Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Issuing Organization
Insurance Sector Education and Training AuthorityLocation
Gauteng
Closing Date
27 Aug 2026
Documents available on tender detail page
Tender Type
Request for Proposal
Delivery Location
18 Fricker Road - Sandton - Illovo - 2196
Organization Type
GOVERNMENT
Published
05 Aug 2026
OCDS Reference
ocds-9t57fa-164707
Inseta is seeking a service provider to render board secretariat services for a period of three years. The tender is a request for proposal open to professional services firms. A compulsory briefing session via microsoft teams is required, with details provided in the bid documents.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Return to this tender’s issuing organisation, province, or category.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Date & Time
Thursday, 27 August 2026 - 11:00
Venue
Microsoft Team - Link on Bid Documents
Important: Attendance at this briefing session is mandatory. Bids from suppliers who do not attend may be disqualified.
Bidders to note that registration through the link provided on bid document is required before joining the meeting.
Categories
Request for Proposal
18 Fricker Road - Sandton - Illovo - 2196
Tenders in this industry often require registration with these bodies.
Recommended Certifications
Having these can improve your winning chances: CA(SA) - Chartered Accountant, PMI-PMP (Project Management Professional), Prince2 Practitioner, Six Sigma Certification
AI Document Analysis Stages
Important Dates
Source: 0. ToR -Board Secretariat Services.pdf (TENDER)05 Aug
2026
Tender Published
Tender was published
27 Aug
2026
Closing Date
Tender closing date
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
3. SBD 4 - Bidders Disclosure.pdf
2. SBD 3.1 (Annexure A) - Board Secretariat.pdf
4. SBD 6.1 In Terms of PPR2022.pdf
1. SBD 1 - Board Secretary Services.pdf
0. ToR -Board Secretariat Services.pdf
To download these documents and access AI-powered analysis, visit the main tender page.
Matched by category & region
Free guidance to prepare before you bid
Not sure if your business is ready for this tender? Check CSD, CIDB, and B-BBEE requirements, run a readiness assessment, and move from opportunity to submission.
Open Supplier Readiness HubLearn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
Median Estimate
R 581 900
Range
Based on 25 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
{"closingDate":"27 August 2026","closingTime":"10:00","briefingSession":"{"date":"17 August 2026","time":"10:00","venue":"e: 17 August 2026","is_compulsory":true}"}
Contact Information
Source: 0. ToR -Board Secretariat Services.pdf (TENDER){"name":"Ms. R. Matenche","email":"[email protected]","phone":null,"department":"Supply Chain Management","address":null}
Evaluation Criteria
Source: 0. ToR -Board Secretariat Services.pdf (TENDER)11.1 Responses will be evaluated using a predetermined set of evaluation criteria. The evaluation criteria are
designed to reflect the INSETA’s requirements in terms of identifying a suitable service provider and
ensure the selection process is transparent and affords all the bidders a fair opportunity for evaluation
and selection.
11.2 The evaluation criteria will be based on the following phases/requirements:
11.2.1 Phase 0: Attendance of Compulsory Briefing Session
11.2.2 Phase 1: Legislative requirements
11.2.3 Phase 2: Technical Functionality (100 points) – The threshold of 70 points
11.2.4 Phase 3: Evaluation on Price and Specific Goals
12 COMPULSORY BRIEFING SESSION (Phase 0)
12.1 Bidders are required to attend the compulsory briefing session on the date and time specified.
Note: Failure to attend the compulsory briefing will result in automatic disqualification.
13 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS (Phase 1)
13.1 Bidder(s) must submit:
13.1.1 Completed and Signed Standard Bidding Document (SBD 1) Procurement Invitation.
13.1.2 Completed Standard Bidding Document (SBD 3.1) Pricing Schedule – Annexure A (to be submitted
in a separate envelope).
13.1.3 Completed and Signed Standard Bidding Document (SBD 4) Bidder’s Disclosure.
Failure to comply with (or submit) the legislative requirements listed above will result in the bidder being non-
responsive and result in disqualification.
13.2 The non-submission of the following legislative requirements will not lead to disqualification.
13.2.1 Completed and Signed Standard Bidding Document (SBD 6.1) Preference Points Claim form.
13.2.2 Bidder must provide valid BBBEE Certificate or Sworn Affidavit.
13.2.3 Central Supplier Database (CSD) Report.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
invalidation of your bid.
14 FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION CRITERIA (Phase 2)
14.1 The tender submission will be functionally evaluated out of 100 points – any bidder who scores less
than minimum 70 points will not be considered for further evaluation on Price and Specific Points on
Phase 3.
Description weight
Bidder Experience 40
Bidders are required to demonstrate experience in terms of previous work done. Bidders must submit
reference letters from different public institutions as evidence of related board secretariat work
currently/previously conducted. Reference letters must be on client’s letterhead, accompanied by an
award/appointment letter or a purchase order that align with the reference letter. The reference letters
must be for services conducted within the last five (5) years.
Note: Reference must be from different clients and not all from the same client. Should the submitted
reference letters emanate from the same client, the submission will be scored as one submission.
points
NB: Due diligence will be conducted against reference letters submitted and work performed
for the referees (See section 18.1.1)
Board Secretary Resources Experience and Qualification 50
The bidder must submit a detailed CV clearly demonstrating quantifiable number of years of experience as
a Public Sector Board Secretariat. The names of the public sector institutions where the resource gained
this experience must be reflected in the CV.
Bidders are to use the table below as a guide to demonstrate Public Sector Experience:
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
Public Sector Institution Period of Service
0 points
Methodology and a work Plan schedule 10
Bidder to provide a detailed methodology in line with the scope of work (section 3) and deliverables
(section 4) presented. The methodology is to include but not limited to:
identified in Section 4 and 5 of the Terms of Reference = 5 points
Total 100
14.2 Bidders are required to pass the minimum threshold of 70 points on the functional criteria to be
considered for the next phase of evaluation which is Phase 3 – Price & Specific Goals.
14.3 Bidders who score less than 70 points will not be considered for the next phase, thus will be disqualified,
and will be declared non-responsive.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
15 Price and Specific Points Evaluation (Phase 3)
15.1 Preference Points Applied Against Specific Goals
The tender responses will be evaluated on the 80/20 preference point system for acquisition of
goods or services with Rand value equal to or below R50 million.
15.1.1 The lowest/ highest acceptable tender will be used to determine the accurate system once
tenders are received.
15.1.2 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts) shall
be awarded for:
a) Price; and
b) Specific Goals.
The maximum points for this tender are allocated as follows:
Points
Price 80
Specific goals 20
Total points for Price and SPECIFIC GOALS 100
16 points awarded for price and preference points
(1) The following formula will be used to calculate the points out of 80 for price in respect of an invitation
for a tender with a Rand value equal to or below R50 million, inclusive of all applicable taxes:
(2) Ps = 80 × [1 − (Pt − Pmin) / Pmin]
Where:
Ps = Points scored for comparative price of bid under
Consideration
Pt = Comparative price of bid under consideration
Pmin = Comparative price of lowest acceptable bid
(3) A maximum of 20 points may be awarded to a tenderer for the specific goal specified for the tender.
(4) The points scored for the specific goal must be added to the points scored for price and the total
must be rounded off to the nearest two decimal places.
(5) Subject to section 2(1)(f) of the Act, the contract must be awarded to the tenderer scoring the highest
points.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
17 specific goals preferential points will be awarded as follows
17.1 Table 1: Specific goals for the bid process and points claimed are indicated per the table below.
17.2 The 80/20 preference point system is applicable; corresponding points must also be indicated as
such. The tenderer must indicate how they claim points for each preference point system.
The specific goals allocated points in Number of points
terms of this tender allocated (80/20-point system)
Black Ownership (Maximum points = 6 points)
Women Ownership (Maximum points = 6 points)
Youth Ownership (Maximum points = 5 points)
Company-owned by People living with (Maximum points = 3 points)
disabilities
disabilities
with disabilities
Total 20
Note: Evidence to be submitted by Service Providers: Emerging Micro Enterprise (EME) and
Qualifying Small Enterprise (QSE) – sworn affidavit (DTI or CIPC Template), Generic entities – B-
BBEE certificate.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
17.3 Failure on the part of a tenderer to submit proof or documentation required in terms of this tender to
claim points for specific goals with the tender, will be interpreted to mean that preference points for
specific goals are not claimed.
17.4 The organ of state reserves the right to require of a tenderer, either before a tender is adjudicated or at
any time subsequently, to substantiate any claim in regard to preferences, in any manner required by
the organ of state.
17.5 A maximum of 20 points may be awarded to a tenderer for the specific goal specified for the tender.
17.6 The points scored for the specific goal must be added to the points scored for price, and the total must
be rounded off to the nearest two decimal places.
17.7 Subject to section 2(1)(f) of the Act, the contract must be awarded to the tenderer scoring the highest
points unless objective criteria justify the award to another bidder.
17.8 Preference points shall be calculated after the process has been brought to a comparative basis,
taking into account all factors of non-firm prices.
17.9 In the event that two or more bids have scored equal points in terms of price and
preference points for Specific Goals, the successful bid must be the one scoring the highest number of
preference points for Specific Goals, in terms of PPPFA Act .
17.10 However, when functionality is part of the evaluation process and two or more bids have scored equal
points for Specific Goals, the successful bid must be the one scoring the highest score for functionality.
17.11 Should two or more bids be equal in all respects, the award shall be decided by the drawing of lots.
18 Bid Procedure Conditions:
18.1 Counter Conditions:
The INSETA draws the bidders’ attention that amendments to any of the Bid Conditions or setting of
counter conditions by bidders will result in the invalidation of such bids.
18.1.1 Award Criteria: Due Diligence Process
18.1.1.1 INSETA reserves the right to conduct due diligence/screen on the bidder prior to the
award of a contract.
18.1.1.2 The due diligence/screening will be conducted based on the reference letters received
from the bidder to confirm the services rendered and the standard of the bidder’s
performance.
18.1.1.3 INSETA may, in addition to the above, employ any other appropriate method to
conduct due diligence.
18.1.1.4 Should such due diligence/ screening results have a negative outcome, the INSETA
reserves the right not to award the bid to the subjected/recommended/highest scoring
bidder.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
18.1.1.5 The INSETA reserve a right not to award a bid to the highest scoring bidder but to
award to a service provider who meet the requirement fully.
18.1.1.6 Non-contactable referees will lead to the failure of the due diligence process and will
result in a negative outcome for the bidder.
19 Bid requirements when bidding as the following:
19.1 Consortium
19.1.1 A consortium is an association of two or more individuals, companies, organisations or
governments (or any combination of these entities) with the objective of participating in a
common activity or pooling their resources for achieving a common goal.
19.1.2 A consortium requires that each participant retains its separate legal status and the
consortium’s control over each participant is generally limited to activities involving the joint
endeavour, particularly the division of profits. A consortium is formed by contract, which
delignates the rights and obligations of each member.
19.1.3 In a consortium, only the lead bidder’s credentials both in terms of financial and technical
qualifications are considered. Therefore, the interpretation and application to an RFQ/Bid
process is such that the lead partner is identified, and the following requirements are required
as follows:
a) Lead Partner
and the partner)
why the need for the consortium, which for all intent and purpose fulfils the
requirements of the bid through combination of skills)
b) Partner
Proof of CSD registration.
Tax Pin.
BBBEE Sworn-Affidavit.
Sbd 4
19.1.4 It should be taken into cognisance that although the lead partner is the qualifying entity, the
partner should prove that it can do business with state-owned entities, through CSD
registration, proof that the taxes are compliant, its level of BBBEE status in order to align with
the BBBEE status level required by the BID, declare interest and answer questions that it is
not a disqualified entity with the National Treasury. The foregoing ensures compliance from
an SCM process perspective that the consortium is in order.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
19.1.5 Of importance is that in a consortium, each individual team members retain their identities.
19.2 A joint venture
19.2.1 A joint venture is a business entity created by two or more parties, generally characterized by
shared ownership, returns and risks and shared governance.
19.3 Unincorporated joint venture:
19.3.1 All SCM documents are filled in by the joint venture in the name of the joint venture, although
the submission of administrative documents (partnership agreement between parties) will be
completed in the name of the joint venture, and the following will be required from both parties,
amongst others
a) SBD 4
b) SBD 6
c) Tax pin
d) CSD registration.
e) The JV agreement will direct which bank account of the two entities will be used.
f) Consolidated Joint BBBEE Certificate.
19.4 Incorporated joint venture:
19.4.1 This aligned to a registered entity or company. A registered entity/ company with a
consolidated BBBEE certificate and a bank account in the name of the Joint venture. The
required compliance documents must be complete by the entity/ company the name of the
joint venture, and the following will be required amongst others
a) SBD 4
b) SBD 6
c) Tax pin
d) CSD registration.
e) The JV agreement will direct which bank account of the two entities will be used.
f) Consolidated Joint BBBEE Certificate.
20 communication
20.1 Respondents are warned that a response will be disqualified should any attempt be made by a bidder
either directly or indirectly to canvass any officer(s) or employees of INSETA in respect of BID process,
between the closing date and the date of the award of the business.
20.2 All enquiries relating to this BID should be emailed three days before the closing date.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
21 conditions to be observed when bidding
21.1 The organization does not bind itself to accept the lowest or any BID, nor shall it be responsible for or
pay any expenses or losses which may be incurred by the bidder in the preparation and delivery of his
BID submission. The organization also reserves the right to withdraw or cancel the BID at any stage.
No BID shall be deemed to have been accepted unless and until a formal contract / letter of award is
prepared and executed. The bid shall remain open for acceptance by the Organization for a period of
120 days from the closing date of the BID Enquiry.
INSETA reserves the right to:
21.2 Not evaluate and award a bid that do not comply strictly with this BID document.
21.3 Make a selection solely on the information received in the Bid Document and Enter into negotiations
with any one or more of preferred bidder(s) based on the criteria specified in the terms of reference.
21.4 Contact any bidder during the evaluation process, in order to clarify any information, without informing
any other bidders. During the evaluation process, no change in the content of the BID shall be sought,
offered or permitted.
21.5 Cancel this BID at any time as prescribed in the PPPFA.
21.6 Should bidder(s) be selected for further negotiations, they will be chosen on the basis of the of cost
effectiveness and the principal of value for money not necessarily on the basis of the lowest costs.
22 anonymously reporting of fraud
19.1. Bidders are encouraged to report any incidents of
behaviour to the Vuvuzela Hotline. Contact number: 0800 119 691
23 cost of bidding
23.1 The bidder shall bear all costs and expenses associated with preparation and submission of its BID
submission and the INSETA shall under no circumstances be responsible or liable for any such costs,
regardless of, without limitation, the conduct or outcome of the bidding, evaluation, and selection
process.
End of terms of reference document
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
Technical Specifications
Source: 0. ToR -Board Secretariat Services.pdf (TENDER)Appointment of a service provider to render board secretariat services to inseta
For a period of three (3) years.
1.1 The Insurance Sector Education and Training Authority (INSETA) is a public entity listed inschedule 3A
of the PFMA and was established in March 2000. The INSETA must comply with the Skills Development
Act (SDA), the Skills Development Levies Act (SDLA), the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA),
any other relevant legislation and the Constitution.
1.1 Therefore, the INSETA requires a suitability qualified service provider to render Board Secretariat
Services to INSETA for a period of three (3) years.
2 legislative and regulatory framework
2.1 This bid and all contracts emanating therefrom will be subject to General Conditions of Contract issued
in accordance with Treasury Regulation 16A (downloadable GCC) published in terms of the Public
Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act ) (PFMA), as well as the Preferential Procurement Policy
Framework Act 2000 (PPPFA) with its latest 2022 regulations.
2.2 The Special Conditions of Contract (SCC) are supplementary to those of the General Conditions of
Contract (GCC). However, where the Special Conditions of Contract conflict with the General Conditions
of Contract, the Special Conditions of Contract prevail.
3 current /situation analysis
3.1 INSETA currently outsources Board Secretariat Services. Therefore, INSETA has embarked on a
process to appoint a service provider to render Board Secretariat services for a period of three (3) years.
4.1 The objective of this bid is to appoint a suitably qualified service provider to render Board Secretariat
Services to the INSETA Board and the Board’s Sub-committees for the period of three (3) years.
4.2 The Board Secretary will render Board support to the INSETA by ensuring that the INSETA effectively
and efficiently complies with the legal requirements relating to corporate governance and operations of
the Board.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
4.3 The Board Secretary is required to play a leading role in good governance by helping the Board and its
Sub-Committees function effectively and in accordance with their Terms of Reference (ToR) and best
practices.
4.4 The role requires the provision of support beyond scheduling meetings to proactively managing the
agenda and ensuring the collation of high-quality, up-to-date information in advance of meetings.
4.5 The role of the Board Secretary services must enable the INSETA Board members to contribute fully to
the Board and its sub-committee discussions and debates, and to enhance the Board’s capability for
good decision making.
4.2 Technical approach
The bidder must at least:
a) Describe, in detail, exactly how they propose to carry out the activities to achieve the outcomes
identified in the terms of reference. Bidders are required to have the office equipment and the
resource/s (which must include, but not be limited to, the following: laptop, internet and email
connection, landline, own office with the basic office equipment). The service provider must be able
to render services at INSETA offices as and when required. The bidder should identify any risks
that might hinder delivery and indicate how they will avoid or overcome such problems.
b) Describe how the work will be carried out in terms of the key performance indicated on the terms
of reference.
c) Describe the tasks, duties or functions to be performed by staff.
d) Details of office and office location that will service this contract as well as the capacity of the office
to meet the requirements of this proposal including the time required at each to deliver in terms of
the requirements of the Request for Proposal.
f) Provide a work plan of activities. In addition to providing details of the estimated number of hours
for each activity, bidders are to supply a detailed timetable that identifies when certain activities will
be undertaken and over what period they will be spread. The timing of activities, the time needed
to complete them, and the order in which they will be undertaken must be explained and justified.
5 deliverables
5.1 The successful bidder will be required to sign a non-disclosure agreement for the duration of the contract
period. The duties and responsibilities of the Board Secretariat will include amongst others:
The Board Secretariat will be required to manage Board and all Board Sub-Committees, including the
below mentioned list of deliverables (but not limited to):
5.1.1 Management of meetings and related administration
a) Develop Annual Work Plans and schedules
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
b) In liaison with Board/Committee chair draft notices and Agendas for the meetings (i.e., Board,
Audit Committee, Finance Committee, Executive Committee and HRR Committee).
c) Prepare and issue notices of meetings within the set time frames.
d) Preparation and distribution of packs within the set timeframes for the Board, Audit Committee,
Finance Committee, Executive Committee and HRR Committee.
e) Keep audio recordings and prepare accurate minutes and action/decision logs of the meetings
including in-committee minutes, as well as follow-up actions and report on matters arising.
f) Communicate the Board and sub-committee resolutions (including reference coding of each
resolution for audit purposes) to relevant parties and prepares action sheets to this effect.
g) Ensure that actions requested by the Board are undertaken by the responsible executives and
report back to the Board.
h) Ensure the INSETA Constitution and Committee charters/ToR are updated timeously, signed
and distributed in line with the rules of the constitution.
i) Conduct a Board and Committee assessment.
j) Compile annual board calendar.
k) Annually obtain Board Member’s declaration of interest and code of conduct.
l) Ensure compliance with applicable Corporate Governance prescripts and applicable legislation.
m) Manage requests from the Board and sub-committees.
n) Provide an administration support for the Board and management strategic sessions.
5.1.2 Board and Board sub-committee Information Sessions and Induction.
a) Arrange induction of the Board and its sub-committees in line with the INSETA policies and
procedures.
b) Coordinate and provide training to board members on their fiduciary duties, corporate governance
and relevant legislation.
5.1.3 Advisory Services
a) Provide general advice on legal, governance and compliance to the Board and the Chairperson.
b) Liaise with INSETA legal advisors and Executives managers on legal work required, litigation and
other legal processes to advise the Board on.
c) Manage compliance with the PFMA and Electronic Communications Transactions Act regarding
the meeting documentation and related legislative prescripts.
5.1.4 Reporting
a) Attend status meetings/progress update meetings/Management meetings to report on work done
and work in harmony with the executive management team of INSETA.
b) Functionally report to the CEO and is accountable to the Board.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
c) Compile presentations and reports for the Board and its sub-committees as and when required.
d) Provide a monthly report to the CEO on Board and Committee related activities.
5.1.5 Record Keeping:
a) Maintains statutory registers for INSETA (including but not limited to):
I. The register of Board and Board Committee members and index thereof.
II. Minutes and decision log.
III. Resolution Register.
IV. Retains and maintains the statutory registers for the company.
b) Assist in recording and capturing of all the Board and its sub-committees’ activities as required by
the Law.
c) Maintenance, safe-keeping and retrieval of the Board and its sub-committee records.
d) Ad-hoc Board and its sub-committees related assignments as determined by the CEO of INSETA
as and when required.
5.2 Minimum Requirements
a) The prospective service provider must assign resources or staff who have the following experience
and possess the following qualifications:
I. At least 7 years’ experience in a Company Secretariat role in the public sector.
II. Must have an NQF level 8 qualification in Governance/Legal/Commerce
III. Must have a valid Chartered Governance Institute of Southern Africa (CGISA) membership.
IV. Experience in the SETA environment preferably.
b. The prospective service provider must assign resources or staff who have the following behavioural
attributes
I. Good written, verbal communication and presentations
II. Report writing
III. Confidentiality and integrity
IV. Good understanding of administrative functions and meeting procedures
V. Ability to operate at the Executive Management level
VI. Ability to work under pressure and meet strict deadlines
VII. Computer Literacy
VIII. Good interpersonal skills and relationship-building skills
IX. Tolerant, motivated, enthusiastic, energetic, and assertive.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
6 timeframes
6.1 The contract duration will be for a period of 3 years.
Methodology
Source: 0. ToR -Board Secretariat Services.pdf3.1 INSETA currently outsources Board Secretariat Services. Therefore, INSETA has embarked on a
process to appoint a service provider to render Board Secretariat services for a period of three (3) years.
4 scope of work
4.1 The objective of this bid is to appoint a suitably qualified service provider to render Board Secretariat
Services to the INSETA Board and the Board’s Sub-committees for the period of three (3) years.
4.2 The Board Secretary will render Board support to the INSETA by ensuring that the INSETA effectively
and efficiently complies with the legal requirements relating to corporate governance and operations of
the Board.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
4.3 The Board Secretary is required to play a leading role in good governance by helping the Board and its
Sub-Committees function effectively and in accordance with their Terms of Reference (ToR) and best
practices.
4.4 The role requires the provision of support beyond scheduling meetings to proactively managing the
agenda and ensuring the collation of high-quality, up-to-date information in advance of meetings.
4.5 The role of the Board Secretary services must enable the INSETA Board members to contribute fully to
the Board and its sub-committee discussions and debates, and to enhance the Board’s capability for
good decision making.
4.2 Technical approach
a) Describe, in detail, exactly how they propose to carry out the activities to achieve the outcomes
identified in the terms of reference. Bidders are required to have the office equipment and the
resource/s (which must include, but not be limited to, the following: laptop, internet and email
connection, landline, own office with the basic office equipment). The service provider must be able
to render services at INSETA offices as and when required. The bidder should identify any risks
that might hinder delivery and indicate how they will avoid or overcome such problems.
b) Describe how the work will be carried out in terms of the key performance indicated on the terms
of reference.
c) Describe the tasks, duties or functions to be performed by staff.
d) Details of office and office location that will service this contract as well as the capacity of the office
to meet the requirements of this proposal including the time required at each to deliver in terms of
the requirements of the Request for Proposal.
f) Provide a work plan of activities. In addition to providing details of the estimated number of hours
for each activity, bidders are to supply a detailed timetable that identifies when certain activities will
be undertaken and over what period they will be spread. The timing of activities, the time needed
to complete them, and the order in which they will be undertaken must be explained and justified.
below mentioned list of deliverables (but not limited to):
5.1.1 Management of meetings and related administration
a) Develop Annual Work Plans and schedules
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
b) In liaison with Board/Committee chair draft notices and Agendas for the meetings (i.e., Board,
Audit Committee, Finance Committee, Executive Committee and HRR Committee).
c) Prepare and issue notices of meetings within the set time frames.
d) Preparation and distribution of packs within the set timeframes for the Board, Audit Committee,
0 points
Methodology and a work Plan schedule 10
Bidder to provide a detailed methodology in line with the scope of work (section 3) and deliverables
(section 4) presented. The methodology is to include but not limited to:
identified in Section 4 and 5 of the Terms of Reference = 5 points
Total 100
14.2 Bidders are required to pass the minimum threshold of 70 points on the functional criteria to be
considered for the next phase of evaluation which is Phase 3 – Price & Specific Goals.
14.3 Bidders who score less than 70 points will not be considered for the next phase, thus will be disqualified,
and will be declared non-responsive.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
15 Price and Specific Points Evaluation (Phase 3)
15.1 Preference Points Applied Against Specific Goals
The tender responses will be evaluated on the 80/20 preference point system for acquisition of
goods or services with Rand value equal to or below R50 million.
15.1.1 The lowest/ highest acceptable tender will be used to determine the accurate system once
tenders are received.
15.1.2 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts) shall
be awarded for:
a) Price; and
b) Specific Goals.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: 0. ToR -Board Secretariat Services.pdfb) Assist in recording and capturing of all the Board and its sub-committees’ activities as required by
the Law.
c) Maintenance, safe-keeping and retrieval of the Board and its sub-committee records.
d) Ad-hoc Board and its sub-committees related assignments as determined by the CEO of INSETA
as and when required.
5.2 Minimum Requirements
a) The prospective service provider must assign resources or staff who have the following experience
and possess the following qualifications:
I. At least 7 years’ experience in a Company Secretariat role in the public sector.
II. Must have an NQF level 8 qualification in Governance/Legal/Commerce
III. Must have a valid Chartered Governance Institute of Southern Africa (CGISA) membership.
Bidder Experience 40
reference letters from different public institutions as evidence of related board secretariat work
currently/previously conducted. Reference letters must be on client’s letterhead, accompanied by an
award/appointment letter or a purchase order that align with the reference letter. The reference letters
must be for services conducted within the last five (5) years.
Note: Reference must be from different clients and not all from the same client. Should the submitted
reference letters emanate from the same client, the submission will be scored as one submission.
points
NB: Due diligence will be conducted against reference letters submitted and work performed
for the referees (See section 18.1.1)
Board Secretary Resources Experience and Qualification 50
a Public Sector Board Secretariat. The names of the public sector institutions where the resource gained
this experience must be reflected in the CV.
19.1 Consortium
19.1.1 A consortium is an association of two or more individuals, companies, organisations or
governments (or any combination of these entities) with the objective of participating in a
common activity or pooling their resources for achieving a common goal.
19.1.2 A consortium requires that each participant retains its separate legal status and the
consortium’s control over each participant is generally limited to activities involving the joint
endeavour, particularly the division of profits. A consortium is formed by contract, which
delignates the rights and obligations of each member.
19.1.3 In a consortium, only the lead bidder’s credentials both in terms of financial and technical
qualifications are considered. Therefore, the interpretation and application to an RFQ/Bid
process is such that the lead partner is identified, and the following requirements are required
as follows:
a) Lead Partner
and the partner)
why the need for the consortium, which for all intent and purpose fulfils the
requirements of the bid through combination of skills)
b) Partner
Proof of CSD registration.
Tax Pin.
BBBEE Sworn-Affidavit.
Sbd 4
19.1.4 It should be taken into cognisance that although the lead partner is the qualifying entity, the
partner should prove that it can do business with state-owned entities, through CSD
registration, proof that the taxes are compliant, its level of BBBEE status in order to align with
the BBBEE status level required by the BID, declare interest and answer questions that it is
not a disqualified entity with the National Treasury. The foregoing ensures compliance from
an SCM process perspective that the consortium is in order.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
19.1.5 Of importance is that in a consortium, each individual team members retain their identities.
19.2 A joint venture
19.2.1 A joint venture is a business entity created by two or more parties, generally characterized by
shared ownership, returns and risks and shared governance.
19.3 Unincorporated joint venture:
19.3.1 All SCM documents are filled in by the joint venture in the name of the joint venture, although
the submission of administrative documents (partnership agreement between parties) will be
completed in the name of the joint venture, and the following will be required from both parties,
amongst others
a) SBD 4
b) SBD 6
c) Tax pin
d) CSD registration.
e) The JV agreement will direct which bank account of the two entities will be used.
f) Consolidated Joint BBBEE Certificate.
19.4 Incorporated joint venture:
19.4.1 This aligned to a registered entity or company. A registered entity/ company with a
consolidated BBBEE certificate and a bank account in the name of the Joint venture. The
required compliance documents must be complete by the entity/ company the name of the
joint venture, and the following will be required amongst others
a) SBD 4
b) SBD 6
c) Tax pin
d) CSD registration.
e) The JV agreement will direct which bank account of the two entities will be used.
f) Consolidated Joint BBBEE Certificate.
Compliance Requirements
Source: 0. ToR -Board Secretariat Services.pdf (TENDER)Minimum functionality/qualifying score: 70
CSD registration
CSD registration, proof that the taxes are compliant, its level of BBBEE status in order to align with
Central Supplier Database (CSD) Report
appointment letter or a purchase order that align with the reference letter
appointment letters or purchase orders = 40
appointment letters or purchase orders = 30 points
appointment letters or purchase orders = 20 points
award/appointment letter or a purchase order that align with the reference letter. The reference letters
Board Secretary Resources Experience and Qualification 50
The bidder must submit a detailed CV clearly demonstrating quantifiable number of years of experience as
this experience must be reflected in the CV.
B-BBEE Minimum Level: 8
Points Allocation: 70 points
B-BBEE Details: 3.1.2 Completed Standard Bidding Document (SBD 3.1) Pricing Schedule – Annexure A (to be submitted
in a separate envelope).
13.1.3 Completed and Signed Standard Bidding Document (SBD 4) Bidder’s Disclosure.
Failure to comply with (or submit) the legislative requirements listed above will result in the bidder being non-
responsive and result in disqualification.
13.2 The non-submission of the following legislative requirements will not lead to disqualification.
13.2.1 Completed and Signed Standard Bidding Document (SBD 6.1) Preference Points Claim form.
13.2.2 Bidder must provide valid BBBEE Certificate or Sworn Affidavit.
13.2.3 Central Supplier Database (CSD) Report.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
invalidation of your bid.
14 FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION CRITERIA (Phase 2)
14.1 The tender submission will be functionally evaluated out of 100 points – any bidder who scores less
than minimum 70 points will not be considered for further evaluation on Price and Specific Points on
Phase 3.
Description weight
Bidder Experience 40
Bidders are required to demonstrate experience in terms of previous work done. Bidders must submit
reference letters from different public institutions as evidence of related board secretariat work
currently/previously conducted. Reference letters must
Contractual Terms
Source: 0. ToR -Board Secretariat Services.pdf7.1 The successful bidder will be required to enter into a Service Level Agreement (SLA) with measurable
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), performance targets, reporting frequencies and consequences for
non‐performance.
7.2 The successful bidder may be required to have adequate professional indemnity as well as liability
insurance in place (upon parties contracting).
7.3 The successful bidder will be required to sign a non-disclosure agreement for the duration of the contract
period.
7.4 In the case of the service provider using sub-contractors, the former will be responsible for ensuring
delivery of services from any such sub-contractors and for making any payments to such sub-
contractors.
7.5 Bidders are required to fully comply with the relevant SCM Legislative Framework as well as application
of regulatory and prescripts. Bidders are also required to take all reasonable steps to protect information,
in line with the provisions of the POPIA.
7.6 Bidder will be subjected to periodic review in terms of measuring satisfactory performance until contract
is completed and shall invoke applicable penalties as per contract terms and conditions, where there is
unsatisfactory performance.
8 unsatisfactory performance
8.1 In the event that the Service Provider fails to meet the performance standards outlined in this ToR or
SLA, INSETA shall where applicable raise remedies, terminate the contract, seek damages or raise
penalties such as impose financial penalties to the Service Provider.
8.2 The following shall be considered examples of unsatisfactory performance:
8.2.1 Failure to meet the agreed-upon deadlines.
8.2.2 Failure to deliver goods or services that meet the agreed-upon standards.
8.2.3 Failure to respond to client inquiries or issues in a timely manner.
8.2.4 Failure to maintain confidentiality or security of client information.
8.2.5 Gross negligence by the service provider or its employees.
9 absence of obligation & confidentiality
9.1 No legal or other obligation shall arise between the service provider and INSETA unless/until both
parties have signed a formal contract or Service Level Agreement in place.
Board Members: Ms. R. Matenche (Chairperson), Mr. J.J.M. Mabena (Labour), Mr. C.B. Botha (Labour),
Mr. S.B. Mthethwa (Labour), Ms. N.M. Nxele (Employer), Mr. S.M. Mpuru (Professional Bodies), Ms. A.S. Khoza (Employer)
Ms. M.R Rauleka (Labour), Mr. B.A. Monedi (Labour), Ms. S.A. Anders (Labour)
CEO: Ms. G. Mkhize
9.2 The Contract site is at INSETA (as and when required).
10 workmen and supervision on site
10.1 The Service Provider shall be held responsible for the conduct of his employees and the conduct of his
sub-contractor's employees for the full duration of the contract.
to the Insurance Sector Education & Training Authority for a period of 3 years.
Tender documents will be available from 05 August 2026 from the following websites:
For a period of three (3) years.
1 background
1.1 The Insurance Sector Education and Training Authority (INSETA) is a public entity listed inschedule 3A
of the PFMA and was established in March 2000. The INSETA must comply with the Skills Development
Act (SDA), the Skills Development Levies Act (SDLA), the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA),
any other relevant legislation and the Constitution.
1.1 Therefore, the INSETA requires a suitability qualified service provider to render Board Secretariat
Services to INSETA for a period of three (3) years.
6.1 The contract duration will be for a period of 3 years.
7 contractual obligation
7.1 The successful bidder will be required to enter into a Service Level Agreement (SLA) with measurable
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), performance targets, reporting frequencies and consequences for
non‐performance.
7.2 The successful bidder may be required to have adequate professional indemnity as well as liability
insurance in place (upon parties contracting).
7.3 The successful bidder will be required to sign a non-disclosure agreement for the duration of the contract
period.
7.4 In the case of the service provider using sub-contractors, the former will be responsible for ensuring
delivery of services from any such sub-contractors and for making any payments to such sub-
contractors.
7.5 Bidders are required to fully comply with the relevant SCM Legislative Framework as well as application
of regulatory and prescripts. Bidders are also required to take all reasonable steps to protect information,
in line with the provisions of the POPIA.
7.6 Bidder will be subjected to periodic review in terms of measuring satisfactory performance until contract
is completed and shall invoke applicable penalties as per contract terms and conditions, where there is
unsatisfactory performance.
penalties such as impose financial penalties to the Service Provider.
8.2 The following shall be considered examples of unsatisfactory performance:
8.2.1 Failure to meet the agreed-upon deadlines.
8.2.2 Failure to deliver goods or services that meet the agreed-upon standards.
8.2.3 Failure to respond to client inquiries or issues in a timely manner.
8.2.4 Failure to maintain confidentiality or security of client information.
8.2.5 Gross negligence by the service provider or its employees.
Description
Source: 4. SBD 6.1 In Terms of PPR2022.pdfincome-generating contracts)
Contact Information
Source: 4. SBD 6.1 In Terms of PPR2022.pdf (TENDER){"name":null,"email":null,"phone":null,"department":null,"address":".........................................................."}
Evaluation Criteria
Source: 4. SBD 6.1 In Terms of PPR2022.pdf (TENDER)Pt−Pmin
Ps= 80(1− )
Pmin
Where
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration
Pt = Price of tender under consideration
Pmin = Price of lowest acceptable tender
of 5
3.2. Formulae for disposal or leasing of state assets and income
Generating procurement
3.2.1. Points awarded for price
A maximum of 80 or 90 points is allocated for price on the following basis:
80/20 or 90/10
Pt−Pmax Pt−Pmax
Ps= 80(1+ ) or Ps= 90(1+ )
Pmax Pmax
Where
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration
Pt = Price of tender under consideration
Pmax = Price of highest acceptable tender
4.1. In terms of Regulation 4(2); 5(2); 6(2) and 7(2) of the Preferential Procurement
Regulations, preference points must be awarded for specific goals stated in the tender.
For the purposes of this tender the tenderer will be allocated points based on the goals
stated in table 1 below as may be supported by proof/ documentation stated in the
conditions of this tender:
4.2. In cases where organs of state intend to use Regulation 3(2) of the Regulations, which
states that, if it is unclear whether the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system applies,
an organ of state must, in the tender documents, stipulate in the case of—
(a) an invitation for tender for income-generating contracts, that either the 80/20
or 90/10 preference point system will apply and that the highest acceptable
tender will be used to determine the applicable preference point system; or
(b) any other invitation for tender, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point
system will apply and that the lowest acceptable tender will be used to
determine the applicable preference point system,
then the organ of state must indicate the points allocated for specific goals for both the
90/10 and 80/20 preference point system.
Table 1: Specific goals for the tender and points claimed are indicated per the table
below.
Note to tenderers: The tenderer must indicate how they claim points for each
preference point system.)
of 5
Number of points
Number of points claimed (80/20
The specific goals allocated points
allocated system)
in terms of this tender
(80/20 system) (To be completed by
the tenderer)
Black Ownership Maximum points = 6
points
Women Ownership Maximum points = 6
points
Youth Ownership Maximum points = 5
points
Company-owned by People living Maximum points = 3
points
with disabilities
people living with disabilities
people living with disabilities
Note: Evidence to be submitted by Service Providers: Emerging Micro Enterprise (EME)
and Qualifying Small Enterprise (QSE) – sworn affidavit (DTI or CIPC Template), Generic
entities – B-BBEE certificate.
Declaration with regard to company/firm
4.3. Name of company/firm...............................................................................
4.4. Company registration number: .....................................................................
4.5. Type of company/ firm
of 5
Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium
One-person business/sole propriety
Close corporation
Public Company
Personal Liability Company
(Pty) Limited
Non-Profit Company
State Owned Company
[Tick applicable box]
4.6. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm,
certify that the points claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender,
qualifies the company/ firm for the preference(s) shown and I acknowledge that:
i) The information furnished is true and correct;
ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the General Conditions as
indicated in paragraph 1 of this form;
iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a result of points claimed as shown
in paragraphs 1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish documentary
proof to the satisfaction of the organ of state that the claims are correct;
iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any
of the conditions of contract have not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in
addition to any other remedy it may have –
(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process;
(b) recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a
result of that person’s conduct;
(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered
as a result of having to make less favourable arrangements due
to such cancellation;
(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders and
directors, or only the shareholders and directors who acted on a
fraudulent basis, be restricted from obtaining business from any
organ of state for a period not exceeding 10 years, after the audi
alteram partem (hear the other side) rule has been applied; and
(e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.
..............................................
Signature(s) of tenderer(s)
Surname and name: ................................................................
Date: ...............................................................
Address: ...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
of 5
Technical Specifications
Source: 4. SBD 6.1 In Terms of PPR2022.pdf (TENDER)income-generating contracts)
Contractual Terms
Source: 4. SBD 6.1 In Terms of PPR2022.pdf4.3. Name of company/firm...............................................................................
4.4. Company registration number: .....................................................................
4.5. Type of company/ firm
of 5
Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium
One-person business/sole propriety
Close corporation
Public Company
Personal Liability Company
(Pty) Limited
Non-Profit Company
State Owned Company
[Tick applicable box]
4.6. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm,
certify that the points claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender,
qualifies the company/ firm for the preference(s) shown and I acknowledge that:
i) The information furnished is true and correct;
ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the General Conditions as
indicated in paragraph 1 of this form;
iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a result of points claimed as shown
in paragraphs 1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish documentary
proof to the satisfaction of the organ of state that the claims are correct;
iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any
of the conditions of contract have not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in
addition to any other remedy it may have –
(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process;
(b) recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a
result of that person’s conduct;
(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered
as a result of having to make less favourable arrangements due
to such cancellation;
(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders and
directors, or only the shareholders and directors who acted on a
fraudulent basis, be restricted from obtaining business from any
organ of state for a period not exceeding 10 years, after the audi
alteram partem (hear the other side) rule has been applied; and
(e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.
..............................................
Signature(s) of tenderer(s)
Surname and name: ................................................................
Date: ...............................................................
Address: ...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
of 5
Section
Source: 4. SBD 6.1 In Terms of PPR2022.pdfPt−Pmin
Ps= 80(1− )
Pmin
Where
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration
Pt = Price of tender under consideration
Pmin = Price of lowest acceptable tender
of 5
3.2. Formulae for disposal or leasing of state assets and income
Generating procurement
3.2.1. Points awarded for price
A maximum of 80 or 90 points is allocated for price on the following basis:
80/20 or 90/10
Pt−Pmax Pt−Pmax
Ps= 80(1+ ) or Ps= 90(1+ )
Pmax Pmax
Where
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration
Pt = Price of tender under consideration
Pmax = Price of highest acceptable tender
4.1. In terms of Regulation 4(2); 5(2); 6(2) and 7(2) of the Preferential Procurement
Regulations, preference points must be awarded for specific goals stated in the tender.
For the purposes of this tender the tenderer will be allocated points based on the goals
stated in table 1 below as may be supported by proof/ documentation stated in the
conditions of this tender:
4.2. In cases where organs of state intend to use Regulation 3(2) of the Regulations, which
states that, if it is unclear whether the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system applies,
an organ of state must, in the tender documents, stipulate in the case of—
(a) an invitation for tender for income-generating contracts, that either the 80/20
or 90/10 preference point system will apply and that the highest acceptable
tender will be used to determine the applicable preference point system; or
(b) any other invitation for tender, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point
system will apply and that the lowest acceptable tender will be used to
determine the applicable preference point system,
then the organ of state must indicate the points allocated for specific goals for both the
90/10 and 80/20 preference point system.
Table 1: Specific goals for the tender and points claimed are indicated per the table
below.
Note to tenderers: The tenderer must indicate how they claim points for each
preference point system.)
of 5
Number of points
Number of points claimed (80/20
The specific goals allocated points
allocated system)
in terms of this tender
(80/20 system) (To be completed by
the tenderer)
Black Ownership Maximum points = 6
points
Women Ownership Maximum points = 6
points
Youth Ownership Maximum points = 5
points
Company-owned by People living Maximum points = 3
points
with disabilities
people living with disabilities
people living with disabilities
Note: Evidence to be submitted by Service Providers: Emerging Micro Enterprise (EME)
and Qualifying Small Enterprise (QSE) – sworn affidavit (DTI or CIPC Template), Generic
entities – B-BBEE certificate.
Declaration with regard to company/firm
4.3. Name of company/firm...............................................................................
4.4. Company registration number: .....................................................................
4.5. Type of company/ firm
of 5
Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium
One-person business/sole propriety
Close corporation
Public Company
Personal Liability Company
(Pty) Limited
Non-Profit Company
State Owned Company
[Tick applicable box]
4.6. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm,
certify that the points claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender,
qualifies the company/ firm for the preference(s) shown and I acknowledge that:
i) The information furnished is true and correct;
ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the General Conditions as
indicated in paragraph 1 of this form;
iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a result of points claimed as shown
in paragraphs 1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish documentary
proof to the satisfaction of the organ of state that the claims are correct;
iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any
of the conditions of contract have not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in
addition to any other remedy it may have –
(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process;
(b) recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a
result of that person’s conduct;
(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered
as a result of having to make less favourable arrangements due
to such cancellation;
(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders and
directors, or only the shareholders and directors who acted on a
fraudulent basis, be restricted from obtaining business from any
organ of state for a period not exceeding 10 years, after the audi
alteram partem (hear the other side) rule has been applied; and
(e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.
..............................................
Signature(s) of tenderer(s)
Surname and name: ................................................................
Date: ...............................................................
Address: ...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
of 5
Important Dates
Source: 2. SBD 3.1 (Annexure A) - Board Secretariat.pdf (TENDER){"closingDate":"27 August 2026","closingTime":"11:00"}
Contact Information
Source: 2. SBD 3.1 (Annexure A) - Board Secretariat.pdf (TENDER){"name":null,"email":"[email protected]","phone":"011 381 8900","department":null,"address":null}
Evaluation Criteria
Source: 2. SBD 3.1 (Annexure A) - Board Secretariat.pdf (TENDER)Board Evaluation 1 Per session
Evaluations members
Technical Specifications
Source: 2. SBD 3.1 (Annexure A) - Board Secretariat.pdf (TENDER)of Activity UOM Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Quantity
Drafting of agenda Rate p/h R R R
Board
Meetings
± 4hrs Rate p/h Preparation of Board Packs
Drafting of Minutes, matters Rate p/h
arising and decision logs
Board Evaluation 1 Per session
Board and Committee for 15
Evaluations members
Audit 6
Drafting of agenda. Rate p/h
18 Fricker Road, Telephone: 011 381 8900
Illovo, Sandton 2196 Website: www.inseta.org.za
P.O. Box 32035, Braamfontein 2017
Sbd 3.1
Pricing Schedule
Source: 2. SBD 3.1 (Annexure A) - Board Secretariat.pdfPricing schedule should be submitted in a separate sealed envelope (1 Original and 1 copy) attached to SBD 3.1.
Bidders are required to provide pricing for three years including up to 4.5% year on year increase.
18 Fricker Road, Telephone: 011 381 8900
Illovo, Sandton 2196 Website: www.inseta.org.za
P.O. Box 32035, Braamfontein 2017
Sbd 3.1
Table 2: Disbursements
Description (Est) Quantity UoM Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Travel expenses 1 rate per KM R R R
(Kilometre rate from Base i.e.,
Inseta)
NB: AA rates to apply
Compliance Requirements
Source: 2. SBD 3.1 (Annexure A) - Board Secretariat.pdf (TENDER)Bidders must complete the pricing template listed below. Annexure A – SBD3.1 - Pricing Schedule / Proposal – All
Contact Information
Source: 3. SBD 4 - Bidders Disclosure.pdf (TENDER){"name":null,"email":null,"phone":null,"department":"SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT","address":null}
Evaluation Criteria
Source: 3. SBD 4 - Bidders Disclosure.pdf (TENDER)arrangements with any competitor regarding the quality, quantity,
Technical Specifications
Source: 3. SBD 4 - Bidders Disclosure.pdf (TENDER)Supply chain
Management system should this declaration prove to be
False.
.................................... ...................................
Signature Date
.................................... ......................................................
Position Name of bidder
Compliance Requirements
Source: 3. SBD 4 - Bidders Disclosure.pdf (TENDER)No specific requirements found
Health & Safety
Source: 3. SBD 4 - Bidders Disclosure.pdfI certify that the information furnished in paragraphs 1, 2
and 3 ABOVE IS CORRECT.
Contact Information
Source: 1. SBD 1 - Board Secretary Services.pdf (TENDER){"name":null,"email":"[email protected]","phone":"012 406 9222","department":"y to do business with all organs of state including","address":"register for the webinar: Click"}
Submission Guidelines
Source: 1. SBD 1 - Board Secretary Services.pdf (TENDER)Returnable Documents: If No, please note that you will automatically be disqualified, Completed & Signed SBD 1, Completed & Signed SBD 4, Completed & Signed SBD 6.1, Part 3: SBD 3.1 or 3.3 – Pricing Schedule (In a separate envelope)
Evaluation Criteria
Source: 1. SBD 1 - Board Secretary Services.pdf (TENDER)3.5.4 To carry out site inspections, product evaluations or explanatory meetings in order to verify the
nature and quality of the services offered by the bidder(s), whether before or after adjudication
3.5.5 To correct any mistakes at any stage of the tender that may have been in the Bid documents or
occurred at any stage of the tender process.
3.5.6 To cancel and/or terminate the tender process at any stage, including after the Closing Date
culpable misrepresentation to INSETA in its Tender or at any stage during this BID process.
4.1 During evaluation of the bids, explanatory/clarity information may be requested in writing from bidders.
Technical Specifications
Source: 1. SBD 1 - Board Secretary Services.pdf (TENDER)Inseta for a period of three (3) years.
Date: 17 August 2026 at 10:00 – 10:45
Quality Management
Source: 1. SBD 1 - Board Secretary Services.pdfand will at its discretion appoint:
3.3 A fully completed and signed Tender Document.
3.4 False declaration on SBD’s documents and any other fields will render the document non-compliant.
3.5 INSETA reserves the right:
3.5.1 Not to award or cancel this tender at any time and shall not be bound to accept the lowest or
any Bid.
3.5.2 To award contract or any part thereof to one or more bidders.
3.5.3 To accept part of a tender rather than the whole tender.
3.5.4 To carry out site inspections, product evaluations or explanatory meetings in order to verify the
nature and quality of the services offered by the bidder(s), whether before or after adjudication
of the Bid.
3.5.5 To correct any mistakes at any stage of the tender that may have been in the Bid documents or
occurred at any stage of the tender process.
9.1 Any clarification required by a bidder regarding the meaning or interpretation of the Terms of
Reference, or any other aspect concerning the bid, is to be requested in writing (e-mail) from
[email protected] before or by 17:00 PM– no questions will be accepted 3 days before the
closing date
9.2 The bid number should be mentioned in all correspondence. All communication between the
Bidder(s) and INSETA must be done in writing. Telephonic requests for clarification will not be
accepted. If appropriate, the clarifying information will be made available to all bidders by e-mail
only, will be uploaded on the INSETA website and ETender Portal
9.3 Any communication to an official or a person acting in an advisory capacity for INSETA, in respect of
the bid between the closing date and the award of the bid by the Bidder(s) is discouraged.
9.4 Whilst all due care has been taken in connection with the preparation of this bid, INSETA makes no
representations or warranties that the content of the bid or any information communicated to or
provided to Bidder(s) during the bidding process is, or will be, accurate, current or complete. INSETA,
and its employees and advisors will not be liable with respect to any information communicated which
may not be accurate, current, or complete.
9.5 If Bidder(s) finds or reasonably believes it has found any discrepancy, ambiguity, error or inconsistency
in this bid or any other information provided by INSETA (other than minor clerical matters), the
Bidder(s) must promptly notify INSETA in writing of such discrepancy, ambiguity, error or inconsistency
in order to afford INSETA an opportunity to consider what corrective action is necessary (if any).
9.6 Any actual discrepancy, ambiguity, error or inconsistency in the bid or any other information provided
by INSETA will, if possible, be corrected and provided to all Bidders before the closing date of the bid.
Pricing Schedule
Source: 1. SBD 1 - Board Secretary Services.pdf7.1 All bidders must submit 2 copies of signed and completed documents –
7.1.1 1 x original and 1 copy identical to the original bid proposal
7.1.2 2 sealed pricing envelopes which include SBD 3.1 or SBD 3.3 (1 original and 1 copy)
7.1.3 including 1 memory stick which contains a copy of the bid proposal and pricing schedule,
should be handed in/delivered for attention to:
e.g. company resolution
Part 2: Technical Proposal in response to the terms of reference
document
Part 3: SBD 3.1 or 3.3 – Pricing Schedule (In a separate envelope)
Compliance Requirements
Source: 1. SBD 1 - Board Secretary Services.pdf (TENDER)Tax compliance
Tax compliance requirements
Tax compliance status (tcs) pin may be made via e-filing through the SARS
Tcs pin is available but the bidder is registered on the central supplier database
Csd number
Csd number must be provided
Central supplier database
Central Supplier Database in order to do business
3.1 The bidder must register on the National Treasury’s Central Supplier Database in order to do business
with an organ of state or for the INSETA to award a bid or contract. Registration on the CSD
(www.csd.gov.za) provides a bidder with an opportunity to do business with all organs of state including
3.2 National Treasury Contact Details: 012 406 9222 or email [email protected] “Bidders
2.3 Application for tax compliance status (tcs) pin may be made via e-filing through the SARS
Submit a separate tcs certificate / pin / csd number.
2.6 Where NO tcs pin is available but the bidder is registered on the central supplier database
(Csd), a csd number must be provided.
A requirement to register for a tax compliance
B-BBEE Details: D SUBMISSION CHECKLIST- 2 x hard copies and 1 x soft Tick if submitted
copy (readable USB)
Did the bidder attend the Compulsory Briefing Session?
Yes/no
If No, please note that you will automatically be disqualified
Part 1: Legislative Requirements
Completed & Signed SBD 1
Completed & Signed SBD 4
Completed & Signed SBD 6.1
Proof of authority to sign documents must be submitted with the bid
e.g. company resolution
Part 2: Technical Proposal in response to the terms of reference
document
Part 3: SBD 3.1 or 3.3 – Pricing Schedule (In a separate envelope)
6 Version
Valid BBBEE Certificate or Sworn Affidavit.
11.1. INSETA reserves the right to conduct due diligence on the information submitted by the bidders prior
to final award or at any time during the contract period. Misrepresentation is a criminal offence.
12.1. This Competitive Bid and all the appended documentation and the proposal in response thereto this
bid together with the forms the basis for a formal contract to be negotiated and finalised between
INSETA and the successful bidder/s in whole or in part.
End of document
7 Version
Health & Safety
Source: 1. SBD 1 - Board Secretary Services.pdf3.5.8 Award to multiple bidders to spread the risk.
3.5.9 A Bidder must be a South African entity (Company, Close Corporation, Sole Proprietor or
individual) or have a local branch office in South Africa.
3.5.10 The Bidder must comply with all applicable legislation in the Republic of South Africa in the
performance of its daily activities, including but not limited to labour legislation and bargaining
council agreements, health and safety regulations and environmental laws.
3.5.11 INSETA will reject a Bidder’s Tender without any further consideration where that Bidder makes
culpable misrepresentation to INSETA in its Tender or at any stage during this BID process.
3.5.12 The Board and employees of INSETA shall not do any business with INSETA
3.5.13 INSETA will, for the purpose of this bid, shortlist Bidders and request presentations or
demonstrations from such short-listed Bidders. All costs relating to the preparation of such
presentations/ demonstrations will be borne by the Bidders.
3.5.14 No faxed or e-mailed bids will be accepted
12.1. This Competitive Bid and all the appended documentation and the proposal in response thereto this
bid together with the forms the basis for a formal contract to be negotiated and finalised between
Contractual Terms
Source: 1. SBD 1 - Board Secretary Services.pdf6.1 Copyright of all documentation relating to this contract inter-alia, the specifications, SLA, contract,
belongs to the INSETA. The successful bidder may not disclose any information, documentation or
products to other clients without the written approval of the accounting authority or the delegate.
6.2 The intellectual property pertaining to any enhancements to the proposed solution will belong to
6.3 Service provider shall not use or sell INSETA’s developed intellectual property without the prior
consent of the SETA.
6.4 If the service provider would like to use information or data generated by the service, the prior written
permission must be obtained from INSETA.
6.5 The Service provider acknowledges and agrees that:
6.5.1 Each provision of clause above is separate, severally and separately enforceable from any other
provisions of this agreement and
6.5.2 The invalidity or non-enforceability of any one or more provision hereof, shall not prejudice or
effect the enforceability and validity of the remaining provisions of this agreement.
6.6 This clause shall survive termination of the contract.
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 5 of 2000
Covers preferential procurement and preference-point systems used in public tenders.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 12 of 2004
Supports anti-corruption controls and supplier integrity in procurement processes.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 28 of 2024
Provides the national framework for public procurement across government.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 2 of 2000
Supports access to tender records, award decisions and public-sector procurement information.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 3 of 2000
Supports lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative tender decisions.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Address
18 Fricker Rd, Illovo, Sandton, 2196, South Africa
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
5
Last checked
05 Aug 2026
AI status
Enhanced
Data conflicts
None detected
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogGet deep intelligence on Services: Professional. Unlock full pricing strategies, bid frequency, and historical win rates.