Production of a 300-Page monograph and 6 factsheets for the sabssm project

{"name":null,"email":null,"phone":null,"department":null,"address":".........................................................."}

The tender is open to all service providers, but preference points are available for: SMMEs (EME & QSE), companies owned by black people (50% or more), black youth (30% or more), black women (30% or more), and black people with disabilities (30% or more). Bidders must be able to produce the required deliverables and comply with the Preferential Procurement Regulations, 2022.

income-generating contracts)

No specific requirements found

Points Allocation: 90 points

B-BBEE Details: SBD 6.1

Preference points claim form in terms of the preferential

Procurement regulations 2022

This preference form must form part of all tenders invited. It contains general information

and serves as a claim form for preference points for specific goals.

Nb: before completing this form, tenderers must study the

General conditions, definitions and directives applicable in

Respect of the tender and preferential procurement

Regulations, 2022

1. General conditions

1.1 The following preference point systems are applicable to invitations to tender:

• the 80/20 system for requirements with a Rand value of up to R50 000 000 (all

applicable taxes included); and

• the 90/10 system for requirements with a Rand value above R50 000 000 (all

applicable taxes included).

1.2 To be completed by the organ of state

(delete whichever is not applicable for this tender).

a) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 90/10 preference point

system.

b) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 80/20 preference point

system.

c) Either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system will be applicable in this tender.

The lowest/ highest acceptable tender will be used to determine the accurate

system once tenders are received.

1.3 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts)

shall be awarded for:

(a) Price; and

(b) Specific Goals.

1.4 To be completed by the organ of state:

The maximum points for this tender are allocated as follows:

Points

Price 80

Specific goals 20

Total points for Price and SPECIFIC GOALS 100

of 5

1.5 Failure on the part of a tenderer to submit proof or documentation required in terms of

this tender to claim points for specific goals with the tender, will

Procurement regulations 2022

and serves as a claim form for preference points for specific goals.

Nb: before completing this form, tenderers must study the

1.1 The following preference point systems are applicable to invitations to tender:

• the 80/20 system for requirements with a Rand value of up to R50 000 000 (all

applicable taxes included); and

• the 90/10 system for requirements with a Rand value above R50 000 000 (all

applicable taxes included).

1.2 To be completed by the organ of state

(delete whichever is not applicable for this tender).

a) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 90/10 preference point

system.

b) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 80/20 preference point

system.

c) Either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system will be applicable in this tender.

system once tenders are received.

1.3 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts)

shall be awarded for:

(a) Price; and

(b) Specific Goals.

1.4 To be completed by the organ of state:

Price 80

Specific goals 20

Total points for Price and SPECIFIC GOALS 100

of 5

1.5 Failure on the part of a tenderer to submit proof or documentation required in terms of

this tender to claim points for specific goals with the tender, will be interpreted to mean

that preference points for specific goals are not claimed.

1.6 The organ of state reserves the right to require of a tenderer, either before a tender is

adjudicated or at any time subsequently, to substantiate any claim in regard to

preferences, in any manner required by the organ of state.

(a) “tender” means a written offer in the form determined by an organ of state in

response to an invitation to provide goods or services through price quotations,

competitive tendering process or any other method envisaged in legislation;

(b) “price” means an amount of money tendered for goods or services, and

includes all applicable taxes less all unconditional discounts;

(c) “rand value” means the total estimated value of a contract in Rand, calculated at the

time of bid invitation, and includes all applicable taxes;

(d) “tender for income-generating contracts” means a written offer in the form

determined by an organ of state in response to an invitation for the origination of

income-generating contracts through any method envisaged in legislation that will

result in a legal agreement between the organ of state and a third party that produces

revenue for the organ of state, and includes, but is not limited to, leasing and disposal

of assets and concession contracts, excluding direct sales and disposal of assets

through public auctions; and

(e) “the Act” means the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 (Act No.

).

3.1. Points awarded for price

3.1.1 The 80/20 or 90/10 preference point systems

A maximum of 80 or 90 points is allocated for price on the following basis:

80/20 or 90/10

Pt−Pmin Pt−Pmin

Ps= 80(1− ) or Ps= 90(1− )

Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration

Pt = Price of tender under consideration

Pmin = Price of lowest acceptable tender

of 5

3.2. Formulae for disposal or leasing of state assets and income

3.2.1. Points awarded for price

A maximum of 80 or 90 points is allocated for price on the following basis:

80/20 or 90/10

Pt−Pmax Pt−Pmax

Ps= 80(1+ ) or Ps= 90(1+ )

Ps = Points scored for price of tender under consideration

Pt = Price of tender under consideration

Pmax = Price of highest acceptable tender

4.1. In terms of Regulation 4(2); 5(2); 6(2) and 7(2) of the Preferential Procurement

stated in table 1 below as may be supported by proof/ documentation stated in the

conditions of this tender:

4.2. In cases where organs of state intend to use Regulation 3(2) of the Regulations, which

states that, if it is unclear whether the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point system applies,

an organ of state must, in the tender documents, stipulate in the case of—

(a) an invitation for tender for income-generating contracts, that either the 80/20

or 90/10 preference point system will apply and that the highest acceptable

tender will be used to determine the applicable preference point system; or

(b) any other invitation for tender, that either the 80/20 or 90/10 preference point

system will apply and that the lowest acceptable tender will be used to

determine the applicable preference point system,

then the organ of state must indicate the points allocated for specific goals for both the

90/10 and 80/20 preference point system.

of 5

Table 1: Specific goals for the tender and points claimed are indicated per the table

below.

(Note to organs of state: Where either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system is

applicable, corresponding points must also be indicated as such.

Note to tenderers: The tenderer must indicate how they claim points for each

preference point system.)

points claimed claimed allocated

allocated (80/20 (90/10

(90/10 system) The specific goals (80/20 system) system)

allocated points in terms of system) (To be (To be

this tender (To be completed by (To be completed completed the tenderer) completed by by the by the organ

the organ of tenderer) of state)

state)

Smme (eme &qse) 2 4

Owned by black people (50% 2 4

or more)

Owned by black people who 2 4

are youth (30% or more)

Owned by black people who 2 4

are women (30% or more)

Owned by black people with 2 4

disabilities (30% or more)

Total Points 10 20

4.3. Name of company/firm...............................................................................

4.4. Company registration number: .....................................................................

4.5. Type of company/ firm

 Partnership/Joint Venture / Consortium

 One-person business/sole propriety

 Close corporation

 Public Company

 Personal Liability Company

 (Pty) Limited

 Non-Profit Company

 State Owned Company

[Tick applicable box]

of 5

4.6. I, the undersigned, who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the company/firm,

certify that the points claimed, based on the specific goals as advised in the tender,

qualifies the company/ firm for the preference(s) shown and I acknowledge that:

i) The information furnished is true and correct;

ii) The preference points claimed are in accordance with the General Conditions as

indicated in paragraph 1 of this form;

iii) In the event of a contract being awarded as a result of points claimed as shown

in paragraphs 1.4 and 4.2, the contractor may be required to furnish documentary

proof to the satisfaction of the organ of state that the claims are correct;

iv) If the specific goals have been claimed or obtained on a fraudulent basis or any

of the conditions of contract have not been fulfilled, the organ of state may, in

addition to any other remedy it may have –

(a) disqualify the person from the tendering process;

(b) recover costs, losses or damages it has incurred or suffered as a

result of that person’s conduct;

(c) cancel the contract and claim any damages which it has suffered

as a result of having to make less favourable arrangements due

to such cancellation;

(d) recommend that the tenderer or contractor, its shareholders and

directors, or only the shareholders and directors who acted on a

fraudulent basis, be restricted from obtaining business from any

organ of state for a period not exceeding 10 years, after the audi

alteram partem (hear the other side) rule has been applied; and

(e) forward the matter for criminal prosecution, if deemed necessary.

..............................................

Signature(s) of tenderer(s)

Surname and name: ................................................................

Date: ...............................................................

Address: ...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

of 5

Ce points claim form in terms of the preferential

This preference form must form part of all tenders invited. It contains general information

and serves as a claim form for preference points for specific goals.

1.1 The following preference point systems are applicable to invitations to tender

the 80/20 system for requirements with a Rand value of up to R50 000 000 (all

the 90/10 system for requirements with a Rand value above R50 000 000 (all

a) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 90/10 preference point

b) The applicable preference point system for this tender is the 80/20 preference point

c) Either the 90/10 or 80/20 preference point system will be applicable in this tender.

1.3 Points for this tender (even in the case of a tender for income-generating contracts)

(b) Specific Goals.

The maximum points for this tender are allocated as follows

Specific goals 20

Total points for Price and SPECIFIC GOALS 100

this tender to claim points for specific goals with the tender, will be interpreted to mean

that preference points for specific goals are not claimed.

preferences, in any manner required by the organ of state.

Preference points claim form in terms of the preferential

Supply chain management system should

This declaration prove to be false.

.................................... .....................................................

Signature Date

.................................... ......................................................

Position Name of bidder

{"name":null,"email":null,"phone":null,"department":"SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT","address":null}

Sbd4

Bidder’s disclosure

1. Purpose of the form

Any person (natural or juristic) may make an offer or offers in terms of

this invitation to bid. In line with the principles of transparency,

accountability, impartiality, and ethics as enshrined in the Constitution of

the Republic of South Africa and further expressed in various pieces of

legislation, it is required for the bidder to make this declaration in respect

of the details required hereunder.

Where a person/s are listed in the Register for Tender Defaulters and /

or the List of Restricted Suppliers, that person will automatically be

disqualified from the bid process.

2. Bidder’s declaration

2.1 Is the bidder, or any of its directors / trustees / shareholders / members /

partners or any person having a controlling interest1 in the enterprise,

employed by the state? YES/NO

2.1.1 If so, furnish particulars of the names, individual identity numbers, and, if

applicable, state employee numbers of sole proprietor/ directors /

trustees / shareholders / members/ partners or any person having a

controlling interest in the enterprise, in table below.

Full Name Identity Number Name of State

institution

2.2 Do you, or any person connected with the bidder, have a relationship

1 the power, by one person or a group of persons holding the

majority of the equity of an enterprise, alternatively, the person/s

having the deciding vote or power to influence or to direct the

course and decisions of the enterprise.

Sbd4

with any person who is employed by the procuring institution? YES/NO

2.2.1 If so, furnish particulars:

................................................................................................

................................................................................................

2.3 Does the bidder or any of its directors / trustees / shareholders /

members / partners or any person having a controlling interest in the

enterprise have any interest in any other related enterprise whether or

not they are bidding for this contract? YES/NO

2.3.1 If so, furnish particulars:

........................................................................................

........................................................................................

3 declaration

I, the undersigned,

(name)............................................................................... in

submitting the accompanying bid, do hereby make the following

statements that I certify to be true and complete in every respect:

3.1 I have read and I understand the contents of this disclosure;

3.2 I understand that the accompanying bid will be disqualified if this

disclosure is found not to be true and complete in every respect;

3.3 The bidder has arrived at the accompanying bid independently from, and

without consultation, communication, agreement or arrangement with

any competitor. However, communication between partners in a joint

venture or consortium2 will not be construed as collusive bidding.

3.4 In addition, there have been no consultations, communications,

agreements or arrangements with any competitor regarding the quality,

quantity, specifications, prices, including methods, factors or formulas

used to calculate prices, market allocation, the intention or decision to

submit or not to submit the bid, bidding with the intention not to win the

bid and conditions or delivery particulars of the products or services to

which this bid invitation relates.

3.4 The terms of the accompanying bid have not been, and will not be,

disclosed by the bidder, directly or indirectly, to any competitor, prior to

the date and time of the official bid opening or of the awarding of the

contract.

3.5 There have been no consultations, communications, agreements or

arrangements made by the bidder with any official of the procuring

2 Joint venture or Consortium means an association of persons for

the purpose of combining their expertise, property, capital,

efforts, skill and knowledge in an activity for the execution of a

contract.

Sbd4

institution in relation to this procurement process prior to and during the

bidding process except to provide clarification on the bid submitted

where so required by the institution; and the bidder was not involved in

the drafting of the specifications or terms of reference for this bid.

3.6 I am aware that, in addition and without prejudice to any other remedy

provided to combat any restrictive practices related to bids and

contracts, bids that are suspicious will be reported to the Competition

Commission for investigation and possible imposition of administrative

penalties in terms of section 59 of the Competition Act No

and or may be reported to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) for

criminal investigation and or may be restricted from conducting business

with the public sector for a period not exceeding ten (10) years in terms

of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act No

or any other applicable legislation.

I certify that the information furnished in paragraphs

1, 2 and 3 ABOVE IS CORRECT.

I accept that the state may reject the bid or act

Against me in terms of paragraph 6 of PFMA SCM

Instruction /22 on preventing and combating

Abuse in the supply chain management system should

This declaration prove to be false.

.................................... .....................................................

Signature Date

.................................... ......................................................

Position Name of bidder

Bidders must not be listed on the Register for Tender Defaulters or the List of Restricted Suppliers. They must not have any undisclosed conflicts of interest, and must comply with the declaration requirements. Any false or incomplete disclosure will result in disqualification.

Supply chain management system should

This declaration prove to be false.

.................................... .....................................................

Signature Date

.................................... ......................................................

Position Name of bidder

No specific requirements found

agreements or arrangements with any competitor regarding the quality,