This tender has been awarded to LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS for R 1 000 000 00.
Awarded
Award Information
Award Value
R 1 000 000 00
Winning Supplier
LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS
Type: GEN
Services: Professional
Engineering
The road accident fund (raf) wishes to appoint a suitably qualified service provider for software performance testing services in support of the current and upcoming system releases for a period of twelve (12) months.
The road accident fund (raf) wishes to appoint a suitably qualified service provider for software performance testing services in support of the current and upcoming system releases for a period of twelve (12) months.
What the tender required and what the award supports
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Summary
The road accident fund (raf) is procuring software performance testing services for a twelve-month agreement, covering the design, execution, and reporting of performance tests on software applications and environments, including monitoring system behaviour and identifying bottlenecks. Bidders must be csd-registered, tax-compliant, and submit at least three valid reference letters, with evaluation following the 80/20 preference point system (80 points price, 20 points specific goals). The single most consequential consideration is that all mandatory requirements must be met or the bid is disqualified, and the quoted hourly rate must be fixed and inclusive of all costs for the entire contract period.
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards — PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement — so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
DocumentSBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022.docxReview complete
Contact Information
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022.docx (unknown)
Award analysis coverage
0 of 4 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
37 sourced criteria
financial capacity
10 sourced criteria
pricing
4 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
32 sourced criteria
evaluation
25 sourced criteria
experience
Source analysis requires completion or review
personnel
5 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
4 sourced criteria
delivery contract
10 sourced criteria
equity registrations
Source analysis requires completion or review
What the buyer was looking for
1Mandatory requirement
Mandatory: Submit at least three (3) signed reference letters on company letterhead, each including the client company name, contact person, contact number or email, and confirmation that Software Performance Testing Services were rendered, all within the last five years; letters missing any required information are invalid.
Threshold: at least three (3) signed reference letters on company letterhead
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS.
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
No contact information is provided in the extracted text.
Submission Guidelines
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022.docx (unknown)
Submission details are not provided in the extracted text. Bidders must refer to the full tender document for instructions on how and where to submit, including the number of copies and packaging requirements. The tender must be submitted before the closing time and date as stated in the tender notice.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022.docx (unknown)
The tender will be evaluated using the 80/20 preference point system. Points will be awarded for price (maximum 80 points) and for specific goals (maximum 20 points). The specific goals and the points allocated to each are not detailed in the provided text. The organ of state reserves the right to request substantiation of any preference claims made.
DocumentRFQ Documnet PR10118235 for Software Performance Testing Services.docxReview complete
Description
Source: RFQ Documnet PR10118235 for Software Performance Testing Services.docx (unknown)
The Road Accident Fund (RAF) is a Schedule 3A public entity established under the Road Accident Fund Act, 1996. Its mandate is to provide compulsory social insurance cover to all users of South African roads, to rehabilitate and compensate persons injured as a result of negligent driving, and to promote road safety. The RAF head office is in Centurion, with Customer Experience Centres in each province. This RFQ seeks a service provider for Software Performance Testing Services in support of current and upcoming system releases for a period of twelve (12) months.
Important Dates
Source: RFQ Documnet PR10118235 for Software Performance Testing Services.docx (unknown)
Closing date and time: 23 September 2026 at 12:00
RFQ issued date: 17 September 2026
RFQ validity period: 30 days from the closing date
Compulsory briefing session / site visit: N/A
Expected service commencement: twelve (12) months agreement from the date of the last signatory
Contact Information
Source: RFQ Documnet PR10118235 for Software Performance Testing Services.docx (unknown)
Use reference number PR10118235 in the subject line and all correspondence.
Quotations received after the closing time will not be considered.
Returnable documents (all must be completed and signed):
SBD 4 (Bidders Disclosure): discloses any interest or connection with the state.
SBD 6.1 (Preference Points Claim in terms of PPR 2022): claims preference points for specific goals.
Annexure A (Security Measures): acknowledges and accepts RAF security requirements.
Cost breakdown table: must be completed with the hourly rate and grand total.
Signed declaration on the RFQ cover page: certifies that the bidder has read and understood the conditions and that the information submitted is true.
Failure to follow these instructions will result in the quotation not being considered.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: RFQ Documnet PR10118235 for Software Performance Testing Services.docx (unknown)
Evaluation is in two phases:
Phase 1 – Mandatory Requirements: bidders must indicate compliance or non-compliance. Failure to meet any mandatory requirement disqualifies the bid.
Phase 2 – Price and Specific Goals (80/20 preference point system):
Price: 80 points
Specific Goals: 20 points
Total: 100 points
Mandatory requirements include:
Submission of at least three (3) valid reference letters (see compliance requirements).
CSD registration.
Tax matters declared in order by SARS.
Completion and signing of all annexures.
No collusive behaviour; bidders may not submit more than one proposal from more than one registered company with a common director/shareholder.
No offering of gifts or hospitality to RAF officials.
Technical Specifications
Source: RFQ Documnet PR10118235 for Software Performance Testing Services.docx (unknown)
The service provider will deliver Software Performance Testing Services in support of current and upcoming system releases for a period of twelve (12) months.
Scope includes, but is not limited to:
Planning and scoping of targeted systems, applications, interfaces, and business transactions to be performance tested.
Defining performance test scenarios, user journeys, concurrency levels, workload models, and acceptance criteria in consultation with RAF.
Preparing test scripts, test data, and performance test environments to simulate realistic usage conditions.
Executing baseline, load, stress, endurance, and scalability tests against identified applications, APIs, and supporting services.
Monitoring and analysing response times, throughput, error rates, infrastructure utilisation, and system behaviour during test execution.
Reporting performance bottlenecks, capacity constraints, and optimisation recommendations to improve system readiness for production.
Conducting re-tests to validate that agreed performance improvements and tuning actions have addressed identified issues.
Ensuring all testing activities are documented comprehensively and that applications and environments are left in a stable and controlled state after testing.
The quoted hourly rate must be fixed and firm for the duration of the twelve (12) month agreement.
The hourly rate must be inclusive of all costs required to deliver the services, including labour, tools, licenses, reporting, administration, travel (where required and agreed on up front) and any other related costs.
RAF will not accept any additional costs not expressly included in the pricing schedule.
The recommended service provider must submit approved timesheets, service reports and/or deliverables accepted by RAF.
Financial Requirements
Source: RFQ Documnet PR10118235 for Software Performance Testing Services.docx (unknown)
Pricing format: hourly rate for Software Performance Testing Services, VAT inclusive (if VAT registered), quoted in South African Rand (ZAR).
Prices must be fixed and firm for the duration of the twelve (12) month agreement.
Prices must be inclusive of all costs (labour, tools, licenses, reporting, administration, travel where agreed, and any other related costs).
No additional costs will be accepted.
Only prices completed in the cost breakdown table will be accepted for evaluation; failure to provide a price in the table leads to disqualification.
No price changes will be accepted after the official Award Letter / Purchase Order (PO) is issued.
If a VAT-registered bidder fails to include VAT, the quoted price will be deemed all-inclusive and accepted as such; no VAT will be added after award.
Non-VAT-registered bidders who charge VAT will be automatically disqualified.
The 80/20 preference point system applies (bids with a Rand value equal to or above R2,000.01 and up to R1,000,000.00, all taxes included).
Compliance Requirements
Source: RFQ Documnet PR10118235 for Software Performance Testing Services.docx (unknown)
CSD registration: mandatory – RAF will only conduct business with CSD-registered suppliers.
Tax compliance: tax matters must be declared in order by SARS.
Reference letters: minimum of three (3) signed reference letters on company letterhead from previous clients where Software Performance Testing Services were rendered successfully within the last five (5) years. Letters signed before September 2021 will not be accepted. Each letter must include:
Name of the company where the services were rendered
Contact person
Contact number or email address
Confirmation that Software Performance Testing Services were rendered
Reference letters must be submitted by the closing date and time. Letters missing any of the required information will not be considered valid. RAF reserves the right to validate all reference letters.
Disability: bidders with a disability must provide a valid medical certificate issued by a registered medical practitioner as proof of disability.
Collusive behaviour: bidders may not submit more than one proposal from more than one registered company with a common director/shareholder. Both/all companies will be disqualified.
Gifts and hospitality: bidders must not offer any gift, hospitality or other benefit to any RAF official. Branded marketing material is considered a gift. Solicited bribery must be reported to the toll-free fraud line at 0800 005919; failure to report will deem the service provider an accomplice and restrict them from doing business with all Organs of State.
Returnable documents: SBD 4 (Bidder's Disclosure) — must be completed, signed and submitted with the bid. The form requires the bidder to declare any relationship with state employees, any relationship with persons employed by the procuring institution, and any interest in other related enterprises. The bidder must certify that the bid was prepared independently, without collusion or disclosure of terms to competitors, and that the bidder was not involved in drafting the specifications or terms of reference. A false declaration will result in disqualification.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: SCM-Bid Documents SBD 4 .doc (unknown)
Disqualification criteria: The bidder must not be listed on the Register for Tender Defaulters or the List of Restricted Suppliers. The bidder must certify that the bid was prepared independently and without collusion or disclosure of terms to competitors. The bidder must not have been involved in drafting the specifications or terms of reference for this bid.
DocumentAnnexure A - Security Measures.pdfReview complete
Description
Source: Annexure A - Security Measures.pdf (unknown)
The Road Accident Fund (RAF) requires a suitably qualified service provider for Software Performance Testing Services to support current and upcoming system releases over a 12-month period. The service provider will handle RAF confidential, private, personal, or sensitive information and must comply with the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) and the technical and organisational security measures detailed in Annexure A.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Annexure A - Security Measures.pdf (unknown)
Bidders must demonstrate compliance with the following security and data protection requirements:
Policies and procedures aligned with RAF requirements and the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA).
Willingness to undergo security screening or vetting for company directors and resources provided.
Third-party service providers handling personal information must be screened or vetted for data protection policies and must sign a data protection agreement.
Full compliance with all applicable legislative and regulatory frameworks for processing personal information.
Technical Specifications
Source: Annexure A - Security Measures.pdf (unknown)
Scope: Software Performance Testing Services in support of current and upcoming system releases for a period of 12 months.
Security and data handling requirements:
Secure document handling and transportation using lockable containers and a secure (lockable) transportation system.
Accurate record keeping for each document stored, including location, access history, and retention schedule, organised for easy tracking.
Secure retrieval protocols with identity verification of requesters and secure transport of documents.
Detailed retrieval activity logs recording date, time, requester identity, and reason.
Physical documents stored in lockable cabinets to prevent unauthorised access or tampering.
Access to documents restricted to authorised personnel only, with controlled and monitored access policies and procedures.
Premises must have fire suppression systems or equivalent, including carbon dioxide fire extinguishers.
Secure perimeter with controlled access and/or surveillance systems; secure doors, locks, and alarms.
Physical security measures: controlled access points, surveillance cameras, and/or 24/7 security monitoring; immediate notification to RAF of any real, attempted, or suspected breach with provision of CCTV footage, police reports, and alarm system records.
Document access control limited to authorised personnel for handling, viewing, or transport.
Access monitoring and control procedures to ensure only authorised personnel access documents and storage facilities.
Network security: firewalls, intrusion detection, and encryption to protect digital document storage systems.
Access control on a need-to-know basis; strong authentication methods; regular review and update of access permissions.
Data protection obligations: compliance with applicable data protection laws; safeguards against unauthorised access, disclosure, alteration, and destruction; immediate notification to RAF of data breaches; confidentiality obligations imposed on agents, subcontractors, and third parties; third-party providers handling PII must be vetted and sign data protection agreements; RAF reserves the right to conduct security screening of directors and resources.
Cybersecurity standards: robust measures against malware, phishing, and unauthorised access; encryption for data in transit and at rest using industry-standard protocols and algorithms; regular system, software, and application updates and patching.
Incident reporting and response: documented incident response plan; timely reporting of security incidents or data breaches to RAF.
Subcontractor and third-party oversight: subcontractors must adhere to the same data protection and cybersecurity standards; service provider remains responsible for their actions and compliance.
Audit and monitoring: RAF reserves the right to audit and monitor compliance; service provider must cooperate with audits and assessments.
Compliance Requirements
Source: Annexure A - Security Measures.pdf (unknown)
Mandatory compliance requirements:
Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) compliance.
Implementation of technical and organisational security measures as specified in Annexure A.
Security screening or vetting of company directors and resources (RAF reserves the right to conduct).
Third-party service providers handling PII must be vetted for data protection policies and must sign a data protection agreement.
Compliance with all applicable legislative and regulatory frameworks for processing personal information.
Health & Safety
Source: Annexure A - Security Measures.pdf (unknown)
Health and safety requirements from Annexure A:
Premises must have a fire suppression system or equivalent, including carbon dioxide fire extinguishers, to prevent damage or loss of documents and records in the event of fire.
Secure facility requirements: secure perimeter with controlled access and/or surveillance; secure doors, locks, and alarms to prevent unauthorised access.
Source: Annexure A - Security Measures.pdf (unknown)
Contractual terms and conditions derived from Annexure A – Security Measures:
Service provider must implement and maintain all specified technical and organisational security measures for the duration of the contract.
Physical security: secure perimeter, controlled access, surveillance, 24/7 monitoring, lockable cabinets, fire suppression with CO2 extinguishers; immediate breach notification to RAF with CCTV footage, police reports, and alarm records.
Access control: need-to-know basis, strong authentication, regular permission reviews; only authorised personnel may handle, view, or transport documents; detailed access and retrieval logs required.
Network security: firewalls, intrusion detection, encryption for digital storage systems.
Data protection: POPIA compliance; safeguards against unauthorised access, disclosure, alteration, destruction; immediate breach notification; confidentiality obligations extended to agents, subcontractors, and third parties; third-party PII handlers must be vetted and sign data protection agreements; RAF may screen directors and resources.
Cybersecurity: robust measures against malware, phishing, unauthorised access; encryption for data in transit and at rest using industry-standard protocols; regular patching and updates.
Incident response: documented plan; timely reporting of incidents and breaches to RAF.
Subcontractor oversight: subcontractors must meet the same standards; service provider remains liable for their compliance.
Audit rights: RAF may audit and monitor compliance; service provider must cooperate fully.
Special Conditions
Source: Annexure A - Security Measures.pdf (unknown)
Special conditions from Annexure A – Security Measures:
Service provider will be entrusted with RAF confidential, private, personal, or sensitive information (files, data, documents).
Must comply with POPIA and implement all specified security measures.
Document handling and transportation: secure protocols, lockable containers/packaging, secure (lockable) transportation system to prevent loss, theft, or damage.
Record keeping: accurate records of each document stored, including location, access history, retention schedule, organised for easy tracking.
Retrieval and handling: secure retrieval with identity verification; detailed retrieval logs (date, time, requester, reason); secure storage in lockable cabinets; access limited to authorised personnel with controlled and monitored procedures.
Fire suppression: premises must have fire suppression system or CO2 extinguishers.
Data protection obligations, cybersecurity standards, incident reporting, subcontractor oversight, and audit rights as detailed in contractual_terms.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
2Mandatory requirement
Mandatory: Tax matters must be declared in order by SARS; failure results in disqualification.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
3Mandatory requirement
Mandatory: No collusive behaviour; bidders may not submit more than one proposal from more than one registered company with a common director/shareholder, and must not offer gifts or hospitality to RAF officials.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
4Mandatory requirement
Price: Quoted hourly rate must be fixed and firm for the 12-month agreement, inclusive of all costs (labour, tools, licenses, reporting, administration, travel where agreed), VAT inclusive if VAT-registered; failure to include VAT for VAT-registered bidders means the price is deemed all-inclusive, and non-VAT-registered bidders who charge VAT are disqualified.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
5Inferred operational need
The service provider will deliver Software Performance Testing Services in support of current and upcoming system releases for a period of twelve (12) months.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
12Inferred operational need
Ensuring all testing activities are documented comprehensively and that applications and environments are left in a stable and controlled state after testing.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
14Mandatory requirement
The hourly rate must be inclusive of all costs required to deliver the services, including labour, tools, licenses, reporting, administration, travel (where required and agreed on up front) and any other related costs.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
16Mandatory requirement
The Road Accident Fund (RAF) requires a suitably qualified service provider for Software Performance Testing Services to support current and upcoming system releases over a 12-month period. The service provider will handle RAF confidential, private, personal, or sensitive information and must comply with the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) and the technical and organisational security measures detailed in Annexure A.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
22Inferred operational need
Document handling and transportation: secure protocols, lockable containers/packaging, secure (lockable) transportation system to prevent loss, theft, or damage.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
36Inferred operational need
Cybersecurity standards: robust measures against malware, phishing, and unauthorised access; encryption for data in transit and at rest using industry-standard protocols and algorithms; regular system, software, and application updates and patching.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
38Mandatory requirement
The Road Accident Fund (RAF) is a Schedule 3A public entity established under the Road Accident Fund Act, 1996. Its mandate is to provide compulsory social insurance cover to all users of South African roads, to rehabilitate and compensate persons injured as a result of negligent driving, and to promote road safety. The RAF head office is in Centurion, with Customer Experience Centres in each province. This RFQ seeks a service provider for Software Performance Testing Services in support of current and upcoming system releases for a period of twelve (12) months.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
48Mandatory requirement
Mandatory: Complete and sign all annexures, including Annexure A (Security Measures) and the cost breakdown table with hourly rate and grand total; incomplete submissions are not considered.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
49Mandatory requirement
Cost breakdown table: must be completed with the hourly rate and grand total.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
64Mandatory requirement
Reference letters: minimum of three (3) signed reference letters on company letterhead from previous clients where Software Performance Testing Services were rendered successfully within the last five (5) years. Letters signed before September 2021 will not be accepted. Each letter must include:
Threshold: minimum of three (3) signed reference letters on company letterhead fro
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
69Mandatory requirement
Reference letters must be submitted by the closing date and time. Letters missing any of the required information will not be considered valid. RAF reserves the right to validate all reference letters.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
71Inferred operational need
Collusive behaviour: bidders may not submit more than one proposal from more than one registered company with a common director/shareholder. Both/all companies will be disqualified.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
72Mandatory requirement
Gifts and hospitality: bidders must not offer any gift, hospitality or other benefit to any RAF official. Branded marketing material is considered a gift. Solicited bribery must be reported to the toll-free fraud line at 0800 005919; failure to report will deem the service provider an accomplice and restrict them from doing business with all Organs of State.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
73Mandatory requirement
Data protection obligations: compliance with applicable data protection laws; safeguards against unauthorised access, disclosure, alteration, and destruction; immediate notification to RAF of data breaches; confidentiality obligations imposed on agents, subcontractors, and third parties; third-party providers handling PII must be vetted and sign data protection agreements; RAF reserves the right to conduct security screening of directors and resources.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
74Mandatory requirement
Subcontractor and third-party oversight: subcontractors must adhere to the same data protection and cybersecurity standards; service provider remains responsible for their actions and compliance.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
82Mandatory requirement
Returnable documents: SBD 4 (Bidder's Disclosure) — must be completed, signed and submitted with the bid. The form requires the bidder to declare any relationship with state employees, any relationship with persons employed by the procuring institution, and any interest in other related enterprises. The bidder must certify that the bid was prepared independently, without collusion or disclosure of terms to competitors, and that the bidder was not involved in drafting the specifications or terms of reference. A false declaration will result in disqualification.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
83Mandatory requirement
Submission details are not provided in the extracted text. Bidders must refer to the full tender document for instructions on how and where to submit, including the number of copies and packaging requirements. The tender must be submitted before the closing time and date as stated in the tender notice.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
84Mandatory requirement
Evaluation: 80/20 preference point system applies (80 points price, 20 points specific goals); bids with a value between R2,000.01 and R1,000,000.00 are subject to this system, and failure to meet any mandatory requirement disqualifies the bid.
Threshold: 80 points
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
85Inferred operational need
SBD 6.1 (Preference Points Claim in terms of PPR 2022): claims preference points for specific goals.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
104Scored criterion
Third-party service providers handling personal information must be screened or vetted for data protection policies and must sign a data protection agreement.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
106Inferred operational need
Physical security measures: controlled access points, surveillance cameras, and/or 24/7 security monitoring; immediate notification to RAF of any real, attempted, or suspected breach with provision of CCTV footage, police reports, and alarm system records.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
107Scored criterion
Disqualification criteria: The bidder must not be listed on the Register for Tender Defaulters or the List of Restricted Suppliers. The bidder must certify that the bid was prepared independently and without collusion or disclosure of terms to competitors. The bidder must not have been involved in drafting the specifications or terms of reference for this bid.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
108Scored criterion
The tender will be evaluated using the 80/20 preference point system. Points will be awarded for price (maximum 80 points) and for specific goals (maximum 20 points). The specific goals and the points allocated to each are not detailed in the provided text. The organ of state reserves the right to request substantiation of any preference claims made.
Threshold: maximum 80 points) and for specific goals (maximum 20 points)
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
109Inferred operational need
Access control: need-to-know basis, strong authentication, regular permission reviews; only authorised personnel may handle, view, or transport documents; detailed access and retrieval logs required.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
110Inferred operational need
Retrieval and handling: secure retrieval with identity verification; detailed retrieval logs (date, time, requester, reason); secure storage in lockable cabinets; access limited to authorised personnel with controlled and monitored procedures.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
115Mandatory requirement
Premises must have a fire suppression system or equivalent, including carbon dioxide fire extinguishers, to prevent damage or loss of documents and records in the event of fire.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
120Inferred operational need
Physical security: secure perimeter, controlled access, surveillance, 24/7 monitoring, lockable cabinets, fire suppression with CO2 extinguishers; immediate breach notification to RAF with CCTV footage, police reports, and alarm records.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
122Mandatory requirement
Data protection: POPIA compliance; safeguards against unauthorised access, disclosure, alteration, destruction; immediate breach notification; confidentiality obligations extended to agents, subcontractors, and third parties; third-party PII handlers must be vetted and sign data protection agreements; RAF may screen directors and resources.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
123Inferred operational need
Cybersecurity: robust measures against malware, phishing, unauthorised access; encryption for data in transit and at rest using industry-standard protocols; regular patching and updates.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
The linked award records LISECO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 1000000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
APPOINTMENT OF THE SERVICE PROVIDER FOR PROVISION OF HYGIENE CARE SERVICES FOR 2 YEARS (24 MONTHS) AT THE NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION PREMISES IN PRETORIA, BRUMMERIANRF/ CORP EM 65 /2025-26