Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Issuing Organization
Manufacturing, Engineering and Related Services SETA (merSETA)Location
Gauteng
Closing Date
17 Sept 2026
Documents available on tender detail page
Tender Type
Request for Proposal
Delivery Location
08 Hillside Road Block C - Parktown - Johannesburg - 2193
Organization Type
GOVERNMENT
Published
10 Sept 2026
OCDS Reference
ocds-9t57fa-169862
Merseta is seeking an accredited skills development provider (sdp) or assessment centre to develop assessment tools for the occupational qualification production operator (120037). The tender is a request for proposal open to national providers. NO briefing session is scheduled.
Date & Time
Thursday, 17 September 2026 - 13:00
Venue
null
Proposals must be submitted to [email protected]
Categories
Request for Proposal
08 Hillside Road Block C - Parktown - Johannesburg - 2193
Recommended Certifications
Having these can improve your winning chances: QCTO Accreditation, Assessor Registration, Moderator Registration
AI Document Analysis Stages
Description
10 Sept
2026
Tender Published
Tender was published
17 Sept
2026
Closing Date
Tender closing date
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf
Scope of work MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037) Learning Unit.pdf
To download these documents and access AI-powered analysis, visit the main tender page.
Matched by category & region
Free guidance to prepare before you bid
Not sure if your business is ready for this tender? Check CSD, CIDB, and B-BBEE requirements, run a readiness assessment, and move from opportunity to submission.
Open Supplier Readiness HubMedian Estimate
R 55 280
Range
Based on 11 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment
Tools for Occupational Qualification: Production Operator (120037)
instrument;
Develop a Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Toolkit instrument;
Develop the Qualification Assessment Specification Addendum (QASA); and
Support the submission process and obtain formal approval of the QASA by the
Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO).
maximum of Twenty four (24) months from date of signature.
NB: Potential appointed supplier should have a lead or subject matter expert for the
qualification and 3 Assessor / Moderator as team members
not be considered.
4.1 Evaluation Stage 1: Compliance
All bidders must comply with the administrative requirements outlined in the Standard
Bidding Documents and the mandatory requirements listed below. All bidders failing
to provide the required information and documentation in this evaluation stage may
face disqualification from further evaluation. Failure to comply with the requirements
assessed in Stage 1 (compliance) may lead to the disqualification of bids.
a) Standard Bidding Document (SBD 4)
b) Standard Bidding Documents (SBD 6.1)
4.2 Evaluation Stage 2: Technical Evaluation
Bidders must meet the minimum technical specification requirements in this evaluation stage
to advance to the next evaluation stage. Failure to meet the prescribed technical specification
will automatically disqualify the bid offer from proceeding to the next evaluation stage. Any
bid that fails to meet the overall minimum threshold of 70% or has not received the
minimum score for any individual component thresholds will be disqualified for further
evaluation on stage 3.
Each proposal that passed functional evaluation score of 70 and more, will be on equal
footing to proceed to the final round of evaluation on price and specific goals
No. Evaluation Criteria Description Scoring Guide Weight
accreditation for the The bidder must provide valid
related qualification QCTO-recognised Skills
= 25 points SDP Accreditation for Development Provider (SDP)
unrelated Qualification Sales Advisor qualification (SAQA
qualification = 10 ID 118097) or a closely related
points occupational qualification.
accreditation = 0
points
(Disqualification)
accreditation
letter/certificate = 15
points
Submission of a formal
Accreditation accreditation acknowledgement conditional /
Letter / Certificate QCTO or relevant delegated accreditation
authority. evidence = 5 points
letter/certificate = 0
points
(Disqualification)
assessor with ≥ 3
years’ relevant
The bidder must propose at least
experience = 20
one team member who is a
points
registered assessor, with a
Registered Assessor
Experience assessor with < 3
experience in occupational
years’ experience =
qualifications assessment or
10 points
assessment development.
assessor = 0 points
(Disqualification)
The bidder must provide a signed
Service Level Agreement (SLA) or SLA/MoU with
Memorandum of Understanding relevant industry
SLA with Industry (MoU) with a relevant automotive partner = 10 points
Partner industry partner, supporting
assessment development, = 5 points
validation, or workplace
relevance. points
similar projects = 10
Demonstrated experience in
points
developing assessment
Relevant Experience
instruments, RPL tools, or
QAS/QASA for occupational
QASA Development points
qualifications. Evidence must be
provided.
experience = 0
points
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Scope of work MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037) Learning Unit.pdf (RFP)Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO).
4.1 Evaluation Stage 1: Compliance
to provide the required information and documentation in this evaluation stage may
face disqualification from further evaluation. Failure to comply with the requirements
assessed in Stage 1 (compliance) may lead to the disqualification of bids.
4.2 Evaluation Stage 2: Technical Evaluation
Bidders must meet the minimum technical specification requirements in this evaluation stage
to advance to the next evaluation stage. Failure to meet the prescribed technical specification
will automatically disqualify the bid offer from proceeding to the next evaluation stage. Any
bid that fails to meet the overall minimum threshold of 70% or has not received the
minimum score for any individual component thresholds will be disqualified for further
evaluation on stage 3.
Each proposal that passed functional evaluation score of 70 and more, will be on equal
footing to proceed to the final round of evaluation on price and specific goals
No. Evaluation Criteria Description Scoring Guide Weight
= 25 points SDP Accreditation for Development Provider (SDP)
points occupational qualification.
authority. evidence = 5 points
points occupational qua
assessor = 0 points
SLA with Industry (MoU) with a relevant automotive partner = 10 points
assessment development, = 5 points
relevance. points
QASA Development points
Technical Specifications
Source: Scope of work MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037) Learning Unit.pdf (RFP)MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment
Tools for Occupational Qualification: Production Operator (120037)
instrument;
Develop a Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Toolkit instrument;
Develop the Qualification Assessment Specification Addendum (QASA); and
Support the submission process and obtain formal approval of the QASA by the
Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO).
maximum of Twenty four (24) months from date of signature.
NB: Potential appointed supplier should have a lead or subject matter expert for the
qualification and 3 Assessor / Moderator as team members
not be considered.
4.1 Evaluation Stage 1: Compliance
All bidders must comply with the administrative requirements outlined in the Standard
Bidding Documents and the mandatory requirements listed below. All bidders failing
to provide the required information and documentation in this evaluation stage may
face disqualification from further evaluation. Failure to comply with the requirements
assessed in Stage 1 (compliance) may lead to the disqualification of bids.
a) Standard Bidding Document (SBD 4)
b) Standard Bidding Documents (SBD 6.1)
4.2 Evaluation Stage 2: Technical Evaluation
Bidders must meet the minimum technical specification requirements in this evaluation stage
to advance to the next evaluation stage. Failure to meet the prescribed technical specification
will automatically disqualify the bid offer from proceeding to the next evaluation stage. Any
bid that fails to meet the overall minimum threshold of 70% or has not received the
minimum score for any individual component thresholds will be disqualified for further
evaluation on stage 3.
Each proposal that passed functional evaluation score of 70 and more, will be on equal
footing to proceed to the final round of evaluation on price and specific goals
No. Evaluation Criteria Description Scoring Guide Weight
accreditation for the The bidder must provide valid
related qualification QCTO-recognised Skills
= 25 points SDP Accreditation for Development Provider (SDP)
unrelated Qualification Sales Advisor qualification (SAQA
qualification = 10 ID 118097) or a closely related
points occupational qualification.
accreditation = 0
points
(Disqualification)
accreditation
letter/certificate = 15
points
Submission of a formal
Accreditation accreditation acknowledgement conditional /
Letter / Certificate QCTO or relevant delegated accreditation
authority. evidence = 5 points
letter/certificate = 0
points
(Disqualification)
assessor with ≥ 3
years’ relevant
The bidder must propose at least
experience = 20
one team member who is a
points
registered assessor, with a
Registered Assessor
Experience assessor with < 3
experience in occupational
years’ experience =
qualifications assessment or
10 points
assessment development.
assessor = 0 points
(Disqualification)
The bidder must provide a signed
Service Level Agreement (SLA) or SLA/MoU with
Memorandum of Understanding relevant industry
SLA with Industry (MoU) with a relevant automotive partner = 10 points
Partner industry partner, supporting
assessment development, = 5 points
validation, or workplace
relevance. points
similar projects = 10
Demonstrated experience in
points
developing assessment
Relevant Experience
instruments, RPL tools, or
QAS/QASA for occupational
QASA Development points
qualifications. Evidence must be
provided.
experience = 0
points
Experience & Qualifications
Source: Scope of work MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037) Learning Unit.pdfexperience = 20
one team member who is a
points
registered assessor, with a
Registered Assessor
Experience assessor with < 3
experience in occupational
years’ experience =
qualifications assessment or
10 points
assessment development.
assessor = 0 points
(Disqualification)
The bidder must provide a signed
Service Level Agreement (SLA) or SLA/MoU with
SLA with Industry (MoU) with a relevant automotive partner = 10 points
Partner industry partner, supporting
assessment development, = 5 points
validation, or workplace
relevance. points
similar projects = 10
points
developing assessment
Relevant Experience
instruments, RPL tools, or
qualifications. Evidence must be
provided.
experience = 0
points
Quality Management
Source: Scope of work MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037) Learning Unit.pdfinstrument;
Develop a Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Toolkit instrument;
Develop the Qualification Assessment Specification Addendum (QASA); and
Support the submission process and obtain formal approval of the QASA by the
Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO).
accreditation for the The bidder must provide valid
related qualification QCTO-recognised Skills
= 25 points SDP Accreditation for Development Provider (SDP)
unrelated Qualification Sales Advisor qualification (SAQA
qualification = 10 ID 118097) or a closely related
points occupational qualification.
accreditation = 0
points
(Disqualification)
accreditation
letter/certificate = 15
points
Submission of a formal
Section
Source: Scope of work MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037) Learning Unit.pdfQuality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO).
4.1 Evaluation Stage 1: Compliance
to provide the required information and documentation in this evaluation stage may
face disqualification from further evaluation. Failure to comply with the requirements
assessed in Stage 1 (compliance) may lead to the disqualification of bids.
4.2 Evaluation Stage 2: Technical Evaluation
Bidders must meet the minimum technical specification requirements in this evaluation stage
to advance to the next evaluation stage. Failure to meet the prescribed technical specification
will automatically disqualify the bid offer from proceeding to the next evaluation stage. Any
bid that fails to meet the overall minimum threshold of 70% or has not received the
minimum score for any individual component thresholds will be disqualified for further
evaluation on stage 3.
Each proposal that passed functional evaluation score of 70 and more, will be on equal
footing to proceed to the final round of evaluation on price and specific goals
No. Evaluation Criteria Description Scoring Guide Weight
= 25 points SDP Accreditation for Development Provider (SDP)
points occupational qualification.
authority. evidence = 5 points
points occupational qua
assessor = 0 points
SLA with Industry (MoU) with a relevant automotive partner = 10 points
assessment development, = 5 points
relevance. points
QASA Development points
Description
Source: Scope of work MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037) Learning Unit.pdfMerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment
Tools for Occupational Qualification: Production Operator (120037)
instrument;
Develop a Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Toolkit instrument;
Develop the Qualification Assessment Specification Addendum (QASA); and
Support the submission process and obtain formal approval of the QASA by the
Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO).
maximum of Twenty four (24) months from date of signature.
NB: Potential appointed supplier should have a lead or subject matter expert for the
qualification and 3 Assessor / Moderator as team members
not be considered.
4.1 Evaluation Stage 1: Compliance
All bidders must comply with the administrative requirements outlined in the Standard
Bidding Documents and the mandatory requirements listed below. All bidders failing
to provide the required information and documentation in this evaluation stage may
face disqualification from further evaluation. Failure to comply with the requirements
assessed in Stage 1 (compliance) may lead to the disqualification of bids.
a) Standard Bidding Document (SBD 4)
b) Standard Bidding Documents (SBD 6.1)
4.2 Evaluation Stage 2: Technical Evaluation
Bidders must meet the minimum technical specification requirements in this evaluation stage
to advance to the next evaluation stage. Failure to meet the prescribed technical specification
will automatically disqualify the bid offer from proceeding to the next evaluation stage. Any
bid that fails to meet the overall minimum threshold of 70% or has not received the
minimum score for any individual component thresholds will be disqualified for further
evaluation on stage 3.
Each proposal that passed functional evaluation score of 70 and more, will be on equal
footing to proceed to the final round of evaluation on price and specific goals
No. Evaluation Criteria Description Scoring Guide Weight
accreditation for the The bidder must provide valid
related qualification QCTO-recognised Skills
= 25 points SDP Accreditation for Development Provider (SDP)
unrelated Qualification Sales Advisor qualification (SAQA
qualification = 10 ID 118097) or a closely related
points occupational qualification.
accreditation = 0
points
(Disqualification)
accreditation
letter/certificate = 15
points
Submission of a formal
Accreditation accreditation acknowledgement conditional /
Letter / Certificate QCTO or relevant delegated accreditation
authority. evidence = 5 points
letter/certificate = 0
points
(Disqualification)
assessor with ≥ 3
years’ relevant
The bidder must propose at least
experience = 20
one team member who is a
points
registered assessor, with a
Registered Assessor
Experience assessor with < 3
experience in occupational
years’ experience =
qualifications assessment or
10 points
assessment development.
assessor = 0 points
(Disqualification)
The bidder must provide a signed
Service Level Agreement (SLA) or SLA/MoU with
Memorandum of Understanding relevant industry
SLA with Industry (MoU) with a relevant automotive partner = 10 points
Partner industry partner, supporting
assessment development, = 5 points
validation, or workplace
relevance. points
similar projects = 10
Demonstrated experience in
points
developing assessment
Relevant Experience
instruments, RPL tools, or
QAS/QASA for occupational
QASA Development points
qualifications. Evidence must be
provided.
experience = 0
points
Experience & Qualifications
Source: Scope of work MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037) Learning Unit.pdfexperience = 20
one team member who is a
points
registered assessor, with a
Registered Assessor
Experience assessor with < 3
experience in occupational
years’ experience =
qualifications assessment or
10 points
assessment development.
assessor = 0 points
(Disqualification)
The bidder must provide a signed
Service Level Agreement (SLA) or SLA/MoU with
SLA with Industry (MoU) with a relevant automotive partner = 10 points
Partner industry partner, supporting
assessment development, = 5 points
validation, or workplace
relevance. points
similar projects = 10
points
developing assessment
Relevant Experience
instruments, RPL tools, or
qualifications. Evidence must be
provided.
experience = 0
points
Quality Management
Source: Scope of work MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037) Learning Unit.pdfinstrument;
Develop a Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Toolkit instrument;
Develop the Qualification Assessment Specification Addendum (QASA); and
Support the submission process and obtain formal approval of the QASA by the
Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO).
accreditation for the The bidder must provide valid
related qualification QCTO-recognised Skills
= 25 points SDP Accreditation for Development Provider (SDP)
unrelated Qualification Sales Advisor qualification (SAQA
qualification = 10 ID 118097) or a closely related
points occupational qualification.
accreditation = 0
points
(Disqualification)
accreditation
letter/certificate = 15
points
Submission of a formal
Section
Source: Scope of work MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037) Learning Unit.pdfQuality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO).
4.1 Evaluation Stage 1: Compliance
to provide the required information and documentation in this evaluation stage may
face disqualification from further evaluation. Failure to comply with the requirements
assessed in Stage 1 (compliance) may lead to the disqualification of bids.
4.2 Evaluation Stage 2: Technical Evaluation
Bidders must meet the minimum technical specification requirements in this evaluation stage
to advance to the next evaluation stage. Failure to meet the prescribed technical specification
will automatically disqualify the bid offer from proceeding to the next evaluation stage. Any
bid that fails to meet the overall minimum threshold of 70% or has not received the
minimum score for any individual component thresholds will be disqualified for further
evaluation on stage 3.
Each proposal that passed functional evaluation score of 70 and more, will be on equal
footing to proceed to the final round of evaluation on price and specific goals
No. Evaluation Criteria Description Scoring Guide Weight
= 25 points SDP Accreditation for Development Provider (SDP)
points occupational qualification.
authority. evidence = 5 points
points occupational qua
assessor = 0 points
SLA with Industry (MoU) with a relevant automotive partner = 10 points
assessment development, = 5 points
relevance. points
QASA Development points
Important Dates
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ){"closingTime":"13H00","briefingSession":"{"date":null,"time":null,"venue":"the bidder’s premises or client sites,","is_compulsory":false}"}
Contact Information
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ){"name":null,"email":"[email protected]","phone":null,"department":"Supply Chain Management","address":"ITATION DATE: 10th of September RFQ-LEA-26-27-170 2026"}
Submission Guidelines
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ)Returnable Documents: Please find the attached the attached scope of work for the, Qualification: Production Operator (120037), d) Central Supplier Database registration number, Regulations and reflect accordingly on CSD. It is therefore a condition of this RFQ that the tax
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ)The RFQ will be evaluated using a three (03) evaluation approach
Stage 1: Compliance with Administrative and Mandatory Requirements.
Stage 2: Evaluation of Compliance to Specifications
Stage 3: Price and Preference goals
6.1 First stage: Compliance with Administrative and Mandatory Requirements
e) SBD 6.1. Preference Points Claim form
6.2 Second Stage: Compliance to Specifications or Functionality Scoring (if applicable)
The purpose of the technical evaluation criteria (functionality or compliance to specification) is
to determine capacity and technical responsiveness of each proposal by assessing the quality
thereof. Below is a detailed breakdown of the scoring criteria. Bidders from the second stage
who have complied with the specifications or achieved required minimum threshold points will
be eligible to progress to the next stage to be evaluated on points for Price and Specific Goals.
6.3 Third Stage: Price and Preference goals
a) After the evaluation of mandatory/administrative requirements, functionality and or
compliance to specification, the next stage of evaluation of the bids will be in respect of
price and preferential points only.
b) In compliance with the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2022, the 80/20 preference
point system is applicable: points for this bid shall be awarded for Price (80) and 20)
Preference as defined in SBD 6.1
c) Preferential goals and applicable points for this RFQ in terms of Preferential Procurement
Specific goal Points Example of Submission Tick if Indicate document that
Total Points allocated 20
RFQ to claim points for specific goals, will be interpreted to mean that preference points for
specific goals are not claimed by the bidder.
Technical Specifications
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ)Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification: Production Operator
(120037)
Full Name: Kgomotso Mabe
Methodology
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ)of 20
The RFQ will be evaluated using a three (03) evaluation approach:
Stage 1: Compliance with Administrative and Mandatory Requirements.
Stage 2: Evaluation of Compliance to Specifications
Stage 3: Price and Preference goals
6.1 First stage: Compliance with Administrative and Mandatory Requirements
a) Bidder completed all RFQ Forms
b) Bidder registered on National Treasury CSD (Provide a valid CSD Number)
c) Pricing Schedule
d) SBD 4 – Bidders disclosure
e) SBD 6.1. Preference Points Claim form
f) SBD 7.1 Contract forms
g) Any other mandatory required
6.2 Second Stage: Compliance to Specifications or Functionality Scoring (if applicable)
The purpose of the technical evaluation criteria (functionality or compliance to specification) is
to determine capacity and technical responsiveness of each proposal by assessing the quality
thereof. Below is a detailed breakdown of the scoring criteria. Bidders from the second stage
who have complied with the specifications or achieved required minimum threshold points will
be eligible to progress to the next stage to be evaluated on points for Price and Specific Goals.
6.3 Third Stage: Price and Preference goals
a) After the evaluation of mandatory/administrative requirements, functionality and or
compliance to specification, the next stage of evaluation of the bids will be in respect of
price and preferential points only.
b) In compliance with the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2022, the 80/20 preference
point system is applicable: points for this bid shall be awarded for Price (80) and 20)
Preference as defined in SBD 6.1
c) Preferential goals and applicable points for this RFQ in terms of Preferential Procurement
Regulations 2022, are indicated in the table below:
Quality Management
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ)7.1 The merSETA reserves the right, at any time prior to the closing date, to amend any bid condition,
the bid validity period, the RFQ specifications, or to extend the closing date. Where bidder
particulars are available, merSETA shall notify affected bidders in writing and publish such
amendment on its website. Bidders remain responsible for monitoring the website prior to
submission.
7.2 The merSETA shall not be obliged to accept the lowest-priced bid or any bid, whether in whole
or in part. Award shall be made to the bidder that, in merSETA’s sole discretion, demonstrates
the requisite capability and submits a bid that is functionally compliant and financially
advantageous to merSETA.
7.3 The merSETA reserves the right to award this bid in whole or in part.
7.4 merSETA reserves the right to conduct site inspections at the bidder’s premises or client sites,
where deemed necessary.
7.5 merSETA reserves the right to require any information, agreement, or supporting document
necessary to verify a bid. By submitting a bid, the bidder consents to such verification, including
Pricing Schedule
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ)Submission of Quotation
Quotations must be clearly marked: RFQ Number & Description of the required goods/services’
Offers shall be submitted by email to: [email protected] using the RFQ number as
the email subject.
Quotations received late / after the closing date and time will not be considered
Report unethical conduct on our Fraud Hotline: 0800 333 057
Stop scammers / theft / fraud / dishonesty / bribery /blackmail / intimidation and remain anonymous.
Document Title Request for Quotation(s)
Document Number SCM–TP-008 Revision Date 01 June 2026
Page Number of 9 *Next Revision Date 31 May 2031
Revision Number Rev 04 Access Controlled
Reviewed: Senior Manager: SCM Approved: Acting Chief Executive Officer
Bidders Information
Company Name
Company Registration number
VAT registration number
Contact Person
Telephone number
Cell number
E-mail address
Postal address
Physical address
CSD Supplier number
I certify that the information furnished on this form is true and correct. I further accept that, in
addition to cancellation of a contract, action may be taken against me should this declaration prove
to be false.
Name of Representative Signature Date
(Duly Authorised)
of 20
Terms and Conditions of Request for Quotation (RFQ)
time of this RFQ.
applicable).
Preferential Procurement Regulations, 2022; the General Conditions of Contract (GCC) and if
applicable any other Special Conditions of Contract.
Failure on the part of a tenderer to submit proof or documentation required in terms of this RFQ
to claim points for specific goals, will be interpreted to mean that preference points for specific
goals are not claimed by the bidder. Kindly refer to SBD 6.1 form for additional information.
documents may result in the quotation being disqualified.
unless otherwise stipulated.
allocated price page be insufficient, the tenderer may supplement the price page with an
additional pricing breakdown on the company letterhead.
on the price declaration shall be considered the correct price.
Form SBD 7.1 or SBD 7.2. (If applicable)
party in any manner whatsoever other than for preparing a proposal in response to this RFQ,
without prior written permission from merSETA and the Bidder.
closing date and time of the RFQ.
appointment letter or a Purchase Order form has been received.
or to award the quote as whole or in part.
reference purposes on the National Treasury website by following the link below;
(https://www.treasury.gov.za/divisions/ocpo/sc/generalconditions/general%20conditions%20of%20con
tract.pdf)
of 20
Undertaking by Bidder
services described in the attached documents to merSETA on the terms and conditions. In
accordance with the specifications stipulated in the quotation documents (and which shall be
taken as part of and be incorporated into this quote) at the prices and on the terms regarding
time for delivery and/or execution inserted therein.
(a) the offer herein shall remain binding upon me and open for acceptance by merSETA
during the validity period indicated and calculated from the closing time of the quote;
(b) this quote and its acceptance shall be subject to the Public Finance Management Act,
1999, the merSETA Supply Chain Management Policy and Procedures, the General
and Special Conditions of Contract as may be applicable, with which I/we am fully
acquainted;
(c) if I/we withdraw my quote within the period for which I/we have agreed that the quote
shall remain open for acceptance, or fail to fulfil the contract when called upon to do
so. The merSETA may, without prejudice to its other rights, agree to the withdrawal of
my quote or cancel the contract that may have been entered into between merSETA
and I/us. I/we will then pay to merSETA any additional expenses incurred for having
either to accept any less favourable quote or, if fresh quote have to be invited, the
additional expenditure incurred by the invitation of fresh quotes and by the subsequent
acceptance of any less favourable quotes.
(d) the merSETA shall reserve the right to recover such additional expenditure by set-off
against monies which may be due to me under this, or any other tender or contract or
against any guarantee or deposit that may have been furnished by me or on my behalf
for the due fulfilment of this or any other tender or contract. Pending the ascertainment
of the amount of such additional merSETA may sustain by reason of my default;
(e) if my quote is accepted, the acceptance may be communicated to me by electronic
mail, to the email address supplied in my quotation document;
(f) the law of the Republic of South Africa shall govern the contract created by the
acceptance of my quote and I choose domicilium citandi et executandi in the Republic
at (full physical address) :
my quote: that the price(s), rate(s) and preference quoted cover all of the work/item(s) and
my obligations under a resulting contract, and I accept that any mistakes regarding the
price(s) and calculations will be at my risk.
of 20
and conditions devolving on me under this agreement, as the Principal(s) liable for the due
fulfilment of this contract.
me and I/we hereby undertake to satisfy fully any sentence or judgement which may be
pronounced against me as a result of such action.
business has with regard to this quote or any related quotations by completion of the Bidder’s
Disclosure Section.
So on behalf of the tenderer, certify that the information supplied
In terms of this document is correct and true, that the signatory to
This document is duly authorised and acknowledge that:
(1) The tenderer will furnish documentary proof regarding any tendering issue to the
satisfaction of the merSETA, if requested to do so.
(2) If the information supplied is found to be incorrect and/or false then merSETA, in
addition to any remedies it may have, may: -
a) Recover from the contractor all costs, losses or damages incurred or sustained by
merSETA as a result of the award of the contract, and/or
b) Cancel the contract and claim any damages which merSETA may suffer by having
to make less favourable arrangements after such cancellation.
Name of Representative Signature Date
(Duly Authorised)
of 20
Authority to sign
Tender/RFQ NO: ___________ Description: ______________________________________
Indicate the business/entity type of the tenderer by ticking the appropriate box hereunder:
Close Joint Sole
Company Corporation Partnership Venture Proprietor
The tenderer must complete the fields set out below for the relevant category applicable to them, and attach
their Registration Certificates for Companies, Close Corporations and Partnerships, or Agreements
and Powers of Attorney for Joint Ventures, or ID documents to the support data provided at the end of
this form.
I/We, the undersigned, being the Board of Directors / Members /Partners in the business trading
as:
Business Name:
Registration No:
Hereby authorise/resolved that Mr/Ms______________________________, in his/her capacity as
_________________________, is authorised to make applications and or sign on behalf of the
Company / Close Corporation / Partnership / Trust /Joint Venture, all documents in connection
with the tender, any contract resulting from our bid and any other documents and correspondence
in connection with this bid and /or contract. Resolution by Board of Directors to be attached for
Company
Signature of Signatory:_____________________________ Date: _____________
Sole Proprietor: I, _________________________hereby confirm that I am the sole owner of the
business trading as: _____________________Signature
CC Member/s, Partners, JV Partner Signatures:
Name Signature Date
NB: Failure to complete, sign and date the resolution as outlined above will negatively impact and
delay contract signing. Bidders may attach a signed company resolution on a company letterhead
of 20
SBD 4 - Bidder’s Disclosure
Any person (natural or juristic) may make an offer or offers in terms of this invitation to bid. In line
with the principles of transparency, accountability, impartiality, and ethics as enshrined in the
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa and further expressed in various pieces of legislation,
it is required for the bidder to make this declaration in respect of the details required hereunder.
Where a person/s are listed in the Register for Tender Defaulters and / or the List of Restricted
Suppliers, that person will automatically be disqualified from the bid process.
2.1 Is the bidder, or any of its directors / trustees / shareholders / members / partners or any person
having a controlling interest1 in the enterprise, employed by the state YES/NO
2.1.1 If so, furnish particulars of the names, individual identity numbers, and, if applicable, state
employee numbers of sole proprietor/ directors / trustees / shareholders / members/ partners or
any person having a controlling interest in the enterprise, in table below.
Full Name Identity Number Name of State institution
2.2 Do you, or any person connected with the bidder, have a relationship with any person who is
employed by the procuring institution? YES/NO
2.2.1 If so, furnish particulars:
2.3 Does the bidder or any of its directors / trustees / shareholders / members / partners or any
person having a controlling interest in the enterprise have any interest in any other related
enterprise whether or not they are bidding for this contract? YES/NO
2.3.1 If so, furnish particulars:
1 the power, by one person or a group of persons holding the majority of the equity
of an enterprise, alternatively, the person/s having the deciding vote or power to
influence or to direct the course and decisions of the enterprise.
of 20
allocated price page be insufficient, the tenderer may supplement the price page with an
additional pricing breakdown on the company letterhead.
shareholders, or members.
7.6 In addition to the references submitted, merSETA reserves the right to consider its own past
experience with any bidder that has supplied similar goods/ rendered similar services to merSETA
within the preceding five (5) years.
Pricing Schedule: Firm Prices [Option 1]
Note 1:
a) Only firm prices will be accepted. Non-Firm prices (including prices subject to rates of
exchange variations) will not be considered
b) In cases where different delivery points influence the pricing, a separate pricing schedule
must be submitted for each delivery point
company representative Date:
Pricing Schedule– Firm Prices [Option 2]
Note:
a) Only firm prices will be accepted. Non-Firm prices (including prices subject to rates of
exchange variations) will not be considered
b) In cases where different delivery points influence the pricing, a separate pricing schedule
must be submitted for each delivery point
Bill of quantities - price table (amend or delete if not applicable)
authorised representative DATE:
of 20
Pricing Schedule– Firm Prices [Option 3]
Note:
a) Only firm prices will be accepted. Non-Firm prices (including prices subject to rates of
exchange variations) will not be considered
b) In cases where different delivery points influence the pricing, a separate pricing schedule
must be submitted for each delivery point
agreement:
(i) Bidding documents, viz
Procurement Regulations;
(ii) General Conditions of Contract; and
(iii) Other (specify)
and rate(s) quoted cover all the goods and/or works specified in the bidding documents; that the
price(s) and rate(s) cover all my obligations and I accept that any mistakes regarding price(s) and
rate(s) and calculations will be at my own risk.
Financial Requirements
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ)Payment Terms: Payment Terms
5.1 The merSETA undertakes to pay valid invoices in full within 30 (thirty) days from statement date
for work done to its satisfaction upon presentation of a substantiated claim. The merSETA shall
not pay for any unproductive or duplicated time spent by the service provider on any assignment
because of staff changes, inefficiencies or rework.
Health & Safety
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ)terms of section 59 of the Competition Act No and or may be reported to the National
Prosecuting Authority (NPA) for criminal investigation and or may be restricted from conducting
business with the public sector for a period not exceeding ten (10) years in terms of the Prevention
and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act No or any other applicable legislation.
I certify that the information furnished in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above is correct.
Contractual Terms
Source: Request for Quotation MerSETA, Accredited SDP or Assessment Centre for the development of Assessment Tools for Occupational Qualification Production Operator (120037).pdf (RFQ)(a) the offer herein shall remain binding upon me and open for acceptance by merSETA
during the validity period indicated and calculated from the closing time of the quote;
(b) this quote and its acceptance shall be subject to the Public Finance Management Act,
1999, the merSETA Supply Chain Management Policy and Procedures, the General
and Special Conditions of Contract as may be applicable, with which I/we am fully
acquainted;
(c) if I/we withdraw my quote within the period for which I/we have agreed that the quote
shall remain open for acceptance, or fail to fulfil the contract when called upon to do
so. The merSETA may, without prejudice to its other rights, agree to the withdrawal of
my quote or cancel the contract that may have been entered into between merSETA
and I/us. I/we will then pay to merSETA any additional expenses incurred for having
either to accept any less favourable quote or, if fresh quote have to be invited, the
additional expenditure incurred by the invitation of fresh quotes and by the subsequent
acceptance of any less favourable quotes.
(d) the merSETA shall reserve the right to recover such additional expenditure by set-off
against monies which may be due to me under this, or any other tender or contract or
against any guarantee or deposit that may have been furnished by me or on my behalf
for the due fulfilment of this or any other tender or contract. Pending the ascertainment
of the amount of such additional merSETA may sustain by reason of my default;
(e) if my quote is accepted, the acceptance may be communicated to me by electronic
mail, to the email address supplied in my quotation document;
(f) the law of the Republic of South Africa shall govern the contract created by the
acceptance of my quote and I choose domicilium citandi et executandi in the Republic
at (full physical address) :
4.3. Name of company/firm ____________________________________________
4.4. Company registration number: .....................................................................
Type of company/ firm [tick applicable box]
Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium
One-person business/sole propriety
Close corporation
Public Company
Personal Liability Company
(Pty) Limited
Non-Profit Company
State Owned Company
of 20
4.5. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm, certify that
the points claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender, qualifies the company/
firm for the preference(s) shown and I acknowledge that:
i) The information furnished is true and correct;
ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the General Conditions as
indicated in paragraph 1 of this form;
iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a result of points claimed as shown in
paragraphs 1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish documentary proof to
the satisfaction of the organ of state that the claims are correct;
iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any of the
conditions of contract have not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in addition to any
other remedy it may have –
(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process;
(b) recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a result of
that person’s conduct;
(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered as a
result of having to make less favourable arrangements due to such
cancellation;
(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders and directors,
or only the shareholders and directors who acted on a fraudulent basis,
be restricted from obtaining business from any organ of state for a period
not exceeding 10 years, after the audi alteram partem (hear the other side)
rule has been applied; and
(e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.
Tenderer’s signature _______________________________________________
Surname and name: ______________________________________________
Date: ______________________________________________
Address: ______________________________________________
of 20
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 5 of 2000
Covers preferential procurement and preference-point systems used in public tenders.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 12 of 2004
Supports anti-corruption controls and supplier integrity in procurement processes.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 28 of 2024
Provides the national framework for public procurement across government.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 2 of 2000
Supports access to tender records, award decisions and public-sector procurement information.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 3 of 2000
Supports lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative tender decisions.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
These rules are linked to the work category, industry, or regulated service area.
Act 101 of 1997
Relevant to universities, TVET colleges and public higher-education procurement.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve schools, universities, TVET colleges, education departments, or learning institutions.
Act 84 of 1996
Relevant to procurement linked to schools and provincial education departments.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve schools, universities, TVET colleges, education departments, or learning institutions.
Address
Block C, Metropolitan Park, 8 Hillside Rd, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
2
Last checked
11 Sept 2026
AI status
Enhanced
Data conflicts
None detected
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.
Contact
+27 10 219 3000www.merseta.org.zaBlock C, Metropolitan Park, 8 Hillside Rd, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
Win SETA-accredited training tenders, skills development contracts, and educational service opportunities. Learn about SAQA registration and accreditation.
Access North West education infrastructure development tenders for 2026. A practical guide to school construction, sanitation, and maintenance procurement for CIDB-registered contractors in the province.
Access Limpopo education department school building maintenance tenders. Guide to school repairs, renovations, and infrastructure contracts.
Guide to Western Cape education department tenders for suppliers. Learn about school supplies, infrastructure, catering, and educational services procurement.
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogGet deep intelligence on Education. Unlock full pricing strategies, bid frequency, and historical win rates.