What the tender required and what the award supports
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
Summary
Development of a detailed lusikisiki precinct plan for the lusikisiki cbd, commissioned by ingquza hill local municipality. The project covers spatial planning, urban design, transport, and land use management over a 6-month period. Bidders must score at least 70 out of 100 on functionality (experience, expertise, methodology) to proceed to the 80/20 price and specific goals evaluation, where 20 points are available for ownership by black youth, women, disabled persons, and black people.
Document read. The full tender notice and its supporting documents are read end-to-end. Key sections, requirements, dates, and contact details are identified and pulled into a working summary you can act on.
Compliance review. The working summary is checked against South African procurement standards — PFMA, PPPFA, B-BBEE, CIDB, local content, and preferential procurement — so nothing critical is missed before you start your bid response.
DocumentBID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdfReview complete
Description
Award analysis coverage
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
4 sourced criteria
financial capacity
1 sourced criteria
pricing
6 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
Source analysis requires completion or review
evaluation
4 sourced criteria
experience
2 sourced criteria
personnel
4 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
Source analysis requires completion or review
delivery contract
Source analysis requires completion or review
equity registrations
1 sourced criteria
What the buyer was looking for
1Mandatory requirement
Environmental management is a required component of the precinct plan. The service provider must develop an Environmental Management Framework as part of Phase 3 deliverables. Situational analysis in Phase 2 must assess environmental characteristics and sensitive areas. The plan must promote climate-resilient urban development and comply with applicable environmental legislation.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Bid-ready summary. The submission guidelines, evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and compliance sections are refined into professional, easy-to-scan prose. This is the final version you can rely on when preparing your bid or briefing your team.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Document read
Compliance review
Bid-ready summary
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf
Ingquza Hill Local Municipality invites bids for the Development of Lusikisiki Precinct Plan. Lusikisiki CBD is the primary commercial, administrative and service centre of the municipality, facing challenges including traffic congestion, inadequate public transport, informal trading pressure, limited public open space, ageing infrastructure, parking shortages, fragmented land use, poor streetscape quality and insufficient pedestrian infrastructure. The precinct plan must provide a detailed spatial framework for sustainable urban growth, coordinated investment and effective land use management, aligned with the SDF, LUMS, SPLUMA and other legislation. The plan must promote inclusive, compact, sustainable development; higher-density mixed-use development; integrated land use/transport/engineering/social infrastructure planning; improved accessibility; climate-resilient development; and local economic development. Project duration: 6 months. Multidisciplinary consulting firms or consortiums with experience in precinct planning, spatial/regional planning, urban design, environmental management and stakeholder engagement are sought.
Important Dates
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
Closing date: 16 September 2026. Closing time: 12:00. Advert date: 28 August 2026. No compulsory briefing or site visit indicated; site meetings will be advertised separately if attendance is compulsory. Tender validity period: 90 days after closing date.
Briefing Session
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
No compulsory briefing or site visit indicated in the document. Site meetings will be reflected on adverts if attendance is compulsory.
Contact Information
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
Technical enquiries: Economic Development Office – A Jordaan, 039 253 1096, [email protected]. Supply Chain Management enquiries: A Ntongana, 039 252 0131, [email protected]. Submission address: 135 Main Street, Flagstaff, 4810 (Municipal Reception).
Submission Guidelines
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
Submission method: hand-delivered in a sealed envelope to the tender box at Ingquza Hill Local Municipality, 135 Main Street, Flagstaff, 4810. Closing date: 16 September 2026 at 12:00. No late, couriered, faxed or emailed tenders accepted. Envelope must be endorsed with the tender number (IHLM/43/2026-27/PLAN) and description. Bidders must initial every page of the original bid document; do not reproduce, disassemble or insert pages. Returnable documents required with the bid: valid full CSD proof of registration; completed and signed MBD 1–9 declarations; valid SARS TCS PIN printout; proof of professional accreditation with SACPLAN, SACAP and SAGC for key personnel; signed letter confirming no undisputed municipal accounts overdue by more than 30 days with supporting proof. Failure to submit any mandatory document renders the bid non-responsive.
Returnable Documents
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
Returnable documents (all must be completed, signed and submitted with the bid): MBD 1 – Invitation to Bid (cover page with bidder details and signature); MBD 2 – Tax Clearance Certificate requirements; MBD 3.1 – Pricing Schedule (Firm Prices); MBD 3.3 – Pricing Schedule and Specification; MBD 4 – Declaration of Interest (discloses state employment/relationships); MBD 6.1 – Preference Points Claim Form (specific goals claim with verification documents); MBD 7.1 – Contract Form (to be completed by successful bidder); MBD 8 – Declaration of Bidder's Past SCM Practices; MBD 9 – Certificate of Independent Bid Determination (no collusion). Additional mandatory documents: valid full CSD proof of registration; valid SARS TCS PIN printout; proof of professional accreditation with SACPLAN, SACAP, SAGC for key personnel; signed letter confirming no undisputed municipal accounts overdue >30 days with proof. Authority to Sign/Board Resolution authorising signatory.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
Two-stage evaluation. Stage 1 – Functionality (100 points): Experience 40 points (appointment letters or orders with reference letters for up to 4 public sector precinct plan projects, 10 points each); Expertise 40 points (Professional Town Planner registered with SACPLAN, 5 years post-registration experience – 20 points; Professional Architect or Urban Designer registered with SACAP, 5 years experience – 10 points; Professional GIS specialist registered with SAGC, 5 years experience – 10 points; detailed organogram with responsibilities); Methodology 20 points (methodological approach with both programme of work and cashflow projections – 20 points; with only one of these – 10 points; approach only – 5 points). Minimum qualifying score: 70/100 to proceed to Stage 2. Stage 2 – Price and Specific Goals (80/20 system): Price 80 points; Specific Goals 20 points allocated as: company owned by black youth (18–35) – 6 points; owned by black women – 6 points; owned by black people living with disability – 2 points; owned by black people – 6 points. Verification documents: CSD registration report/ID copy for ownership claims; letter from medical practitioner for disability claim. Tender validity: 90 days from closing date.
Technical Specifications
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
Scope: Development of a detailed Lusikisiki Precinct Plan for the Lusikisiki CBD, aligned with the Municipality's approved Spatial Development Framework (SDF), Land Use Management Scheme (LUMS), Spatial Planning and Land Use Management By-law (2016), SPLUMA, Land Survey Act, Sectional Titles Act, CSIR Red Book standards and other applicable legislation. Key deliverables: comprehensive precinct plan including urban design 3D modelling; inception report; situational analysis; draft motivation report and plans; policy and plan scrutiny; LUMS maps preparation; draft power of attorney; site development plan design; draft precinct plan design (transportation and mobility framework, environmental management framework, public facilities and open space frameworks, tourism and local economic development strategy, urban design framework); final approved Lusikisiki Precinct Development Plan; handover of all project documentation. Project duration: 6 months in five phases – Phase 1 Inception (1 month), Phase 2 Planning (2 months), Phase 3 Design and Development (1 month), Phase 4 Consultations and Approvals (1 month), Phase 5 Close-out (1 month). Service provider must provide monthly quality progress reports, timeous invoices, variance reports against programme and expenditure, and adhere to milestones. All documents produced become property of the Municipality. Copyright vests in the Municipality. Confidentiality obligation applies.
Methodology
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf
Phased methodology required with detailed project plan addressing five phases: Phase 1 Inception (1 month) – inception meeting, confirm scope/objectives/deliverables/timelines, review existing planning documentation, prepare detailed methodology and work programme, prepare Service Level Agreement. Phase 2 Planning (2 months) – review legislation/policies/strategic documents, comprehensive situational analysis, assess land uses/development patterns/demographics/socio-economic conditions/environmental characteristics/tourism/agricultural/economic opportunities, identify opportunities/constraints/key planning issues, policy and plan scrutiny, LUMS maps preparation, draft power of attorney, site development plan design. Phase 3 Design and Development (1 month) – present draft land use framework, develop precinct vision/objectives, transportation and mobility framework, environmental management framework, public facilities and open space frameworks, tourism and local economic development strategy, urban design framework. Phase 4 Consultations and Approvals (1 month) – consult municipal departments, traditional leadership, ward committees, public participation meetings, revise draft based on comments. Phase 5 Close-out (1 month) – incorporate comments, prepare final plan, handover documentation. Monthly progress reports, timeous invoices, variance reports required throughout.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf
Key personnel requirements: Project Leader must be a registered Professional Town Planner (SACPLAN) with 5 years post-registration experience, knowledge and experience in similar projects, proof of similar projects, land surveying experience (5 years), GIS expertise (map creation/reading), ability to produce 3D models (AutoCAD/SketchUp/Lumion), project management experience, research/analytical/writing/communication skills. Professional Architect or Urban Designer (SACAP) with 5 years experience – 10 points. Professional GIS Specialist (SAGC) with 5 years experience – 10 points. Detailed organogram with responsibilities required. All team members must attend progress meetings; compulsory attendance for project team leader, spatial planner or land surveyor. Replacement of candidates only in extreme cases with written approval; replacements must have equal/higher qualifications and experience. Schedule of resources with certificates, qualifications and anticipated roles must be included.
Pricing Schedule
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf
Pricing schedule: firm prices only, inclusive of VAT and all disbursements. Professional fees total shown before VAT, VAT amount shown separately, then final inclusive amount. Cost estimates valid for 90 days. Payment milestones: Phase 1 Inception Report – 30%; Phase 2 Planning deliverables – 30%; Phase 3 Draft Precinct Plan Design – 20%; Phase 4 Presentation to Municipality – 10%; Phase 5 Final Approval and handover – 10%. Payment within 30 days of correct invoice and report. Budget must clearly identify professional fees and disbursements, and include all expenses (VAT, workshop costs, fees, additional costs).
Financial Requirements
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
Pricing: firm prices only (no price escalation). Quotations must include VAT (if registered) and all disbursements; professional fees total shown before VAT, VAT amount shown separately, then final inclusive amount. Cost estimates valid for 90 days. Payment schedule (milestone-based, payment within 30 days of correct invoice and report): Phase 1 Inception Report – 30%; Phase 2 Planning deliverables – 30%; Phase 3 Draft Precinct Plan Design – 20%; Phase 4 Presentation to Municipality and stakeholder engagement – 10%; Phase 5 Final Approval and handover – 10%. Budget must include all expenses: professional fees, disbursements, VAT, workshop costs, fees and additional costs. No bonds, guarantees or insurance requirements stated.
Compliance Requirements
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
Mandatory compliance: valid CSD registration; valid SARS Tax Compliance Status (TCS) PIN (or CSD number if TCS unavailable); each JV/consortium party must submit separate TCS PIN/CSD number; proof of professional registration with SACPLAN (Town Planner), SACAP (Architect/Urban Designer) and SAGC (GIS Specialist) for key personnel, each with 5 years post-registration experience; no director/shareholder in service of the state; not listed on the Register of Tender Defaulters (Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act); no undisputed municipal accounts overdue >30 days; completed and signed MBD 1–9 declarations (MBD 1 Invitation to Bid, MBD 2 Tax Clearance, MBD 3.1/3.3 Pricing Schedule, MBD 4 Declaration of Interest, MBD 6.1 Preference Points Claim, MBD 7.1 Contract Form, MBD 8 Past SCM Practices, MBD 9 Certificate of Independent Bid Determination); Authority to Sign/Board Resolution authorising signatory. Specific Goals claims require verification documents as per MBD 6.1.
B-BBEE Requirements
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
Specific Goals (20 points total under 80/20 system): Company owned by black youth (18–35 years) – 6 points (verified by CSD registration report/ID copy of owner/director); owned by black women – 6 points (CSD registration report/ID copy); owned by black people living with disability – 2 points (letter from medical practitioner); owned by black people – 6 points (CSD registration report/ID copy). Failure to submit proof/documentation for specific goals claims results in zero points for specific goals. Organ of state may require substantiation of claims at any time.
Environmental
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf
Environmental management is a required component of the precinct plan. The service provider must develop an Environmental Management Framework as part of Phase 3 deliverables. Situational analysis in Phase 2 must assess environmental characteristics and sensitive areas. The plan must promote climate-resilient urban development and comply with applicable environmental legislation.
Contractual Terms
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf
Contract terms: General Conditions of Contract (GCC) and Municipal Supply Chain Management special contract conditions apply. Service Level Agreement (SLA) to be signed upon appointment. Contract duration: 6 months. Municipality may terminate for non-performance or non-compliance. All project documents, data and copyright vest in the Municipality. Confidentiality: service provider may not disclose project information to third parties without prior written consent. Municipality reserves the right not to accept any proposal, to accept whole or part, and not to accept the lowest bid. No bids from persons in service of the state or on the Register of Tender Defaulters. Bidders must not have abused the SCM system or failed on previous contracts. Tender validity: 90 days; withdrawal during validity may incur liability for additional expenses incurred by the Municipality. Municipality may extend the tender period by public notice. Replacement of key personnel not allowed except in extreme cases with written approval from the Municipal Manager; replacements must have equal or higher qualifications and experience. Payment within 30 days of correct invoice and milestone report.
Special Conditions
Source: BID DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LUSIKISIKI PRECINCT PLAN.pdf (TENDER)
Special conditions: replacement of key personnel not allowed except in extreme cases with written approval via Project Management Committee to Municipal Manager; replacements must have equal/higher qualifications and experience. Payment within 30 days of correct invoice and milestone report. Budget must include all expenses (VAT, workshop costs, fees, additional costs) and clearly identify professional fees and disbursements. Proposals must respond to Terms of Reference, be clearly indexed, easy to read, bound, and submitted in sealed envelope with tender number and title. Short-listed bidders may be required to present in person at own cost. Municipality reserves right to extend tender period by notice in press or on website.
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
2Inferred operational need
Phased methodology required with detailed project plan addressing five phases: Phase 1 Inception (1 month) – inception meeting, confirm scope/objectives/deliverables/timelines, review existing planning documentation, prepare detailed methodology and work programme, prepare Service Level Agreement. Phase 2 Planning (2 months) – review legislation/policies/strategic documents, comprehensive situational analysis, assess land uses/development patterns/demographics/socio-economic conditions/environmental characteristics/tourism/agricultural/economic opportunities, identify opportunities/constraints/key planning issues, policy and plan scrutiny, LUMS maps preparation, draft power of attorney, site development plan design. Phase 3 Design and Development (1 month) – present draft land use framework, develop precinct vision/objectives, transportation and mobility framework, environmental management framework, public facilities and open space frameworks, tourism and local economic development strategy, urban design framework. Phase 4 Consultations and Approvals (1 month) – consult municipal departments, traditional leadership, ward committees, public participation meetings, revise draft based on comments. Phase 5 Close-out (1 month) – incorporate comments, prepare final plan, handover documentation. Monthly progress reports, timeous invoices, variance reports required throughout.
Threshold: 1 month
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
4Mandatory requirement
Scope: Development of a detailed Lusikisiki Precinct Plan for the Lusikisiki CBD, aligned with the Municipality's approved Spatial Development Framework (SDF), Land Use Management Scheme (LUMS), Spatial Planning and Land Use Management By-law (2016), SPLUMA, Land Survey Act, Sectional Titles Act, CSIR Red Book standards and other applicable legislation. Key deliverables: comprehensive precinct plan including urban design 3D modelling; inception report; situational analysis; draft motivation report and plans; policy and plan scrutiny; LUMS maps preparation; draft power of attorney; site development plan design; draft precinct plan design (transportation and mobility framework, environmental management framework, public facilities and open space frameworks, tourism and local economic development strategy, urban design framework); final approved Lusikisiki Precinct Development Plan; handover of all project documentation. Project duration: 6 months in five phases – Phase 1 Inception (1 month), Phase 2 Planning (2 months), Phase 3 Design and Development (1 month), Phase 4 Consultations and Approvals (1 month), Phase 5 Close-out (1 month). Service provider must provide monthly quality progress reports, timeous invoices, variance reports against programme and expenditure, and adhere to milestones. All documents produced become property of the Municipality. Copyright vests in the Municipality. Confidentiality obligation applies.
Threshold: 6 months
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
5Mandatory requirement
Pricing: firm prices only (no price escalation). Quotations must include VAT (if registered) and all disbursements; professional fees total shown before VAT, VAT amount shown separately, then final inclusive amount. Cost estimates valid for 90 days. Payment schedule (milestone-based, payment within 30 days of correct invoice and report): Phase 1 Inception Report – 30%; Phase 2 Planning deliverables – 30%; Phase 3 Draft Precinct Plan Design – 20%; Phase 4 Presentation to Municipality and stakeholder engagement – 10%; Phase 5 Final Approval and handover – 10%. Budget must include all expenses: professional fees, disbursements, VAT, workshop costs, fees and additional costs. No bonds, guarantees or insurance requirements stated.
Threshold: 90 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
6Inferred operational need
Project duration is 6 months with milestone-based payments: 30% on inception report, 30% on planning deliverables, 20% on draft precinct plan design, 10% on consultations and approvals, and 10% on final approval and handover; payment within 30 days of correct invoice and report.
Threshold: 6 months
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
7Delivery obligation
Contract terms: General Conditions of Contract (GCC) and Municipal Supply Chain Management special contract conditions apply. Service Level Agreement (SLA) to be signed upon appointment. Contract duration: 6 months. Municipality may terminate for non-performance or non-compliance. All project documents, data and copyright vest in the Municipality. Confidentiality: service provider may not disclose project information to third parties without prior written consent. Municipality reserves the right not to accept any proposal, to accept whole or part, and not to accept the lowest bid. No bids from persons in service of the state or on the Register of Tender Defaulters. Bidders must not have abused the SCM system or failed on previous contracts. Tender validity: 90 days; withdrawal during validity may incur liability for additional expenses incurred by the Municipality. Municipality may extend the tender period by public notice. Replacement of key personnel not allowed except in extreme cases with written approval from the Municipal Manager; replacements must have equal or higher qualifications and experience. Payment within 30 days of correct invoice and milestone report.
Threshold: 6 months
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
8Mandatory requirement
Pricing schedule: firm prices only, inclusive of VAT and all disbursements. Professional fees total shown before VAT, VAT amount shown separately, then final inclusive amount. Cost estimates valid for 90 days. Payment milestones: Phase 1 Inception Report – 30%; Phase 2 Planning deliverables – 30%; Phase 3 Draft Precinct Plan Design – 20%; Phase 4 Presentation to Municipality – 10%; Phase 5 Final Approval and handover – 10%. Payment within 30 days of correct invoice and report. Budget must clearly identify professional fees and disbursements, and include all expenses (VAT, workshop costs, fees, additional costs).
Threshold: 90 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
9Delivery obligation
Returnable documents (all must be completed, signed and submitted with the bid): MBD 1 – Invitation to Bid (cover page with bidder details and signature); MBD 2 – Tax Clearance Certificate requirements; MBD 3.1 – Pricing Schedule (Firm Prices); MBD 3.3 – Pricing Schedule and Specification; MBD 4 – Declaration of Interest (discloses state employment/relationships); MBD 6.1 – Preference Points Claim Form (specific goals claim with verification documents); MBD 7.1 – Contract Form (to be completed by successful bidder); MBD 8 – Declaration of Bidder's Past SCM Practices; MBD 9 – Certificate of Independent Bid Determination (no collusion). Additional mandatory documents: valid full CSD proof of registration; valid SARS TCS PIN printout; proof of professional accreditation with SACPLAN, SACAP, SAGC for key personnel; signed letter confirming no undisputed municipal accounts overdue >30 days with proof. Authority to Sign/Board Resolution authorising signatory.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: The source says this applies after appointment and concerns contract delivery.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
10Mandatory requirement
Special conditions: replacement of key personnel not allowed except in extreme cases with written approval via Project Management Committee to Municipal Manager; replacements must have equal/higher qualifications and experience. Payment within 30 days of correct invoice and milestone report. Budget must include all expenses (VAT, workshop costs, fees, additional costs) and clearly identify professional fees and disbursements. Proposals must respond to Terms of Reference, be clearly indexed, easy to read, bound, and submitted in sealed envelope with tender number and title. Short-listed bidders may be required to present in person at own cost. Municipality reserves right to extend tender period by notice in press or on website.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
11Mandatory requirement
Mandatory compliance: valid CSD registration; valid SARS Tax Compliance Status (TCS) PIN (or CSD number if TCS unavailable); each JV/consortium party must submit separate TCS PIN/CSD number; proof of professional registration with SACPLAN (Town Planner), SACAP (Architect/Urban Designer) and SAGC (GIS Specialist) for key personnel, each with 5 years post-registration experience; no director/shareholder in service of the state; not listed on the Register of Tender Defaulters (Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act); no undisputed municipal accounts overdue >30 days; completed and signed MBD 1–9 declarations (MBD 1 Invitation to Bid, MBD 2 Tax Clearance, MBD 3.1/3.3 Pricing Schedule, MBD 4 Declaration of Interest, MBD 6.1 Preference Points Claim, MBD 7.1 Contract Form, MBD 8 Past SCM Practices, MBD 9 Certificate of Independent Bid Determination); Authority to Sign/Board Resolution authorising signatory. Specific Goals claims require verification documents as per MBD 6.1.
Threshold: 5 years
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
12Inferred operational need
Functionality evaluation (100 points) requires a minimum of 70 points to proceed: 40 points for experience (up to 4 public sector precinct plan projects), 40 points for expertise (team qualifications and organogram), and 20 points for methodology (programme of work and cashflow projections).
Threshold: minimum of 70 points to proceed: 40 points for experience (up to 4 publ
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
13Mandatory requirement
Price and specific goals are evaluated under the 80/20 system: price 80 points, specific goals 20 points (black youth 6, black women 6, black disabled 2, black people 6); verification documents (CSD report, ID copies, medical letter) must be submitted with the bid.
Threshold: 80 points
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 495000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
14Mandatory requirement
Key personnel requirements: Project Leader must be a registered Professional Town Planner (SACPLAN) with 5 years post-registration experience, knowledge and experience in similar projects, proof of similar projects, land surveying experience (5 years), GIS expertise (map creation/reading), ability to produce 3D models (AutoCAD/SketchUp/Lumion), project management experience, research/analytical/writing/communication skills. Professional Architect or Urban Designer (SACAP) with 5 years experience – 10 points. Professional GIS Specialist (SAGC) with 5 years experience – 10 points. Detailed organogram with responsibilities required. All team members must attend progress meetings; compulsory attendance for project team leader, spatial planner or land surveyor. Replacement of candidates only in extreme cases with written approval; replacements must have equal/higher qualifications and experience. Schedule of resources with certificates, qualifications and anticipated roles must be included.
Threshold: 5 years
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
15Scored criterion
Two-stage evaluation. Stage 1 – Functionality (100 points): Experience 40 points (appointment letters or orders with reference letters for up to 4 public sector precinct plan projects, 10 points each); Expertise 40 points (Professional Town Planner registered with SACPLAN, 5 years post-registration experience – 20 points; Professional Architect or Urban Designer registered with SACAP, 5 years experience – 10 points; Professional GIS specialist registered with SAGC, 5 years experience – 10 points; detailed organogram with responsibilities); Methodology 20 points (methodological approach with both programme of work and cashflow projections – 20 points; with only one of these – 10 points; approach only – 5 points). Minimum qualifying score: 70/100 to proceed to Stage 2. Stage 2 – Price and Specific Goals (80/20 system): Price 80 points; Specific Goals 20 points allocated as: company owned by black youth (18–35) – 6 points; owned by black women – 6 points; owned by black people living with disability – 2 points; owned by black people – 6 points. Verification documents: CSD registration report/ID copy for ownership claims; letter from medical practitioner for disability claim. Tender validity: 90 days from closing date.
Threshold: Minimum qualifying score: 70/100 to proceed to Stage 2
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
16Mandatory requirement
Key personnel must include a Professional Town Planner registered with SACPLAN with 5 years post-registration experience, a Professional Architect or Urban Designer registered with SACAP with 5 years experience, and a Professional GIS specialist registered with SAGC with 5 years experience.
Threshold: 5 years
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
17Mandatory requirement
Ingquza Hill Local Municipality invites bids for the Development of Lusikisiki Precinct Plan. Lusikisiki CBD is the primary commercial, administrative and service centre of the municipality, facing challenges including traffic congestion, inadequate public transport, informal trading pressure, limited public open space, ageing infrastructure, parking shortages, fragmented land use, poor streetscape quality and insufficient pedestrian infrastructure. The precinct plan must provide a detailed spatial framework for sustainable urban growth, coordinated investment and effective land use management, aligned with the SDF, LUMS, SPLUMA and other legislation. The plan must promote inclusive, compact, sustainable development; higher-density mixed-use development; integrated land use/transport/engineering/social infrastructure planning; improved accessibility; climate-resilient development; and local economic development. Project duration: 6 months. Multidisciplinary consulting firms or consortiums with experience in precinct planning, spatial/regional planning, urban design, environmental management and stakeholder engagement are sought.
Threshold: 6 months
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
18Mandatory requirement
Bidders must submit a hand-delivered sealed envelope to 135 Main Street, Flagstaff, 4810 by 12:00 on 16 September 2026; no late, couriered, faxed or emailed tenders accepted.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 495000 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference only
The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
19Mandatory requirement
Mandatory documents include: valid full CSD proof of registration, completed and signed MBD 1–9 declarations, valid SARS TCS PIN printout, proof of professional accreditation with SACPLAN (Town Planner), SACAP (Architect/Urban Designer) and SAGC (GIS Specialist) for key personnel, and a signed letter confirming no undisputed municipal accounts overdue by more than 30 days.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
20Inferred operational need
All documents produced become the property of the Municipality; copyright vests in the Municipality; confidentiality applies; replacement of key personnel requires written approval from the Municipal Manager.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document. No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Source: AI key requirements · requirements
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
21Mandatory requirement
Submission method: hand-delivered in a sealed envelope to the tender box at Ingquza Hill Local Municipality, 135 Main Street, Flagstaff, 4810. Closing date: 16 September 2026 at 12:00. No late, couriered, faxed or emailed tenders accepted. Envelope must be endorsed with the tender number (IHLM/43/2026-27/PLAN) and description. Bidders must initial every page of the original bid document; do not reproduce, disassemble or insert pages. Returnable documents required with the bid: valid full CSD proof of registration; completed and signed MBD 1–9 declarations; valid SARS TCS PIN printout; proof of professional accreditation with SACPLAN, SACAP and SAGC for key personnel; signed letter confirming no undisputed municipal accounts overdue by more than 30 days with supporting proof. Failure to submit any mandatory document renders the bid non-responsive.
Threshold: 30 days
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for TPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inference
The recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
22Inferred operational need
Specific Goals (20 points total under 80/20 system): Company owned by black youth (18–35 years) – 6 points (verified by CSD registration report/ID copy of owner/director); owned by black women – 6 points (CSD registration report/ID copy); owned by black people living with disability – 2 points (letter from medical practitioner); owned by black people – 6 points (CSD registration report/ID copy). Failure to submit proof/documentation for specific goals claims results in zero points for specific goals. Organ of state may require substantiation of claims at any time.
Threshold: 20 points
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.