":null,"department":"of Measure","address":"r Quotation"}
Returnable Documents
Source: RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdf (RFQ)Sbd 6.1
form for preference points for specific goals.
Nb: before completing this form, tenderers must study the general conditions,
Preferential procurement regulations, 2022
1.1 The following preference point systems are applicable to invitations to tender:
the 80/20 system for requirements with a Rand value of up to R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes
included); and
the 90/10 system for requirements with a Rand value above R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes
included).
1.2 To be completed by the organ of state
(delete whichever is not applicable for this tender).
a) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 90/10 preference point system.
b) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 80/20 preference point system.
c) Either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system will be applicable in this tender. The lowest/ highest
acceptable tender will be used to determine the accurate system once tenders are received.
1.3 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts) shall be awarded
for:
Price; and
1.4 To be completed by the organ of state:
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration
Pt = Price of tender under consideration
Pmax = Price of highest acceptable tender
Price 80
Specific goals 20
Total points for Price and SPECIFIC GOALS 100
of 12
1.1 Failure on the part of a tenderer to submit proof or documentation required in terms of this tender to
claim points for specific goals with the tender, will be interpreted to mean that preference points for specific
goals are not claimed.
1.2 The organ of state reserves the right to require of a tenderer, either before a tender is adjudicated or at any time
subsequently, to substantiate any claim in regard to preferences, in any manner required by the organ of
state.
(a) “tender” means a written offer in the form determined by an organ of state in response to an invitation
to provide goods or services through price quotations, competitive tendering process or any other method envisaged
in legislation;
(b “price” means an amount of money tendered for goods or services, and includes all applicable
taxes less all unconditional discounts;
(c “rand value” means the total estimated value of a contract in Rand, calculated at the time of bid
invitation, and includes all applicable taxes;
(d) “tender for income-generating contracts” means a written offer in the form determined by an organ
of state in response to an invitation for the origination of income -generating contracts through any method
envisaged in legislation that will result in a legal agreement between the organ of state and a third party
that produces revenue for the organ of state, and includes, but is not limited to, leasing and disposal of
assets and concession contracts, excluding direct sales and disposal of assets through public auctions; and
(e) “the Act” means the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 (Act No. ).
3.1. Points awarded for price
3.1.1 The 80/20 or 90/10 preference point systems
A maximum of 80 or 90 points is allocated for price on the following basis:
80/20 or 90/10
of 12
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration
Pt = Price of tender under consideration
Pmin = Price of lowest acceptable tender
3.1. Formulae for disposal or leasing of state assets and income generating
3.1.1. Points awarded for price
A maximum of 80 or 90 points is allocated for price on the following basis:
3.1. In terms of Regulation 4(2); 5(2); 6(2) and 7(2) of the Preferential Procurement Regulations, preference
points must be awarded for specific goals stated in the tender. For the purposes of this tender the tenderer
will be allocated points based on the goals stated in table 1 below as may be supported by proof/ documentation stated
in the conditions of this tender:
3.2. In cases where organs of state intend to use Regulation 3(2) of the Regulations, which states that, if it
is unclear whether the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system applies, an organ of state must, in the tender documents,
stipulate in the case of-
(a) an invitation for tender for income-generating contracts, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference
point system will apply and that the highest acceptable tender will be used to determine the applicable
preference point system; or
(b) any other invitation for tender, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system will apply
and that the lowest acceptable tender will be used to determine the applicable preference point
system,
then the organ of state must indicate the points allocated for specific goals for both the 90/10 and 80/20
preference point system.
Table 1: Specific goals for the tender and points claimed are indicated per the table below.
(Note to organs of state: Where either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system is applicable,
corresponding points must also be indicated as such.
Note to tenderers: The tenderer must indicate how they claim points for each preference point
system.)
of 12
allocated Number of points Number of points
allocated
(90/10 system) claimed claimed (80/20
(80/20 system)
Specific goals (To be completed (90/10 system) system)
(To be completed
by the organ of (To be completed (To be completed
by the organ of
state) by the tenderer) by the tenderer)
state)
Percentage (%)
Points (6)
51% and above 6
Below 51%
Percentage (%)
Points (4)
51% and above 4
Below 51%
Percentage (%)
Points (4)
51% and above 4
Below 51%
Percentage (%)
Points (2)
51% and above 2
Below 51%
RDP Goals Points (2)
Promotion of SMMEs 2
BEE Status Points (2)
Level 1-4 2
Evaluation Criteria
Source: RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdf (RFQ)Only bidders registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) will be considered. Bidders must hold a valid SANAS accreditation certificate for pH meter calibration. Bidders must not be listed on the Register for Tender Defaulters or the List of Restricted Suppliers. Bidders must complete and submit all mandatory SBD forms. To claim preference points for specific goals, bidders must provide supporting documentation and meet the stated criteria (e.g., 51%+ ownership by HDIs, women, youth, or PwD; BEE status level 1-4; or SMME promotion).
Technical Specifications
Source: RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdf (RFQ)pH meter on site calibration
Compliance Requirements
Source: RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdf (RFQ)CSD registration number and full CSD report with the bid proposal
Central Supplier Database (CSD) will be considered
B-BBEE Minimum Level: 1
Points Allocation: 20 points
B-BBEE Details: 1. You are kindly requested to submit a written quotation to the Agricultural Research Council as per
below or attached terms of reference (TOR).
Description Quantity Unit of Measure
pH meter on site calibration
1.00 Ea
Specification for pH meter calibration
of 12
a. Only
bidders registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) will be considered. Bidders
shall include the CSD registration number and full CSD report with the bid proposal.
b. Only bidders that claim specific goals will be considered for scoring on the 20 points
as per the 80/20 principle.
c. Completed and signed Standard Bidding Documents (SBD) forms included in the bid document.
d. Submission should be sent to [email protected]
delivery address.
period and extent of the warranty must be clearly stated. Where services are required, service providers must
submit documentation pertaining the relevant experience.
be evaluated by applying the 80/20 principle as prescribed by the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
and its Regulations.
the table below:
of 12
Percentage Ownership
Specific Goals Points (20) P
HDI Requirement: 51%
Health & Safety
Source: RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdfI, the undersigned, (name)............................................................................... in submitting the accompanying
bid, do hereby make the following statements that I certify to be true and complete in every respect:
3.1 I have read and I understand the contents of this disclosure;
3.2 I understand that the accompanying bid will be disqualified if this disclosure is found not to be true and complete
in every respect;
3.3 The bidder has arrived at the accompanying bid independently from, and without consultation , communication, agreement
or arrangement with any competitor. However, communication between partners in a joint venture or consortium
will not be construed as collusive bidding.
3.4 In addition, there have been no consultations, communications, agreements or arrangements with any
competitor regarding the quality, quantity, specifications, prices, including methods, factors or formulas used
to calculate prices, market allocation, the intention or decision to submit or not to submit the bid , bidding with the
intention not to win the bid and conditions or delivery particulars of the products or services to which this bid
invitation relates.
3.4 The terms of the accompanying bid have not been, and will not be, disclosed by the bidder, directly or indirectly,
to any competitor, prior to the date and time of the official bid opening or of the awarding of the contract.
3.5 There have been no consultations, communications, agreements or arrangements made by the bidder
with any official of the procuring institution in relation to this procurement process prior to and during
the bidding process except to provide clarification on the bid submitted where so required by the institution;
and the bidder was not involved in the drafting of the specifications or terms of reference for this bid.
3.6 I am aware that, in addition and without prejudice to any other remedy provided to combat any restrictive practices
related to bids and contracts, bids that are suspicious will be reported to the Competition Commission for
investigation and possible imposition of administrative penalties in terms of section 59 of the Competition Act
No and or may be reported to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) for criminal investigation
and or may be restricted from conducting business with the public sector for a period not exceeding ten (10)
years in terms of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act No or any other applicable
legislation.
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED IN PARAGRAPHS 1, 2 and 3 ABOVE IS
Contractual Terms
Source: RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdfperiod and extent of the warranty must be clearly stated. Where services are required, service providers must
submit documentation pertaining the relevant experience.
8.1 The validity of the quotations must be indicated.
8.2 Prices quoted should be in South African Rand and inclusive of VAT costs such as delivery ,
insurance, taxes, etc.
8.3 No price adjustments or amendment of the delivery particulars contained in paragraph 8.2 will be
considered by the ARC.
8.4 The supplier accepts full responsibility for the proper execution and fulfilment of the
goods/services quoted for.
8.5 ARC reserves the right to accept or reject any special terms and conditions that may qualify the
goods/services to be provided.
8.6 Quotes should be submitted on an official letterhead and duly signed .
8.7 Goods and services should be supplied / rendered upon receipt of a purchase order from the
3.1. Name of company/firm...............................................................................
3.2. Company registration number: .....................................................................
3.3. Type of company/ firm
of 12
Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium
One-person business/sole propriety
Close corporation
Public Company
Personal Liability Company
(Pty) Limited
Non-Profit Company
State Owned Company
[Tick applicable box]
3.4. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company /firm, certify that the points
claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender, qualifies the company/ firm for the
preference(s) shown and I acknowledge that:
i) The information furnished is true and correct;
ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the General Conditions as indicated in
paragraph 1 of this form;
iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a result of points claimed as shown in paragraphs
1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish documentary proof to the satisfaction of
the organ of state that the claims are correct;
iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any of the conditions
of contract have not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in addition to any other remedy it may
have -
(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process;
(b) recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a result of that person’s
conduct;
(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered as a result of having
to make less favourable arrangements due to such cancellation;
(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders and directors, or only
the shareholders and directors who acted on a fraudulent basis, be restricted from obtaining
business from any organ of state for a period not exceeding 10 years, after the
audi alteram partem (hear the other side) rule has been applied; and
(e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.
of 12
Signature(s) of tenderer(s)
Section
Source: RFQ DOCUMENT OVI01REQ003774.pdfb. Only bidders that claim specific goals will be considered for scoring on the 20 points
as per the 80/20 principle.
be evaluated by applying the 80/20 principle as prescribed by the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
Specific Goals Points (20) Ponts (10)
Total points 20 10
form for preference points for specific goals.
1.1 The following preference point systems are applicable to invitations to tender
the 80/20 system for requirements with a Rand value of up to R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes
the 90/10 system for requirements with a Rand value above R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes
a) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 90/10 preference point system.
b) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 80/20 preference point system.
c) Either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system will be applicable in this tender. The lowest/ highest
1.3 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts) shall be awarded
Specific Goals.
The maximum points for this tender are allocated as follows
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration
Specific goals 20
Total points for Price and SPECIFIC GOALS 100
claim points for specific goals with the tender, will be interpreted to mean that preference points for specific
subsequently, to substantiate any claim in regard to preferences, in any manner required by the organ of
Preference points claim form in terms of the preferential procurement
This preference form must form part of all tenders invited. It contains general information and serves as a claim
competitor regarding the quality, quantity, specifications, prices, including methods, factors or formulas used
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 5 of 2000
Covers preferential procurement and preference-point systems used in public tenders.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 12 of 2004
Supports anti-corruption controls and supplier integrity in procurement processes.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 28 of 2024
Provides the national framework for public procurement across government.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 2 of 2000
Supports access to tender records, award decisions and public-sector procurement information.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 3 of 2000
Supports lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative tender decisions.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
These rules are linked to the type of public body issuing this tender.
Act 71 of 2008
Relevant to governance and reporting obligations for state-owned companies and public entities.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve professional consulting, advisory, research, feasibility, or management services.
These rules are linked to the work category, industry, or regulated service area.
Act 38 of 2001
Relevant to financial services, audit, accounting, KYC and anti-money-laundering obligations.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve professional consulting, advisory, research, feasibility, or management services.
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
REVISED SBD 4 -Annexure A.pdf
This tender is for the on-site calibration of pH meters, issued by the Agricultural Research Council in Gauteng. The document provided is primarily a bidder's disclosure form (SBD4) that must be completed and submitted with the bid. It focuses on ensuring transparency, preventing conflicts of interest, and avoiding collusion or corruption in the bidding process.
To download these documents and access AI-powered analysis, visit the main tender page.
Organization
Agricultural Research CouncilContact Person
Karabo Mofokeng
Phone
021-809-3093
[email protected]
Address
1134 Park St, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0083, South Africa
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
2
Last checked
04 Aug 2026
AI status
Enhanced
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.
government organization in South Africa
Key Personnel
Provinces Active
Industries
Free guidance to prepare before you bid
Not sure if your business is ready for this tender? Check CSD, CIDB, and B-BBEE requirements, run a readiness assessment, and move from opportunity to submission.
Open Supplier Readiness HubSubmission Guidelines
Source: REVISED SBD 4 -Annexure A.pdf (TENDER)Complete and sign the SBD 4 Bidder's Disclosure form. Submit it as part of the quotation. Failure to disclose all required information (e.g., CSD-registered companies linked to directors) will lead to disqualification.
Returnable Documents
Source: REVISED SBD 4 -Annexure A.pdf (TENDER)Returnable document: Completed and signed SBD 4 Bidder's Disclosure form. The form requires: - Declaration of employment by organ of state (if yes, provide full name, identity number, and organ of state). - Declaration of relationship with any person employed by the procuring institution (if yes, provide particulars). - Declaration of interest in any other related enterprise (list all CSD-registered companies with supplier registration number and status). - General declaration certifying independence, no collusion, no disclosure of bid terms, and no involvement in drafting specifications. - Signature, date, designation, and name of bidder.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: REVISED SBD 4 -Annexure A.pdf (TENDER)Bidders must not be listed on the Register for Tender Defaulters or the List of Restricted Suppliers. The bid must be prepared independently without consultation or agreement with competitors. Any collusion will result in disqualification and possible referral to the Competition Commission. The bidder must disclose all relevant information as required by the SBD 4 form.
Technical Specifications
Source: REVISED SBD 4 -Annexure A.pdf (TENDER)Bidder’s disclosure
1.1 Any person (natural or juristic) may make an offer or offers in terms of
this invitation to bid. In line with the principles of transparency,
accountability, impartiality, and ethics as enshrined in the Constitution
of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Constitution), and further
expressed in the various applicable legislation, it is required for the
bidder to make this declaration in respect of the details required
hereunder.
1.2 If a person is listed in the Register for Tender Defaulters and/or the List
of Restricted Suppliers, that person will automatically be disqualified
from the bid process.
2.1 Is the bidder, or any of the directors / trustees / shareholders / members
/ partners of the bidder employed by an organ of state, as defined in
section 239 of the Constitution? YES/NO
2.2 If YES, furnish particulars of the names, individual identity numbers, in
the table below:
Full Name Identity Number Name of organ of
state
an enterprise, alternatively, the person/s having the deciding vote or power to influence
or to direct the course and decisions of the enterprise.
Sbd4
2.3 Do you, or any person connected with the bidder, have a relationship
with any person who is employed by the procuring institution? YES/NO
2.3.1 If so, furnish particulars:
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
2.4 Does the bidder or any of its directors/trustees/shareholders
members/partners or any person having a controlling interest in the
enterprise have any interest in any other related enterprise, whether or
not they are bidding for this contract? YES/NO
2.4.1 If so, indicate all companies registered in the CSD in the table below:
Supplier registration number Status (active/inactive/deleted)
(Maaa)
Failure to disclose all CSD-registered active companies linked to all
Directors will lead to disqualification.
3 general declaration
I, ............................................................................................., the
undersigned, in submitting the accompanying bid, do hereby make the
following statements that I certify to be true and complete in every respect:
3.1 I have read and I understand the contents of this disclosure.
3.2 I understand that the accompanying bid will be disqualified if this
disclosure is found to be false.
3.3 The bidder has arrived at the accompanying bid independently from, and
without consultation, communication, agreement or arrangement with
any competitor.
3.4 In addition, there have been no consultations, communications,
agreements or arrangements with any competitor regarding the quality,
quantity, specifications, prices, including methods, factors or formulas
used to calculate prices, market allocation, the intention or decision to
submit or not to submit the bid, bidding with the intention not to win the
bid and conditions or delivery particulars of the products or services to
which this bid invitation relates.
Sbd4
3.5 The terms of the accompanying bid have not been, and will not be,
disclosed by the bidder, directly or indirectly, to any competitor, prior to
the date and time of the official bid opening or of the awarding of the
contract.
3.6 There have been no consultations, communications, agreements or
arrangements made by the bidder with any official of the procuring
institution in relation to this procurement process prior to and during the
bidding process except to provide clarification on the bid submitted
where so required by the institution; and the bidder was not involved in
the drafting of the specifications or terms of reference for this bid.
3.7 I am aware that, in addition and without prejudice to any other remedy
provided to combat any restrictive practices related to bids and contracts,
bids that are suspicious will be reported to the Competition Commission
for investigation and possible imposition of administrative penalties in
terms of section 59 of the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. )
and or may be referred to law enforcement agencies for criminal
investigation and or may be restricted from conducting business with the
state for a period not exceeding 10 years in terms of the Prevention and
Combating of Corrupt Activities Act, 2004 (Act No. ) or any
other applicable legislation.
I certify that the above is correct.
I accept that the procuring institution may reject the
Bid or take appropriate action against me if this
Declaration is false.
.................................... ................................................
Signature Date
.................................... ................................................
Designation Name of bidder
Compliance Requirements
Source: REVISED SBD 4 -Annexure A.pdf (TENDER)Bidder must not be listed on Register for Tender Defaulters or List of Restricted Suppliers. Must complete SBD 4 disclosure form truthfully. Must disclose any employment by an organ of state, relationships with procuring institution, and interests in other enterprises. Failure to disclose all CSD-registered companies linked to directors leads to disqualification.
Section
Source: REVISED SBD 4 -Annexure A.pdfBidder must certify that the bid was prepared independently, without consultation or agreement with competitors regarding quality, quantity, specifications, prices, methods, market allocation, or intention to bid. Any collusion will result in disqualification and possible referral to the Competition Commission for investigation and penalties.
Data conflicts
None detected
Get deep intelligence on Scientific research and development. Unlock full pricing strategies, bid frequency, and historical win rates.