Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Documents available on tender detail page
Tender Type
Request for Quotation
Delivery Location
1134 Park Street - Hatfield - Pretoria - 0001
Organization Type
GOVERNMENT
Published
29 Jul 2026
OCDS Reference
ocds-9t57fa-163829
The agricultural research council seeks a 1‑year renewal of its grammarly business enterprise subscription. Suppliers of software subscription services, particularly grammarly, should submit a quotation. The tender closes on 4 august 2026 and is open to bidders in gauteng.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Return to this tender’s issuing organisation, province, or category.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Date & Time
Tuesday, 04 August 2026 - 11:00
Venue
null
Hand-delivered submissions will not be accepted.
Request for Quotation
1134 Park Street - Hatfield - Pretoria - 0001
Tenders in this industry often require registration with these bodies.
Recommended Certifications
Having these can improve your winning chances: CA(SA) - Chartered Accountant, PMI-PMP (Project Management Professional), Prince2 Practitioner, Six Sigma Certification
AI Document Analysis Stages
Important Dates
Source: CO0022607RFQ00000005 Grammarly Renewal.pdf (RFQ)29 Jul
2026
Tender Published
Tender was published
04 Aug
2026
Closing Date
Tender closing date
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
CO0022607RFQ00000005 Grammarly Renewal.pdf
Analysis completed but response format was invalid
To download these documents and access AI-powered analysis, visit the main tender page.
Matched by category & region
Free guidance to prepare before you bid
Not sure if your business is ready for this tender? Check CSD, CIDB, and B-BBEE requirements, run a readiness assessment, and move from opportunity to submission.
Open Supplier Readiness HubLearn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
Median Estimate
R 581 900
Range
Based on 25 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
{"closingTime":"11:00"}
Contact Information
Source: CO0022607RFQ00000005 Grammarly Renewal.pdf (RFQ){"name":null,"email":"[email protected]","phone":null,"department":"of Measure","address":"CLOSING DATE: Date: 04-August-2026"}
Evaluation Criteria
Source: CO0022607RFQ00000005 Grammarly Renewal.pdf (RFQ)Unable to extract eligibility criteria
Technical Specifications
Source: CO0022607RFQ00000005 Grammarly Renewal.pdf (RFQ)Quantity Unit of Measure
Grammarly Business Enterprise Renewal for 22 users -1 Year
Subscription.
Compulsory requirement: 1 YR
All bid responses must include a letter of authority from
Grammarly, confirming that the supplier is an approved agent.
2.1. Only bidders registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) will be considered. Bidders shall include the
CSD registration number and full CSD report with the bid proposal.
of 9
2.2. Only bidders that claim specific goals will be considered for scoring on the 20 points as per the 80/20 principle.
2.3. Completed and signed Standard Bidding Documents (SBD) forms included in the bid document.
2.4. Submission should be sent to [email protected]
address.
extent of the warranty must be clearly stated. Where services are required, service providers must submit
documentation pertaining the relevant experience.
Your written quotation must be emailed depending on the instructions given in the email or advert.
All price quotations that have a rand value of R 2,000.00 to below R 50,000,000.00, including VAT, will be evaluated
by applying the 80/20 principle as prescribed by the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act and
its Regulations.
the table below:
Percentage Ownership
Specific Goals Points (20) Ponts (10) (1%)
6 3 Ownership by HDIs 51%+
Ownership by Women 51%+ 4 2
Ownership by Youth 51%+ 4 2
Ownership by PwD 51%+ 2 1
BEE Status Level 1 - 4 2 1
RDP Goals No RDP Goals 2 1
Total points 20 10
8.1. The 60-day validity of the quotation must be indicated.
8.2. Prices quoted should be in South African Rand and inclusive of VAT costs such as delivery, insurance, taxes,
etc.
8.3. No price adjustments or amendment of the delivery particulars contained in paragraph 8.2 will be considered
by the ARC.
8.4. The supplier accepts full responsibility for the proper execution and fulfilment of the goods/services quoted
for.
8.5. ARC reserves the right to accept or reject any special terms and conditions that may qualify the goods/services
to be provided.
8.6. Quotes should be submitted on an official letterhead and duly signed.
of 9
8.7. Goods and services should be supplied/rendered upon receipt of a purchase order from the ARC.
8.8. The General Conditions of Contract issued by National Treasury are applicable.
8.9. The ARC supply chain management code of conduct is applicable.
8.10. Standard Bidding Documents (SBD) forms must be signed and returned together with the quotation. Failure
to comply may result to disqualification of your quotation.
8.11. Your quotation must indicate the delivery date.
8.12. The ARC reserve the right to do due diligence on the quotations.
8.13. The ARC reserves the right to benchmark prices quoted.
Sbd 6.1
Preference points claim form in terms of the preferential procurement
Regulations 2022
This preference form must form part of all tenders invited. It contains general information and serves as a claim form
for preference points for specific goals.
Nb: before completing this form, tenderers must study the general conditions, definitions and
Directives applicable in respect of the tender and preferential procurement regulations, 2022
1.1 The following preference point systems are applicable to invitations to tender: the 80/20 system for
requirements with a Rand value of up to R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes included); and the 90/10
system for requirements with a Rand value above R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes included).
1.2 To be completed by the organ of state
(delete whichever is not applicable for this tender).
a) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 90/10 preference point system.
b) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 80/20 preference point system.
c) Either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system will be applicable in this tender. The lowest/ highest acceptable
tender will be used to determine the accurate system once tenders are received.
1.3 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts) shall be awarded for: Price; and
Specific Goals.
1.4 To be completed by the organ of state:
The maximum points for this tender are allocated as follows:
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under
consideration
Pt = Price of tender under consideration
Pmax = Price of highest acceptable tender
Points
of 9
Price 80
Specific goals 20
Total points for Price and SPECIFIC 100
Goals
1.1 Failure on the part of a tenderer to submit proof or documentation required in terms of this tender to claim points for
specific goals with the tender, will be interpreted to mean that preference points for specific goals are not claimed.
1.2 The organ of state reserves the right to rEngineeringof a tenderer, either before a tender is adjudicated or at any
time subsequently, to substantiate any claim in regard to preferences, in any manner required by the organ of state.
(a) “tender” means a written offer in the form determined by an organ of state in response to an invitation to provide
goods or services through price quotations, competitive tendering process or any other method envisaged in
legislation;
(b “price” means an amount of money tendered for goods or services, and includes all applicable taxes less all
unconditional discounts;
(c “rand value” means the total estimated value of a contract in Rand, calculated at the time of bid invitation, and includes
all applicable taxes;
(d) “tender for income-generating contracts” means a written offer in the form determined by an organ of state in
response to an invitation for the origination of income-generating contracts through any method envisaged in
legislation that will result in a legal agreement between the organ of state and a third party that produces revenue for
the organ of state, and includes, but is not limited to, leasing and disposal of assets and concession contracts,
excluding direct sales and disposal of assets through public auctions; and
(e) “the Act” means the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 (Act No. ).
3.1. Points awarded for price
3.1.1 The 80/20 or 90/10 preference point systems
A maximum of 80 or 90 points is allocated for price on the following basis:
80/20 or 90/10
Where
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration
Pt = Price of tender under consideration
Pmin = Price of lowest acceptable tender
80/20 or 90/10
of 9
3.1. In terms of Regulation 4(2); 5(2); 6(2) and 7(2) of the Preferential Procurement Regulations, preference points must
be awarded for specific goals stated in the tender. For the purposes of this tender the tenderer will be allocated
points based on the goals stated in table 1 below as may be supported by proof/ documentation stated in the
conditions of this tender:
3.2. In cases where organs of state intend to use Regulation 3(2) of the Regulations, which states that, if it is unclear
whether the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system applies, an organ of state must, in the tender documents,
stipulate in the case of-
(a) an invitation for tender for income-generating contracts, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point
system will apply and that the highest acceptable tender will be used to determine the applicable
preference point system; or
(b) any other invitation for tender, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system will apply and that
the lowest acceptable tender will be used to determine the applicable preference point system,
then the organ of state must indicate the points allocated for specific goals for both the 90/10 and 80/20 preference
point system.
Table 1: Specific goals for the tender and points claimed are indicated per the table below.
(Note to organs of state: Where either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system is applicable, corresponding
points must also be indicated as such.
of 9
Note to tenderers: The tenderer must indicate how they claim points for each preference point system.)
3.1. Name of company/firm...............................................................................
3.2. Company registration number: .....................................................................
3.3. Type of company/ firm
Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium
One-person business/sole propriety
Close corporation
of 9
Public Company
Personal Liability Company
(Pty) Limited
Non-Profit Company
State Owned Company
[Tick applicable box]
3.4. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm, certify that the
points claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender, qualifies the company/ firm for the preference(s)
shown and I acknowledge that:
i) The information furnished is true and correct; ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the
General Conditions as indicated in paragraph 1 of this form; iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a
result of points claimed as shown in paragraphs 1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish
documentary proof to the satisfaction of the organ of state that the claims are correct;
iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any of the conditions of contract have
not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in addition to any other remedy it may have -
(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process;
(b) recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a result of that person’s conduct;
(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered as a result of having to make less
favourable arrangements due to such cancellation;
(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders and directors, or only the shareholders and
directors who acted on a fraudulent basis, be restricted from obtaining business from any organ of state
for a period not exceeding 10 years, after the audi alteram partem (hear the other side) rule has been
applied; and (e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.
Signature(s) of tenderer(s)
Surname and name:
Date:
Address:
of 9
Sbd4
Bidder’s disclosure
Any person (natural or juristic) may make an offer or offers in terms of this invitation to bid. In line with the principles
of transparency, accountability, impartiality, and ethics as enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa and further expressed in various pieces of legislation, it is required for the bidder to make this declaration in
respect of the details required hereunder.
Where a person/s are listed in the Register for Tender Defaulters and/or the List of Restricted Suppliers, that person
will automatically be disqualified from the bid process.
2.1 Is the bidder, or any of its directors / trustees / shareholders / members / partners or any person having a controlling
interest in the enterprise, employed by the state? YES/NO
2.1.1 If so, furnish particulars of the names, individual identity numbers, and, if applicable, state employee
numbers of sole proprietor/directors/trustees/shareholders/members/ partners or any person having a
controlling interest in the enterprise, in table below.
the person/s having the deciding vote or power to influence or to direct the course and decisions of the enterprise.
Full Name Identity Number Name of State institution
2.2 Do you, or any person connected with the bidder, have a relationship with any person who is employed by the
procuring institution? YES/NO
2.2.1 If so, furnish particulars:
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
2.3 Does the bidder or any of its directors/trustees/shareholders/members/partners or any person having a controlling
interest in the enterprise have any interest in any other related enterprise whether or not they are bidding for this
contract? YES/NO
of 9
2.3.1 If so, furnish particulars:
........................................................................................
........................................................................................
Compliance Requirements
Source: CO0022607RFQ00000005 Grammarly Renewal.pdf (RFQ)CSD registration number and full CSD report with the bid proposal
Central Supplier Database (CSD) will be considered
B-BBEE Minimum Level: 1
Points Allocation: 20 points
B-BBEE Details: al Research Council as per the attached
specification or below.
Description
Quantity Unit of Measure
Grammarly Business Enterprise Renewal for 22 users -1 Year
Subscription.
Compulsory requirement: 1 YR
All bid responses must include a letter of authority from
Grammarly, confirming that the supplier is an approved agent.
2.1. Only bidders registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) will be considered. Bidders shall include the
CSD registration number and full CSD report with the bid proposal.
of 9
2.2. Only bidders that claim specific goals will be considered for scoring on the 20 points as per the 80/20 principle.
2.3. Completed and signed Standard Bidding Documents (SBD) forms included in the bid document.
2.4. Submission should be sent to [email protected]
address.
extent of the warranty must be clearly stated. Where services are required, service providers must submit
documentation pertaining the relevant experience.
by applying the 80/20 principle as prescribed by the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act and
its Regulations.
the table below:
Percentage Ownership
Specific Goals Points (20) Ponts
HDI Requirement: 51%
Health & Safety
Source: CO0022607RFQ00000005 Grammarly Renewal.pdf[Tick applicable box]
3.4. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm, certify that the
points claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender, qualifies the company/ firm for the preference(s)
shown and I acknowledge that:
i) The information furnished is true and correct; ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the
General Conditions as indicated in paragraph 1 of this form; iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a
result of points claimed as shown in paragraphs 1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish
documentary proof to the satisfaction of the organ of state that the claims are correct;
iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any of the conditions of contract have
not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in addition to any other remedy it may have -
(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process;
(b) recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a result of that person’s conduct;
(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered as a result of having to make less
favourable arrangements due to such cancellation;
(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders and directors, or only the shareholders and
directors who acted on a fraudulent basis, be restricted from obtaining business from any organ of state
for a period not exceeding 10 years, after the audi alteram partem (hear the other side) rule has been
applied; and (e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.
Signature(s) of tenderer(s)
I, the undersigned, (name)............................................................................... in submitting the
accompanying bid, do hereby make the following statements that I certify to be true and complete in every respect:
3.1 I have read and I understand the contents of this disclosure;
3.2 I understand that the accompanying bid will be disqualified if this disclosure is found not to be true and complete in
every respect;
3.3 The bidder has arrived at the accompanying bid independently from, and without consultation, communication,
agreement or arrangement with any competitor. However, communication between partners in a joint venture or
consortium will not be construed as collusive bidding.
3.4 In addition, there have been no consultations, communications, agreements or arrangements with any competitor
regarding the quality, quantity, specifications, prices, including methods, factors or formulas used to calculate prices,
market allocation, the intention or decision to submit or not to submit the bid, bidding with the intention not to win
the bid and conditions or delivery particulars of the products or services to which this bid invitation relates.
3.4 The terms of the accompanying bid have not been, and will not be, disclosed by the bidder, directly or indirectly, to
any competitor, prior to the date and time of the official bid opening or of the awarding of the contract.
3.5 There have been no consultations, communications, agreements or arrangements made by the bidder with any
official of the procuring institution in relation to this procurement process prior to and during the bidding process
except to provide clarification on the bid submitted where so required by the institution; and the bidder was not
involved in the drafting of the specifications or terms of reference for this bid.
3.6 I am aware that, in addition and without prejudice to any other remedy provided to combat any restrictive practices
related to bids and contracts, bids that are suspicious will be reported to the Competition Commission for
investigation and possible imposition of administrative penalties in terms of section 59 of the Competition Act No and or may be reported to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) for criminal investigation and or may
be restricted from conducting business with the public sector for a period not exceeding ten (10) years in terms of
the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act No or any other applicable legislation.
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED IN PARAGRAPHS 1, 2 and 3 ABOVE IS CORRECT.
I accept that the state may reject the bid or act against me in terms of paragraph 6
Of PFMA SCM instruction /22 on preventing and combating abuse in the
Section
Source: CO0022607RFQ00000005 Grammarly Renewal.pdf2.2. Only bidders that claim specific goals will be considered for scoring on the 20 points as per the 80/20 principle.
by applying the 80/20 principle as prescribed by the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act and
Specific Goals Points (20) Ponts (10) (1%)
Total points 20 10
for preference points for specific goals.
1.1 The following preference point systems are applicable to invitations to tender: the 80/20 system for
requirements with a Rand value of up to R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes included); and the 90/10
a) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 90/10 preference point system.
b) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 80/20 preference point system.
c) Either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system will be applicable in this tender. The lowest/ highest acceptable
1.3 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts) shall be awarded for: Price; and
Specific Goals.
The maximum points for this tender are allocated as follows
Ps = Points scored for price of tender under
Specific goals 20
Total points for Price and SPECIFIC 100
1.1 Failure on the part of a tenderer to submit proof or documentation required in terms of this tender to claim points for
specific goals with the tender, will be interpreted to mean that preference points for specific goals are not claimed.
time subsequently, to substantiate any claim in regard to preferences, in any manner required by the organ of state.
Preference points claim form in terms of the preferential procurement
This preference form must form part of all tenders invited. It contains general information and serves as a claim form
regarding the quality, quantity, specifications, prices, including methods, factors or formulas used to calculate prices,
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 5 of 2000
Covers preferential procurement and preference-point systems used in public tenders.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 12 of 2004
Supports anti-corruption controls and supplier integrity in procurement processes.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 28 of 2024
Provides the national framework for public procurement across government.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 2 of 2000
Supports access to tender records, award decisions and public-sector procurement information.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 3 of 2000
Supports lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative tender decisions.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Address
1134 Park St, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0083, South Africa
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
1
Last checked
29 Jul 2026
AI status
Enhanced
Data conflicts
None detected
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.
government organization in South Africa
Key Personnel
Provinces Active
Industries
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogGet deep intelligence on Computer programming, consultancy and related activities. Unlock full pricing strategies, bid frequency, and historical win rates.