Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE Act)
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Issuing Organization
South African Local Government AssociationLocation
Gauteng
Closing Date
11 Sept 2026
Documents available on tender detail page
Tender Type
Request for Bid(Open-Tender)
Delivery Location
175 Corobay Avenue - Waterkloof glen - Pretoria - 0002
Organization Type
GOVERNMENT
Published
21 Aug 2026
OCDS Reference
ocds-9t57fa-166575
SALGA seeks to appoint a panel of service providers to support municipalities and municipal entities in improving their municipal revenue value chain under the municipal revenue management support programme (mrmsp) for 36 months. The panel will provide technical, advisory and hands-on support across revenue loss reduction, indigent management, revenue enhancement, systems and processes, collection campaigns, and capacity building. Bidders must score at least 70 points in the technical functionality evaluation to be considered for the panel.
Closing date and time: 11 September 2026 at 11:00 am; submissions must be made via the SALGA SCM portal at https://scmportal.salga.org.za/ – proposals via other platforms will not be considered.
Bidders must be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) before submitting bids (non-registration will not automatically disqualify).
All returnable forms (SBD 1, SBD 4, SBD 6.1, and an originally signed General Conditions of Contract) must be completed in full and signed on the SupplyFlow portal; failure to do so may render the bid invalid.
The panel must demonstrate expertise across all seven areas: municipal finance and revenue management, electricity distribution, water services, fiscal policy and legal analysis, quantitative modelling and data analytics, revenue systems and business processes, and capacity building.
Technical functionality evaluation (100 points) requires a minimum threshold of 70 points; scoring covers understanding of SALGA requirements (20), approach and methodology (40), company experience via reference letters (20), and key personnel experience (20).
Bids must remain valid and irrevocable for 120 days after the closing date; bidders must declare any conflict of interest and sign confidentiality and indemnity agreements with SALGA.
Enquiries must be directed to Mr. Lucky Nkomo at [email protected] (012 369 8184); clarification questions will only be accepted up to four days before the closing date.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Return to this tender’s issuing organisation, province, or category.
Continue with tenders sharing this issuer, category, or province.
Date & Time
Friday, 11 September 2026 - 11:00
Venue
null
Categories
Request for Bid(Open-Tender)
175 Corobay Avenue - Waterkloof glen - Pretoria - 0002
AI Document Analysis Stages
Description
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf21 Aug
2026
Tender Published
Tender was published
11 Sept
2026
Closing Date
Tender closing date
These references help suppliers understand the public-procurement framework around this opportunity. They are generated from the tender category, issuing organisation type and procurement context.
These rules commonly apply to South African public-sector procurement.
Act 53 of 2003
Provides the empowerment-compliance context often used in public-sector supplier evaluation.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 108 of 1996 (s217)
This is general procurement context, not legal advice. Always verify requirements in the official tender documents and issuing authority notices.
Bid Document -Project B.pdf
South African Local Government Association (SALGA) invites proposals to appoint a panel of service providers to support municipalities and municipal entities in improving their municipal revenue management support programme (MRMSP) for a period of 36 months. The contract is for hourly-rate services, with an estimated quantity of 350 hours, and will be evaluated under the 80/20 preference point system.
SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdf
SALGA is procuring a panel of service providers to support municipalities and municipal entities in improving their municipal revenue value chain under the Municipal Revenue Management Support Programme (MRMSP) for a 36-month period. The scope covers revenue loss reduction, indigent management, revenue enhancement, systems and process improvement, collection and consumer education campaigns, and capacity building. Bidders must submit through SALGA's automated SCM portal by 11 September 2026 at 11:00 am.
To download these documents and access AI-powered analysis, visit the main tender page.
Matched by category & region
Free guidance to prepare before you bid
Not sure if your business is ready for this tender? Check CSD, CIDB, and B-BBEE requirements, run a readiness assessment, and move from opportunity to submission.
Open Supplier Readiness HubLearn how to submit a winning bid with these related articles
Median Estimate
R 611 791
Range
Based on 25 comparable awarded tenders. Companies with similar profiles typically bid near the median.
* Estimates are based on historical data and do not guarantee actual award values.
We refine every tender document through these stages so you can brief your team and prepare your bid with confidence. Anything marked as "in progress" will be upgraded automatically — no action required from you.
30 points Submission of a good project plan, management plan, deliverables and methodology approach in line with scope of
work
40 points Submission of outstanding project plan, deliverables & management plan (that outlines the details of all the
elements of framework and roadmap development to completion) in line with scope of work
Company Experience 20
Scores will be allocated as follows:
Number of reference letters submitted:
0 points No Evidence: No documented achievements or verifiable outcomes.
3 points 1 letter of past work with minimal impact or relevance to the role.
5 points 2 letters, limited Evidence: Few examples of past work with minimal impact or relevance to the role.
10 points 3 letters, moderate Evidence: Solid examples of past work with measurable results and some relevance.
15 points 4 letters which is strong Evidence: Multiple examples of impactful work with clear outcomes directly related to the role.
20 points 5 letters or more Exceptional Evidence: Numerous examples of outstanding achievements with significant,
quantifiable impact directly aligned with the role.
Experience of key personnel 20
0 points No knowledge and experience in support of municipalities and municipal entities to improve their municipal revenue
management support programme
3 points Less than 2 years’ team average experience in support of municipalities and municipal entities to improve their
municipal revenue management support programme
5 points Less than 5 years’ team average experience in support of municipalities and municipal entities to improve their
municipal revenue management support programme
10 points 5 10 years’ team average in support of municipalities and municipal entities to improve their municipal revenue
management support programme
15 points 1015 years’ team average in support of municipalities and municipal entities to improve their municipal revenue
management support programme
20 points More than 15 years’ team average in support of municipalities and municipal entities to improve their municipal
revenue management support programme
Total points 100
Bidder`s disclosure
1.1 Any person (natural or juristic) may make an offer or offers in terms of this invitation to bid. In line with the principles of transparency, accountability, impartiality, and ethics as
enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Constitution), and further expressed in the various applicable legislation, it is required for the bidder to make this
declaration in respect of the details required hereunder.
1.2 If a person is listed in the Register for Tender Defaulters and / or the List of Restricted Suppliers, that person will automatically be disqualified from the bid process.
2.1 Is the bidder, or any of the directors / trustees / shareholders / members / partners of the bidder employed by an organ of state, as defined in section 239 of the Constitution? Yes No
2.1.1 If YES, furnish particulars of the names, individual identity numbers, in the table below:
Full Name Identity Number Name of organ of state
2.2 Do you, or any person connected with the bidder, have a relationship with any person who is employed by the procuring institution? Yes No
2.2.1 If so, furnish particulars:
2.3 Does the bidder or any of its directors / trustees / shareholders / members / partners or any person having a controlling interest1 in the enterprise have any interest in any other related Yes No
enterprise, whether or not they are bidding for this contract?
2.3.1 If so, indicate all companies registered in the CSD in the table below:
Supplier registration number (MAAA) Status (active / inactive / deleted)
Failure to disclose all CSDregistered active companies linked to all Directors will lead to disqualification.
1the power, by one person or a group of persons holding the majority of the equity of an enterprise, alternatively, the person/s having the deciding vote or power to influence or to
direct the course and decisions of the enterprise.
Initials
BIDDER`S DISCLOSURE (continued)
I, ______________________________________________, the undersigned, in submitting the accompanying bid for Acquisition #: 20260811000282180101500 to South African
Local Government Association, do hereby make the following statements that I certify to be true and complete in every respect:
3.1 I have read and I understand the contents of this disclosure.
3.2 I understand that the accompanying bid will be disqualified if this disclosure is found to be false.
3.3 The bidder has arrived at the accompanying bid independently from, and without consultation, communication, agreement or arrangement with any competitor.
3.4 In addition, there have been no consultations, communications, agreements or arrangements with any competitor regarding the quality, quantity, specifications, prices, including
methods, factors or formulas used to calculate prices, market allocation, the intention or decision to submit or not to submit the bid, bidding with the intention not to win the bid and
conditions or delivery particulars of the products or services to which this bid invitation relates.
3.5 The terms of the accompanying bid have not been, and will not be, disclosed by the bidder, directly or indirectly, to any competitor, prior to the date and time of the official bid opening
or of the awarding of the contract.
3.6 There have been no consultations, communications, agreements or arrangements made by the bidder with any official of the procuring institution in relation to this procurement process
prior to and during the bidding process except to provide clarification on the bid submitted where so required by the institution; and the bidder was not involved in the drafting of the
specifications or terms of reference for this bid.
3.7 I am aware that, in addition and without prejudice to any other remedy provided to combat any restrictive practices related to bids and contracts, bids that are suspicious will be reported
to the Competition Commission for investigation and possible imposition of administrative penalties in terms of section 59 of the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. ) and or may
be referred to law enforcement agencies for criminal investigation and or may be restricted from conducting business with the state for a period not exceeding 10 years in terms of the
Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act, 2004 (Act No. ) or any other applicable legislation.
I certify that the above is correct. I accept that the procuring institution may reject the bid or take appropriate action against me if this
Declaration is false.
Signature Date
Designation/Position Name of Bidder/Firm
Preference points claim form in terms of the preferential procurement regulations 2022 (sbd 6.1)
This preference form must form part of all tenders invited. It contains general information and serves as a claim form for preference points for specific goals.
Nb: before completing this form, tenderers must study the general conditions, definitions and directives applicable in respect of the tender and preferential
Procurement regulations, 2022.
1.GENERAL Conditions
1.1 The following preference point systems are applicable to all bids:
the 80/20 system for requirements with a Rand value of up to R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes included); and
the 90/10 system for requirements with a Rand value above R50 000 000 (all applicable taxes included).
1.2 The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 80/20 preference point system.
1.3 Points for this bid shall be awarded for:
a. Price; and
b. SPECIFIC GOALS
1.4 To be completed by the organ of state.
The maximum points for this bid are allocated as follows:
Points
Price 80
Specific goals 20
Total points for price and specific goals 100
1.5 Failure on the part of a tenderer to submit proof or documentation required in terms of this tender to claim points for specific goals with the tender, will be interpreted to mean that preference points for specific
goals are not claimed.
1.6 The organ of state reserves the right to require of a tenderer, either before a tender is adjudicated or at any time subsequently, to substantiate any claim in regard to preferences, in any manner required by the
organ of state.
2.DEFINITIONS
a. "tender" means a written offer in the form determined by an organ of state in response to an invitation to provide goods or services through price quotations, competitive tendering process or any other
method envisaged in legislation;
b. "price" means an amount of money tendered for goods or services, and includes all applicable taxes less all unconditional discounts;
c. "rand value" means the total estimated value of a contract in Rand, calculated at the time of bid invitation, and includes all applicable taxes;
d. "tender" for incomegenerating contracts†means a written offer in the form determined by an organ of state in response to an invitation for the origination of incomegenerating contracts through any
method envisaged in legislation that will result in a legal agreement between the organ of state and a third party that produces revenue for the organ of state, and includes, but is not limited to, leasing and
disposal of assets and concession contracts, excluding direct sales and disposal of assets through public auctions; and
e. "the Act" means the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 (Act No. ).
3 formulae for procurement of goods and services
3.1 Points awarded for price
3.1.1 The 80/20 preference point systems
A maximum of 80 points is allocated for price on the following basis:
Important Dates
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Closing date: 11 Sep 2026 at 11:00. Clarification questions deadline: 28 Aug 2026 at 23:59. Briefing session: register on the SALGA Supplier Portal (if any); date, time and venue not stated; not marked compulsory.
Briefing Session
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Bidders must register on the SALGA Supplier Portal to register for a briefing session (if any).
Contact Information
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Enquiries: Supply Chain Management Department, Tel: 012 369 8000, Email: [email protected]. Bidding documents available at SALGA Supplier Portal under bid number 20260811000282180101500.
Submission Guidelines
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Submit via the SALGA Supplier Portal under bid number 20260811000282180101500. Proposals over R1,000,000,000 (inclusive of VAT) will not be accepted. No goods/services to be delivered before an official order is received. Bidders who consistently do not respond to acquisition invitations may be excluded from future invitations. All pages must be initialled. Returnable documents include: completed and signed Form of Offer, General Conditions of Contract, Bidder's Disclosure, SBD 6.1, SBD 6.2, valid original or certified COIDA letter of good standing, proof of authority from OEM and OSM, at least 3 written and contactable references, joint venture legal agreement (if applicable), and B-BBEE certificate or sworn affidavit.
Returnable Documents
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Mandatory requirements checklist: valid proposal and quotation; all pages of RFP initialled; signed Bidder's Disclosure attached; completed and signed SBD 6.1 attached; B-BBEE certificate or affidavit attached; CIDB certificate (if applicable) attached.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Evaluation type: PPR 2022 80/20 points system. Total points: 100 (Price 80, Preference 20). Two-stage bidding. Functionality criteria (100 points total): Understanding of MRMSP key deliverables (20 points); Approach and Methodology (40 points); Company Experience based on reference letters (20 points); Experience of key personnel (20 points). Preference points breakdown: B-BBEE status level (Level 1: 10, Level 2: 9, Level 3: 7, Level 4: 6, Level 5: 4, Level 6: 3, Level 7: 2, Level 8: 1); Black Female Shareholding (>=100%: 3 points); Black Youth Shareholding (>=100%: 3 points); SMME (EME or QSE: 4 points). Price points formula: Ps = 80(1 - Pt/Pmin) for lowest acceptable bid.
Technical Specifications
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Panel of service providers to render and support the Municipal Revenue Management Support Programme (MRMSP) of SALGA. Item: Hourly rate, quantity 350. Functionality scoring: Understanding of MRMSP key deliverables (0-20 points); Approach and Methodology (0-40 points) based on project plan, management plan, deliverables and methodology; Company Experience (0-20 points) based on number of reference letters (0 points for none, 3 for 1, 5 for 2, 10 for 3, 15 for 4, 20 for 5 or more); Experience of key personnel (0-20 points) based on team average years in supporting municipalities and municipal entities to improve municipal revenue management (0 for none, 3 for <2 years, 5 for <5 years, 10 for 5-10 years, 15 for 10-15 years, 20 for >15 years).
Methodology
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdfApproach and Methodology 40
0 points no submission of project plan, approach and deliverables
5 points Project plan and preliminary approach is not suitable for the scope of work
10 points Submission of incomplete project plan, management plan, deliverables and methodology approach in line with
scope of work. Lacking in detail.
20 points Submission of satisfactory project plan, management plan, deliverables and methodology approach in line with
scope of work
30 points Submission of a good project plan, management plan, deliverables and methodology approach in line with scope of
work
40 points Submission of outstanding project plan, deliverables & management plan (that outlines the details of all the
elements of framework and roadmap development to completion) in line with scope of work
Company Experience 20
Experience & Qualifications
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Company Experience: scoring based on number of reference letters submitted (0 points for no evidence, up to 20 points for 5 or more letters with exceptional evidence). Experience of key personnel: scoring based on team average years of experience in supporting municipalities and municipal entities to improve municipal revenue management support programme (0 points for no experience, up to 20 points for more than 15 years).
Financial Requirements
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Pricing: hourly rate, vatable, quantity 350. Prices must be fixed and firm, rounded to two decimal places. All quotes valid for 120 days from closing date. VAT registered bidders to show unit prices exclusive of VAT and total inclusive and exclusive of VAT. Non-VAT registered bidders to show prices exclusive of VAT.
Compliance Requirements
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)CSD registration: mandatory, with CSD Summary Report; tax compliance checked on CSD at time of award. B-BBEE: valid B-BBEE status level verification certificate or sworn affidavit (for EMEs & QSEs) required to claim preference points. COIDA: valid original or certified letter of good standing. OEM/OSM: proof of authority to sell, distribute, implement and support products. References: at least 3 written and contactable references. Joint venture: legal agreement if applicable. SBD 6.1: completed and signed preference points claim form. SBD 6.2: completed and signed declaration for local production and content. Bidder's Disclosure: completed and signed. Form of Offer: completed and signed. General Conditions of Contract: completed and signed. CIDB: certificate if applicable.
B-BBEE Requirements
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Preference points breakdown: B-BBEE status level of contributor (Level 1: 10 points, Level 2: 9, Level 3: 7, Level 4: 6, Level 5: 4, Level 6: 3, Level 7: 2, Level 8: 1); Black Female Shareholding (>=100%: 3 points); Black Youth Shareholding (>=100%: 3 points); SMME (EME or QSE: 4 points).
Contractual Terms
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)This RFP is subject to the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2022, the General Conditions of Contract (GCC), and any other special conditions of contract.
Special Conditions
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Proposals over R1,000,000,000 (inclusive of VAT) will not be accepted. Delivery will be made directly to the delivery address. No goods/services to be delivered before an official order is received. Bidders who consistently do not respond to acquisition invitations may be excluded from future invitations. All pages must be initialled.
Requirements
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdf (RFP)Eligibility criteria: registration on National Treasury's Centralised Supplier Database (CSD) with proof of registration; tax compliance at time of award; signed acceptance of terms and conditions; completed and signed Bidder's Disclosure; completed and signed SBD 6.1; completed and signed Form of Offer; completed and signed General Conditions of Contract; valid original or certified COIDA letter of good standing; proof of authority from Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) to sell, distribute and support products; proof of authority from Original Software Manufacturer (OSM) to sell, distribute, implement and support products; at least 3 written and contactable references; joint venture legal agreement if applicable; valid B-BBEE status level verification certificate or sworn affidavit; completed and signed SBD 6.2 declaration for local production and content.
Section
Source: Bid Document -Project B.pdfEvaluation type: ppr 2022 8020 points system
Evaluation version: 2
Total Points Breakdown
Details points
Price Points 80
Preference Points 20
2 stage bidding
Total Points 100
Preference Points Breakdown
BBBEE Status Level of Contributor
Range POINTS
0 0
1 10
2 9
3 7
4 6
5 4
6 3
7 2
8 1
Black Female Shareholding
Range POINTS
= 100 3
< 100 0
Black Youth Shareholding
Range POINTS
= 100 3
< 100 0
Smme (eme or qse)
Range POINTS
Qse 4
Eme 4
None 0
Generic 0
Functionality criteria:
Functionality Criteria POINTS
Support municipalities and municipal entities to improve their municipal revenue management support programme 20
(Mrmsp)
0 points Lack of understanding of key deliverables
10 points Understanding of key deliverables and submission of documentation
20 Points Comprehensive understanding of key deliverables
Approach and Methodology 40
0 points no submission of project plan, approach and deliverables
5 points Project plan and preliminary approach is not suitable for the scope of work
10 points Submission of incomplete project plan, management plan, deliverables and methodology approach in line with
scope of work. Lacking in detail.
20 points Submission of satisfactory project plan, management plan, deliverables and methodology approach in line with
Where
Ps = Points scored for price of bid under consideration
Pt = Price of bid under consideration
Pmin = Price of lowest acceptable bid
3.2 Formulae for disposal or leasing of state assets and incomegenerating procurement
3.2 1 points awarded for price
A maximum of 80 points is allocated for price on the following basis:
Where
Ps = Points scored for price of bid under consideration
Pmax = Price of highest acceptable bid
4.POINTS Awarded for specific goals
4.1 In terms of Regulation 4(2); 5(2); 6(2) and 7(2) of the Preferential Procurement Regulations, preference points must be awarded for specific goals stated in the tender. For the purposes of this tender the tenderer
will be allocated points based on the goals stated in table 1 below as may be supported by proof/ documentation stated in the conditions of this tender:
4.2 In cases where organs of state intend to use Regulation 3(2) of the Regulations, which states that, if it is unclear whether the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system applies, an organ of state must, in the tender
documents, stipulate in the case of:
a. an invitation for tender for incomegenerating contracts, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system will apply and that the highest acceptable tender will be used to determine the applicable
preference point system; or
b. any other invitation for tender, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system will apply and that the lowest acceptable tender will be used to determine the applicable preference point system,
then the organ of state must indicate the points allocated for specific goals for both the 90/10 and 80/20 preference point system.
Table 1: Specific goals for the tender and points claimed are indicated per the tables below.
Number of points allocated (80/20 system) Number of points claimed (80/20 system)
The specific goals allocated points in terms of this tender
(To be completed by the organ of state) (To be completed by the tenderer)
BBBEE Status Level of Contributor 10
Black Female Shareholding 3
Black Youth Shareholding 3
Smme (eme or qse) 4
The following table(s) show the breakdown of points per specific goal.
BBBEE Status Level of Contributor
Range POINTS
0 0
1 10
2 9
3 7
4 6
5 4
6 3
7 2
8 1
Black Female Shareholding
Range POINTS
= 100 3
< 100 0
Black Youth Shareholding
Range POINTS
= 100 3
< 100 0
Smme (eme or qse)
Range POINTS
Qse 4
Eme 4
None 0
Generic 0
SBD 6.1 (Continued)
Declaration with regard to company/firm
4.3 Name of company/firm:
4.4 Company registration number:
4.5 Type of company/firm:
4.6 I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm, certify that the points claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender, qualifies the company/ firm for the
preference(s) shown and I acknowledge that:
i. The information furnished is true and correct;
i i. The preference points claimed are in accordance with the General Conditions as indicated in paragraph 1 of this form;
iii. In the event of a contract being awarded as a result of points claimed as shown in paragraphs 1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish documentary proof to the satisfaction of the organ of state
that the claims are correct
iv. If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any of the conditions of contract have not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in addition to any other remedy it may have
a. disqualify the person from the bidding process;
b. recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a result of that person's conduct;
c. cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered as a result of having to make less favourable arrangements due to such cancellation;
d. recommend that the bidder or contractor, its shareholders and directors, or only the shareholders and directors who acted on a fraudulent basis, be restricted by the National Treasury from obtaining
business from any organ of state for a period not exceeding 10 years, after the audi alteram partem (hear the other side) rule has been applied; and
e. forward the matter for criminal prosecution.
Signature of bidder(s)
Surname and name:
Date
Address
Description
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdfSALGA is the national employers' association representing all 257 municipalities, established to assist in the transformation of local government. Its mandate covers representation, advocacy, capacity building, support and advice, strategic profiling, and knowledge sharing.
Context — municipalities face significant revenue challenges: audit outcomes remain weak, revenue leakages cost about R25 billion annually, collection rates are below 70%, consumer debt is approximately R467.2 billion, and municipalities owe creditors about R160.8 billion. The programme aims to strengthen the municipal revenue value chain through targeted support.
Important Dates
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdf (RFP)Closing date: 11 September 2026 at 11:00 am.
Last day for questions: 11 September 2026.
Proposal submissions due: 28 August 2026 by 11h00.
No briefing session or site visit is stated in the document.
Contact Information
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdf (RFP)Enquiries — Mr. Lucky Nkomo, Senior Buyer: SCM, at [email protected], SALGA National Office, 012 369 8184.
Clarification questions will only be taken up to four days prior to the closing date.
Bidders finding discrepancies or omissions in the RFP should inform SALGA through the designated email address before the closing date.
Submission Guidelines
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdf (RFP)Submission channel — proposals must be submitted through the SALGA SCM portal at https://scmportal.salga.org.za/. Proposals submitted through any other platform will not be considered. Service providers must register on the portal for their proposals to be considered.
Returnable forms — all must be completed in full and signed on the SupplyFlow portal:
Disqualification risks:
Other requirements:
Returnable Documents
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdf (RFP)Standard Bidding Forms: Preference Points Claim Form (SBD 6.1), Bidder's Disclosure (SBD 4), Bid Invitation (SBD 1) must be completed in full and signed on the SupplyFlow portal. Pricing Schedule: Bidders will not be evaluated on price and B-BBEE as this is a panel of service provider request.
Evaluation Criteria
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdf (RFP)Evaluation is conducted in two phases:
Phase 1 — Pre-Compliance Check:
Phase 2 — Technical Functionality (total 100 points):
Minimum threshold: 70 points. Bidders scoring 70 points and above will be recommended as a list of panel of experts.
Note: Bidders will not be evaluated on price and B-BBEE as this is a panel of service provider request.
Technical Specifications
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdf (RFP)Purpose — appoint a panel of suitably qualified and experienced service providers to support municipalities and municipal entities to improve their municipal revenue value chain through the Municipal Revenue Management Support Programme (MRMSP), for a period of 36 months.
Scope of work — the panel must provide technical, advisory and hands-on implementation support across the municipal revenue value chain through the following workstreams:
Key deliverables — depending on the specific municipal intervention, the panel must deliver at least:
Performance measurement — all interventions must be municipality-specific, evidence-based and measurable, with baseline information, targets and performance indicators to demonstrate impact on revenue generation, protection, collection and financial sustainability.
Methodology
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdfApproach and methodology — bidders must submit a detailed project plan covering deliverables, timeframes/milestones, resources and capabilities, aligned with SALGA requirements. The plan must demonstrate a clear approach to delivering the scope of work.
Scoring — the approach and methodology is worth 40 points, with higher scores for more comprehensive and outstanding plans.
Experience & Qualifications
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdfPanel requirements — bidders must demonstrate access to a suitably qualified multi-disciplinary team with proven experience in the South African local government environment, capable of providing technical, financial, legal, regulatory and analytical support across the municipal revenue value chain. Minimum expertise areas:
Key personnel — certified copies of certificates of registration with a recognised professional body and CVs reflecting years of relevant local government experience are required. Team average experience is scored up to 20 points.
Quality Management
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdfPerformance measurement — all interventions must be municipality-specific, evidence-based and measurable. Each assignment must establish baseline information, targets and performance indicators to enable SALGA to measure impact on revenue generation, protection, collection and financial sustainability.
Deliverables include monitoring tools and dashboards covering key revenue indicators, and progress reports demonstrating achievements against agreed targets.
Financial Requirements
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdf (RFP)Pricing — bidders will not be evaluated on price as this is a panel of service provider request. No pricing schedule details are provided beyond the standard SBD 3.1/3.2/3.3 forms.
No bonds, guarantees, insurance, or financial capacity thresholds are stated in the document.
Compliance Requirements
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdf (RFP)CSD registration — bidders are advised to be registered on the Central Supplier Database (CSD) before submitting bids.
Returnable forms (all must be completed in full and signed on the SupplyFlow portal):
Other compliance:
Contractual Terms
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdfContract duration — the contract runs for the duration of the assignment and expires on fulfilment of the scope of work. It may be extended by mutual agreement.
Termination — either party may terminate with 30 days' written notice. SALGA may also terminate with 30 days' notice if the bidder fails to perform or violates the RFP provisions.
Liability — SALGA will not be liable for any actions of the recommended bidder or its employees.
Intellectual property — all materials and products developed under the contract vest in SALGA. They may not be disclosed or sold without consent and must be handed over on completion or termination.
Variation — SALGA may vary the instruction to include more or exclude work; the bidder is not entitled to claim for excluded work.
Disputes — to be settled by mutual consultation, mediation, or in a South African court.
General conditions — SALGA's general conditions of bid, contract and order apply.
Special Conditions
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdf (RFP)Conditions of bid — failure to meet any requirement may render the bid non-responsive. The service provider must sign confidentiality and indemnity agreements. SALGA may vary the instruction to include more work. Failure to comply with any condition invalidates the proposal. Conflict of interest may lead to cancellation. SALGA may request additional information. Bidders must not disclose proposal details without authorisation. No press releases without prior written approval. Proposals valid for 120 days. Submission creates no contractual obligations. Disputes settled by mutual consultation, mediation, or in a South African court. Bidders bound by General Conditions of Contract. All returnable bid documents must be completed in full. SALGA not liable for costs incurred during site visits or submission. Completion of Standard Bidding Documents is mandatory.
Section
Source: SALGA-07-2026 (PROJECT B).pdfEvaluation is in two phases: Phase 1 Pre-Compliance Check (CSD registration advised) and Phase 2 Technical Functionality. Functionality criteria: Understanding of SALGA requirements (20 points), Approach and Methodology (40 points), Company Experience (20 points), Experience of key personnel (20 points). Minimum threshold is 70 points. Bidders scoring 70 and above are recommended for the panel.
Sets the constitutional standard for fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective public procurement.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 5 of 2000
Covers preferential procurement and preference-point systems used in public tenders.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 12 of 2004
Supports anti-corruption controls and supplier integrity in procurement processes.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 28 of 2024
Provides the national framework for public procurement across government.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 2 of 2000
Supports access to tender records, award decisions and public-sector procurement information.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Act 3 of 2000
Supports lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative tender decisions.
Relevant because this is a South African public-sector procurement opportunity.
Address
175 Corobay Avenue - Waterkloof glen - Pretoria - 0002
Source confidence
High source confidence
Official source
eTenders.gov.za
Documents found
2
Last checked
21 Aug 2026
AI status
Enhanced
Data conflicts
None detected
This tender has strong source evidence, including source metadata and supporting tender information synced from the government tender portal.
Tenders SA is not the issuing authority. All tenders are automatically synced from the official government tender portal. Always confirm final submission details, closing dates, briefing sessions, eligibility requirements, and documents on the official government portal before applying.
Key Personnel
💡 Want more tendering tips and strategies?
Explore Our BlogGet deep intelligence on Other service activities. Unlock full pricing strategies, bid frequency, and historical win rates.