This tender has been awarded to PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS for R 78 20.
PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS
Issuing Organization
National Lotteries Commission
Location
National
Award Date
1 October 2026
Award Date
1 October 2026
Status
Active / AwardedScoring
eTenders ID
79024
Awarded To
PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS
Awarding Entity
National Lotteries Commission
Award Value
R 78 20
Awarded: 1 October 2026
GOVERNMENT
Re-advert: request for price quotation for the catering service for the national lotteries commission: education and awareness campaigns (jane furse 29 septemer 2026)
Request for quotations to supply and delivery of licenses for manage engine software components
Request for quotations for appointment of a service provider for renewal of codetwo cloud-based email signatures 365 subscription for the national lotterie commission.
Re- advert request for quotations for the appointment of a suitably qualified service provider to provide once-off building repair and refurbishment at the national lotteries commission eastern cape provincial office, east london
Request for price quotation for the catering service for the national lotteries commission: education and awareness campaigns (sekgosese area, greater letaba 18 august 2026)
Get a full report on PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS including tender win history, total contract values, and bidding patterns.
RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf
596.3 KB
Tender source analysis
Source material and existing AI analysis appear first. Supplier conclusions remain qualified by the evidence Tenders-SA holds.
The national lotteries commission (NLC) seeks a recruitment service provider to handle response management for advertised positions on an as-and-when-required basis. The scope includes screening, categorizing, and capturing applicant cvs, as well as providing regular progress reports to the NLC recruitment office.
AI Document Analysis Stages
Description
0 of 1 source documents fully reviewed. Unstated details are identified only after complete source review.
technical scope
18 sourced criteria
financial capacity
1 sourced criteria
pricing
6 sourced criteria
compliance returnables
10 sourced criteria
evaluation
16 sourced criteria
experience
3 sourced criteria
personnel
1 sourced criteria
equipment capacity
1 sourced criteria
delivery contract
6 sourced criteria
equity registrations
7 sourced criteria
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
An award confirms appointment. It does not prove why a supplier was selected, that every qualification remains current, or that delivery was completed successfully.
Appointment of a panel of recruitment agencies for a period of three (3) years
Leasing of 25 water tankers for a period of three (03) years
Appointment of a panel of legal practitioners for the period of 36 months
Appointment of a service provider for supply and provision of infrastructure resources for period 2026-2027 festive season for operations at golela poe
Provision and delivery of computer equipment, accesories and server licenses
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
The National Lotteries Commission (NLC) seeks a qualified recruitment company to provide response‑handling services for all advertised NLC positions on an as‑and‑when‑required basis. Services include capturing applications, categorising candidates (A‑D), recording work experience and qualifications, and providing regular progress and closing reports.
Briefing Session
Source: RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf (RFQ)There is no compulsory briefing session for this RFQ. Bidders may attend optional briefings at their own expense, but attendance is not required.
Returnable Documents
Source: RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf (RFQ)SIGNATURE OF BIDDER: ......................................................... CAPACITY UNDER WHICH THIS BID IS SIGNED: .......................................................... (Proof of authority must be submitted e.g. company resolution) DATE: ...................................................
Methodology
Source: RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf (RFQ)Experience & Qualifications
Source: RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf (RFQ)Pricing Schedule
Source: RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf (RFQ)B-BBEE Requirements
Source: RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf (RFQ)Health & Safety
Source: RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf (RFQ)Contractual Terms
Source: RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf (RFQ)Special Conditions
Source: RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf (RFQ)Section
Source: RFQ2026-007-005 Response Handling for the NLC as and when required.pdf (RFQ)The successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 90 days
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: Minimum total score to be considered: 70 pts
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: Minimum 5 years in screening and capturing applications
Why it matters: The source places this item in the evaluation criteria; the recorded weight or threshold is shown when available.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: 5 years
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: minimum of an annual review done for contracts longer than a year and a
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: at least five (5) client reference letters on official letterhead
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 3 years
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Threshold: 10 years
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Threshold: Minimum 5 years’ experience in response handling
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
No source document identifier is stored for this item.
Known supplier evidence
Tenders-SA records other appointments with overlapping scope terms for PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS.
Qualified inference
Supported inferenceThe recorded history supports exposure to related scope, but does not establish the bid evidence submitted or current delivery capacity.
Related historical records suggest exposure; they do not prove bid contents, current capacity, or delivery.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: This is a qualified operational interpretation of the stored scope, not a stated mandatory or scored criterion.
Inferred from stored analysis; verify against the source document.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Why it matters: The source identifies this as a mandatory or eligibility condition for a compliant bid.
Known supplier evidence
The linked award records PROMINENT COMPETENT PLACEMENTS as appointed for this tender. Recorded contract value: 78.2 ZAR.
Qualified inference
Inference onlyThe successful bid likely addressed this expectation, but the submitted evidence and evaluation reason are unavailable.
The linked award confirms appointment only, not the submitted qualification or reason for selection.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Browse categories with current opportunities in this area.
Compare tender activity across provinces.
Explore organisations currently publishing tenders.
Tools and research to help you assess opportunities.
Learn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our Blog