Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Documents available on tender detail page
Tender Type
Request for Quotation
Delivery Location
127- 15 TH ROAD RANDJESPARK - MIDRAND - JOHANNESBURG - 1683
Organization Type
GOVERNMENT
Published
05 Nov 2026
OCDS Reference
ocds-9t57fa-176993
The national credit regulator requires a service provider to moderate the results and outcomes of its organisational development project and to review its executive structure. The work is a professional services assignment evaluated on the 80/20 preference point system, with 80 points for price and 20 for specific goals. The most consequential consideration for a bidder is that the 20 goal points are split across narrow ownership categories, so an sme that does not fit one of those categories competes on price alone. Bids close on 12 november 2026 at 09:00.
Closing: bids must be submitted by 12 November 2026 at 09:00; late submissions are not accepted.
Evaluation split: 80/20 system with 80 points for price, measured against the lowest acceptable tender, and 20 points for specific goals.
Goal points: 7 for black-owned SMMEs, 7 for women-owned SMMEs, 3 for SMMEs owned by people with disabilities and 3 for youth-owned SMMEs; no proof means no points.
Preference claim: SBD 6.1 must be completed and signed by an authorised representative, and claimed points may be substantiated before or after adjudication.
Scope: the provider must moderate the results and outcomes of the organisational development project and review the executive structure.
Penalty risk: fraudulent goal claims can lead to disqualification, cost recovery, cancellation of contract and restriction from state business for up to 10 years.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Browse categories with current opportunities in this area.
Compare tender activity across provinces.
Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Return to this tender’s issuing organisation, province, or category.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Browse categories with current opportunities in this area.
Compare tender activity across provinces.
Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Date & Time
Thursday, 12 November 2026 - 11:00
Venue
null
Request for Quotation
127- 15 TH ROAD RANDJESPARK - MIDRAND - JOHANNESBURG - 1683
Tenders in this industry often require registration with these bodies.
Recommended Certifications
Having these can improve your winning chances: CA(SA) - Chartered Accountant, PMI-PMP (Project Management Professional), Prince2 Practitioner, Six Sigma Certification
AI Document Analysis Stages
Description
Source: TERMS OF REFERENCE.pdf05 Nov
2026
Tender Published
Tender was published
12 Nov
2026
Closing Date
Tender closing date
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022.docx
A service provider is required to conduct moderation of results and outcomes of an OD project and review the executive structure at the National Credit Regulator. Bidders may claim preference points under the 80/20 B-BBEE preference point system, where price carries 80 points and four specific goals carry 20 points total.
TERMS OF REFERENCE.pdf
The National Credit Regulator (NCR) is procuring a suitably qualified professional service provider to conduct moderation of job evaluation outcomes and review the executive structure at the NCR. The service provider must ensure consistent, objective grading of jobs, review preliminary scores and compensable factors, ratify moderated outcomes to the executive committee, and produce a final moderated job evaluation report along with a change management report and recommendations for executive portfolio realignment and reporting structure revision.
Standard Bidding Document (SDB) 4_Annexure A.doc
The National Credit Regulator is procuring the appointment of a service provider to moderate the results and outcomes of an OD project and review its executive structure.
SCM_Bid_documents_SBD1.docx
A service provider is required to moderate the results and outcomes of an OD project and review the executive structure at the National Credit Regulator.
To download these documents and access AI-powered analysis, visit the main tender page.
Organization
National Credit RegulatorMatched by category & region
Free guidance to prepare before you bid
Not sure if your business is ready for this tender? Check CSD, CIDB, and B-BBEE requirements, run a readiness assessment, and move from opportunity to submission.
Open Supplier Readiness HubMedian Estimate
R 449 129
Range
Based on 25 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
Moderation of job evaluation outcomes: review preliminary scores and grades; assess compensable factors including complexity, responsibility and skills; uphold or adjust grading; present outcomes to the executive committee for ratification; issue a final moderated job evaluation report
Payroll audit: audit current payroll to determine the financial impact of job evaluation outcomes and the salary benchmark
Change management report: advise on implementation options for job evaluation outcomes and a new proposed salary scale, considering remuneration equity and NCR budget availability
Review of current executive structure: evaluate strategic alignment, span of control, roles and accountability, governance effectiveness, capability and capacity, and benchmarking against similar organisations
Key deliverable: recommendations covering realignment of executive portfolios, creation or consolidation of functions, revised reporting structures, and clarification of accountability and decision rights
Reporting: present all required reports to EXCO
Timeline: work must be completed within four (4) months of issuing the Purchase Order
Important Dates
Source: TERMS OF REFERENCE.pdf (RFQ)RFQ issued: 5 November 2026
Closing date and time: 12 November 2026 at 11:00
Evaluations by Evaluation Committee: 13 November 2026
Appointment: 18 December 2026
Contact Information
Source: TERMS OF REFERENCE.pdf (RFQ)Enquiries email: [email protected]
Copy email: [email protected]
National Credit Regulator office: 15 Road, Randjespark, Midrand, 1683
Submission Guidelines
Source: TERMS OF REFERENCE.pdf (RFQ)Submission method: email
Submission email: [email protected]
Copy email: [email protected]
Closing date and time: 12 November 2026 at 11:00
Reference: quote RFQ No. NCR1048.10.2026
Late submissions: not considered under any circumstances
Proposal validity: at least ninety (90) days from the due date
All documentation listed in Section 6 must be submitted; failure may result in the submission being discarded
Returnable forms:
Evaluation Criteria
Source: TERMS OF REFERENCE.pdf (RFQ)Scoring system: 80/20 preference points (80 points for price, 20 points for specific goals)
Specific goals points:
Evidence for specific goals: share certificate, ID copies stamped by a commissioner of oaths, sworn affidavits, B-BBEE certificates, proof of disability, CIPC documents
Points are awarded only on evidence submitted
Functionality evaluation (minimum qualifying score: 70%):
Bidders scoring below 70% on functionality are disqualified and not evaluated on price and specific goals
Technical Specifications
Source: TERMS OF REFERENCE.pdf (RFQ)Moderation of job evaluation outcomes: review preliminary scores and grades assigned by the initial evaluator; assess compensable factors such as complexity, responsibility and skills; uphold or adjust grading; present moderated outcomes to the executive committee for ratification; issue a final moderated job evaluation report
Payroll audit: audit current payroll to determine the financial impact of job evaluation outcomes and salary benchmark
Change management report: advise on options for implementing job evaluation outcomes and a new salary scale, considering remuneration equity and NCR budget availability
Review of current executive structure: strategic alignment of executive portfolios; span of control and reporting lines; roles, accountability and decision rights; governance effectiveness of committees and forums; capability, capacity and succession risks; benchmarking against similar organisations
Key deliverable: recommendations covering realignment of executive portfolios, creation or consolidation of functions, revised reporting structures, and clarification of accountability and decision rights
Reporting: present all required reports to EXCO
Contract period: work must be completed within four (4) months of issuing the Purchase Order
National Credit Regulator context: 180 employees, one office in Randjespark, Midrand
Experience & Qualifications
Source: TERMS OF REFERENCE.pdfCompany experience (25 points): five years' practical experience in remuneration philosophy and related processes, organisation structure review, and facilitated change management in organisational development projects
Scoring: more than five years in all areas = 5; five years in all areas = 4; four years in all areas = 3; three years in all areas = 2; less than two years in all areas = 1
Project plan: must include objectives and methodology, deliverables and timelines, risk assessment and risk management plan, and change management plan
Scoring: four elements = 5; three elements = 4; two elements = 3; one element = 2; not provided = 1
Project team profile (30 points): valid SARA membership certificate mandatory; project team leader registered with SARA (South African Reward Association) and must have 10 years' experience; project team members must have a minimum of five years' relevant experience and expertise
Scoring: leader over 10 years with certificates and members over 5 years = 5; leader 10 years and members 5 years = 4; leader 7-9 years and members 4 years = 3; leader 5-6 years and members 3 years = 2; leader or members 1-4 years = 1
References (10 points): three relevant reference letters from recent clients in the past 36 months, on letterhead, indicating contact name, telephone number and email address; letters must show proof of practical experience
Scoring: more than 3 letters = 5; 3 letters = 4; 2 letters = 3; 1 letter = 2; none = 1
Minimum functionality score: 70% to proceed to price and specific goals evaluation
Compliance Requirements
Source: TERMS OF REFERENCE.pdf (RFQ)Central Supplier Database (CSD): mandatory registration; submit proof of registration and vendor number starting with MAAA
Tax status: written confirmation that SARS may disclose the bidder's tax compliance status on an ongoing basis during the contract tenure
SBD 1 (Invitation to Bid): complete and sign the supplied pro forma
SBD 4 (Declaration of Interest): complete and sign the supplied pro forma
SBD 6.1 (Preference Point Claim Form): submit to claim specific goals points
B-BBEE evidence: share certificate, ID copies stamped by a commissioner of oaths, sworn affidavits, B-BBEE certificates, proof of disability, CIPC documents
SARA membership: valid certificate mandatory for the project team
CIDB grading: not required (professional services, not construction)
Acceptance of General Terms and Conditions: confirm via the NCR website
Important Dates
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022.docx (unknown)12 November 2026 at 09:00
Evaluation Criteria
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022.docx (unknown)Evaluation uses 80/20 preference point system
Price: 80 points allocated (based on comparison with lowest acceptable tender)
Specific goals: 20 points allocated
Total possible score: 100 points
Technical Specifications
Source: SBD 6.1 IN TERMS OF PPR2022.docx (unknown)Service provider to conduct moderation of result and outcomes of OD project and review executive structure at the National Credit Regulator.
Description
Source: SCM_Bid_documents_SBD1.docxThe National Credit Regulator seeks a service provider to moderate the results and outcomes of its organisational development project and to review its executive structure. No further detail on the scope or deliverables is provided in the available text.
Important Dates
Source: SCM_Bid_documents_SBD1.docx (unknown)Closing date: 12 November 2026 at 11:00.
No compulsory briefing or site visit is stated in the available text.
Contact Information
Source: SCM_Bid_documents_SBD1.docx (unknown)Bidding procedure enquiries:
Technical enquiries:
Submission address: bid box at the National Credit Regulator (street address not stated in the available text).
Submission Guidelines
Source: SCM_Bid_documents_SBD1.docx (unknown)Submission method: sealed bid deposited in the bid box at the National Credit Regulator's street address (address not stated in the available text).
Closing: 12 November 2026 at 11:00. Late bids will not be considered.
Format: bids must be submitted on the official forms provided, not retyped, or in the manner prescribed in the bid document.
Returnable forms and documents:
Disqualification risks:
Evaluation Criteria
Source: SCM_Bid_documents_SBD1.docx (unknown)Evaluation stages:
Technical Specifications
Source: SCM_Bid_documents_SBD1.docx (unknown)The National Credit Regulator requires a service provider to:
No further scope, deliverables, quantities, locations or service levels are stated in the available text.
Financial Requirements
Source: SCM_Bid_documents_SBD1.docx (unknown)Pricing format: not stated in the available text.
Bid security, guarantees, retention and payment terms: not stated in the available text.
Compliance Requirements
Source: SCM_Bid_documents_SBD1.docx (unknown)CSD registration: required; provide the CSD number.
Tax compliance: a valid SARS Tax Compliance Status PIN is required; a printed TCS certificate may be submitted.
B-BBEE: a B-BBEE status level verification certificate or a sworn affidavit (for EMEs and QSEs) must be submitted to claim preference points.
Authority to sign: proof of authority (e.g. company resolution) must be submitted.
State employment: no bid will be considered from a person in the service of the state, a company with a director in the service of the state, or a close corporation with a member in the service of the state.
Foreign suppliers: must complete the foreign supplier questionnaire.
Consortia, joint ventures and subcontractors: each party must submit a separate TCS certificate/PIN/CSD number.
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 5 of 2000
Covers preferential procurement and preference-point systems used in public tenders.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 12 of 2004
Supports anti-corruption controls and supplier integrity in procurement processes.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 28 of 2024
Provides the national framework for public procurement across government.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 2 of 2000
Supports access to tender records, award decisions and public-sector procurement information.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 3 of 2000
Supports lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative tender decisions.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
These rules are linked to the type of public body issuing this tender.
Act 71 of 2008
Relevant to governance and reporting obligations for state-owned companies and public entities.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve financial services, accounting, auditing, actuarial, or advisory work.
These rules are linked to the work category, industry, or regulated service area.
Act 38 of 2001
Relevant to financial services, audit, accounting, KYC and anti-money-laundering obligations.
Relevant because this tender appears to involve financial services, accounting, auditing, actuarial, or advisory work.
Address
127- 15 TH ROAD RANDJESPARK - MIDRAND - JOHANNESBURG - 1683
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
4
Last checked
06 Nov 2026
AI status
Enhanced
Data conflicts
None detected
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.
Key Personnel
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
As a Construction contractor in Gauteng, 2026 is shaping up to be a year of renewed focus on regulatory compliance and transformation. The Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) grading system remains a critical component of procurement processes, ensuring that contractors are assessed for their financial, technical, and experiential capabilities. Understanding the CIDB Grade 5 requirements is essential for contractors looking to secure tenders and grow their businesses.
In 2026 the Gauteng construction market is being driven by a surge of infrastructure spend and a tightening of compliance checks across all public‑sector contracts. For contractors aiming at Grade 6 work—typically projects valued between R5 million and R25 million—the difference between winning and being disqualified hinges on meeting the exact financial, technical and experiential thresholds set out by the CIDB and supporting legislation. A single missing certificate or an outdated BBBEE verification can nullify a bid before the evaluation panel even opens the file, making rigorous pre‑qualification essential.
As we navigate the complex regulatory environment of 2026, Construction contractors in Gauteng must ensure they meet the stringent requirements for CIDB Grade 8. With the ongoing emphasis on transformation and compliance in the construction sector, understanding the financial, technical, and experiential thresholds is crucial for successful tender submissions. The Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) grading system is a critical component of this landscape, and contractors must be well-versed in its requirements to avoid disqualification.
If you’re chasing civil-works tenders in Gauteng this quarter, Grade 5 is the sweet spot—big enough for provincial and municipal packages up to R20 million, small enough to avoid the red-tape avalanche of Grades 7-9. Since January 2026 the CIDB’s amended gazette 45678 enforces stricter financial-ratio proof and site-based experience. Miss one threshold and the portal spits your bid out before the technical committee even opens the PDF.
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogGet deep intelligence on Professional, scientific and technical activities. Unlock full pricing strategies, bid frequency, and historical win rates.